Dynamical fission in Sn induced reactions at 35 A. MeV CHIMERA-ISOSPIN Collaboration () () presented by Paolo Russotto INFN CT-LNS XII Nuclear Physics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Neck fragmentation time Semi-peripheral reactions: Fragmentation in a smaller region, but with larger cross section ! Possibility to better disantangle.

Advertisements

First results of reactions induced by exotic beams in the region of 11 Be with CHIMERA array EURORIB'10 -Lamoura, Jura, France June 6 th -11 th 2010 L.

PROBING THE DENSITY DEPENDENCE OF SYMMETRY ENERGY WITH HIC KITPC Workshop, Beijing, June09, “Recent Progress and New Challenges in Isospin.

Marina Barbui Trento, Italy, April 7-11, 2014

Alpha Stucture of 12 B Studied by Elastic Scattering of 8 Li Excyt Beam on 4 He Thick Target M.G. Pellegriti Laboratori Nazionali del Sud – INFN Dipartimento.

Reactions induced by 11 Be beam at Rex-Isolde. Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.

W. Udo Schröder University of Rochester, Rochester, NY Proximity Splitting W. Udo Schröder IWNDT International Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics and.

Structure effects in the reactions 9,10,11 Be+ 64 Zn at the Coulomb barrier Valentina Scuderi 10th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics, New.

Study of nuclear equations of state: the ASY-EOS experiment at GSI Simone Santoro 1,2 for ASY-EOS Collaboration 1 University of Messina 2 INFN - Catania.

ECT*, Trento 2013A. Chbihi1 Nuclear EOS at low density Abdou Chbihi GANIL.

Isospin Dependence of Intermediate Mass Fragments in 124Sn, 124Xe + 124Sn, 112Sn D. V. Shetty, A. Keksis, E. Martin, A. Ruangma, G.A. Souliotis, M. Veselsky,

E. De Filippo (INFN Catania) for the REVERSE / ISOSPIN collaboration Time sequence and isoscaling in neck fragmentation  Fragments production in peripheral.

WCI 2004: 3- SORTING Catania January 2004 WCI 2004 session 3: DATA SORTING Can we extract mechanism? Can we extract sources in space-time? What are the.

Structure and Reactions of Exotic Nuclei, February 2005 Francesco Cappuzzello N*  + 3n light nuclei via the ( 7 Li, 7 Be) reaction.

NECK FRAGMENTATION IN FISSION AND QUASIFISSION OF HEAVY AND SUPERHEAVY NUCLEI V.A. Rubchenya Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

1 Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants in complete fusion Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Flerov Laboratory.

E432a: Decay of Highly Excited Projectile-like Fragments Formed in dissipative peripheral collisions at intermediate energies 1.Understanding thermodynamic.

The ASYEOS Experiment at GSI Presentation by Simon Gannon University of Liverpool Supervisors: M. Chartier R. Lemmon 1.

Search for hyperheavy toroidal nuclear structures formed in heavy ion collisions Anna Sochocka and Roman Płaneta, M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics,

- Mid-rapidity emission in heavy ion collisions at intermediate energies - Source reconstruction - Free nucleon multiplicities - Neutron/proton ratio of.

Nonstatistical fluctuations for deep inelastic processes in 27 Al + 27 Al collision Introduction Experimental procedures Cross section excitation functions.

Laura Francalanza Collaborazione EXOCHIM INFN Sezione di Catania - LNS.

Peripheral collisions as a means of attaining high excitation –Velocity dissipation is key quantity R. Yanez et al, PRC (in press) Proximity emission as.

Semiempirical MonteCarlo for FAZIA Napoli, 3-5 October, 2007 Giovanni Casini INFN Florence Silvia Piantelli and Giovanni Casini.

Probing the nuclear EOS with fragment production Maria Colonna Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (Catania)

Maria Colonna Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (Catania) Dynamics and Thermodynamics with.

Dynamical fragment production in non-central heavy-ion collisions E *, J PLF* TLF* Sylvie Hudan, Indiana University EvaporationBinary breakupfragmentation.

European Science Foundation Exploratory Workshop How to Constrain the High Density Symmetry Energy HiDeSymE ne European Science Foundation Exploratory.

Neutron enrichment of the neck-originated intermediate mass fragments in predictions of the QMD model I. Skwira-Chalot, T. Cap, K. Siwek-Wilczyńska, J.

Charge Equilibration Dynamics: The Dynamical Dipole Competition of Dissipative Reaction Mechanisms Neck Fragmentation M.Di Toro, PI32 Collab.Meeting, Pisa.

C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.

RNB Cortina d’Ampezzo, July 3th – 7th 2006 Elisa Rapisarda Università degli studi di Catania E.Rapisarda for the Diproton collaboration 18 *

In-Medium Cluster Binding Energies and Mott Points in Low Density Nuclear Matter K. Hagel SSNHIC 2014 Trento, Italy 8-Apr-2014 Clustering and Medium Effects.

N/Z Dependence of Isotopic Yield Ratios as a Function of Fragment Kinetic Energy Carl Schreck Mentor: Sherry Yennello 8/5/2005 J. P. Bondorf et al. Nucl.

NS08 MSU, June 3rd – 6th 2008 Elisa Rapisarda Università degli studi di Catania E.Rapisarda 18 2.

Mid-peripheral collisions : PLF* decay Statistical behavior  isotropy  v H > v L  v L > v H P T TLF * PLF * 1 fragment v L > v H forward v H > v L backward.

FARCOS Femtoscope ancillary Array for Correlations & Spectroscopy G. Verde, INFN-Catania EXOCHIM collaboration, INFN (LNS-CT-MI-NA), Un. Messina, GANIL,

Reaction studies with low-energy weakly-bound beams Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud NN 2015Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.

The INFN Italy EXOTIC group Milano, Napoli, Padova, NIPNE Romania, Crakow Poland. Presented by C.Signorini Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Padova (Italy):

In-Medium Cluster Binding Energies and Mott Points in Low Density Nuclear Matter K. Hagel WPCF 2013 Acireale, Italy 7-Nov-2013 Clustering and Low Density.

February 12-15,2003 PROCON 2003, Legnaro-Padova, Italy Jean Charles THOMAS University of Leuven / IKS, Belgium University of Bordeaux I / CENBG, France.

The experimental evidence of t+t configuration for 6 He School of Physics, Peking University G.L.Zhang Y.L.Ye.

Production mechanism of neutron-rich nuclei in 238 U+ 238 U at near-barrier energy Kai Zhao (China Institute of Atomic Energy) Collaborators: Zhuxia Li,

LEA-COLLIGA 4 th Meeting November 14-16, 2011 IPN Orsay - Paris Study and comparison of the decay modes of the systems formed in the reactions 78 Kr+ 40.

Experimental Reconstruction of Primary Hot Fragment at Fermi Energy Heavy Ion collisions R. Wada, W. Lin, Z. Chen IMP, China – in JBN group.

Investigation of the freeze-out conﬁguration in the 197 Au Au reaction at 23 AMeV A.Sochocka Department of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer.

Second International Spes Workshop, LNL, 26 th - 28 th May 2014 Prompt collective oscillations with exotic beams Letter of intent for the SPES-ALPI facility.

Exploring the alpha cluster structure of nuclei using the thick target inverse kinematics technique for multiple alpha decays. The 24 Mg case Marina Barbui.

52° International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics Status of art of FARCOS Project L. Acosta 2,8, F. Amorini 2, A. Anzalone 2, L. Auditore 4,5, G. Cardella.

Signals for dynamical process from IMF-IMF correlation function

Entry distributions for fragments produced in deep-inelastic collisions with stable and radioactive beams For the PARIS collaboration W. Królas, M. Kmiecik,

FAST IN-MEDIUM FRAGMENTATION OF PROJECTILE NUCLEI

Ternary and quaternary reseparation of heavy colliding systems

International Workshop on Nuclear

Is the caloric curve a robust signal of the phase transition

POLITA T. Cap, J. Wilczyński, K. Siwek-Wilczyńska,

INDRA: Identification de Noyaux et Détection avec Résolutions Accrues

ISODEC – NEWCHIM Collaboration

Ternary Fission and Neck Fragmentation

124Sn + 64Ni (35AMeV) b- impact parameter

78Kr+40Ca and 86Kr+48Ca at 10A MeV

Jiansong Wang for NIMROD Collaboration

Pioneering work on neck fragmentation:

Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University

Reaction Dynamics in Near-Fermi-Energy Heavy Ion Collisions

Sensitivity of reaction dynamics by analysis of kinetic energy spectra of emitted light particles and formation of evaporation residue nuclei.

for NEWCHIM-ISODEC Collaboration

NECK FRAGMENTATION EVENT

Mid-peripheral collisions : PLF* decay

Physics with CHIMERA at LNS: recent results and future perspectives

Presentation transcript:

Dynamical fission in Sn induced reactions at 35 A. MeV CHIMERA-ISOSPIN Collaboration (*) (*) presented by Paolo Russotto INFN CT-LNS XII Nuclear Physics Workshop Marie and Pierre Curie Nuclear Structure and Low Energy Reactions September 21-25, 2005 Kazimierz Dolny, Poland

Analysed systems 124 Sn+ 64 Ni at 35 A.Mev  neutron rich 112 Sn+ 58 Ni at 35 A.Mev  neutron poor Phenomenon Fission of projectile like fragments (PLF) in peripheral and semi-peripheral reaction Competition Statistical “slow” equilibrated fission Vs “Dynamical” “fast” non-equilibrated fission E.De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, (2005) 100 Mo Mo at 19 A.MeV A.A. Stefanini et al., Z. Phys. A351 (1995) 167

1m 1° 30° 176° good angular resolution identification in mass and/or charge of the detected particles low detection threshold and high dynamical range in energy direct velocity measurement (TOF) The CHIMERA detector TARGET Beam REVERSE Forward part 1° 30° REVERSE Experiment: 688 Telescopes, forward part. ( ) 2003/2004- CHIMERA-ISOSPIN 1192 telescopes p t d 4 He 6 He 3 He Li H.I.  E-TOF  E-TOF M,E  E-E  E-E Z,E PSD LCP

NOTE:Z 2F =37-57  Z proj log scale AH/AL Mass asymmetries 2 < multiplicity < 7 (peripheral reactions)  Data Analysis focused on two heaviest fragments E 2F = kinetic energy of the two fragments Centrality of collision Coulomb ring <  V beam = 8 cm/ns Well defined PLF source: sequential scattering of PLF followed by its splitting into 2 fragments. The lighter fragments are emitted preferentially backwards in the PLF reference system, i.e., towards the target nucleus: Dynamical Fission

Angular distribution are not forward/backward symmetric.  fast process  Time interval between the two steps much shorter than PLF rotational time In the neutron rich system the Dynamical effects are stronger than in the neutron poor system In-plane (  ) and out-of-plane (  ) angles definition [A.A. Stefanini et al., Z.Phys. A 351(1995)167]] Note:V L par >4 cm/ns

Time estimation Time interval between collision and PLF splitting: fm/c Asymmetric cases (outside Coulomb ring)  shortest time scale: fm/c E.De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, (2005) E.De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, (2005) V.Baran et al., Nucl. Phys. A730, 329 (2004) Difference: ???  no models nor simulations capable of describing Dynamical fission DYN/TOT [%]

Conclusion Analysed system 124 Sn+ 64 Ni at 35 A.Mev 112 Sn+ 58 Ni at 35 A.Mev Peripheral and semi-peripheral reactions are basically binary:PLF+TLF We have analysed the sequential splitting of PLF in two fragments of comparable masses In 20-80% of cases we have observed a fast non-equilibrated dynamical fission of PLF (100<t<300 fm/c): this process is one or two order of magnitude faster than equilibrated fission In the neutron rich system the Dynamical effects are stronger (+10  30%) than in the neutron poor system We are not able to explain the reason of this difference because we have no models nor simulations capable of describing Dynamical fission Further analysis and theoretical model are required!!

COLLABORAZIONE ISOSPIN E. De Filippo b, A. Pagano b, E. Piasecki c, F. Amorini a, A. Anzalone a, L. Auditore d, V. Baran a, I. Berceanu e, J. Blicharska f, J. Brzychczyk g, A. Bonasera a, B. Borderie h, R. Bougault i, M. Bruno j, G. Cardella b, S. Cavallaro a, M.B. Chatterjee k, A. Chbihi l, M. Colonna a, M. D'Agostino j, R. Dayras m, M. Di Toro a, J. Frankland l, E. Galichet h, W. Gawlikowicz g, E. Geraci j, F. Giustolisi a, A. Grzeszczuk f, P. Guazzoni n, D. Guinet o, M. Iacono- Manno a, S. Kowalski f, E. La Guidara a, G. Lanzano b, G. Lanzalone a, N. Le Neindre h, S. Li p, S. Lo Nigro a, C. Maiolino a, Z. Majka g, M. Papa b, M. Petrovici e, S. Pirrone b, R. Planeta g, G. Politi b, A. Pop e, F. Porto a, M.F. Rivet h, E. Rosato q, F. Rizzo a, S. Russo n, P.Russotto a M. Sassi n, K. Schmidt e, K. Siwek-Wilczynska c, I. Skwira c, M.L. Sperduto a, J. C. Steckmeyer i, L. Swiderski c, A. Trifirò d, M. Trimarchi d, G. Vannini j, M. Vigilante q, J.P. Wieleczko l, J. Wilczynski r, H. Wu p, Z. Xiao p, L. Zetta n, and W. Zipper f a) INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy b) INFN, Sezione di Catania and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy c) Institute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Warsaw, Poland d) INFN, Gruppo Collegato di Messina and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Messina, Italy e) Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania f) Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland g) M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University, Cracow, Poland h) Institute de Physique Nucléaire, IN2P3 and Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France i) LPC, Ensi Caen and Université de Caen, France j) INFN, Sezione di Bologna and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, Italy k) Saha Institute Of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India l) GANIL, CEA, IN2P3, Caen, France m) DAPNIA/SPhn, CEA-Saclay,France n) INFN, Sezione di Milano and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano, Italy o) IPN, IN2P3-CNRS and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France p) Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou, China q) INFN, Sezione di Napoli and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli, Italy r) A. Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Swierk/Warsaw, Poland

Relative velocities between two fragments normalized to velocity resulting from Coulomb repulsion  Viola Systematics [D.J. Hinde et al., Nucl. Phys. A472, 318 (1987)] The velocity field of various parts of the PLF did not attain equilibrium as in statistical fission larger then 1 (+20%) in  plane dynamical region Note:V L par >4 cm/ns

 out =90° in-plane emission

Exponentially decreasing distribution: dynamical Flat distribution: statistical NOTE: TLF’s fragments have been cut off; V L par >4cm/ns. Dyn: -30°<  plane <45° Eq: -130°<  plane <-90° and -90°<  plane <130°

Dyn: -30° <  plane < 45° Eq: -130° <  plane < -90° and -90° <  plane <130°

NOTE: Angular coverage 1°<  lab < 30° log scale Outside Coulomb ring and largest asymmetries  neck emission [E.De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, (2005)]

V L par >4 cm/ns and Z 2F  Z proj PLF splitting into 2 main fragments Low velocity and Z 2F >Z proj Target remnants AH/AL Mass asymmetries E 2F  peripherality NOTE:in the highest asymmetry Z L >  9 Data Analysis focused on two heaviest fragments Conditions 2 < multiplicity < 7 (peripheral reactions) log scale

AH/AL Mass asymmetries E 2F  peripherality log scale

How to select peripherality in both system to compare them???????? Angular coverage 1°<  lab < 30° no Energy Transverse lcp, no Total Kinetic Energy Loss (TKEL) E 2F   TKEL and centrality of the collision The global variables show a similar behaviour for both system Selection of same percentage of events in the E 2F distribution

Example:velocity of the source of the two heaviest fragments

DYN/TOT [%] ( 124 Sn+ 64 Ni) – ( 112 Sn+ 58 Ni)