PPAN 2009 Prioritization Exercise Ruth Gregory PPAN December 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Prioritization Framework Principles
Advertisements

John Womersley The Science and Technology Facilities Council and Nuclear Physics John Womersley Director, Science Programmes October 2008.
Report from the Particle Astrophysics Advisory Panel Particle Astrophysics Advisory Panel Report.
Overview of Portfolio Optimization By Tim Washington September 14 th, 2011.
A year since the last STFC Town meeting Paul Nolan Personal views Heads of UK Nuclear Physics Groups - Chair.
Nuclear Physics Peer Review Processes 1.Objectives 2.Types of activities and relevant processes 3.New project /major upgrade 4.Project R&D 5.Exploitation.
The Physics of Nuclei, Nuclear Matter and Nucleosynthesis Report of the Nuclear Physics Advisory Panel.
Board of Governors January 27, 2014 Update on Enhanced Planning.
ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT Operating Efficiency Measures to highlight Best Practice Opportunities Results of CAVP and CAFA Meeting held October 20, 2005 DRAFT.
STFC Town Meeting Speakers: Nigel Glover Particle Physics Advisory Panel Ruth Gregory PPAN John Womersley Director Science Programmes.
DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
MSUSA Capital Bonding Request Proposal
A better place Karen Balfour Be Birmingham VCS Matters Summit 23 June 2010.
Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Particle Astrophysics meeting October 2010 John Womersley Director, Science Programmes, STFC.
Council 23 rd November 2007 Financial Statements for the year ended 31 st July 2007.
The STFC Science Programme 2010 – 15 Towards an implementation plan John Womersley Director, Science Programmes December 2009.
Philip Burrows IoP HEPP Conference, Oxford 7/4/09 Particle Physics Advisory Panel Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.
Developing a Partner Reward Strategy – to build competitive advantage Peter Scott Consulting
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Particle Physics Town Meeting 2010 John Womersley Director, Science Programmes March 2010.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
ECFA European Committee for Future Accelerators ECFA ACTIVITIES Lenny Rivkin, EPFL & PSI CHIPP Plenary meeting Fribourg, 30 June – 2 July, 2014.
The Science and Technology Facilities Council Janet Seed CLAS/JLAB meeting March 2011.
Recommendation for Board approval of updated nodal fee filing Steve Byone Overview –Historical summary –Highlights from approved interim Nodal Surcharge.
Philip Burrows LCUK Plenary Meeting, Daresbury 22/09/09 PPAP report + SoI status Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Particle Physics* & Nuclear Physics About the PP Group 16 Academics & Fellows 7 Visiting Profs including 1 Nobel Laureate 25 Researchers and Engineers.
Overview of UK Nuclear Physics Paul Nolan. Structure of how nuclear physics is organised in the UK Nuclear Physics funding in the UK Numbers to indicate:
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous - RALIoP HEPP Conference, UCL 29 th March Particle Physics Advisory Panel C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous Rutherford.
Tony Medland PPAP, Birmingham 11 July 2011
STFC Town Meetings Programmatic Review Science Board Summary Matt Griffin (Outgoing) Chair, Science Board 1.
Particle Physics Funding Mechanism PPARC has become STFC –Should be same funding structure as before PP and A constitute about £330M/year About half is.
What’s going on John Womersley. Outline Particle Physics Grants Round Financial Situation STFC Strategy Why our science matters more than ever.
Particle Physics Advisory Panel Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.
Astronomy particle physics astroparticle physics.
EPSRC Chemistry Grand Challenges ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL Alex Berry, Physical Sciences Portfolio Manager
Ian Thomas Strategic Director Children and Younger Adults School Governor Briefing, October 2013.
Challenges & Issues for SBNE Nigel S. Lockyer 4/4/14.
PPAN Programmatic Review Presentation to PP town meeting Jordan Nash.
CARE Steering Committee and Dissemination Board R. Aleksan CARE Steering Committee Paris, April 11, Introduction.
EPSRC Mathematical Sciences Programme David Harman - Programme Manager 3 rd April 2007 – HoDoMS.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Richard Wade PSD 2007 PPARC Science Challenges. Position sensitive detectors and PPARC Technology Challenges. Big Questions, Big Projects. Developing technology,
Particle Physics Advisory Panel Report to 2013 Town Meeting Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.
Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Philip Burrows PPAP Community Reviews, Birmingham 13/7/09 Community PP science reviews Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford.
News from HOGS Programmatic review Nuclear Physics Travel Meeting with Wakeham Meeting with Ian Pearson STFC Nuclear Physics Advisory Panel Student Travel.
Select Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
John Womersley PPD Staff Meeting 12 October 2005.
Towards a GHG Reduction Strategy for Ontario: Industrial Competitiveness, Investment, Innovation, & Growth September 2010 Canadian Manufacturers.
PPAN perspective and the Science Roadmap Jordan Nash PPAN Chair.
STFC Town Meeting IOP Annual Nuclear Physics Conference 31 March 2016 Susan Smith (On behalf of John Womersley) STFC.
Key figures ,86 M€ Details ● 40 PhDs (8,64 M€) ● 13 Postdocs (2,73 M€) ● 1,77 M€ travel ● 0,99 M€ ‘per diem’ ● 2,74 M€ fees ATLAS:LHCb:ALICE=5:3:2.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
MICE Group Leaders Meeting 22 May 2014, 10:00 Paul Soler Introduction, MICE-OsC and STFC Accelerator Review.
WP leaders meeting R. Aleksan October 5 th, 2009 TIARA 1.Objectives 2.General Context 3.Building TIARA 4.Conclusion.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
1 Science Board and STFC News Prof. Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Planning for UKRI: STFC town meeting Durham, December 2016
Sean J Freeman The University of Manchester
Presentation to PPAP meeting
Boulder Junction Town Road Improvement Project
Boulder Junction Town Road Improvement Project
John Womersley Super-B Workshop Oxford May 2011
Community PP science reviews
STFC Update – Programmes Directorate PPAP Community Meeting
Particle Astrophysics Advisory Panel
Director Be Birmingham Third Sector Assembly, Annual Conference
Community PP science reviews
Presentation transcript:

PPAN 2009 Prioritization Exercise Ruth Gregory PPAN December 2009

Prioritization Process Advisory Panels set up July 2009, consultation exercise over summer, panels reported to PPAN in September. PPAN first prioritized new projects using a uniform set of criteria developed in consultation with PPAN and PALS The new projects were then interleaved with the previous main prioritization from the 07/08 Programmatic Review giving a coarse grained ranking. Financial information was included in the Nov/Dec meeting, and a ranking constructed also considering breadth of program and a focus on individual areas.

The alphas

International Subscriptions Balance between program and International Subscriptions was first examined, flat cashing of the subscriptions was required to make progress. (Apart from exceptional contributions to ESO.)

Key Results It was barely possible to support even  5 projects within the financial envelope. Therefore necessary to administer some cuts across the board. Higher ranked projects were cut 10-15%, lower ranked projects more. Big ticket items were considered in detail separately by area to re-profile and try to apply cuts intelligently. The program was then re-merged and cuts applied to the rest of the projects. We tried to preserve as much as possible of the future, consistent with capitalizing on existing investment.

Implications for Particle Theory Consistent with the 10% cut in grants, the grants round will receive further cuts, however, no current grant will be pulled (apart from IPPP which will be renegotiated). RA posts will be dangerously low, BUT, the picture is bleaker in other areas. CERN is still top priority, theory has been unanimously highly supported across the community in both PP and Astronomy. Studentship and Fellowships main other direct cut.

Studentships and Fellowships S&F cost 25M per year, it was necessary to apply cuts. As no cuts had been applied in the previous PR, we decided to recommend a cut commensurate with the but to grants in 07/08 at 25%. This was felt to be unsatisfactory, but necessary and appropriate.

New PPAN projects unable to support ANITA, Accelerator R&D for CLIC, Clover Follow-On, CCAT, COMET, CTA, Detector R&D, ELENA, Einstein Telescope, ISOL at SPIRAL2, JPARC neutrino upgrades, LHCb upgrades, LHeC, UK involvement in LSST, NUSTAR additional contributions, MoonLITE, MROI, NA62 at CERN, Next Generation Dark Matter experiment, NG1df, Panda, SNO+, Super B factory