Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Haze Update & Current Results Michele Notarianni Brenda Johnson EPA Region 4.
Advertisements

Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Technical Support System Review / / RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Conference.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
WRAP Status Report EPA/RPO Meeting Durham, NC February 6, 2002.
Fall Technical Conference Regional Haze SIP Development Snowbird, Utah September , 2002.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
An Update on the Colorado Regional Haze SIP Process and Outcomes Presented at: WRAP – Implementation Work Group San Francisco, CA March 2005.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
Status of Technical Analysis Technical Oversight Committee September 14, 2006.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
October 29, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
Ozone and NOx in the West WRAP November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico Don Arkell Regional Haze Implementation.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Navajo Nation Interest’s In EPA Rulemakings Affecting EGU’s National Tribal Forum May 22-24, 2012 Tulsa, Oklahoma Anoop Sukumaran, Navajo Nation Environmental.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
Putting the Pieces Together OTC Fall Meeting November 2-3, 2005 Planning to Meet the SIP Submittal Deadlines.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
WESTAR Staff Reports 2015 Fall Business Meeting Scottsdale, Arizona.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
May 23, 2013 Don Arkell WESTAR Staff WESTAR Council Meeting Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association.
1 Spring Business Meeting Regional Haze SIP Development Survey San Francisco, California April 9, 2003.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
Status of WRAP Work Plan Tom Moore, WRAP September 19, 2002 WESTAR Fall Technical Conference.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
OTC Control Strategy Committee Meeting Tad Aburn, Chair, Multi-P Workgroup October 5, 2005 The OTC Multipollutant Model Rule.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
April 17, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update Combined Session – Emissions and Fire Emissions Joint Forums – Missoula, MT September.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
State Regional Haze SIP Development Critical Path for Western States.
WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Regional Haze Planning Training.
WESTAR Staff Reports  Technical Coordinator Report  Regional Haze Planning Report  Training Program Report.
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
2012 Spring Business Meeting Seattle, Washington
2013 Fall Business Meeting Denver, Colorado
Western Regional Haze Planning and
EPA Clarification on Regional Haze SIP Issues
Market Trading Forum Update
WESTAR Planning Committee Report
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Report
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011

Draft-Do Not Cite or Quote Regional Haze SIP/FIP Status (September 2011) 66 States with final SIPs submitted (also AK) San Juan GS FIP (FINAL) States that have not submitted SIPs (also HI and VI) Proposed SIP or FIP7 22 Final SIP (full program) 33 Final SIP – BART only Four Corners and Navajo FIPs

Due Dates for Updates 308 States: Progress report due 5 years from submittal of the first haze plan and must be in the form of an implementation plan revision (51.308(g)). 309 States: State must submit progress report in 2013 (51.309(d)(10)); also must be in SIP form. Comprehensive plan revision (51.308(f)) due in 2018 and every 10 years thereafter.

Regional Haze 5-Year Updates Under 40 CFR (g)(h)&(i) Description of the status of implementation of all measures (g)(1) Summary of emission reductions (g)(2) Assess visibility conditions in each Class I area, comparing baseline and current conditions (g)(3) Analysis of change in emissions over past 5 years (g)(4) Assess significant changes in anthropogenic emissions (g)(5) Assess whether current plan is sufficient (g)(6) Review State’s monitoring strategy (g)(7) Statement of adequacy of existing plan (h)(1, 2, 3) FLM consultation (i)(4) 309 States have additional and unique requirements (additional regional coordination projects)

Issues With 5-Year Updates Monitoring: Current, baseline and delta for five-year periods. IMPROVE data two-year delays. Different due dates for states. Focus on best and worst days. Emissions: Changes over the past 5 years. Different due dates. Baseline for TSS was 2002 with projections to Emission reductions that haven’t been approved. Some emission categories need work. RH emission reductions (including BART) not included in time frame. Need to keep emissions regionally defined. Wildfire: Huge and varying impacts in the West, not going away. Coordination with other states and FLMs.

Strategies for the 5-Year Update Continue to rely on regional support for the technical pieces (monitoring and emissions data) through a Regional Technical Report which consolidates time frames (work product desired late 2012). Utilize WRAP/WESTAR for continuing interstate and FLM consultation. In addition to regional technical report, keep telling the collective success story, in spite of frustrations and ongoing challenges.

Western Regional Technical Report for Haze SIP 5-year Progress Reports Analysis of Monitoring and Emissions Data Regional Products to assist States with RHR Planning October 31, 2011

Regional Haze Rule 5-year Progress Reports Regional Technical Analysis Monitoring – Use IMPROVE Report as starting point – Analyze IMPROVE Worst and Best Visibility Days’ data for each Class I area in the West – Compare “Baseline Period” to “First Progress Period” data – Analyze reasons for change in visibility – Develop state reports and review in detail with each state

Absolute change in dv from the baseline (2000–2004) to period 1 (2005–2009) for the 20% worst visibility days at 107 of the 110 IMPROVE regional haze tracking sites. Brown circles indicate degradation in the worst 20% visibility days, while blue circles represent improvement in worst 20% visibility days.

Absolute change in dv from the baseline (2000–2004) to period 1 (2005–2009) for the 20% best visibility days at 107 of the 110 IMPROVE regional haze tracking sites. Brown circles indicate degradation in the best 20% visibility days, while blue circles represent improvement in best 20% visibility days.

Fraction of hypothetical ammonium sulfate uniform rate of progress (URP) for the 20% worst visibility days at 107 of the 110 IMPROVE regional haze tracking sites from the baseline (2000–2004) to period 1 (2005–2009). Brown circles indicate degradation in the worst 20% visibility days due to ammonium sulfate extinction, while blue circles represent improvement in worst 20% visibility days due to ammonium sulfate extinction.

Historical data from EPA Clean Air Markets Division, Projections by WGA AQ program staff

Regional Haze Rule 5-year Progress Reports Regional Technical Analysis Emissions – Prioritize emissions analyses based on finding from analysis of IMPROVE monitoring data for Worst and Best Visibility Days for each Class I area in the West – Compare 2002 “Baseline” to 2008 WestJumpAQMS emissions Analyze changes in anthropogenic emissions Work with states to document reasons for those changes Analyze natural sources for change and variation

2008 Emissions Inventories from WestJumpAQMS will be used for Regional Haze 5-year Progress Reports Emissions, cont. – Link changes and variation in emissions to monitored data – Identify key emissions sources for further work in anticipation of 2018 full Regional Haze SIP revision due date – Develop state reports and review in detail with each state

Regional Haze Technical Report Timeline Analysis and review of IMPROVE Monitoring Data with individual states for each Class I area February 2012 start Inventory and Analysis of 2008 Emissions Data from WestJumpAQMS November 2011 start Series of calls with WRAP member agencies’ experts to review sources of emissions data Drafting of report mid-2012, final report targeted for Fall 2012