Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Preliminary Sizing PDR 26 September, 2000
Team Concept Biplane Configuration Square Fuselage Rectangular Wings Conventional Swept Tail Tail Dragger
Aircraft Specifications
Equipment Storage EquipmentVolume(in 3 ) Gear box 3 x 1.5 x 1 Motor2.25 x 1.5 Speed Controller1.5 x 1.25 x 1 Receiver 1.75 x 1.25 x 0.75 Gyro 1.5 x 1.25 x 1.25 Data Recorder 1.75 x 2.25 x 3.25 Battery(20) 2 x 1 x 1 Servo 1.5 x 1.25 x 0.75 Interface 1.25 x 3.5 x 5.75
Equipment Storage
Concept Description Biplane Pros: Cons: Shorter Wing Span Wing Interference Increase Turn Clearance Accessibility of Equipment Increase Roll Rate Maneuverability Transporting Less Need For High Lift Devices Decalage Provides Natural Stall Recovery Less Need For High Lift Devices Induced Drag Decalage Provides Natural Stall Recovery Accessibility of Equipment Biplane Configuration Pros:Cons:
Concept Description Square Fuselage Pros:Cons: Ease of Construction Aerodynamics Strong Bending Weak Twisting Equipment Storage Rectangular Wing Ease of Construction Aerodynamics
Concept Description Pros:Cons: Conventional Swept Tail Stalls at High Angles of Attack Construction Tail Dragging Landing Gear No Extra Control System Necessary For Nose Gear
SIZING and WEIGHT ESTIMATION METHOD -Set motor weight and properties -Set flight parameters -Use historical data to calculate initial Wto -Iterate to obtain wing area and Wto -Use S and Wto to build drag model -Use drag model to evaluate energy (each stage) -Find new battery weight based on energy required -Re-iterate S and Wto until values converge
HISTORICAL DATABASES
Constraint Equation Endurance take derivative and set =0.
Constraint Equation Rate Of Climb
Constraint Equation Turning (Thrust)(Velocity)=Power
Constraint Equation V-Stall Lift~Weight
Constraint Equation Cruise
Constraint Equation Take Off
Constraint Diagram
Questions?