Meditation 1. Argument From Illusion We needn’t reject sources of knowledge one by one – we can reject by class. Authorities – parents, books, famous people,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

Philosophy Through the Centuries
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Perception & the External World
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
© Michael Lacewing Scepticism Michael Lacewing
The evil demon argument. I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
The Ontological Argument
René Descartes ( ). The popular version of Descartes.
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
1.Why does Descartes want certainty? 2.What area of philosophy was Descartes concerned with? 3.Explain the differences between the sceptical approach and.
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
The Evil Demon Argument
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Skepticism The Dreaming Argument. The First Meditation A ll that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and certainty,
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ First Meditation
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
Descartes & Rationalism
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Descartes’ Meditations
The Dreaming Argument.
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Meditation 6. Trusting the Senses The senses certainly appear real. Rejects God or himself as the source of sense impression & concludes they are real.
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
DESCARTES MEDITATION 1. René Descartes
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 10 Epistemology #3 (Berkeley)
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
Meditation 2. The Cogito Like a drowning man – head sinks below water and yet cannot put feet on river bed. Panic! Needs an Archimedean Point – a sure.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
Meditation 3. Clear & Distinct Ideas Knows that he, “a thinking thing”, exists. Believes he exists because it is so “clearly and distinctly” so – this.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Bouwsma and the evil demon. Bouwsma’s Goal Bouwsma tries to show that in the evil demon scenario we are not actually deceived. Contrary to what Descartes.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism.
Skepticism Introduction.
Descartes’ Meditations
Philosophy and History of Mathematics
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
The Evil Demon Argument
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Descartes Scepticism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
On your whiteboards: 3 differences between philosophical scepticism and everyday incredulity What is meant by “infinite regress”? Why is it a problem.
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
First Meditation – paragraph 1
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Meditation 1. Argument From Illusion We needn’t reject sources of knowledge one by one – we can reject by class. Authorities – parents, books, famous people, etc can’t be trusted – they have been known to lie and be in error. Descartes accepts – though not Empiricist – that the senses are a major source of knowledge. But the senses give us false info regularly – sticks look bent in water, mirages, etc. So reject all sense experience as a class! Wait a minute – this is going too far – I’m certain of sitting here before the fire, etc. “It would be imprudent to trust what has deceived us even once.” Descartes. 1 st Meditation.

Meditation 1. Argument From Dreaming Descartes talks about it being certain he sits before a fire in his pyjamas, book in hand. Sense experience is obviously real! But what if this is a dream? Can I tell the difference – always and for certain – between dream and reality? But even if dreaming, the images fused in even bizarre dreams are from “reality” - shapes, colours, numbers, etc. So ideas remain even if senses are questioned. A priori is stronger that a posteriori! “Awake or sleeping, two and three added together always make five, and a square never has more than four sides – truths so apparent can’t be suspected of any falsity or uncertainty.” 1 st Meditation

Meditation 1. Evil Demon (1) The senses can’t be trusted, We don’t know if we are awake or dreaming. All a posteriori knowledge doubtful. It’s not impossible that it’s not God who controls things but an evil demon with omnipotent power. God wouldn’t deceive us but an evil demon might. So we could be fooled about maths and other a priori matters too! All “knowledge” – outer and inner now is profoundly uncertain. “I will suppose that there is an evil demon, supremely evil and cunning, who works as hard as he can to deceive me.” 1 st Meditation

Meditation 1. Homework. Purpose:- Knowledge of flow of argument. Use Beginner’s Guide to Descartes’ Meditations, & class notes. Either – Write a diary entry for the day of the 1 st Meditation. Write the 1 st Meditation as a sports commentary. Write as Descartes talking to his therapist. Dialogue? Write as the evil demon. 600 words min.