© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Concept innatism II: the case of substance Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Malcolm’s ontological argument Michael Lacewing
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Meditation One What is the objective of the Meditations? Hint: look at second sentence of Med. I.
EPISTEMOLOGY Section 3. Descartes’ Doubt If it is possible that I am dreaming now, then I have reasons to doubt whether my current perceptual beliefs.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
Results from Meditation 2
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations The Wax Example. The Extension of the Cogito For even if, as I have supposed, none of the objects of imagination are real, the power.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
Meditation 6. Trusting the Senses The senses certainly appear real. Rejects God or himself as the source of sense impression & concludes they are real.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descartes’ Interactionist Dualism. Overview Descartes’ general project Descartes’ general project Argument for dualism Argument for dualism Explanation.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
The argument for the existence of bodies (Meditation 6) 1.Nature provided me with a strong propensity to believe there are bodies. 2.The only way I could.
Rene Descartes ( ) The Father of Modern Philosophy
Meditation 2. The Cogito Like a drowning man – head sinks below water and yet cannot put feet on river bed. Panic! Needs an Archimedean Point – a sure.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
Meditation 3. Clear & Distinct Ideas Knows that he, “a thinking thing”, exists. Believes he exists because it is so “clearly and distinctly” so – this.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes II. First Argument for the Existence of God (P1)There must be at least as much reality and perfection in a cause as in its effect. (P2)If an.
 Try to think of color without attaching it to an item.  A concept such as color may only exist in our realm as it is attached to another object. 
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Substance and Property Dualism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
The Ontological Argument
Skepticism.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
On your whiteboards: 3 differences between philosophical scepticism and everyday incredulity What is meant by “infinite regress”? Why is it a problem.
Is the concept of substance innate?
Dualism.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Descartes and Hume on knowledge of the external world
Presentation transcript:

© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing

Into doubt We can be deceived by our senses.

Into doubt (2) There are ‘no certain indications by which we may clearly distinguish wakefulness from sleep’.

The cogito I am certain that I think, I exist. I am a thinking thing. But I am not certain I have a body. = ?

The wax argument At first, our idea of the wax is of something defined by its sensory properties. But this is muddled: when I melt a piece of wax, it loses all of its original sensory qualities, yet I believe it is the same wax. This shows our conception of material objects, when clear and distinct, is as changeable and extended.

The external world: two steps to go Meditation V: we can know that clear and distinct ideas are true; so material objects really are extended, if they exist at all. Meditation VI: We have experiences of an external world, which must either be caused by a real external world or God. God is not a deceiver. Therefore material objects do exist.

Clear and distinct ideas On the cogito: ‘In this first item of knowledge there is simply a clear and distinct perception of what I am asserting’. While thinking it, I cannot doubt it. In order to be certain of clear and distinct ideas while we are not considering them, we must first prove God exists.