Agricultural Applications of FGD Materials Jim Roewer FGD Agricultural Use Workshop September 13, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976(TSCA) *passed by the United States Congress in 1976 *The TSCA is found in United States law at *addresses the production,
Advertisements

Coal Ash Use and Disposal Debra Pflughoeft-Hassett, Associate Gypsum Parameters 20 Fenton Avenue Grand Forks, North Dakota
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Attachment 5. Environmental Compliance EPA Regulations March
Coal Combustion Products and Electronic Waste Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
Coal Combustion Residuals Proposed Regulation Air and Waste Management Association Southern Section August 6, 2010.
The Proposed Part 115 Rules and Waste Utilization East and West Michigan Chapters of the Air and Waste Management Association & The Environmental Law Section.
Jan. EPA Final GHG Reporting Guidance (actually Dec ) Mar. 31stAnnual GHG Reporting AprilProposed HAPs or Mercury MACT July 1st Annual Toxic Release.
1 Impact of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule 2012 Annual ARIPPA Tech Convention August 22, 2012 Presented by: John Slade, Senior Consultant, All4.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mercury from Electric Utilities: Monitoring and Emission Reductions Greg DeAngelo & Tiffany Miesel Florida.
Toxic Substances Control Act TSCA Current Events Heighten Awareness for Semiconductor Industry SESHA Hill Country Chapter December 5, 2002.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. EPA Regulations Review Update: Subpart W NESHAPS (40 CFR 61) Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR Part 192) Andrea Cherepy, Phil Egidi, Reid.
Bergeson & Campbell, P. C. © 2011 Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., All Rights Reserved 1 EPA’s Chemical Data Reporting Rule Bergeson & Campbell,
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Rochelle Routman, PG Environmental Specialist Georgia Power
Coal Ash Ponds The Romeo and Juliet Story of Coal Fired Power Plants Society sees them as toxic together, but currently, one cannot exist without the other.
Hazardous Materials: Risky Business, Safe Solutions Suzanne Metz, Workers Compensation Program Randy Benson, Rural Healthcare Quality Network.
Use of FGD Byproducts in Agriculture: DOE Perspective Workshop on Research and Demonstration of Agricultural Uses of Gypsum and Other FGD Materials St.
Sandi Tabor V.P. Government Affairs Lignite Energy Council Sandi Tabor V.P. Government Affairs Lignite Energy Council Environmental Issues.
1 REFINERY OILY RESIDUALS COST MINIMIZATION STRATEGY DSM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. P.O. Box Houston, TX (281)
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston Fossil Plant Knoxville.
Railroad Commission of Texas Pipeline Safety Division.
American Coal Ash Association Texas Coal Ash Users Group Austin, TX May 13, 2015 CCP Federal Regulation Update.
RCRA Record Keeping and Reporting For Small Quantity Generators
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
The Importance of FGD Gypsum To the CCP Industry By David Goss, Executive Director American Coal Ash Association OSU – EPRI Workshop St. Louis, September.
 Energy from Waste Mass burn technologies operating at extremely high temperatures Initially - no filtration for hazardous air emissions No federal or.
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
Federal CCB Regulations: Utility Industry’s Perspective Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference March 30, 2010.
CCB Regulation Update Jim Roewer APPA Energy & Air Quality Task Force April 26, 2010.
Adem.alabama.gov Coal Combustion Waste Regulation Stephen A. Cobb Governmental Hazardous Waste Branch Land Division.
SGP Worksheets Workshop Winston-Salem, NC December 12, 2000 George Cushnie NMFRC.
Coal Combustion Residuals Final Regulation August 19, 2015 Frank Ney U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 4.
CCR Final Rule Utility Perspective on Key Compliance Items
Our Creeping Progression to Anaerobic Digestion of Multiple Solid and Sludge Wastes How Regulations, Permitting and Policy are Affecting the Emergence.
Air & Waste Management Association September 13, 2012 The Cahaba Lilies Photo by Danny Smith U.S. Environmental Policy Issues and the Natural Gas Solution.
Jim Roewer Executive Director USWAG. CCR Background 1993 and 2000 Bevill Amendment Regulatory Determinations – Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) do not.
EPA’s Proposed CCB Regulations & Morgantown STAR Project 1 Shawn A. Seaman September 27, 2010
WRAP States Four Factor Reasonable Progress Lee Gribovicz WRAP IWG Meeting March 10, 2009.
Environmental Regulations. Learning Objectives TLW understand the history of environmental regulations TLW be able to describe key content of environmental.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
Surveys, Proposed Mining Regulations and other things… Presented to ARIPPA on April 24, 2007 by Dave Goss, Executive Director American Coal Ash Association.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
SPCC & CCP Issues Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference April 12, 2006.
Understanding the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Hazardous Waste Definition Exemption Jeff Bowman, TEEX.
Eco·Systems, Inc.. Beneficial Reuse of Industrial Byproducts Definition- turning an industrial byproduct into a valuable commodity Examples – Coal Combustion.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
APPA New Generation Meeting Waste Issues and Gasification: What Don’t We Know? Judith A. George, Counsel for USWAG June 28, 2006.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Fuels for Schools & Beyond Biomass Boilers Status March 18, 2009.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
MICHAEL E. SCOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Available Information on the Beneficial Reuse of Coal Combustion Products 1.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
All About Waste Dallas, TX ♦ May 18, 2016 Carrie Yonley, P.E.
Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG Midwest Environmental Compliance Conference May 13, 2015 | Overland Park, Kansas USEPA Coal Combustion Residuals Rule: Impact.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Department of Environmental Quality
Clean Water Act Regulations affecting Electric Utilities
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Presentation transcript:

Agricultural Applications of FGD Materials Jim Roewer FGD Agricultural Use Workshop September 13, 2006

CCP Regulatory Background RCRA §8002(n) (42 U.S.C. §6982(n) Directs EPA to study “…adverse effects … of disposal and utilization of fly ash waste bottom ash waste, flue gas emission control waste and other byproduct materials generated primarily from the combustion of coal and othe rfossil fuels.”

CCP Regulatory Background RCRA §3001(b)(3)(C) (42 U.S.C. §6921(b)(3)(C)) The Administrator shall, after public hearings and opportunity for comment, either determine to promulgate regulations under this subtitle [subtitle C] … or determine that such regulations are unwarranted.

CCP Regulatory Background 1980 Bevill Amendment 1988 Report to Congress 1993 Regulatory Determination on “High Volume” Wastes 1999 Report to Congress on “Remaining Wastes” 2000 Regulatory Determination 2004 EPA CCP “Listening Sessions”

CCP Regulatory Background “High Volume Wastes” = fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas desulfurization materials (FGD) from coal combustion “Remaining Wastes” = oil and gas combustion wastes, and high volume wastes co-managed with low volume wastes. “Low Volume Wastes” = boiler cleaning wastes, boiler blowdown, demineralizer regenerant, etc.

CCP Regulatory Background 1988 Report to Congress (RTC I) 1993 Regulatory Determination (58 Fed. Reg ) High Volume Wastes do not warrant regulation under RCRA Subtitle C EPA “encourages the utilization of coal combustion wastes”

CCP Regulatory Background 1999 Report to Congress (RTC II) – focus on remaining wastes May 2000 Regulatory Determination No Hazardous Regulation for CCPs No regulation for CCPs when beneficially used EPA does “not wish to place any unnecessary barriers on beneficial use”

CCP Regulatory Background Rulemaking Schedule: CCP Disposal May 2007 Proposal; Final Rule ~ May 2008 Mineplacement OSM - ANPR Fall 2007, Proposed Rule March 2007, Final Rule March 2008 EPA – NODA Fall 2007

Other Regulatory Issues: TSCA IUR TSCA Inventory Update Rule Requires Utilities to Report on Chemicals Intended to provide information on chemical exposure Information gathered to support risk reduction opportunities Manufacturers and importers of substances must report data every four years

TSCA IUR: Who, What, When? Any person that manufacturer or imports >25,000 pound of a TSCA-listed chemical Data reported on Form U Parts I & II (> 25,000 lbs) Part III for High Volume (>300,000 lbs) Once every four years 2002 was last IUR submission year 8/25 to 12/23/2006 is next submission period

TSCA IUR: CCP Reporting Fly Ash & Bottom Ash included in “Ashes, Residues (CAS No ) FGD Material in “Slimes and Sludges, coal flue gas scrubber thickener underflow” (CAS No ); “Slimes …flue gas desulfurization, stabilized” (CAS No ); “Slimes … flue gas desulfurization” (CAS No ); “Waste solids, calcium sulfate ash sludges” (CAS No )

TSCA IUR: CCP Reporting Each facility (power plant) must report those CCPs >25,000 lbs. that are used or stored prior to use (on and off-site use) CCPs disposed of are not reported TSCA Form U, Parts I & II must be completed and submitted in 2006 for CCPs used in calendar year 2005 Part III not required in 2006 for inorganic substances (will be for next reporting period)

TSCA IUR: CCP Reporting Is FGD Material Used in Agricultural Applications Subject to IUR Reporting? Yes, Unless Used to Enrich Soil Potential Applications Nutrient Addition Mitigation of Acid and Sodic Soils Additive to Fertilizer & Composting Materials

FGD Regulatory Status Summary Federal Status as Non-hazardous Waste FGD Utilization Subject to TSCA IUR FDG Generation Expected to Increase Utilization Must Increase to Match Increased Use in Wallboard Manufacture Increased Use in Agricultural Applications Or, Additional/Expanded Disposal Will be Necessary

Questions? Jim Roewer 202/