Getting the Most Value for Your Assessment Dollar: Cost Analysis for the New Kentucky Assessment System John F. Olson Assessment Solutions Group CCSSO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment Minneapolis, MN June 26-29, 2012 June
Advertisements

Using the Pareto Creator v. 2.0 Step-by-Step instructions to using the Pareto Creator to develop and print Pareto charts. *These instructions assume that.
Evolution of Parametric Analysis within Rolls-Royce Purchasing
IDOA Office Supply and Toner Products Pre-Proposal Conference May 10, 2013 Adam Thiemann IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst.
Cost Estimate for the New Kentucky Assessment System Prepared for: Ken Draut Roger Ervin Jennifer Stafford Kentucky Department of Education Report Prepared.
Components of the 2015 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR A –STAAR L –STAAR Alternate.
Components of the 2014 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR L –STAAR Modified –STAAR.
Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D.
BIS310: Week 4 BIS310: Structured Analysis and Design Feasibility Study and Business Requirements Statement -Selecting the Best Alternative Design Strategies.
E-Rate Central E-Rate Overview and Update September 2014.
Early Effort Estimation of Business Data-processing Enhancements CS 689 November 30, 2000 By Kurt Detamore.
Idaho High School Wireless Project Joyce Popp Chief Information Officer.
1 Designing High Quality, Affordable Assessment Systems Edward Roeber Michigan State University National Research Council Board on Testing and Assessment.
Management: Analysis and Decision Making
What Are States Doing to Prepare For the Next Generation of Assessments? Planning For and Beyond John Olson Barry Topol National Conference on.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
Program Performance Reporting and Evaluation in Australia Mark Nizette Department of Finance and Administration October 2001.
Welcome Bringing Clarity to Business Support NVQs on the QCF – 4428 Business and Administration.
Maine Course Pathways Maine School Superintendents’ Conference June 24 – 25, 2010.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Information on Grades 3-8 Testing Steven Katz Director Office of State Assessment.
Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,
Bidders’ Conference Convened by Dirigo Health Agency June 18, 2012 Solicitation to Select Designated Survey Vendors.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
State Smart Transportation Initiative October 9, 2014 Matthew Garrett Oregon DOT Director Erik Havig Oregon DOT Planning Section Manager.
Implementation Yaodong Bi. Introduction to Implementation Purposes of Implementation – Plan the system integrations required in each iteration – Distribute.
Bill Higbee April 12, 2011 Selecting an Enterprise Class Social Media Monitoring Vendor.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
Successful IT Projects slides © 2007 Darren Dalcher & Lindsey Brodie Successful IT Projects By Darren Dalcher & Lindsey Brodie
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
32 nd National Energy & Environmental Conference September 19, 2005 Benchmarking the Engineering & Construction Industry.
ASG Cost Model Presentation CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment.
Overview Lifting the Curtain - Debriefings FAI Acquisition Seminar.
Getting the Most Value for Your Assessment Dollar – Designing Adapting and Maintaining Quality Assessment Programs During Tough Economic Times To Consortia,
2 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Project Chartering  Define the components of a project charter  Develop a project idea into an effective project charter  Review.
Understanding the TerraNova Test Testing Dates: May Kindergarten to Grade 2.
Array Processing.
A Summary of Caturano and Company’s Whitepaper Presented by: Joseph L. Petrelli, President & Co-Founder Demotech, Inc.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 4. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT Four UNIT Five Project UNIT Six Preview Project Status Summary.
Draft Transition Plan for the Transfer of the Drug Medi-Cal Treatment Program Fourth Series: Stakeholder Meetings Department of Health Care Services Department.
IFS310: Module 7 Business Requirements Statement Interpersonal Skills and Communications.
Establishing the Validity of Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: A Collaborative of State-based Research CTEAG Project Summary of Accomplishments.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
Understanding and Communicating About New Performance Standards on New Performance Standards on Michigan’s Standardized Tests RAISING EXPECTATIONS.
Test Administrators. Be aware of what’s new this year in OAKS Understand the roles and responsibilities of test administrators Understand how to use valid.
Test Administrators. 1/28/2016Free Template from 2 Be aware of what’s new this year in OAKS Understand the roles and responsibilities.
ASG Cost Model Presentation New Jersey Department of Education October 21, 2009.
HE 550: Higher Education Finance Unit 7 Seminar Pre-Seminar Welcome to HE 550: Educational Program Assessment, Unit 7 Seminar Seminar will begin at top.
Statewide Networks of Middle Level Education Liaisons and Support Schools Friday, May 19, :30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. The New York State Education Department.
Technical Reports ELEC422 Design II. Objectives To gain experience in the process of generating disseminating and sharing of technical knowledge in electrical.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
Management and Cost Accounting, 6 th edition, ISBN © 2004 Colin Drury MANAGEMENT AND COST ACCOUNTING SIXTH EDITION COLIN DRURY.
Briefing for financial market analysts 30 April 2013 Draft report on the effectiveness of information disclosure regulation at Auckland Airport.
Part Three: Information for Decision-making Chapter Ten: Pricing Decisions and Profitability Analysis Use with Management and Cost Accounting 8e by Colin.
Designing High Quality Assessments that are Affordable: Conclusions and Recommendations John F. Olson CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit,
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition
K Andy Pricing Case Pricing Case.
Information for Decision-making Chapter Ten:
The University of Texas System Assessment of
Presented to IEEE Standards Education Committee 11 April 2014
SAT and Accountability Evidence and Information Needed and Provided for Using Nationally Recognized High School Assessments for ESSA Kevin Sweeney,
Alternate Assessment Updates
2014 Fall Assessment Conference Assessment Program Update
F1: What’s New for Grade 8 Assessments?
To Consortia, or not to Consortia
Project Overview.
Getting the Most Value for Your Assessment Dollar: Cost Analysis for the New Kentucky Assessment System John F. Olson Assessment Solutions Group CCSSO.
Presentation transcript:

Getting the Most Value for Your Assessment Dollar: Cost Analysis for the New Kentucky Assessment System John F. Olson Assessment Solutions Group CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 23, 2010

Overview The ASG Cost Model was used to develop the cost of the new Kentucky assessment system components. ASG’s report provided the KDE with a realistic estimate of the cost of the key components of its new 2012 assessment system that can be used for budgeting purposes. Modeling the costs of the new system using the actual design of the new assessment program will provide an accurate estimate of the costs KDE should expect to see when it bids the program in 2010 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 2

Overview (cont.) ASG model outputs also allowed the KDE to gain a deeper understanding of the costs of the various components of each assessment This provides KDE the ability to make trade-offs in assessment program design prior to competitive bidding in order to develop the highest quality and cost-effective assessment for the budgeted dollars. The ASG Cost Model is a variable input, metric-based calculation output model. Specific assessment program variables are input to the model and applied against cost factors to derive assessment cost Several hundred variables are contained in the model. The cost for the entire assessment is built from the ground up, element by element, function by function. Costs are provided for total assessment, by year, by content area, by grade, and by functional activity. Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 3

Key Program Elements & Assumptions The new 2012 Kentucky assessment system consists of the following elements: Combined CRT/NRT assessments in Math grades 3-8, 11 Reading grades 3-8, 10 Science grades 4, 7, 11 Social Studies grades 5, 8, 11 A writing test grades 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 A writing editing & mechanics exam grades 4, 8, 12 Two forms of each assessment will be developed for year 1 (2012) with a new form developed each subsequent year. Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 4

Key Program Elements & Assumptions Assessments will be given to students during the last two weeks of the school year, as specified in the new state law (May – early June). Test results will be mailed to parents and posted online in August. For this study ASG calculated: Incremental year zero (2011) costs required to develop and field test the items to be used in the operational, year one (2012) administration Ongoing total assessment costs for the years 2012, 2013, and 2014 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 5

Year 0 Costs Cost by functional area for Year 0 (2011) Note that ASG’s base case assumes year 0 work is priced at a 50% margin, which is typical of “transition year” programs. Year 0 work also is shown at a 30% margin. September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 6

2012 Costs Cost for each functional area and cost per student – Year 1 (2012) September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 7

2012 Cost by Content Area Total cost by content area – Year 1 (2012) September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 8

Cost by Grade Total cost for the Kentucky assessment program by grade (2012 – 2014) Note: grades 4 and 8 are tested more frequently; consumable test books are used for grade 3 September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 9

Cost by Content Area & Grade Costs for the Kentucky assessment program by content area & grade for 2012 – September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 10

Total Program Costs Total program costs for September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 11

Total Costs and Key Metrics by Year Total program costs and key metrics by year for September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 12

Summary of Impact of Options/Changes in Costs September 28, Assessment Solutions Group Confidential Chart shows cost savings or increases related to various options/changes to the program for

Summary, Conclusions, & Recommendations ASG performed a special study analyzing the costs of the new Kentucky 2012 assessment system Year 0 (2011) activities – item development and field testing Years 1 – 3 ( ) – full administration of new assessment A vendor performing efficiently is expected to price the year 0 activities at $3.2M and the total program costs for years at $12.5M, $12.7M, and $13.2M respectively Consistent with other NCLB state programs, the key costs are in the item development, scoring, and printing areas ASG performed a number of scenarios to consider what could change the cost picture significantly September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 14

Summary, Conclusions, & Recommendations ASG’s analysis finds the total cost and cost per student of the new Kentucky assessment system appear to be in a reasonable range for a high stakes, NCLB-type state assessment. Metrics and benchmarks used in the analysis represent those of an efficient contractor realistically bidding on the program The proposed item release rate and use of NRT components require only one form per year which significantly controls costs. September 28, 2009 Assessment Solutions Group Confidential 15

Summary, Conclusions, & Recommendations ASG recommends that the KDE consider ways to improve the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of the new assessment system in the future. When developing the RFP for the new Kentucky assessment program it will be critical to have a clearly written proposal that calls for the vendor to submit the metrics and specifications outlining their understanding of the program requirements. September 28, Assessment Solutions Group Confidential