27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review1 Status & Plans of the TDWG Mission Statement What Do We have to Guide Us ? Caveats & Concerns Current & Anticipated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Advertisements

Final Commissioning Plan and Schedule Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 09/27/2004 Outline: - Work to be done during shutdown - Work.
The trigger1 The Trigger YETI 7th January 2008 Emily Nurse Outline: Why do we need a Trigger? The trigger system at CDF Rate control at CDF Triggering.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb -1 Chris Hays 1, Ashutosh Kotwal 2, Ye Li 3, Oliver Stelzer-Chilton 1 1 Oxford University.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
Status & Goals of LHC 1 1pb-1 of delivered and recorded luminosities reached! As of this morning: Delivered: 1420 nb-1 Recorded: 1245 nb-1 New record Inst.
DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Initial Step to go beyond 200E30 Ted TDWG, Sept 1st 2006.
UCSB CDF Group, DOE Site visit, Jan 18, J. Incandela 1 Top Physics at CDF ++ Top Quark and New Physics with an eye toward the LHC Work completed.
UCSB Top Quark Analyses On CDF J.Lamb, C.Hill, J. Incandela, C. Mills DOE Visit January 20, 2004.
July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Nick Hadley Run II Physics (I) Nick Hadley The University of Maryland New Perspectives 2000 Fermilab - June 28, 2000.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January
Trigger Menus Invisible Higgs input to trigger menus for initial running 4/9/2007 Invisible Higgs CSC Note meeting Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL.
News Ted & Kirsten June 10, 2005 TDWG. Meet Trigger Reps today? Exotic Trigger Reps: Vadim and Oscar doing great work QCD Trigger Rep: Mary herself EWK.
September 30, 2004FTK meeting1 Making the FTK Physics Case M. Shochet 9/30/04.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
TDAQ Upgrade Software Plans John Baines, Tomasz Bold Contents: Future Framework Exploitation of future Technologies Work for Phase-II IDR.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Simple ideas on how to integrate L2CAL and L2XFT ---> food for thoughts Ted May 25th, 2007.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Plenary Physics Meeting, 17 June 05 Per Jonsson Imperial College London 1 Higgs Searches with 1 fb -1 Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.
ATLAS Trigger Development
Physics Results from CDF and Prospects for a FY 2011 Run Kevin Pitts / University of Illinois DOE S&T Review of Scientific User Facilities June 30 – July.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Performance Requirements J. Lewis Level 2 Loya Jurga 7 December 2001.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK ``Physics Tables’’ for Commissioning Run -- TDWG l TDWG collected information from detector groups during CDFWEEK äHow.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Tim Christiansen (CERN), Claudio Campagnari (UCSB), and Benedikt Hegner (CERN) for the Top-Physics Group AOD/PAT-tuples: Top-PAG Plans and Needs for the.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
News and Related Issues Ted & Kirsten May 27, 2005 TDWG News since last meeting (April 29th) Organization Issues: how to improve communication Future Plans:
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Status and Prospects of D0 Run2 Michael Kirby, Radboud University Nijmegen NIKHEF Jaarvergadering Dec 21, 2005.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
SESAPS November 11, B. Scurlock, University of Florida1 Bobby Scurlock Darin Acosta Paolo Bartalini Richard Cavanaugh Alexey Drozdetskiy Guenakh.
SuperB: Other experiments session LHCb/LHCb upgrade (see LHCb web site/search Google) & NA62 Adrian Bevan Caveats: (i) this is based on the LHCb upgrade.
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Trigger  Detectors at 420m can be included in the HLT
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Presentation transcript:

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review1 Status & Plans of the TDWG Mission Statement What Do We have to Guide Us ? Caveats & Concerns Current & Anticipated Performance Summary Dave Waters University College London

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review2 Mission Statement “Implement a trigger that maximizes the physics return on the luminosity delivered to CDF” Assumes that physics priorities are identified & agreed upon. Often this is clear (e.g. M TOP, M W, B S ), but sometimes not. Implies minimizing deadtime even at highest L INST. Requires an understanding of the sensitivity of different measurements to instantaneous luminosity. Hard, especially for precision measurements. Requires an understanding of the back-up trigger requirements of the various analyses. Even harder. Implies ease of analysis of resulting datasets.

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review3 The Problem Muon Extension Trigger Cross-Section (nb) physics cross-section extrapolation uncertainties can be large

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review4 Luminosity Dependence … Examples Studies indicate that these analyses can use all available luminosities. MWMW Switch to lepton fit when MET resolution is too degraded. M top Chris Hays Effect of additional min-bias events is well accounted for by jet corrections (function of N VTX ). O(100) MeV uncertainty. Will need sufficient backups to properly determine & validate jet corrections in the presence of several overlapping MB events. U-K.Yang

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review5 What Do We Have To Guide Us ? Inertia : Physics Table N is based on Physics Table N-1. RunIIb Physics Priority & Triggers Committee’s Straw Table: Straw 3E32; Ristori et al.

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review6 Caveats Has anything changed regarding the assumptions made by Luciano’s committee ? Performance of the planned upgrades : still to be determined. Trigger rate extrapolations assume continuity (no “phase changes”). Always new ideas for new triggers & upgrades that could further enhance overall performance. What’s missing or incomplete ? Detailed understanding of high priority exotics triggers on the “waiting list”, and what needs to be done to ensure they can run at the highest luminosities. e.g. triggers for Higgs searches (MET + jets; Higgs multijet) A real understanding of backup triggers : requirements & rates. Understand where B-physics triggers fit in at high luminosity.

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review7 Veronique Boisvert A small selection of existing top & electroweak backup triggers fills up spare bandwidth. The main lesson at this point is that we can’t do nothing - some hard work required to figure out which of these we really need at high luminosity. Potentially still some gaps : limited statistics for b-tagging studies & p-scale from . overlap with mainline signal triggers ~ 10-20% The Backup Trigger Problem

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review8 Current Trigger Status We are in the epoch of grand-unification (Kirsten, Ted & Veronica) : we run a single trigger table at all luminosities use all tools available to achieve that (DPS, UPS, lumi-enable, CLCM) We’re up to date : run Level-3. Hopefully the last (but one ?) change in online software version - it’s a major exercise to upgrade. We have implemented or are busy implementing the less controversial recommendations of the Run IIb committee : changes to EM & Jet L1 thresholds drop RP & single-gap triggers SUSY dilepton triggers  (4,8) GeV asymmetric cuts Implementation of core Run IIb trigger table by November. We’re not just cutting but still adding triggers where it makes sense or people have good ideas : CMP (muon  -gap) trigger. extended  trigger.

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review9 ~ 630 Hz L2A ~ 800 Hz L2A Current Trigger Performance Shutdown work : new converter nodes & load balancing / system-optimisation. Will soon start probing the acceptance phase ~1 kHz (function of L).

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review10 Current Trigger Performance WAIT_BUSY deadtime “the wall” ~ 630 Hz L2A ~ 800 Hz L2A

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review11 Recent & Ongoing Upgrades XFT L1 & L2 3D tracking & L2 Timescale : complete hardware commissioning by 1 st September. L1 L2 EVB/L3 CSL L2 Pulsar & SVT : complete. ~ 40 kHz ~ 1 kHz ~ 40 MB/s EVB : highest luminosity : complete. L3 processing  2.4 THz : complete. CSL : MB/s Timescale : commissioning by 30th September. N.B. this is not a complete list : TDC’s, L3 performance optimisation …

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review12 Summary We do have a plan for dealing with the highest luminosities. Some significant gaps remain - e.g. full understanding of backup trigger requirements. Not much breathing space to react to the unknown : Rates grow faster than expected. Reduction factors from upgrades are smaller than expected. Discovery ;-) Other considerations for maximising physics reach : Keeping triggers simple and straightforward to simulate. Minimising numbers of trigger changes. Dataset continuity.

27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review13 The End