FAST Corridor Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Steve Sewell Parsons Brinckerhoff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freight, Goods and Services Plan & Economic Impact on Central Florida.
Advertisements

Transportation Border Working Group
Idaho/Canada Border Issues Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Coeur d’Alene, ID April 22-23, 2008.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
1 GOODS MOVEMENT IN CALIFORNIA. 2 California is facing a significant transportation infrastructure shortfall. California is using innovative approaches.
Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/Plan Ohio Department of Transportation with Parsons Brinckerhoff SCORT.
The Alameda Corridor: Lessons Learned Presented to: UCI Conference on the New Generation of Transportation Financing in California Costa Mesa, CA Gill.
From B.C. to B.C. … and Beyond The Story of the West Coast Corridor Coalition.
1 Trade Corridor Improvement Fund March 5, 2008 Southern California Consensus Group.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Senate Transportation Committee January 25, 2011 Eric Johnson Executive Director Washington Public Ports Association Larry Paulson Executive Director Port.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
The 2011 Rail Conference: Moving Freight and Passengers in the 21 st Century Seaports and Freight Rail Eric D. Johnson Executive Director Washington Public.
URBAN FREIGHT Getting kicked to the curb?. How will we live?
Northwest Port Review An Overview of the Ports of Portland, Tacoma, Seattle, Vancouver, and Prince Rupert Prepared By: Michael Schwab Prepared For: Dr.
Mike Elliott, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen (BLET), Washington State Legislative Board (WSLB) February 2014.
Bruce Warner, Director Oregon Department of Transportation A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned.
Greg Cenac Steve Haik Ross ChapmanRonnie Harris Perry DufreneMarc Mergen Ivan EchegarruaKen Robinson Mike GrayDan Sleker Harold Yeldell TRANSPORT NETWORKS.
California Integrated Logistics Center. A BART TRAIN FOR FREIGHT Moving freight through the Port of Oakland without increasing highway congestion Faster.
1 Intermodal Case Studies Extension & Dissemination: Intermodal Case Studies - Phase II: Progress Report Professor Patrick Sherry National Center for Intermodal.
Port Financial Management Challenges Financing Freight Transportation Improvements St. Louis, Missouri April 29 to May 2, 2001 Financing Freight Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
California Marine Transportation System: Challenges and Potential Solutions Presented to: Western Cargo Conference San Diego, CA October 16, 2004 Gill.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
May Draft list Freight Policy Barriers. State Submitted by Mike Moore State Legislative proposals: – State tax policies threaten increased costs.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Michael R. Christensen, P.E. Deputy Executive Director October 23, 2009 AASHTO Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion: Freight.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
BMT Transport Solutions GmbH 1 Third BSR INTERREG III B partner search forum in Gdansk Actors perspective on pan-Baltic transport development Lars Källström.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Northern California Goods Movement Challenges: The I-580 Altamont Corridor Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC Presentation to Congressman Richard Pombo.
Southern California Association of Governments Freight Transportation: Emerging Issues for Southern California Alan Bowser Goods Movement PlanningWorkshop.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Testing the Hypothesis Bill Schafer Director, Strategic Planning March 21, 2007 Can Rail Reduce Congestion?
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Meetingthe Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying Ahead The AASHTO-FHWA Freight Transportation Partnership —Meeting the Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying.
ADOT Mexico and Border ADOT Mexico and Border Strategy Gail Lewis Arizona Department of Transportation Congressional Briefing November 3, 2015.
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board. Making the Case… – Freight community educated legislators - developed champions Creation of.
1 Overview: The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Economic Cooperation Program Overview: The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Economic Cooperation Program.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Canada-China Trade: Impact on Canadian Road Transport & Lessons Learned from Trading with the “Other Giant” David Bradley CEO, Canadian Trucking Alliance.
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Transportation Infrastructure Perspective Ross Chittenden Deputy Executive Director, Contra Costa Transportation Authority.
1 Carrying Indiana’s Torch 2d Annual Transportation, Distribution and Logistics Summit 14 September 2004 Eric Dietz, PhD, PE
Linking Northern, Central and Southern
Rice University – Baker Institute
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
FAST Phase I is a $500 million investment to:
North Georgia Water Resources Partnership
Linking Northern, Central and Southern
A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned
Linking Northern, Central and Southern
Alameda Corridor CEE 587 March 30, 2011
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
Presentation transcript:

FAST Corridor Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Steve Sewell Parsons Brinckerhoff

What is it? A $500 million investment A $500 million investment A series of improvements separating vehicular and rail traffic A series of improvements separating vehicular and rail traffic A success! A success!

What Does it Do? Moves the Nation’s freight through a major trade corridor Moves the Nation’s freight through a major trade corridor Fixes freight and general traffic bottlenecks Fixes freight and general traffic bottlenecks Increases the competitiveness of Puget Sound Ports Increases the competitiveness of Puget Sound Ports Creates and maintains jobs and economic health Creates and maintains jobs and economic health

What Does it Do? Increases train speed, which increases capacity Increases train speed, which increases capacity Reduces traffic congestion at at grade rail crossings Reduces traffic congestion at at grade rail crossings

What Does it Do? Before After

The Situation Ports of Seattle and Tacoma losing container market share to Southern California and Vancouver, B.C. Ports of Seattle and Tacoma losing container market share to Southern California and Vancouver, B.C. “Freight Mobility” one of many factors “Freight Mobility” one of many factors Threat to regional competitiveness Threat to regional competitiveness Container cargo a little known lifeline: “Freight doesn’t vote” Container cargo a little known lifeline: “Freight doesn’t vote”

What did we do? Three part strategy: Educate Educate Collaborate Collaborate Legislate Legislate

Educate Importance of ports and cargo to the region’s economy Importance of ports and cargo to the region’s economy Importance to the national economy Importance to the national economy The risk of doing nothing The risk of doing nothing

Importance to Washington State One of three jobs relies on international trade One of three jobs relies on international trade One-third of state’s agricultural products; e.g., hay, cherries, apples, are exported One-third of state’s agricultural products; e.g., hay, cherries, apples, are exported You get a “twofer”- improved traffic flows You get a “twofer”- improved traffic flows –Improve safety –Eliminate bottlenecks, streamline traffic –Mitigate impact of freight and traffic growth

Importance to the Nation Second…no third…largest container load center in the U.S. Second…no third…largest container load center in the U.S. Asian imports are more than 90%--Asia to comprise 45% of world trade by 2015 Asian imports are more than 90%--Asia to comprise 45% of world trade by 2015 More than 70% of imports through the Puget Sound destined for Chicago and beyond More than 70% of imports through the Puget Sound destined for Chicago and beyond Jobs across the nation rely on these imports Jobs across the nation rely on these imports

Collaborate=the KEY Build Consensus on project priorities Build Consensus on project priorities Truly a partnership—i.e, all take part in risk and reward Truly a partnership—i.e, all take part in risk and reward Partners include the State, the three ports, the Federal Government, local municipalities, and two railroads (BNSF and UP) Partners include the State, the three ports, the Federal Government, local municipalities, and two railroads (BNSF and UP) A lot of work…saved a lot at the next step A lot of work…saved a lot at the next step

Collaborate Freight Mobility Roundtable Freight Mobility Roundtable –Public/Private Group sponsored by the local MPO –Participants include: Shippers, ocean rail and road carriers, logistics providers, ports, EDC’s, local, state and Federal government…even consultants. –An important forum

Legislate: The State We scared ‘em We scared ‘em –Alameda Corridor –Job impact –State competitiveness We made it easy on ‘em We made it easy on ‘em –Benefits for the whole state –Consensus made this the state’s No.1 priority for Federal funding Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board

Legislate: The Other Washington Again, no regional disputes Again, no regional disputes Our delegation “got it” Our delegation “got it” Bud Shuster and “The Port of Chicago” Bud Shuster and “The Port of Chicago” The “Borders and Corridors” program The “Borders and Corridors” program

The Result A $500 million corridor, through which trade can flow and traffic move A $500 million corridor, through which trade can flow and traffic move

The Result Costs shared by partners Costs shared by partners Original Plan: Original Plan: State:50% State:50% Feds:25% Feds:25% Ports:10% Ports:10% Local:10% Local:10% RR’s:5% RR’s:5% Negotiated adjustments based on changes Negotiated adjustments based on changes

The Result Ten of 15 projects complete or nearly complete Ten of 15 projects complete or nearly complete Complete Complete Under Construction Under Construction Remainder completed by ’06 Remainder completed by ’06

What’s Next? FAST Phase II FAST Phase II –Consensus –Ten more projects –>$260 million –Jobs and Opportunities!!

Thank You