Differentiated Staff Development: Real Change for Learning Julie Martinez & Tisha Uphoff Jefferson Elementary School Lindsay Unified School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading and Supporting Elementary Coaches Presented by: Maqueda Randall-Weeks IRA 53 rd Annual Convention Atlanta, GA May 8, 2008.
Advertisements

6-12 Focus Strategic Instruction Model developed by Kansas University Alameda Unified School District Board Meeting June 10, 2008.
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Co-Teaching? What’s That?
Exploring the TNCore K-3 Reading Units Mia Hyde Coordinator of Reading Content and Resources Tennessee Department of Education Stacy King Instructional.
Beyond Textbooks Inservice: Reteach & Enrich
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
Using technology to enhance learning through shared teaching practice Barbara Judge December 2013.
Training Innovations for Standards-Based Education LINCS Regional Professional Development Center (RPDC) 2 Center for Literacy, Education & Employment.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Summer Leadership 2015 Elementary Early Literacy Elementary Preview and Planning Day Summer Leader ship.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Year 6 PYP Exhibition Information Session 2015
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Learn How to Complete the ACE & Get a College Credit Too.
CSD Teacher Mentoring Program School Year Directors: Allan Bertram – CHS/CMS Ass’t. Principal Diane Olson – ESA Region 3 Consultant.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
PEDAGOGY FOR LEARNER ENGAGEMENT. STUDENT-STAFF INTERACTION How do you directly engage with each of your students, formally and informally to: foster a.
Assessment for Learning May 6, 2014 Basia Kiehler Sandy Riley.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
Literacy Achievement for Secondary Students Exemplary teaching behavior Domains of expertise Anne G Liguori.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Staff Development Entitlement Subcommittee Final Report FY11 Mobile County Public School System.
Teaching Learning Strategies and Academic Language
WELCOME! Get an agenda Get an agenda Take your child’s folder from the correct grade level box. Folders are in alphabetical order Take your child’s folder.
Florida’s Service Delivery Plan: A Roadmap to Success Carolyn Mathews, Florida Department of Education Tom Hanley and Monica Ulewicz, ESCORT.
A Collaboration between: Los Angeles Unified School District University of California, San Diego San Diego State University University of California, Irvine.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
1© 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd. Chapter Ten Transfer of Training.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Using Data Displays to Improve the Performance and Outcomes.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER TEN Transfer of Training.
CESD Board and Admin Retreat March 20-22, FIND YOUR TEAM & TABLE:  Look at the icon on the left hand side of your nametag  your name is also on.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Division of Compensatory Education/Title I Beyond District Improvement Plans Working with Students with Exceptional Learning Needs Sharon Knoth, Assistant.
Implementation of a technology-enhanced problem-based learning curriculum: A year-long study of three teachers Sung Hee Park Purdue University Jeff Cramer.
WELCOME TO PIKES PEAK REGIONAL ELD TRAINING: COLORADO ENGLISH LANAGUAGE PROFICIENCY (CELP) STANDARDS Spring 2012 Facilitated by the Pikes Peaks ELD Directors.
Fraction Sense Fran Gibson. 2 Sacramento County Office of Education | Welcome and Introductions Please share the following information about.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Welcome to Math Night October 27, MS November 5, MV November 9, MB.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Learning Resource Team: Aligning Systems To Support All Learners What does this look like in our school? 3/9/20161.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
SBCUSD Common Core Technology Initiative Assessment, Accountability and Instructional Technology and Information Technology.
It’s Not What They Learn, It’s What They Use: Integrated Solutions for Sustained Results Presented by: Ed Emde, President Wendy Mack, Director of Consulting.
WELCOME to Implementation Training for:
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005
Gearing Up for Implementation of Next Generation Standards:
Board Presentations Protocol:
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

Differentiated Staff Development: Real Change for Learning Julie Martinez & Tisha Uphoff Jefferson Elementary School Lindsay Unified School District

Welcome! Please complete The Stages of Implementation Survey at your table. Please complete The Stages of Implementation Survey at your table. We will refer to this survey later in the presentation. We will refer to this survey later in the presentation.

Today’s Agenda Welcome and Introduction Overview of Jefferson’s Differentiated Staff Development Discussion Step-by-Step Analysis of Differentiated Staff Development Model Research on Adult Learners Debrief

Research on Adult Learners Findings Learning is goal-oriented Information is applicable and useful Projects are engaging and reflect their interest Life experiences and knowledge is considered Varying levels of education and confidence are considered Adults learn best when… Survey staff on needs, challenges and goals Tailor staff development to the varying needs of staff (differentiation) Provide on-going support and feedback Supply materials and resources for TM implementation and development Provide opportunities for immediate implementation of newly acquired knowledge Implications for Trainers

Differentiated Staff Development School Year New Staff Training Goal Setting For Year Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM Staff Grouping According To Level Of Implementation Monthly Differentiated Staff Development

New Staff Training Grade Level Site/Dept TM Exp. SupportK 2 nd 5 th 6 th Reading Resource CounselorOutreachJeffersonJeffersonJeffersonJeffersonJeffersonJeffersonJeffersonSomeNoneSomeNoneNoneNoneNone Initial Training Initial Training Mentor Teacher in the Mentor Teacher in the same or neighboring grade level same or neighboring grade level Ongoing one-on-one follow-up & Ongoing one-on-one follow-up & collaboration collaboration

New Staff Training Grade Level Site/Dept TM Exp. Support

Differentiated Staff Development School Year New Staff Training Goal Setting For Year Staff Grouping According To Level Of Implementation Monthly Differentiated Staff Development Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM

Goal Setting For Year Learning Goals: 1. Develop students’ Thinking Fluency 2. Use Academic Vocabulary to indicate the Cognitive Thought Process instead of map name 3. Develop Metacognitive Skills using the Frame of Reference and the Frame of Understanding for each map Action Plan: 1. “Rejuice” staff on Cognitive Thought Process for each map and Frame of Reference 2. Provide Differentiated Staff Development 3. Establish frequent two-way feedback

Goal Setting For Year Learning Goals: Action Plan:

Differentiated Staff Development School Year New Staff Training Goal Setting For Year Staff Grouping According To Level Of Implementation Monthly Differentiated Staff Development Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM

Level of Implementation Year of Implementation: 3rd Estimate of Implementation Level : *Refer to your Stages of Implementation Survey taken earlier Knowledge & Skills 4 Horizontal Transfer 15 Vertical Transfer 10 Executive Control 4 *Use a numeral figure, percent, or fraction to estimate how many staff members are in each level.

Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM Level of Implementation Year of Implementation: Estimate of Implementation Level : *Refer to your Stages of Implementation Survey taken earlier Knowledge & Skills Horizontal Transfer Vertical Transfer Executive Control *Use a numeral figure, percent, or fraction to estimate how many staff members are in each level.

Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM Level of Implementation Year of Implementation: 3rd Estimate of Implementation Level : *Refer to your Stages of Implementation Survey taken earlier Knowledge & Skills 4 Horizontal Transfer 15 Vertical Transfer 10 Executive Control 4 *Use a numeral figure, percent, or fraction to estimate how many staff members are in each level.

Modified Learning Goals and Action Plan Learning Goals: *1. Move staff beyond Knowledge and Skills Levels 2. Develop students’ Thinking Fluency 3. Use Academic Vocabulary to indicate the Cognitive Thought Process instead of map name 4. Develop Metacognitive Skills using the Frame of Reference and the Frame of Understanding for each map Next Steps: 1. “Rejuice” staff on Cognitive Thought Process for each map and Frame of Reference 2. Provide Differentiated Staff Development 3. Establish frequent two-way feedback

Modified Learning Goals and Action Plan Learning Goals: Next Steps:

Differentiated Staff Development School Year New Staff Training Goal Setting For Year Staff Grouping According To Level Of Implementation Monthly Differentiated Staff Development Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM

Staff Grouping According To Level Of Implementation Group Staff Administrative Approval Match Trainers To Groups

Differentiated Staff Development School Year New Staff Training Goal Setting For Year Staff Grouping According To Level Of Implementation Monthly Differentiated Staff Development Staff Survey On Level Of Implementation & Use Of TM

Monthly Differentiated Staff Development Session Preparation Trainee Goals & Interests Trainer Collaboration Communicate Expectations To Trainees Feedback System Formal & Informal Trainers To Trainees Trainees To Trainers Ideas For Sessions Strengths & deficiencies? Value Of Differentiation Trainees Learned More Disaster Strikes! Flexible Grouping

Ideas for Sessions Knowledge & Skills Make & Take Cognitive Domains Map Specific Activities Vertical Transfer Map/Content Specific Activities Frames Stacking Instead of Transitioning “Taking It Off The Map” Executive Control Frames Content Specific Activities “Taking It Off The Map” Standard-Based Lesson/Unit Planning Horizontal Transfer Gallery Walk Cognitive Domains Content Specific Mapping Standards Correlation

Tips for Success Mistakes are inherent in the learning process. Mistakes are inherent in the learning process. Flexibility! Flexibility! Flexibility! Flexibility! Flexibility! Flexibility! Learning varies by modality and time frame. Learning varies by modality and time frame. Peer collaboration enhances the learning process. Peer collaboration enhances the learning process. Adult Learners! (refer to Adult Learners Page) Adult Learners! (refer to Adult Learners Page)

Contact Information (soft copies or inquiries) Julie Martinez Julie Martinez Tisha Uphoff Tisha Uphoff