January 12-13 2015 LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Management Process. Managing the Information Systems Project Focus of project management To ensure that information system projects meet customer.
Advertisements

Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Follow-Up Review of the APUL Project November 2-3, 2009 Dean A. Hoffer.
Chapter 2 The Analyst As Project Manager In Managing Information Systems 2.3.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
Project Management.
Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.
Making Sense of the WIC EBT IAPD IAPD Session of the 2014 WIC EBT User Group Meeting July 23, :00 AM to 12:00 PM Presented by Cheryl Owens, MAXIMUS.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
1 ®  Overview Benefits of a Good Construction Schedule Baseline Schedule Development Schedule Updating and Maintenance Managing Project Changes USACE.
Project Tracking and Scheduling Infsy 570 Dr. R. Ocker.
Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.
Project Managers Report Video Conference 172 Roy Preece 11 th December 2014.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
NEDM Construction Project Cost & Schedule Philosophy Vince Cianciolo, ORNL Physics Division Internal Cost & Schedule Review 02/11/2005.
January 23, 2014 Kim Wiita. Activities Completed Task Group has met 3 times since the Summer 2013 meeting: August 26, 2013 October 8, 2013 November 11,
HFT project Overview and Status October 14, 2010 F.Videbaek BNL.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) cost estimate December 2, 2014.
IT Project Management, Third Edition Chapter 6 1 Chapter 3: Project Time Management.
1 LEReC Funded! From: Fedotov, Alexei Sent: Thursday, May 14, :04 PM Subject: LEReC project approved Dear All, FYI. The LEReC project is now formally.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code - 706
Copyright 2008 Introduction to Project Management, Second Edition 2  Many people have heard the following sayings: ◦ If you fail to plan, you plan to.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Executive Summary Target Deployment – January 4, 2005 Actual Deployment – December 22, 2004.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
October 4-5, Status of ARRA funded AIPs Electron Lens Scope, Cost, and Schedule Wolfram Fischer October 4, 2010 Electron Lens.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Alexei Fedotov Project Management.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Al Pendzick LEReC Civil Construction.
LBNE Working Group Meeting December 20, :00– 5:00 PM Snake Pit.
Fleming College Quality and Risk Management Review Summary February 2, 2006.
TOF Project Construction Project Plan
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling (LEReC) Alexei Fedotov Project Management.
PIP PMG Project Controls Elmie Evans-Peoples PIP PMG Oct 25, 2012.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
January 4, 2007 Project Overview RHIC II Project Internal Cost Review Roberto Than Cryogenics Systems January 4, 2007.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project 3.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design.
1 US Cost & Schedule Summary W. R. Edwards US Project Manager CD-2/3a Review January 8, 2008 BNL.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Alex Zaltsman Power Amplifiers and LLRF.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting August 3, 2004.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Brenna Flaugher Sept. 24 th Lehman Review1 Run IIB Silicon Upgrade: Cost and Schedule Lehman Review Sept. 24, 2002 Brenna Flaugher Run IIB Silicon Project.
Mark Reichanadter LCLS October 9-11, 2007 LCLS BCR Overview and EIR LOIs Project Progress / Status Revised Project Baseline.
October 4-5, Status of ARRA funded AIPs Stochastic Cooling Alex Zaltsman October 4, 2010 Stochastic Cooling cost and schedule.
AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting P. Pile 6 Jan 2005 AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting 6 Jan 2005 Useful Links: RSVP Project : C-AD.
PPPL is Committed to the Success of NCSX Rob Goldston, Director Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory August 15, 2007.
Strykowsky 1Project Review November 2, 2005 NCSX Project Review November 2, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
Mitigation & Education (MES) Subcommittee Update Chris Jonientz-Trisler, FEMA Co-Chair.
 Project Time Management includes the processes required to accomplish timely completion of the project  Part of Triple Constraints  Managers often.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office February 2014 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
Cost and Schedule Breakout Session Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Independent Project Review (IPR) June 8-9, 2004 NCSX Project Review June 8-9, 2004 Cost, Schedule, and Project Controls Ron Strykowsky.
UK Project Plan (Finance & Risk) Alan Grant STFC DL RLSR 5 th April 2016.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office December 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
Schedule to completion, Risk and Critical Interfaces Roy Preece STFC RAL RLSR 16 th April 2015.
Schedule and Milestones Roy Preece STFC RAL FAC 17 th April 2015.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
Page Headline Project Management Cost & Schedule Review Rob Michnoff.
Status of the MICE Construction Project
LCLS-II Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Conventional Facilities
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
SHARE Special Project SHARE Benefits Optimization
Presentation transcript:

January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel

January Outline Since the July 2014 review Cost by WBS Contingency by WBS Major Procurements High Priority Items How LEReC will be controlled –Monthly status –Milestones Risk Summary 2

January Since the July 2014 Review July - DOE review August – subsystem leads estimate contingency by task September –Resource loaded schedule completed for presented baseline with SRF gun –Contractor and Deputy Project Manager are assigned to charge the project –List of High Priority Items* submitted –New AIP – RHIC Accelerator Design Infrastructure Upgrade (RADTIU) proposed November - High Priority Items & RADTIU approved December - New Project Controls personnel (Khianne Williams) begins work 3 * Equipment to be installed during the FY15 RHIC shutdown.

January Contingency Guidance 4

January Contingency examples 5

January Costs by WBS 6

January Contingency estimates by WBS 7

January Organizational Chart

January Resources 9 Total hours = C-AD hours = % of the labor is within the C-A department. Personnel have been identified and will be available when needed.

January Major Procurements 10 Defined as purchases near, or over $100k direct. Major procurements total $2,498K unburdened.

January High Priority Items 11 We received permission to purchase the items above so that they can be installed in Status will be provided at each monthly telecon with ONP.

January Assumptions for cost and schedule The following assumptions were made within the schedule. –LEReC is fully approved by 3 February –RHIC does not run at all in FY17, in the other FYs RHIC shuts down July each year and restarts January next year. The cost and the funding plan shown in the Execution plan is based on the above. Changes to the assumptions or funding plan may change the cost, schedule and milestones. 12

January Resource loaded schedule (RLS) Tasks for the Infrastructure Upgrade AIP remain in the LEReC RLS at no cost. They are off-project tasks but will be monitored as their status is linked to the timely completion of LEReC. The DC Gun is off-project scope. We are adding tasks in the schedule relating to the fabrication/installation of a stand for the Gun, as well as milestones whose dates we will take from the purchase order. The 9 MHz cavity is being developed off-project, but the LEReC RLS includes dates for its installation. The LEReC AIP will use equipment from the Energy Recovery Linac (ERL). The RLS uses a milestone date detailing when the ERL will be shut down and we may begin extraction of components. 13

January Project Schedule 14 There are currently over 1400 lines in the schedule, and 9 months of float from the planned early finish date to the Project Complete reporting milestone in 3QFY18.

January Critical path 15 The compensating solenoids are the current critical path. Funds were committed on Dec 24 th when Purchasing received our requisition, specs and statement of work. Purchase order # assigned Dec 29.

January Critical Tasks On-project Instrumentation for cooling section Warm cavities Off-project SRF gun testing Repair of SRF cavity HTS solenoid leads DC gun construction 16

January How the Project will be Statused 17 status requests in excel put the schedule in everyone’s hands each month. Highlighted cells point out the info needed now.

January Communication and Reporting Plan Alexei Fedotov, CPM, leads weekly meetings with the LEReC team to discuss progress, risks and concerns. Cost/schedule/status will be reviewed monthly and reported to ONP via and discussed in detail during monthly telecons. The standard BNL accounting system will be the basis for collecting cost data. The CPM will lead quarterly overall cost, schedule and technical performance reviews and report the results to the ONP. ONP may, at their discretion, conduct progress reviews with a committee of experts. Technical performance will be monitored throughout the project to insure conformance to approved functional requirements. Design reviews and performance testing of the completed systems will be used to ensure that the equipment meets the functional requirements. Schedule performance will be monitored via milestones. 18

January Milestones for reporting progress 19

January Milestones for us 20 There are 9 months of float from the early finish date to the Project Complete date.

January Risk 21

January Risk 22

January Summary Total cost is $8.3M Total contingency (bottom-up plus risk) is 26.1% Risks have been identified and are being addressed. The major risk to the project is the performance of the SRF gun, and as mitigation, a parallel effort (off project) with Cornell for a DC gun is in progress. KPPs/UPPs are defined and understood The schedule will continuously evolve and be statused. Personnel requirements were estimated. A dedicated team of people has been assigned to the project. 23