PlusDelta Panelist – engaging, knowledgeable, clear, informative, accurate, passionate; shifting presenters kept the day moving The King video was good.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Advertisements

RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Teacher Evaluation & APPR THE RUBRICS! A RTTT Conversation With the BTBOCES RTTT Team and local administrators July 20, 2011.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Lead Evaluator Training
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
English Now! Level D ELL Services Scoring The Writing Workshop Pretest and Posttest.
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 3. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review RTTT: The Big Picture (and resources) Common Language in Schools Priorities in the Teaching Standards.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Messaging Research & Literature Article Read Planning Visits (and HW) Artifact Review Support your local.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Technology Integration Happens a Lesson/Unit at a time…
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
PlusDelta Panelist -- dynamic, great, like the variety of speakers, good delivery, experienced, related to audience Focus on “what is known, not what is.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Backwards Design. Activity-Oriented Teaching Many teachers engage in “activity-oriented” teaching.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
PlusDelta Panel – nice mix, experience, well- organized, liked the variety, “highly effective”, Good overview, great activities, engaging, Needed a break.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning.
PlusDelta Panel - team approach, highly engaging, interesting, interaction, Good overview of APPR, great activities, good pacing & clarification of CCLS.
PlusDelta Panelist -- charismatic, interesting, engaging, inspirational to hear educators w/such broad and varied backgrounds, like the variety of speakers.
Fall River Public Schools Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support ELL Initiatives & RETELL.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research: Principal Characteristics Time Out: §3012-d Planning Forest or the Trees? Making a “To-Do”
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
BY MADELINE GELMETTI INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS IN MEASURES OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Mission Erie 1 BOCES commits to those we serve students, staff and communities by understanding, anticipating and responding to their needs. Administrative.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
APPR Update School Year.
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Update School Year.
Inter Rater Reliability
Presentation transcript:

PlusDelta Panelist – engaging, knowledgeable, clear, informative, accurate, passionate; shifting presenters kept the day moving The King video was good. The video of the lesson was meaningful. More videos. Good information on APPRNeed more on APPR and rubrics Directions were clearDirections were confusing Lunch was goodNeed: whole wheat, more diet soda, tables outside for lunch, more vegetables, more water, dark chocolate Enjoyed sharing with other districts; Liked the dialogue with teams and districts Team talk; Need more inter-table talk Humor helped to relieve some potential boredom Need more examples & exemplars

2 ExemplarGrade Level Content AreaStandardsTime Straw Man Outline for an Intense Engagement 7Addition and subtraction of rational numbers 7.NS.1, 7.NS.3 15 days Monk’s Words We Live By MSAmerican History - Constitution RI , 5, & 6; W , 4 & 9) 2 days Gettysburg Address HSAmerican History – Civil War RI ; RI , SL ; and L days The Making of a Scientist MSELARI & 8; W.5.2, 4 & 9; SL.5.1; L days

1. Teaching Standards 2. Evidence-based observation techniques grounded in research 3. Application & use of student growth percentile model & VA model (30-2.2) 4. Application & use of the State-approved teacher or principal rubric(s) 5. Application & use of any assessment tools 6. Application & use of State approved locally selected measures 7. Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System 8. Methodology of how scores are generated/composite scores 9. Considerations for evaluating ELLs & SWDs 3

LevelState Assessments Local Measures Other 60 PtsOverall Composite Score Ineffective0-2 Score range locally determined 0-64 Developing Effective Highly Effective