AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS OF TRACE GAS AND AEROSOL PARTICLE EMISSION RATIOS FROM BIOMASS BURNING IN AMAZONIA P Guyon, M Welling, G Frank, P Artaxo, G Nishioka,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3. Droplet Growth by Condensation
Advertisements

MOPITT CO Louisa Emmons, David Edwards Atmospheric Chemistry Division Earth & Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Wavelength dependence of the single scattering albedo Single scattering albedo (SSA) values at 450(blue), 550(green) and 700(red) nm The SSA values during.
METO621 Lesson 18. Thermal Emission in the Atmosphere – Treatment of clouds Scattering by cloud particles is usually ignored in the longwave spectrum.
In Situ Validation of the Suppression of Rain by Smoke from Forest Fires in the Amazon D. Rosenfeld and A. Khain (1), A. A. Costa (2), J. C. P. de Oliveira.
A Dictionary of Aerosol Remote Sensing Terms Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Short.
Cloud Condensation Nuclei Concentrations in the Amazon Basin G P Frank, G Roberts, E Swietlicki, P Artaxo, L Rizzo, P Guyon, O L Mayol-Bracero, A Vestin,
“Carbon Isotope Systematics in Soil” -or- “Plant Poo and Microbe Farts” Justin Yeakel, UCSC.
Ultrafine Particles and Climate Change Peter J. Adams HDGC Seminar November 5, 2003.
METO 637 Lesson 13. Air Pollution The Troposphere In the Stratosphere we had high energy photons so that oxygen atoms and ozone dominated the chemistry.
D. Waddicor, G. Vaughan, K. Bower, T. Choularton, H. Coe, M. Flynn, M. Gallagher, P. Williams Aerosol observations and growth rates in the TTL.
Typically have a higher organic content than coarse particles Also contain soluble inorganics: NH 4 +, NO 3 -, SO 4 2- A bimodal peak is often observed.
Figure 1 Figure 8 Figure 9Figure 10 Altitude resolved mid-IR transmission of H 2 O, CH 4 and CO 2 at Mauna Loa Anika Guha Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
ULTRAFINE PM IN NEAR GROUND LAYER OF URBAN ATMOSPHERE, PRAGUE 2002/2003 JAN HOVORKA, LUBOMÍR BETUŠ ; Institute.
Different heterogeneous routes of the formation of atmospheric ice Anatoli Bogdan Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Innsbruck Austria and.
The effect of the size of CCN on drizzle and rain formation in convective clouds Roelof T. Bruintjes Research Applications Program, National Center for.
Monterey Area Ship Track (MAST) Experiment Virendra P. Ghate MPO 531.
Donald R. Blake (PI), Nicola J. Blake, Simone Meinardi, Angela Young, Andreas Beyersdorf, Lambert A. Doezema, Brian Novak, Barbara Barletta, Jason Midyett,
Earth&Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Tech Modeling the impacts of convective transport and lightning NOx production over North America: Dependence on cumulus.
TOP-DOWN CONSTRAINTS ON REGIONAL CARBON FLUXES USING CO 2 :CO CORRELATIONS FROM AIRCRAFT DATA P. Suntharalingam, D. J. Jacob, Q. Li, P. Palmer, J. A. Logan,
Measurement of aerosol and VOC turbulent fluxes and in-canopy particle characterization at a pristine forest in Amazonia Luciana Rizzo.
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NORTH AMERICAN OUTFLOW: INSIGHTS FROM CHEBOGUE POINT, NOVA SCOTIA Allen Goldstein, Dylan Millet, James Allan, Eben Cross, Rupert.
Forest Fires: Particulate Effects on Global Climatology Akua Asa-Awuku, Christos Fountoukis, & Robyn Williams.
Biosphere/Atmosphere Interactions in the Tropics.
1/30 2-year observation of Organic Aerosol properties In Cape Corsica J. Sciare, and LSCE.
For further information please contact: Ivonne Trebs Tel.: Fax: ONLINE MEASUREMENTS.
Smoke Aerosols, Clouds, Rainfall and Climate (SMOCC)
Studies of Emissions & Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC 4 RS) Brian Toon Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic.
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Objectives 2.1Scatterplots  Scatterplots  Explanatory and response variables  Interpreting scatterplots  Outliers Adapted from authors’ slides © 2012.
Atmospheric Technology Division Rain In Cumulus over the Ocean Jorgen Jensen, Jeff Stith, Teresa Campos, Mary Barth, Dave Rogers NCAR science to complement.
PM Formation in the Atmosphere Primary and Secondary PM Sulfate Formation in the Atmosphere SO4 Formation in Clouds Season SO2-SO4 Transformation rate.
EARTH SCIENCE Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE Tarbuck Lutgens 
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Page 1© Crown copyright Aircraft observations of mineral dust.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Fire Plume Rise WRAP (FEJF) Method vs. SMOKE.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
AEROSOL & CLIMATE ( IN THE ARCTIC) Pamela Lehr METEO 6030 Spring 2006
Global Climate Change The Evidence and Human Influence Principle Evidence CO 2 and Temperature.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature Bell Ringers:  How does weather differ from climate?  Why do the seasons occur?  What would happen if carbon.
Free troposphere as a major source of CCN for the equatorial pacific boundary layer: long-range transport and teleconnections Presented by: Stephen Noble.
ESTIMATION OF SOLAR RADIATIVE IMPACT DUE TO BIOMASS BURNING OVER THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Y. Govaerts (1), G. Myhre (2), J. M. Haywood (3), T. K. Berntsen.
Chemical Apportionment of Size-Segregated Atmospheric Particles during the Burning and Wet Seasons in the Brazilian Amazon O. L. Mayol-Bracero (1,2); M.
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
Atmospheric Chemistry Chemical effects on cloud activation with special emphasis on carbonaceous aerosol from biomass burning M. C. Facchini, S. Decesari,
04/12/011 The contribution of Earth degassing to the atmospheric sulfur budget By Hans-F. Graf, Baerbel Langmann, Johann Feichter From Chemical Geology.
A Non-POC HYPOTHESIS (A. Clarke): The persistence of the adjacent Scu clouds that define a POC region is sustained as a result of entrainment of aged aerosol.
This report presents analysis of CO measurements from satellites since 2000 until now. The main focus of the study is a comparison of different sensors.
Clouds, Rain Processes and Biosphere Interaction in LBA Maria A. F. Silva Dias Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of São Paulo Brazil.
17 Chapter 17 The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature.
Salinity and Density Differences VERTICAL STRUCTURE, THERMOHALINE CIRCULATION & WATER MASSES.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
In-Situ Measurement of Scattering Albedo of Atmospheric Aerosol in the Amazon Region Otmar Schmid 1, Meinrat O. Andreae 1, W. Patrick Arnott 2, Paulo Artaxo.
Modeling the dynamic behavior of Cloud Condensation Nuclei: case study comparing clean (LBA/CLAIRE 2001) and polluted (LBA/SMOCC 2002) air conditions in.
Grade 13 Air Pollution.
Aerosol 1 st indirect forcing in the coupled CAM-IMPACT model: effects from primary-emitted particulate sulfate and boundary layer nucleation Minghuai.
17 Chapter 17 The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature.
Properties of Particulate Matter
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
Thunderstorm Dynamics Group Atmospheric ions and new particle formation For RAC meeting, Presented by Deveandraa Siingh The New particle formation (NPF)
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
Results and discussion Ground based characterization of biomass burning aerosols during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA) field experiment.
Phosphorus in aerosol particles in the Amazon Basin
What are the causes of GCM biases in cloud, aerosol, and radiative properties over the Southern Ocean? How can the representation of different processes.
Air Masses and fronts An air mass is a large body of air that has similar temperature and moisture properties throughout. A front is defined as the transition.
TOWARDS AN AEROSOL CLIMATOLOGY
Measures of Central Tendency
Review of Roesenfeld et al
World Geography 3202 Unit 2 Climate Patterns.
Presentation transcript:

AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS OF TRACE GAS AND AEROSOL PARTICLE EMISSION RATIOS FROM BIOMASS BURNING IN AMAZONIA P Guyon, M Welling, G Frank, P Artaxo, G Nishioka, J Lloyd, O Kolle, M A F Silva Dias, L V Gatti, A M Cordova, M O Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany

2 The SMOCC 2002 experiment (Sep–Nov 2002) Some of the main objectives - Characterize emissions from deforestation fires, especially aerosols - Investigate the impact of smoke aerosols on cloud microphysics and rain formation - Study seasonal differences in atmospheric properties

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 3 Instrumentation CO (Aero-Laser) accuracy/precision ca. 5% CO 2 (LiCor 6251) overall flight precision ca. +/- 0.4 ppm CN (CPC TSI 3022) precision ca. 5% Particle number-size distribution (SMPS TSI) Aerosol Scattering (Nephelometer TSI) precision ca. 5% Aerosol inlet: isokinetic, accumulation mode < cutoff Normal temperature and Pressure (25 °C, 1 atm.)

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 4 Sampling fresh smoke…

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 5 Vertical distribution of CN over clean and smoky regions of the Amazon Elevated plumes Polluted Boundary layer Low CN in background pristine air

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 6 CO to CO 2 and CN to CO emission ratios from forest fires over the Amazon FlamingSmoldering

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 7 In Cloud: -  CO/  CO 2 = 52 -  CN/  CO = 19 In-fire variations of emission ratios From 4 passes through fresh plume: -  CO/  CO 2 = 40–120 -  CN/  CO = 9–35 Outflow: - here:  CN/  CO = 44 - other cases: -  CO/  CO 2 = 50–90 -  CN/  CO = 30–50

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 8 Above boundary layer Within boundary layer Transport of gases and aerosols

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 9 Smoldering in the evening remains at the surface Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany

10 Above boundary layer Within boundary layer Transport of gases and aerosols 20 25

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 11 Processing of aerosol particles Moreover: b(700) > b(700) A(450/700) > A(450/700) Processed particles become larger

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 12 Conclusions  CN/  CO = 10–40 (savanna: 20–40) –remarkably small variation!  CO/  CO 2 : – large variability for flaming phase with values centered around 3–7% (efficient combustion) – smoldering emissions remain close to the surface Insignificant particle number losses during vertical transport and cloud processing in lower troposphere  efficient upward transport of pollutants  long range transport Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany

13 Diurnal variation of emission ratios? Or morning bias?

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 14 Emission of particles as a function of combustion efficiency

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 15 Slide 1: - Read title/institutions/SMOCC Picture in the background taken at our base airport. - The 2 a/c used. - Nice fire plume turning into a pyrocloud, allowing vertical transport of aerosols trace gases pollutants from BL to FT. Slide 2: - Few words about SMOCC2002 (BB season + transition, JP, Rondônia,…) - 1 of main objectives = Characterize emissions from deforestation fires, especially aerosols. Not well known in contrast to e. g. savanna fires. Slide 3 (Instrumentation): To determine the ERs, we made measurements of CO, CO2, total particle number and particle scattering. Additionally, we measured particle number size distribution and CCN. Slide 4 (vertical CN gradient): Coming to some data, this graph presents the “vertical… (title)” - Over green ocean (background pristine air): little aerosols and virtually no gradient - In areas under BB influence, typically: - very polluted BL - elevated polluted plumes, cloud processed We have studied these plumes both within and above the BL. Slide 5 (overall frequency plot): In order to better understand the contribution of smoke to the atmosphere, we have calculated ERs of CO/CO2 and CN/CO for all the plumes measured with the a/c. ERs are defined as the slope of the regression of CO to CO2 and CN to CO, respectively. The CO/CO2 ratios describe the combustion efficiency/phase of the fire since smoldering  CO, flaming  CO2. This frequency plot shows an overview of all ERs obtained during this campaign. - For CN/CO, we found values centered around ca. 10–40 # per cm3 and ppb CO. This compares to savanna burning (e.g. Hobbs et al.: ca. 20 – 36 over Africa). - CO/CO2 ERs showed a large scatter but were overall centered around 4–8% for the most, i.e. quite efficient burning, comparable to savanna. However, the large variation in ERs is not only due to the differences in burning conditions from fire to fire.

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 16 Slide 6 pictures of SLF survey fire: - Taking this fire as an example, - after 4 passes over this fire, we obtained DCO/DCO2 values ranging 40–120, almost the whole range of values obtained for all measured fires. - Same for CN/CO -  hard to give a number for a specific fire - in cloud: middle, but less relevant - But looking at the outflow out of the clouds, CN/CO ratio was even slightly higher than that found in the fresh plumes. This was also confirmed in other cases.  Shows that hot fires are an efficient mode of transport for particles, with, at least, little loss, and, in some cases, maybe production of particles out of the cloud. Slide 7 (Frequency plot ERs below and above BL) Overall, when separating the ER data into plumes measured below and above the BL, we found that: - no stat. significant difference for the CO/CO2 data. - (smoldering circled) Little smoldering was measured from the a/c because smoldering remains close to the surface. Slide 8 (picture smoldering): This is because: - smoldering fires are less vigorous than flaming ones. - smoldering usually more in the evening when convection has ceased. Slide 9 (same as Slide 7): - CN/CO ratio are slightly lower above BL (but the difference is stat. significant) confirming that little particle number loss due to coagulation or scavenging occurs during the upward transport and cloud processing.  efficient transport to FT. Slide 10 (Neph): However, when looking at the ERs of scattering/CO, the slightly larger amount of particles in the BL (i.e. fresher plumes) are less scattering that the processed aerosols. Moreover, simultaneous measurements show that the backscatter ratio and the Angstrom coefficient of these particles within the BL are larger than those above BL, pointing at smaller particles than the detrained ones (stat. signif.). Slide 11 (size distributions): The size distribution of the detrained smoke coming out of the cloud is typically shifted toward higher diameters. Slide 12 (CCN): This has in turn a dramatic effect on the CCN efficiency spectrum of these particles. Whereas fresh smoke tends to be moderately efficient, with some ca. 50% of the particles activated at 1% ss, aerosols from detrained plumes tend to be much more efficient at making CCNs, close to what we actually measured for background aerosols. Therefore, these particles which are too numerous and too small to, in the pyrocloud, undergo efficient coalescence as droplets and rainout, are released in the FT as efficient CCNs. Slide 13 (Conclusions): - CN/CO ERs are spread over a relatively narrow range between ca. 10 and 40 (both CN and CO primarily emitted during smoldering/less efficient burning). These values compare to savanna ERs. - The CO/CO2 ERs showed: - large variability, with values centered around 40–80 (4–8%), which is a quit efficient burning (also comparable to savanna). - smoldering emissions remain close to surface - During vertical transport and cloud processing, there is little loss of particles by coagulation and/or coalescence of droplets, and there is a significant growth of the particles. Therefore, this is an efficient mean for upward transport of pollutants from the BL to the mid-troposphere, thereby favoring long-range transport of, among others, efficient CCN and largely scattering particles. Optional slides: Slide 14 (Morning bias): The apparent diurnal pattern of CO/CO2 ERs is actually a bias accruing in the morning hours due to CO2 from the night transpiration being uplifted with the plume, thereby dramatically decreasing the CO/CO2 values. Even examples of purely smoldering large fires showed very small CO/CO2 values in the morning hours. Probably all ERs relative to CO2 ever measured so far in the morning hours suffered from this bias. These data were removed from the rest of our dataset presented. Slide 15 (ER CN/(CO+CO2) vs CE) Shown is the emission of particles as a function of combustion efficiency for all plumes measured in the BL (morning biased data of course removed). Here, the emission of particles is presented as CN/(CO+CO2), CE is CO2/Ctotal. There is a significant (r^2 = 0.61) dependence of the emission of particles on CE, with more particles emitted at lower CE (toward smoldering).