Risk Factor Analysis - A New Qualitative Risk Management Tool

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panel discussion on the future of software in support of microbial risk assessment.
Advertisements

1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
MAVERICK LEADERSHIP UNLIMITED eCD Afrika PROJECT MANAGEMENT VANI MOODLEY 3 RD MARCH 2012.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
1 Chapter 2: Product Development Process and Organization Introduction Importance of human resources: Most companies have similar technology resources.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
Safety distances: comparison of the metodologies for their determination – M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi ICHS San Francisco, USA - September SAFETY.
Cumulative Risk Assessment for Pesticide Regulation: A Risk Characterization Challenge Mary A. Fox, PhD, MPH Linda C. Abbott, PhD USDA Office of Risk Assessment.
Project Change Management
Overview of Key Rule Features
Risk Management Chapter 7.
Project Risk Management
1 Risk evaluation Risk treatment. 2 Risk Management Process Risk Management Process.
CP methodology adapted to Stockholm Convention Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.C United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology.
Organizational Project Management Maturity: Roadmap to Success
Part II Project Planning © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Chapter : Software Process
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Module 8: Risk Management, Monitoring and Project Control We would like to acknowledge the support of the Project Management Institute and the International.
CPSC 871 John D. McGregor Module 4 Session 3 Architecture Evaluation.
BSBPMG503A Manage Project Time Manage Project Time Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG503A.
Process for Analysis  Choose a standard / type  Qualitative / Quantitative Or  Formal / Informal  Select access controls  Match outcome to project.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
Federal Agency Update - A Public Real Estate Symposium Las Vegas, Nevada January 26, 2010 Procedures Guide for Right of Way Cost Estimation and Cost Management.
© Grant Thornton | | | | | Guidance on Monitoring Internal Control Systems COSO Monitoring Project Update FEI - CFIT Meeting September 25, 2008.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Uncertainty management in Statoil (Risk and opportunity management)
Chapter 8 Managing Project Risk Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 8-1.
1 Project Risk Management Project Risk Management Dr. Said Abu Jalala.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code MS Project Management Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis Lecture # 25.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training.
Monitor & Control Risks 1 MEC-4. What is Monitoring & Controlling Risks? 2 » Monitoring & Controlling Risks is the process of: implementing Risk Response.
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT L ECTURE 7: R ISK M ANAGEMENT I DENTIFYING AND A SSESSING R ISK You got to be careful if you don’t know where you’re going,
Performance-Based Assessment HPHE 3150 Dr. Ayers.
Agenda Interthink – 2003 Organizational Project Management Baseline Study –Industry Profile –Country Profile –Organization Size –Data On Schedule –Data.
Part C Eligibility (Part H). Eligibility Criteria: Children ages birth through two who are developmentally delayed or are at established risk for developmental.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Lesson 1: Examining Professional Project Management Topic 1A: Identify Project Management Processes.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Monitor & Control Risks 1 MEC-4. What is Monitoring & Controlling Risks? 2 » Monitoring & Controlling Risks is the process of: implementing Risk Response.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
10 Informal Reports.
1 Project Management C53PM Session 4 Russell Taylor Staff Work-base – 1 st Floor
Week 2 – Risk Planning & Identification. Risk & Risk Management.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part II Project Planning.
Marketing Planning Process Deirdre Makepeace Level Verifier – Professional Diploma Assignment briefing June and September 2014.
Project Management in Marketing Deirdre Makepeace Level Verifier – Professional Diploma Assignment brief June and September 2014.
Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Project Planning Part II.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
Principles of Information Security, Fourth Edition Risk Management Ch4 Part I.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Project Management PTM721S
Annual Professional Development Conference
Best Practices in Performing DSA Legacy Reviews
Project Management BBA & MBA
Manage Project Costs Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG504A.
Part II Project Planning © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Software Project Management (SPM)
Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata
CIS12-3 IT Project Management
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi. Università di Pisa
Presentation transcript:

Risk Factor Analysis - A New Qualitative Risk Management Tool PMI Connections 2000 Project Management Institute Seminar & Symposium September 12, 2000 - Houston, TX John Kindinger Probabilistic Risk and Hazard Analysis Group (TSA-11) Los Alamos National Laboratory LA-UR 00-3444 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 1

Presentation Topics Background and Objectives for Risk Factor Analysis (RFA) General Approach for Performing RFA Example RFA Results Integration of RFA with Quantitative Risk Analysis

Objectives for the Development of RFA Capable of evaluating technical risks in conceptual design, before schedule & cost baselines are available Easy to perform and adaptable to different projects & programs Systematic, objective and sufficiently comprehensive to produce meaningful specific insights Useable to support quantitative risk analysis

General Approach for Performing Risk Factor Analysis

Tasks for Risk Factor Analysis List activities, tasks or other elements that make up the project Identify the applicable risk factors Develop risk-ranking criteria for each risk factor Evaluate each activity and rank risk for each risk factor Sum results across risk factors for each activity

Activity Identification Follow the logical progression of tasks or process steps being used by the project team Define tasks at the level of detail needed to reveal unique risk issues and important dependencies between tasks Document results with a simple flow chart

Identifying Risk Factors Risk factors are the drivers that will ultimately determine performance measure results Risk factors need to be relevant to the specific activities to be examined For LANL facility projects, we have developed a generic set of risk factors and grouped them into four categories

Example Qualitative Risk Factors

Risk Ranking Criteria The assessments of risk for a given risk factor need to be made consistently across differing types of activities Therefore, for each risk factor, qualitative criteria are needed that define risk in each category (low, medium, high)

Example Qualitative Risk Ranking Criteria

Example Qualitative Risk Ranking Criteria

Risk Evaluation Evaluate each task or activity against each risk factor using the ranking criteria and assess the risk level appropriately All risk factors may not be applicable for any specific activity Record the results on a worksheet, including justification for the assessment

Example Task Worksheet

Risk Summation Also, record the risk rankings in a table format using numbers (0-3) to represent the risk rankings Then sum across the risk factors for each task to get risk category and the total task score All risk factors are weighted equally in this process

Example Risk Factor Ranking & Summation

Example Results from Risk Factor Analyses

Example Risk Factor Analysis Results

Example Risk Factor Analysis Results

Integration of RFA with Quantitative Risk Analysis

Integrated Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis Tasks

Input Distribution Development Risk Factor Analysis results provide a basis for the development of distributions used in the quantitative risk model.

Format of Quantitative Risk Assessment Results Cumulative probability distributions provide a complete picture of uncertainty, it is not ignored or assumed to take on extreme values. Results provide a basis for setting risk-based performance targets and contingencies. Sensitivity analyses identify contributors to risk

Example Risk Reduction Recommendations

Conclusions Risk factor analysis is a qualitative risk analysis technique aimed at identifying and assessing the drivers that will determine overall project performance RFA has been used at Los Alamos for the early assessment of technical risks in conceptual design and later as part of integrated qualitative and quantitative risk analyses