JPSS Common Ground System NPP/J1 Algorithm Paradigm Shift IDPS Splinter May 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic SDLC Models.
Advertisements

Value-at-Risk: A Risk Estimating Tool for Management
NPP Calibration and Validation Rehearsals Janna H. Feeley NASA JPSS Ground Project Greenbelt, MD The Aerospace Corporation El Segundo, CA AMS 2012 Overview.
Information Technologies Page 1 Information Technologies Page 1 Information Technologies Page 1 Information Technologies Page 1Information Technologies.
NPOESS Status Andrew Heidinger, VIIRS OAT co-chair and Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS/Office of Research and Applications Madison, Wisconsin July 27, 2006.
Scheduling The Project  Scheduling Planning, budgeting and scheduling are all part of the same process Planning a project, developing a budget for it,
Allocation of Frames Each process needs minimum number of pages
JPSS POE Estimate Algorithm & Data Products General Assumptions: – NPP Launched – J1 Launch – J2 Launch – FY12 actual cost reflects a 25% cut (reduced.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
NGAS CrIS SDR Cal/Val Activity and Highlights Oct 23, 2012 Lihong Wang, Chunming Wang, Denise Hagan and Degui Gu.
SWE Introduction to Software Engineering
Hardware/Software Integration in System-of-Systems Architecting: The Role of Systems Modeling University of Southern California Viterbi School of Engineering.
Query Evaluation. SQL to ERA SQL queries are translated into extended relational algebra. Query evaluation plans are represented as trees of relational.
Jump to first page Dr. Henry Deng Assistant Professor MIS Department UNLV IS 488 Information Technology Project Management.
Introduction to Project Management ECE 480 Erik Goodman.
Reviewing & Analyzing Schedule
Project Plan The Development Plan The project plan is one of the first formal documents produced by the project team. It describes  How the project will.
171 Use Case Descriptions Chapter 4 – Facade Iteration Initial Requirements (Inception Phase)
LSU 07/25/2004Estimating Costs1 Estimating Project Costs & Time Project Management Unit, Lecture 5.
About Waterloo website Project report June Outline Overview of process Project deliverables Lessons learned.
Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) Data Access NOAA Satellite Conference April 8-12, 2013 Kevin Berberich NESDIS/OSD NDE Project Photographs.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Information System Economics Software Project Cost Estimation.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for {JPSS Algorithm} Presented by Date.
Kerry Grant, Wael Ibrahim, Paula Smit, JPSS CGS Raytheon Intelligence, Information, and Services, Aurora, CO Kurt Brueske, JPSS CGS Raytheon Intelligence,
Project Planning & Estimating – Are we there yet?
S/W Project Management Software Process Models. Objectives To understand  Software process and process models, including the main characteristics of.
CPU Sizing vs. Latency Analysis FTS EDR Latency Simulation 5 March 2008 Doug Shannon.
Sentinel-3 Validation Team (S3VT) Meeting ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, th November 2013 General Presentation Template for S3VT meeting Project name.
The Project Plan IT Project Management COSC
1 JPSS Engineering Review Board (ERB) Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Product Configuration Change Request (CCR) Evaluation 9 May 2014.
1 Long Term Monitoring JPSS Algorithm Team Presented by Date.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
BSBPMG505A Manage Project Quality Manage Project Quality Project Quality Processes Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
JPSS Common Ground System IDPS NPP Algorithm Operability Verification – Launch Build Characterization Tentative Agenda IDPS OAA 5/10/11.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Extreme Programming (XP). Agile Software Development Paradigm Values individuals and interactions over processes and tools. Values working software over.
1 The GOES-R Rainfall Rate / QPE Algorithm Status May 1, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
NDE Title Page NDE NPOESS Data Exploitation Jim Yoe, Implementation Coordinator NPOESS Data Exploitation (NDE) Project NESDIS Office of Systems Development.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
JPSS Common Ground System Document Versioning - Update Milt Panas May 10, 2011 JPSS CGS Form J /22/2010.
Diane E. Wickland NPP Program Scientist NPP Science: HQ Perspective on VIIRS May 18, 2011.
The Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) is the next generation polar-orbiting operational environmental satellite system. The first satellite in the JPSS.
JPSS Common Ground System Baseline Management Process IDPS Splinter May 10, 2011.
Guidelines Revisions Defining What RTF Means by “Savings” December 17,
BSBPMG404A Apply Quality Management Techniques Apply Quality Management Techniques Project Quality Processes C ertificate IV in Project Management
Methods and Techniques for Integration of Small Datasets September 13-14, 2005 St. Louis, Missouri Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban.
Author: Haoyu Song, Murali Kodialam, Fang Hao and T.V. Lakshman Publisher/Conf. : IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), 2009 Speaker:
Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Common Ground System (CGS) Rapid Algorithm Updates Kerry Grant, JPSS CGS Chief Engineer Raytheon Intelligence and Information.
Page 1 Rapid Algorithm Integration in the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Common Ground System (CGS) Kerry Grant, Raytheon JPSS CGS Chief Scientist,
JPSS Common Ground System Block Build Plan Eric Ort IDPS Build Manager June JPSS CGS Form J /22/2010.
Evaluating EVM January 13, EVM Issues and Opportunities ▪ EVM Basics ▪ EVM Issues ▪ EVM ETC and EAC Calculations ▪ EVM Cost and Schedule Value Calculations.
NGAS ATMS Cal/Val Activities and Findings Degui Gu, Alex Foo and Chunming Wang Jan 13, 2012.
Establishing Project Scope 1. Factors Affecting Project Scope  The functionality that must be delivered to meet the user’s needs  The resources available.
VIIRS NCC Imagery at Beta CCR DR 4859 Dr. Thomas Kopp – Imagery Validation Lead Dr. Donald Hillger – Imagery Product Lead Mr. Ryan Williams - Imagery.
N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NPP DATA ACCESS Mitch Goldberg JPSS Program Scientist June 21, 2012.
NUMI MINOS MINOS Far Detector Installation & Commissioning Jeff Nelson MNHEP DoE Visit September, 2002.
SDR/EDR Overview Template Name of the Product: (SDR/EDR) Product Contributors: (SDR/EDR) Team Date: August xx, 2015.
Software project management 3rd Umer khalid Lecturer University of Lahore Sargodha campus.
JPSS Common Ground System Operational Algorithm Status – Launch Build Characterization Tentative Agenda IDPS OAA 4/5/11.
Continuous Delivery- Complete Guide
Spring 2013 Advising Starts this week.
Enterprise Algorithm Change Process
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
NOAA Report on Satellite Data Calibration and Validation – Satellite Anomalies Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 3 Author: Weng.
NOAA-20 and Suomi NPP ATMS On-orbit Performance
[Project Name] Project Report
[Project Name] Project Report
Titan Flyby Altitude – Tour Updates Upcoming Observations in 2006
Presentation transcript:

JPSS Common Ground System NPP/J1 Algorithm Paradigm Shift IDPS Splinter May 10, 2011

JPSS Common Ground System Page 2  Issue: Planned algorithm drops for 2011 and 2012: –2.1 Planned Drops are currently expected too early in the lifecycle when compared with reality –2.1 Planned Drops are assumed to be larger/more complex than the changes we’ll see from NPP Cal/Val –2.1 Planned Drops are tied into 2.1 development timeframe, significantly lengthening their implementation/delivery schedule –Briefed at the IDPS Splinter on April 5, 2011 Government confirmed the dates are unrealistic Government provided very rough dates that are significantly farther out in the schedule (VIIRS and CrIS in particular would likely not close with 2.1 development schedule) Government also confirmed their limited resources will be entirely consumed by NPP Cal/Val in the near term, and that any major changes to algorithms will likely occur on the NPP Cal/Val path vs. reactions to J1 sensor deltas Algorithm Paradigm Shift - Overview

JPSS Common Ground System Page 3 Near-Term: Major Drops Currently Expected for NPP and J1 EDR Algorithm Adjustments Adjustments to VIIRS EDR Algorithms (part 2) Adjustments to VIIRS EDR Algorithms (part 3) Adjustments to CrIMSS EDR Algorithms OMPS TC & NP EDR Algorithms Changes to these algorithms will occur during NPP Cal/Val and subsequent operations, but they won’t arrive in bulk packages via the 2.1 Algorithm Drop Schedule CrIMSS “State 2” will likely go into NPP processing (government won’t want to wait until 2017 to have them implemented and validated)

JPSS Common Ground System Page 4 PRO LRE ESLOC Hours (FY’11 – FY’16) Note: "Other" includes ADL, PRO Common tasks (Det. Design, CUT, SWIC), Sensor Characterization, and SPCR Workoff

JPSS Common Ground System Page 5 Options 1) Re-Baseline near-term drop hours (within WBS 4.1) associated with VIIRS, CrIMSS, OMPS to line up with when we expect unique J1 algorithm drops to be delivered FY14/15 Pros: Moves hours out of ’11 - ’13 and in line with the projected work; Keeps all 2.1 Alg hours intact for later development Cons: NPP Alg baseline will move ahead of 2.1 Alg baseline until 2.1 Alg work begins; PRO Development team will have a bathtub (4-6 heads) in summer of ’12 due to hours moving to the right; Alg drops will not happen as defined. 2) Re-Purpose near-term drop hours (from WBS 4.1 to WBS 7.1) to line up with CalVal activities associated with NPP Pros: Moves hours to where the actual ‘12/’13 algorithm work will be performed; Keeps NPP & 2.1 Algorithms in sync; Keeps PRO Alg staff in tact and working high priority tasks (Cal/Val) Cons: Requires movement of some hours from Development (WBS 4.1) to Sustainment (WBS 7.1); Hours associated with these drops will not be available for future J1 work

JPSS Common Ground System Page 6 Backup

JPSS Common Ground System Page 7 Near-Term: Major Drops Currently Expected for NPP and J1 EDR Algorithm Adjustments Adjustments to VIIRS EDR Algorithms (part 2) Adjustments to VIIRS EDR Algorithms (part 3) Adjustments to CrIMSS EDR Algorithms OMPS TC & NP EDR Algorithms Changes to these algorithms will occur during NPP Cal/Val and subsequent operations, but they won’t arrive in bulk packages via the 2.1 Algorithm Drop Schedule CrIMSS “State 2” will likely go into NPP processing (government won’t want to wait until 2017 to have them implemented and validated) A-DCS, SARR/SARP, SEM Instrument Data These are not on J1 anymore – can be deferred to J2 and DWSS 5 days worth of NPP flight EVCDUs for all VCIDs from SVALBARD These would be the proxy data for J1; a similar dataset will still need to be generated (we would likely participate in that via the Test Data Working Group) Also need to consider the need for NPP test data derived from NPP operations FTS LRD/HRD algorithms This work will still exist and should probably be treated as development (but it requires further refinement of the FTS strategy in general)

JPSS Common Ground System Page 8  1) Replacement of near-term NPP and longer-term J1 algorithm drops with a continuum of smaller changes during NPP Cal/Val and Operations  2) Deferment of applicable drops to the J2/DWSS timeframe (e.g., SEM- N)  3) Need dates for real NPP data to serve: (a) NPP era testing; and (b) testing of coefficients and lookup tables based on J1 sensor characterization  4) First-cut scheduling of an FTS branch, similar to NPP Sensor Characterization, assuming the same SLOC we had assumed before for FTS, concluding with a merging into the last pre-J1-launch maintenance build  5) Synchronization of builds: this really has two phases: (a) Synchronization of early NPP operations builds with 2.1 development builds; and (b) Synchronization of later NPP builds with both 2.1 development *and* J1 sensor-characterization-based LUT and coefficient updates; this is where we'll need the "middle branch" methodology again Algorithm Paradigm Shift