Using APC Data for NTD Reporting APC University, Houston, Texas 16 October, 2014 John D. Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning Federal Transit Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

FY 2014 NTD Reporting Federal Register Notices Explanation of Proposed Changes 28 August 2014.
Nancy Edmonson Consultant and Qualified Statistician Houston, Texas NTD Reporting Estimating boardings and passenger miles with automatic passenger counters.
National Transit Database Annual Reporting. New Reporting System ( “NTD 2.0 ” ) Monthly ridership was first operational module – Reporting started October.
PASSENGER O-D TRIP TABLE FROM FAREBOX RECEIPTS Kelly Chan 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, October 16, 2013.
City of Phoenix/Valley Metro Platinum Pass Program
Section 2.2: What do samples tell us?.
National Transit Database State DOT Reporting John Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning & Analysis, FTA 1.
KY 4/22 Module 1a Purposes of Data Collection. Review of initial handouts Travel Survey Manual, TMIP, USDOT and EPA, 1996 Travel Survey Manual Appendices,
Justifying Rail Bias Factor for Houston METRO’s Transit Model Presentation by Vijay Mahal, HDR Inc Vincent Sanders, Houston METRO May 18, 2009 TRB Applications.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
APC University Sponsored By Hilton Americas October 16, 2014 Welcome!
ATAL INDORE CITY TRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED (AICTSL) Performance Management System Madhav Pai Prajna Rao Srinivasan Vasudevan.
METRO Rail Intercept Survey Findings, Data Uses AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1, 2009.
Washington County Transportation Authority. Mission Statement  The mission of the Washington County Transportation Authority (Washington Rides) is to.
Conducting a Trip Generation Study. When to Collect Data Not covered by the ITE land use classification Location is in CBD Significant multi-modal component.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
The Rural NTD – What Have We Learned? Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor Office of Program Management Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Public Transit in Sacramento
NTD Data Users Seminar 22 May, 2015 John D. Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning & Analysis Federal Transit Administration.
Hartford Hospital Research Institute Time and Effort Reporting Prepared By: HHC Office of Compliance, Audit and Privacy Angelo Quaresima, Research Compliance.
PLEASE SIGN IN 1 Welcome to the Title VI Plan Workshop.
“IF YOU CAN MANAGE IT, YOU CAN MEASURE IT” Robert Hudson, Performance Analyst Dept. Planning/Office of Research & Analysis.
FTA SGR Transit Agencies Feedback Session Results Presented by: PricewaterhouseCoopers Kristy Fridley, Mark Baumgardner, and Charles Baldwin.
Medicaid Allowable Expenditure Report- MAER Amy Kanter, SBS Auditor Michigan Department of Health and Human Services 2015 MDHHS SBS Conference – Traverse.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
1 Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Types & Sources Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
WYDOT Transit Program Reporting 101 June 16, 2011 Taylor J. Rossetti Joni Kithas Harlan.
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
FTA’s Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM)
Department of Human Services Office of Information Services Statewide IT Performance Measures Pilot Project DHS Initial Measures & Next Steps Presentation.
1 Predicted-versus-Actual Studies: Why/how to do them and Lessons Learned Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
New Starts/Small Starts and BRT: An Update APTA Bus Conference Seattle, WA May 5, 2009.
Some ACS Data Issues and Statistical Significance (MOEs) Table Release Rules Statistical Filtering & Collapsing Disclosure Review Board Statistical Significance.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
NTD: Common Problems & Issues 24 April 2012 John D. Giorgis Acting Director, Strategic Planning & Analysis Routematch User’s Conference Atlanta, Georgia.
9-1 Using SafetyAnalyst Module 4 Countermeasure Evaluation.
Integrated National Transit Database Analysis System – Rural/Tribal NTD Module June 24, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration.
16 th Biennial FTA State Programs Meeting State Public Transit Partnerships Conference Washington, DC Keith Gates NTD Program Manager Office of Budget.
“Transportation Audits” What do Agencies need to know? June 28,
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
APC University: San Diego’s Use of APCs on Three Six Modes from Three APC Vendors Brian Lane Senior Transit Planner San Diego Association of Governments.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
SEPTA FARE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Using DVRPC’s Regional Travel Forecasting Model Fang Yuan, Brad Lane, and Vanvi Trieu May 17, 2015.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Pilot Programs, Fare Products & Transfers. Pass Development Goals/Criteria Increase ridership Increase revenue Convenient for Public Total number of pass.
Model Validation of Transit Ridership at the Corridor and Transit Route Level by Mark Charnews October 19, 2006.
Child Restraint Use in 14 Texas Cities 1 For more information, contact Katie Womack, Surveys conducted at child care centers and shopping.
Monterey-Salinas Transit Navigating Through Charter Regulations Prepared for CalACT October 4, 2005 Carl Sedoryk General Manager/CEO Monterey-Salinas Transit.
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
Using Factoring and Average Trips to Fill in the Gaps in APC Data Chris Greenfield Customer Support Specialist RSM Services Corporation Houston, Texas.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
Arizona Transit Association 2013 AzTA/ADOT Conference: Coming Together – Transit Connects Us PUBLIC TRANSIT DEPARTMENT City of Phoenix/Valley Metro Platinum.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Part 265: Data Collection and Reporting.
RIVER VALLEY METRO MASS TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING Tuesday, May 22, 3:00 P.M.
The Transit Industry’s Information Management Solution.
FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
PPTA - April 2016 A CT 44 D ATA R EPORTING QC P LAN E LEMENTS, T HEMES AND O PPORTUNITIES.
RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM W1
An Overview Title VI Applicability Public Outreach Fare Policy
Office of Research and Analysis
Transit Survey White Paper
FIS NEW FUNCTIONALITY Teresa Fisher.
FREEdom and Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP)
Presentation transcript:

Using APC Data for NTD Reporting APC University, Houston, Texas 16 October, 2014 John D. Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning Federal Transit Administration

NTD Service Data Requirements Reporting service consumed to the NTD – Unlinked Passenger Trips (UPT) – Passenger Miles Traveled (PMT) Time Periods – Annual Total – Average Weekday – Average Saturday, Average Sunday – Monthly Ridership Reduced Requirements for Small Systems

Sources of Data If available, you must report data based on a 100% count If not, you may conduct a sample May use – manual passenger counters, – ticket information, – registering fare boxes, or – automatic passenger counters

Stories from the Ops Center Rochester Experienced a 28.8% increase in UPTs for their MB/DO mode between RY 2011 and RY 2012 from 17,506,956 to 22,547,758 Agency was undercounting UPTs by nearly 30% utilizing passenger fare method before switching to APCs in 2012 San Diego Old estimation method used the number of one-way tickets sold, which dropped significantly when day passes replaced transfers installed APCs on their light rail system in FY 14 and UPT increased by 10 million

100% UPT Counts If you have 100% counts you must report them – all passengers counted each time they board an in-service transit vehicle. 100% count systems may miss up to 2% of total passengers – For personnel problems or equipment failures – May adjust data to account for the missing trips If the missing data exceeds 2% of total trips – Follow sampling rules

100% PMT Counts If you have 100% counts you must report them – all passengers counted each time they board and alight an in-service transit vehicle. Generally only available for rail modes with a distance-based fare system. 2% missed-data rule applies

Sampling Requirements FTA requirements are: – Minimum confidence of 95%; and – Minimum precision level of ±10 percent The required precision level (±10 percent) applies to the annual total data – For all mode/type of service combinations – Precision levels of data for average day schedules, will be larger if minimum sample size for total is used

Sampling Cycle for PMT Estimate PMT data by multiplying the average trip length from the most recent mandatory year by the UPT for the current year

Sampling Documentation You must retain sampling documentation in your files – A description of the estimation method that specifies the parameters used – Signed review by a qualified statistician – A summary of the statistician’s education and experience FTA Sampling Manual -Provide ready-to-use plans for new systems -Provides template sampling plans -Provides guidance for statistician-consultants

APC Documentation To use APC data you must get prior FTA approval – For either sampling or a 100% count FTA must approve your agency APC plans – Validation of the APC data for UPT and PM data against a separate manual sample covering a full year – APC maintenance plan for subsequent years

Approval: What Do We Look For? Size of reporter – Large agencies need to be more sophisticated – Small agencies often new APC users who need experience Understanding of basic statistical issues – Plan to review outliers and discard bad data – Accurate adjustment for discarded data – Use of data to identify failed equipment Consistency – Differences between Trip-by-trip APC data and validation data are random and small relative to the totals – No obvious bias to APC data 11

Annual APC Calibration Compare APC UPT/PMT to data collected manually – Baseline of at least 100 bus runs using ride checkers – Runs do not need to be randomly distributed – Separate samples of at least 100 trips for each mode Examine the statistical variance between the two data sets Make appropriate adjustments as needed Submit results to NTD annually 13

Contacts NTD Help Desk NTD Program Manager Keith Gates, John Giorgis, Director Office of Strategic Planning 14