Preliminary studies on Muon System software alignment LHCb week CERN May 29-th, June 2-nd 2006 Stefania Vecchi INFN Bologna Wander Baldini INFN Ferrara.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of test beam data analysis … with emphasis on resistive coating studies Progress and questions 1Meeting at CEA Saclay, 25 Jan 2010Jörg Wotschack,
Advertisements

Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
Status & Plans of Segmentation Y.P.Viyogi(V.E.C.C) Arun Prakash(B.H.U)
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Ricardo GonçaloRobustness Workshop - 4/3/08 Slice Studies I Goals of this session ID/MS misalignment Data samples for trigger studies.
Javier CastilloLHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 05/09/ Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Javier Castillo CEA/Saclay.
Giuseppe Martellotti - 24/02/2014 Performance at high luminosity - efficiency - accidentals - detector layout (contributions from Alessia and Roberta)
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
1 T1-T3 in L1 algorithm  Outlook: I) Summary of L1-confirmation II) About the TrgForwardTracking package III) Confirming (preliminary)  L1-confirmation.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group 28 July 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
The LHCb Muon System and LAPE Participation Burkhard Schmidt CERN - EP/LHB Presented at the CNPq Workshop Rio de Janeiro, 12 January 1999.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
Detector alignment Stefania and Bepo Martellotti 20/12/10.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Z′ Mass Reach MC Analysis USCMS meeting Brown University May 6 – 8, 2010.
1 Selection of non-triggering muons in J/ψ  μμ events for the calibration of the Muon System 1)Offline Selection:  use of Mass Constrained Global Fit.
15/6/2006Gaia Lanfranchi - LNF-INFN1 Why do we have to measure efficiencies in the Muon Detector? Muon Software Meeting, June 15th G. Lanfranchi LNF-INFN.
Study for rejection of muons from p/K decays Sergio Grancagnolo Stefania Spagnolo Andrea Ventura.
Comparison of different chamber configurations for the high luminosity upgrade of M2R2 G. Martellotti - LNF - 13/03/2015 Roma1 + Alessia.
Readout principle Time Drift direction E drift Continuously sensitive Self-triggering Equiv. input charge due to noise:
July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
1 HLT (generic)  Data TDR DaVinci v9r3 DC04 DaVici v12r0 DC04 DaVici v12r1  Outlook! # of track candidates!!! Comparation DC04 & TDR data  L1 does a.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
Gloria Corti, LHCb LHCb background on detector. Gloria Corti Page 2 Evaluating impact on experiment Increasing the inner coverage of the TT detector will.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
Aras Papadelis. NIKHEF 1 Aras Papadelis B-physics meeting 15/ Results from the Nov2004 VELO test beam (and what followed…)
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer
Update on Trigger simulation
Muons from single top events for DC04
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Time Independent Analysis
Saikat Biswas, A. Abuhoza, U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos,
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
J/: towards first physics results/first paper
LHCb Muon Detector MWPC & GEM
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Simone Brusa / INFN – Ferrara On behalf of LHCb muon group:
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Muons from light meson decays
Samples and MC Selection
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary studies on Muon System software alignment LHCb week CERN May 29-th, June 2-nd 2006 Stefania Vecchi INFN Bologna Wander Baldini INFN Ferrara

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Muon system misalignments Muon Chambers will be positioned on the support structure within few mm from the ideal position A muon system misalignment will effect mainly the L0 trigger (Pt measurement & muon candidate selection). It might have a smoother impact in the analysis (Particle ID). With MonteCarlo simulations we can evaluate the effects of a misalignment: –Of the whole detector with respect to the others; –Of M1 respect M2-M5; –Of each station; –Of single chambers in the most critical regions in order to better define the positioning accuracies limits We use the L0muonTrigger routines to evaluate trigger performances. They allow changes in FOI or Pt cut, but not in single chamber position

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June First studies Pt calculation of each muon Candidate Changed in Tower.cpp (L0muonKernel) due to shift in M1 or M2 Study of L0muon trigger performances as a function of misalignment scale: efficiency to signal, Mbias retention, charge asymmetry ONLY effects of L0 performances on Pt calculation can be evaluated no FOI Settings: –Default FOI X/Y: M1=±5/0 M2= ± 3/0 M4= ± 3/1 M5= ±3/1 –Pile Up rejection –L0muon Trigger output rate: 125 KHz

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Data sample / DaVinci In order to use L0mAnalysis package we used RTTC data sample generated by D.Perego –Minimum Bias: events –B s  J/          events –DaVinci v14r4 –L0mAnalysis v4r4 –L0mTrigger v3r0 Run L0mTrigger introducing a shift on M1 and M2 x-coordinate (+-0.5 cm, +-1cm, +-5cm, -10cm) –Affect Pt calculation –No muon candidates losses due to FOI –Introduce charge asimmetry

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June No-Shift

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Shift M1 -0.5cm

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Pt cut and efficiency almost unchanged Charge asymmetry 20% Shift M cm

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Need higher Pt cut to Need higher Pt cut to keep 125 kHz rate keep 125 kHz rate Efficiency drops Efficiency drops Higher MB retention Higher MB retention Big Charge Big Charge asymmetry asymmetry Shift M cm

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Shift M cm Almost only one charge left

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Shift M2 +0.5cm

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Shift M cm

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Slightly different from M1 shift results (geometry) Shift M2 +5cm

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Preliminary performances summary

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Next studies Repeat the study on L0m trigger performances on DC06 ( generated aligned) data with different misaligned geometries (changing geometry reconstruction level. –In this way also effects on FOI can be taken into account. –Need to ask officially for data production? (L0 studies for TDR: 500K mbias + 30K B s ->J/  )

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Conclusions The machinery to see effects of the misalignment is working, now more quantitative studies will start (0.5 – 5.0 cm Given the big amount of combinations, for the moment we will focus mainly on M1-M2-M3 regions

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June spares

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June nominal position nominal position Real situation Simulated situation L0/reconstruction response misaligned Detector misaligned M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

Stefania Vecchi & Wander Baldini LHCb Week 29 May - 2 June Detector Granularity and readout M1M2M3M4M5 R11x2.5 GEM GEM0.6x3.1 mixed r/o 0.67x x3.6 cathode r/o 3.1x3.9 R22x5 GEM GEM1.3x6.3 mixed r/o 1.35x x7.3 cathode r/o 6.2x7.7 R34x10 cathode r/o 2.5x12.5 cathode r/o 2.7x13.5 cathode r/o 11.6x14.5 cathode r/o 12.4x15.5 cathode r/o R4 8x20 wires r/o 5x25 wires r/o 5.4x x x30.9 wires r/o Pad Dimension (cm 2 ) Chamber readout