New Vector Resonance as an Alternative to Higgs Boson (Strong EWSB)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higgs physics theory aspects experimental approaches Monika Jurcovicova Department of Nuclear Physics, Comenius University Bratislava H f ~ m f.
Advertisements

CompHEP Automatic Computations from Lagrangians to Events Ivan Melo University of Zilina Fyzika za Štandardným modelom klope na dvere Svit,
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from D-branes Joshua Erlich College of William & Mary Title U Oregon, May 22, 2007 w/ Chris Carone, Marc Sher, Jong Anly.
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
1 Higgs Mechanism Cyril Topfel. 2 What to expect from this Presentation (Table of Contents) Some very limited theory explanation Higgs at.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Signatures of a new vector resonance from strongly interacting electroweak symmetry breaking M. Gintner, I. Melo, B. Trpišová University of Žilina Exotics.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
4 th Generation Leptons in Minimal Walking Technicolor Theory Matti Heikinheimo University of Jyväskylä.
30 August 04Lorenzo Feligioni1 Searches for Techniparticles at DØ Lorenzo Feligioni Boston University for the DØ collaboration.
Jose E. Garcia presented by: Jose E. Garcia (IFIC-Valencia) on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration XXXIXth Rencontres de Moriond.
1 Search for Excited Leptons with the CMS Detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Andy Yen, Yong Yang, Marat Gataullin, Vladimir Litvine California Institute.
.. Particle Physics at a Crossroads Meenakshi Narain Brown University.
J. Nielsen1 The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Jason Nielsen UC Santa Cruz VERTEX 2004 July 28, 2010.
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 5.
WW Scattering studies for the Future Linear Collider Andres F. Osorio Postgraduate student High Energy Physics Group.
1 VV scattering in P-TDR (CHAPTER 13.2 Vol 2.2) A simple summary of what we intend to put in our chapter CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO)
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
Dec. 17, 2004M. Garcia-Sciveres -- WW Scattering1 WW scattering Dec. 17 LBL ATLAS analysis meeting Motivation Theoretical Introduction Review of MC analyses.
Associated production of the Higgs boson and a single top quark in the littlest Higgs model at Large Hadron Collier Shuo Yang.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
1 Summary talk for ILC Physics Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) November 12, 2004 ACFA LC7, Taipei.
1 Determination of Dark Matter Properties in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity Masaki Asano (SOKENDAI) Collaborator: E. Asakawa (Meiji-gakuin), S.
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
Effective Lagrangians and Physics Beyond the Standard Model S. Dawson TASI06 Lecture 5.
Prospects of Discovering a New Massless Neutral Gauge Boson at the ILC E. Boos 1, V. Bunichev 1 and H.J. Schreiber 2 1 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow.
H 1 → a 1 a 1 → µ + µ - τ + τ - ATLAS Experiment: Search of Higgs Boson decaying into a 1 in Next to Minimal SuperSymmetric Model By: Hou Keong(Tim) Lou.
Electroweak physics at the LHC with ATLAS APS April 2003 Meeting – Philadelphia, PA Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK (on behalf of the ATLAS.
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking without Higgs Bosons in ATLAS Ryuichi Takashima Kyoto University of Education For the ATLAS Collaboration.
Dynamical EWSB and Fourth Generation Michio Hashimoto (KEK) Mt. Tsukuba M.H., Miransky, M.H., Miransky, in preparation.
BESS Model Resonance in the pp W + W tt + X Channel at LHC M. Gintner, I. Melo, B. Trpišová University of Žilina Herlany, September 2006.
H. Quarks – “the building blocks of the Universe” The number of quarks increased with discoveries of new particles and have reached 6 For unknown reasons.
The Higgs Boson Beate Heinemann, University of Liverpool  The Standard Model and Beyond  Tevatron and LHC  Tevatron Results on Higgs Searches  Future.
The Standard Model of the elementary particles and their interactions
Charged Higgs boson at the LHC 이강영 ( 건국대학교 연세대학교
BESS Model Resonance in the pp W + W tt + X Channel at LHC M. Gintner, I. Melo, B. Trpišová University of Žilina CERN, Nov 1, 2006.
03/31/2006S. M. Lietti - UED Search at SPRACE 1 Universal Extra Dimensions Search at SPRACE S. M. Lietti DOSAR Workshop at U.T. Arlington.
Vector boson scattering at CMS (LHC)
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
DIS2003 A.Tilquin Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at LEP What is the Standard Model Why to go beyond and how Supersymmetry Higgs sector.
Strong EWSB in Top Quark Production at ILC Ivan Melo M. Gintner, I. Melo, B. Trpišová (University of Žilina) Praha, Mar 30, 2006.
Jim Olsen Princeton University Colloquium of the School of Physics and Astronomy Queen Mary University of London January 17, 2014 Nature of the New Boson:
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
New Strong LHC Rogerio Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica UNESP  
Nady Bakhet PhD Student – Cairo University PhD Thesis Title
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
The Era of Discovery at the Large Hadron Collider
Xinyu Miao Department of Physics Univ. of Arizona 03/30/07
张仁友 (南昌, ) 中国科学技术大学粒子物理与技术中心
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Xinyu Miao Department of Physics Univ. of Arizona 03/30/07
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Physics at a Linear Collider
What do we hope to understand?
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Shuo Yang Associated production of the Higgs boson and
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking without Higgs Bosons in ATLAS
C.M.S.:.
Phenomenology of Vector Resonances from SEWSB at Future e+e- Colliders
Search for a New Vector Resonance in the pp WWtt+X Channel at LHC
Strong EWSB in Top Quark Production
Presentation transcript:

New Vector Resonance as an Alternative to Higgs Boson (Strong EWSB) Fyzika za Štandardným modelom klope na dvere Svit, 9.-16.9. 2007 New Vector Resonance as an Alternative to Higgs Boson (Strong EWSB) Ivan Melo University of Zilina

EWSB - one of Great Mysteries of Particle Physics Problem ! SM ………………………. 1 Higgs Strong EWSB …….. no Higgs SUSY (MSSM) ..... 5 Higgs Large Extra Dimensions Little Higgs Monotheists Atheists Polytheists Classical New

Naturalness problem (Fine-tuning, Gauge Hierarchy problem) ≈ - (200 GeV)2 for Λ = 103 GeV ≈ - (200 GeV)2 . 1032 for Λ = 1019 GeV mH ≈ 100 – 200 GeV ≈ - (200 GeV)2 . 1032 ≈ + (200 GeV)2 . 1032

SM Strong EWSB SUSY (MSSM) Large Extra Dimensions Little Higgs = 0 → mH = 319 GeV H not elementary, it melts into techniquarks at ΛTC ≈ 1-3 TeV ~ t1(2) Λ is not 1019 GeV, Λ is as low as 103 GeV

Fundamental energy scales Greg Anderson, Northwestern University

Every fundamental energy scale should have a dynamical origin K. Lane

Linear sigma model (model of nuclear forces) σ v = μ/√λ ≈ 90 MeV σ = v + σ (spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking) SU(2)L x SU(2)R → SU(2)V

Standard model Higgs Lagrangian U(σ,π) σ SU(2)L x SU(2)R → SU(2)V v = μ/√λ ≈ 246 GeV Higgs Lagrangian ≡ Linear sigma model

Where are EW pions ??? mσ = μ2 mπ = 0 EW pions Φ1,Φ2,χ become WL, ZL SU(2)L x SU(2)R → SU(2)V (global) massless GB SU(2)L x U(1)Y → U(1)Q (local) Higgs mechanism: W,Z become massive by eating GB EW pions Φ1,Φ2,χ become WL, ZL

Where is σ ? … the (linear) σ model, although it has some agreeable features, is quite artificial. A new particle is postulated, for which there is no experimental evidence … M. Gell-Mann, M. Levy, Nuovo Cimento 16 p.705 (1960) … and they decided to get rid of σ particle …

Nonlinear σ model (QCD) v = 90 MeV Effective Lagrangian valid until a few hundred MeV

Where is Higgs boson ? … Higgs Lagrangian, although it has some agreeable features, is quite artificial. A new particle is postulated, for which there is no experimental evidence … … so we get rid of the Higgs boson Higgs boson is not necessary, Higgs mechanism works even without Higgs !

Nonlinear σ model (SM Higgs sector) v = 246 GeV Effective Lagrangian valid until 1-3 TeV

Chiral SB in QCD EWSB SU(2)L x SU(2)R → SU(2)V , vev ~ 90 MeV SU(2)L x SU(2)R → SU(2)V , vev ~ 246 GeV

Technicolor Technicolor of massless U and D techniquarks: SU(2)L x SU(2)R invariant As a result of dynamics, interactions of massless techniquarks, we get - SU(2)L x SU(2)R → SU(2)V - v = 246 GeV - EW pions = WL, ZL made of U,D techniquarks Best explanation of Naturalness & Hierarchy problems

Extended Technicolor (ETC) ETC was introduced to give masses to fermions … but introduced also large FCNC and conflict with precision EW measurements U D ETC Walking technicolor f f ETC has also problem to explain large top mass (mt = 174 GeV) Topcolor assisted technicolor

WL WL → WL WL WL WL → t t t t → t t (Equivalence theorem) L = i gπ Mρ /v (π- ∂μ π+ - π+ ∂μ π-) ρ0μ + gt t γμ t ρ0μ + gt t γμ γ5 t ρ0μ

International Linear Collider: e+e- at 1 TeV ee ―› ρtt ―› WW tt ee ―› ρtt ―› tt tt ee ―› WW ee ―› tt ee ―› νν WW ee ―› νν tt Large Hadron Collider: pp at 14 TeV pp ―› ρtt ―› WW tt pp ―› ρtt ―› tt tt pp ―› WW pp ―› tt pp ―› jj WW pp ―› jj tt

Chiral effective Lagrangian SU(2)L x SU(2)R global, SU(2)L x U(1)Y local L = Lkin + Lnon.lin. σ model - a v2 /4 Tr[(ωμ + i gv ρμ . τ/2 )2] + Lmass + LSM(W,Z) + b1 ψL i γμ (u+∂μ – u+ i gv ρμ . τ/2 + u+ i g’/6 Yμ) u ψL + b2 ψR Pb i γμ (u ∂μ – u i gv ρμ . τ/2 + u i g’/6 Yμ) u+ Pb ψR + λ1 ψL i γμ u+ Aμ γ5 u ψL + λ2 ψR Pλ i γμ u Aμ γ5 u+ Pλ ψR BESS Our model Standard Model with Higgs replaced with ρ ωμ = [u+(∂μ + i g’/2 Yμτ3)u + u(∂μ+ i g Wμ . τ/2)u+]/2 Aμ = [u+(∂μ + i g’/2 Yμτ3)u - u(∂μ+ i g Wμ . τ/2)u+]/2 u = exp(i π . τ /2v) ψL = (tL,bL) Pb = diag(p1,p2) gπ = Mρ /(2 v gv) gt = gv b2 /4 + … Mρ ≈ √a v gv /2 t

Unitarity constraints Low energy constraints gv ≥ 10 → gπ ≤ 0.2 Mρ (TeV) |b2 – λ2| ≤ 0.04 → gt ≈ gv b2 / 4 |b1 – λ1| ≤ 0.01 → b1 = 0 Unitarity constraints WL WL → WL WL , WL WL → t t, t t → t t gπ ≤ 1.75 (Mρ= 700 GeV) gt ≤ 1.7 (Mρ= 700 GeV)

Partial (Γ―›WW) and total width Γtot of ρ

Subset of fusion diagrams + approximations (Pythia) Full calculation of 66 diagrams at tree level (CompHEP)

Pythia vs CompHEP Before cuts √s (GeV) 800 1000 1500 ρ (M = 700 GeV, Γ = 12.5 GeV, gv = 20, b2 = 0.08) Before cuts √s (GeV) 800 1000 1500 Pythia (fb) 0.35 0.95 3.27 CompHEP (fb) 0.66 1.16 3.33

Backgrounds (Pythia) e+e- → e+e- tt e+e- → tt γ σ(0.8 TeV) = 300.3 + 1.3 fb → 0.13 fb (0.20 fb) σ(1.0 TeV) = 204.9 + 2.4 fb → 0.035 fb (0.16 fb)

|N(ρ) – N(no res.)| √N(ttγ+eett)+(N(no res.)) R = ≈ S/√B > 5 = gv

e- e+ → t t ρ different from Higgs ! x+y=560 nm z=0.40 mm n=2x1010 ρ (M= 700 GeV, b2=0.08, gv=20)

39/8 diagrams in the dominant gg channel No-resonance background ρ ρ ρ

CompHEP results: pp → W W t t + X ρ: Mρ=700 GeV, Γρ=4 GeV, b2=0.08, gv=10 39 diagrams 8 diagrams MWW(GeV) gπ=Mρ/2vgv gt1,2 = gv b2/4 σ(gg) = 10.2 fb ―› 1.0 fb Cuts: 700-3Γρ < mWW < 700 +3Γρ (GeV) pT (t) > 100 GeV, |y(t)| < 2 No resonance background: σ(gg) = 0.037 fb

l jjbjjbjj reconstruction (CompHEP, Pythia, Atlfast, Root) Athena 9.0.3 One charged lepton channel: 40% of events electron > 30 GeV muon > 20 GeV Cuts: of mass of the W: GeV jets > 25 GeV b-tagging efficiency 50% Reconstruction criterion

Distribution in invariant mass of WW pair (ρ →WW) ρ: Mρ=700 GeV, Γρ=4 GeV, b2=0.08, gv=10 number of events/17 GeV 39 diagrams 8 diagrams Lum=100/fb 12.2 events 2.4 events Pz(ν) chosen correctly in 61.5 % of events number of events/17 GeV

8 diagrams 39 diagrams Mass of the W boson Mass of the top quark Lum=100/fb Lum=100/fb 12.2 events 2.4 events number of events/0.6 GeV number of events/0.6 GeV Mass of the top quark Lum=100/fb Lum=100/fb 2.4 events 12.2 events number of events/2.5 GeV number of events/2.5 GeV

ρ: Mρ=1000 GeV Γρ=26 GeV Lum = 100 fb-1 12.8 events number of events/32 GeV

1. Can we improve WWtt reconstruction ? L = 100/fb 2.4 events 8 diagrams 2. versus 8 diagrams

Conclusions New vector resonance as an alternative to Higgs Boson Modified BESS model motivated by technicolor Rich e+e- and pp phenomenology