Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials April 22, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY 2010 School District Funding Chuck Essigs AASBO.
Advertisements

January 7, PUSD has two “buckets” to pay for it’s day-to- day and yearly operations: Maintenance and Operations (M & O) Things that are considered.
AASBO Legislative Update Chuck Essigs 53 rd Annual Conference July 2006.
NEPTUNE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARIZONA FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOL FINANCE Dr. Debra Bergman Assistant Superintendent & Hector M. Encinas Chief Financial Officer.
AASBO Legislative Update Chuck Essigs Spring 2006.
Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials April 2010.
January 7, 2011 Overview of Governor’s Introduced Amendments to the Direct Aid to Public Education Budget (and other Public Education Funding)
Preliminary Budget May 15, PPR = Per Pupil Revenue.
January 2010 Chuck Essigs – Arizona Association of School Business Officials Changes to the Classroom Site Fund (Prop 301) Budget Impact for FY 2011.
2013 Public Law Changes House Enrolled Act 1276 Public Law 6 Amends IC and Township Board Meetings Effective.
Budget Update for School Year Chuck Essigs April 22, 2009.
Spring Cove School District 2014/15 Budget Workshop April 28, 2014.
Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 20,
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
QUALITY LEADERSHIP AND ADVOCACY FOR CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS Copyright © 2012 Arizona School Boards Association | Private and Confidential |
Dr. Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials.
1 Quarterly Budget Update Michael E Finn February 23, 2012.
School Finance: A Framework School Finance: A Framework, Attachment 1.
JANICE PALMER, ASBA DEB DUVALL, ASA CHUCK ESSIGS, AASBO ASBA/ASA/AASBO FY2013 Legislative Update.
FY12 Budget Development Alachua County Board of County Commissioners April 5, 2011.
FY12 and FY13 Budget Development Special Board Meeting Alachua County Office of Management and Budget May 17, 2011.
1 Proposed Budget for Adoption Fiscal Year Michael E. Finn, CFO.
Legislative Update.  $50 million for Move On When Reading  Funding will be generated by an increase in the K‐8 Group A weight from to for.
April 8, Budget Committee Meeting Budget Overview and Discussion.
Public Hearing School Budget March 19, 2008 Public Hearing School Budget March 19, 2008 Deerfield Board of Education.
Dr. Chuck Essigs.  Effective from and after June 30, 2011  Membership is students enrolled on September 15, November 15, January 15 and March 15 divided.
Janice Palmer Arizona School Boards Association Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials.
Early Budget Preparation Chesapeake School Board Meeting November 29, 2010.
Board of Trustees/Superintendent Planning Meeting Financial Services FY Budget Update Lancaster County School District February 7-8,
Dr. Chuck Essigs, AASBO Director of Governmental Relations.
Understanding the Tax Calculation Teddy Dumlao. Key Questions What are the sources of income? What is the relationship between tax rates and tax amounts?
Understanding the Tax Calculation Teddy Dumlao. Key Questions What is the relationship between tax rates and tax amounts? What governing board decisions.
Legislative Update Chuck Essigs. HB2031 Schools; Contractors; Fingerprint Clearance Card  Requested by school districts  Contractors, subcontractors,
AASBO Bi-Monthly Meeting Changes in Additional State Aid (Homeowner’s Rebate) – Details September 8, 2010 Prepared by: Judy Richardson, Vice President.
Arizona Association of School Business Officials March 10, 2010.
FY2010 Budget and 2009 Legislative Session Update July 15, 2009 Janice Palmer Arizona School Boards Association Jeremy Calles Arizona Department of Education.
Teacher Employment Provisions In HB 2227: Impact and Implications for School Districts Chris Thomas, ASBA General Counsel AASBO Bi-Monthly Meeting, May.
AASBO March Bi-Monthly Membership Meeting Dr. Chuck Essigs.
LOCKPORT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Budget Development Update Michelle T. Bradley Superintendent of Schools December 2011.
WPCSD BUDGET DISCUSSION FY2015 & FY2016 MARCH 3, 2015 White Pine County School District.
LOCKPORT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Budget Development Process for An Overview of the New Property Tax Cap Presented by Michelle T. Bradley Superintendent.
Chris Thomas, Director of Legal & Policy Services/General Counsel Arizona School Boards Association.
Arizona School Finance Module II: Outside the RCL.
Phoenix Central School District 2013 – 2014 Budget Hearing May 13, 2013.
AreaElem.H.S. 1. Basic Amount$ $ Group B Spec. Ed.Varies by Category 3. Pupil Transportation (Average) $ Capital (CORL and Soft.
FY17 BUDGET BASICS Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office.
Funding for PK-12 Education in the State of Nebraska.
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
Purpose The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to present the Proposed Final 2015/2016 Budget, following the required Act 1 timeline. SFASD must receive.
Spring-Ford Area School District Proposed Preliminary January 2015/16 Budget Presentation January 28, 2014.
Legislative Update June 11, FY Budget  House Passes Budget (6/7/13) Base Student Cost of $2,101, up from current $2,012, below $2,771.
2016 K-12 Education Package Presented by Tami Darnall SD Department of Education.
April 6, Budget Committee Meeting Budget Overview and Discussion.
School Finance in Arizona Chuck Essigs AASBO. Funding of Schools  Very little state assistance  Very little state control  Ability to fund.
WPCSD BUDGET DISCUSSION FY2016 & 2017 JANUARY 28, 2016 REVISED 3/16/2016 REVISED 3/25/2016 PAUL JOHNSON, CFO WHIT PINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1135 AVENUE.
Arizona’s Performance Based Compensation National Conference on Teacher Compensation and Evaluation Chicago, IL November 21-22, 2002 Penny Kotterman, President.
Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office
Proposed Budget for Adoption
Budget Planning February 14, 2018 Board of Education meeting
Preliminary Budget February 12, 2018.
Proposed Expenditure Budget
Spring-Ford Area School District Proposed Preliminary January 2014/15 Budget Presentation January 27, 2014.
Budget and Legislative Update
Bell Times Analysis Task Force Budget
Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials
Preliminary Budget February 11, 2019.
CENTRAL BERKSHIRE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials
Board work session – Saturday, January 21, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials April 22, 2010

 By March 30 th Joint Legislative Budget Committee shall determine a per pupil amount for the budget year……….  What Changed – New language, “Adjusted for any prior year carry forward or shortfall” FY2011 First Year for Implementation

 Allocation from ARS (per weighted student)  Unexpended budget balance from prior year  The net interest earned during the prior year

YearBudget CapacityTotal AvailableDifference FY2002$272.42$ FY2003$239.47$ FY2004$ FY2005$ FY2006$353.00$ FY2007$333.00$333.07$0.07 FY2008$401.00$ FY2009$390.00$ FY2010$244.00$ Total$ $ Ave.$300.54$277.46

 FY2011 – per weighted count $220  Prior Year Shortfalls $195  FY2011 – Amount = $25 per weighted student *Adjust to shortfall total in FY2011

Proposal/Adjust Over Two Years  Current  FY2011$220-$25  Proposed  FY2011$220-$120  Leaves $95 shortfall for FY2012

 Current  FY2012$220* $220 Budget Amount  Proposed  FY2012$220*-$95** $125 Budget Amount  Leaves $95 shortfall for FY2012 *Based upon $220 available from Classroom Site Fund in FY2012 **$95 shortfall from FY2011

 Additional teacher compensation money from sources other than Classroom Site Fund for FY2011.  Not considered supplanting for FY2012 calculation.

 Base Level $ / with teacher comp $ (No change from FY2010)  Transportation $2.32 inc. to $2.35 and $1.89 inc. to $1.91 (Remember 120% limit TRCL vs TSL)  Additional assistance for charters K-8 inc from $ to $ and 9-12 from $ to $ (later reduced)

 Reduce soft capital by $165.1 million (Est. 80%)  Districts with less than 600 cut is 50% (Est. 40%)  Eliminate Group B weight for K students ($218 million)  Reduce additional assistance for charters by $10 million (Est. $85 per student/ 116,781 charter students)

 Suspend building renewal formula  Suspend utility funding formula  Allows charging tuition for K students  Sets Career Ladder at 5.0% (Same as FY 2010)  Permits school districts to expend soft capital monies for any capital of operational expense  Eliminates non-formula funding programs (Exempt for Voc. Block Grant)  School Safety Program (40% General Fund Gone/ 60% Prop 301 Remains)

 Suspend Soft Capital ($47 million) and CORL Funding ($248 million)  Reduce base level by $102.7 million (2% Reduction)  Reduce additional assistance for charters by $31 million (Est. $265 per student)  Total $428 million

 Change calculation of homeowners rebate (additional state aid) to 40% of primary taxes or 40% of QTR amount whichever is less  Impact on homeowners property taxes  Example  $5.00 Primary Rate - $2.00 Reduction ▪ $5.00 – (40% / $2.00) – Effective $3.00 Rate  $2.80 QTR - $1.12 Reduction ▪ $2.80 – (40% / $1.12) – Effective $3.88 Rate

 Provides technical corrections to override laws  Removes requirement to budget and report separately for special program overrides and eliminates ability to carry forward 50% of unspent special program override  Holds districts harmless for reductions to overrides from elimination of Group B K weight (Senate Education Amendment  Holds districts harmless for reductions to overrides from reductions to base level if sales tax election fails ($102 million)

 Change 80 points to 85 points  Retirement calculation based on 60 months, not 36 months  Member who leaves after 5 years gets member contributions plus 25% of employer contributions  Return to work still an issue  (53 yes votes in House/29 yes votes in Senate)

 School districts shall not adopt policies for teachers that provide retention priority based upon tenure or seniority.  Contracts shall not include compensated days for professional association activities  Removes April 15 notification and March 15 through May 15 date for issuing contract  Changes time to return contract to 15 days  Changes ARS to allow board to reduce salaries or eliminate certificated teachers. Eliminate notice by May 15 of prior year.

 Numerous charter school changes  Teacher certification changes  Eliminates bid requirement for Special Ed. Students placed in ADE approved private schools  Allows district board to establish multiple bank accounts to deposit miscellaneous receipts  Reduces required time in 7 th and 8 th grades from 1068 to 1000 hours  Allows non-career ladder districts to budget 3% outside RCL for teacher performance pay for FY2011 (FY2012 4%, FY2012 5%, FY %, but requires voter approval)

 HB2732  Student cannot be promoted from 3 rd grade if testing indicates that student is far below 3 rd grade level  Requires State Board to develop intervention and remedial strategies that districts need to use  SBE Task Forces reports 1/15/2011/ program delayed

 SB1323/ HB2385  Problems with SAIS  Pick points in time instead of 100 day average – September 15, November 15, January 15 and March 15  Funding on membership but absence data must still be reported  Delayed implementation (Effective June 30, 2011)  Example is STAR in New Mexico  200 Day Calendar - 5% base level increase/ Must increase Instructional Hours by 10%

 HB2521 – Requires superintendent contract to include at least 20% of salary as performance pay (55 – 0 Vote in House)

 S1188 – County School Supt. Required to file a copy of revenue estimate to set tax rate with Property Tax Oversight Commission. The projected ending cash balance, adjusted for encumbrances and payables must be certified by district

 HB2282 – Website information on receipts and expenditures. ASBA and AASBO oppose and are trying to get an alternative put in place.  Implementation date January 1, 2013  Available on website – all revenues and expenditures over $5,000  Be searchable, updated at least every 3 months and retained for at least 3 years  To mirror requirements for ADOA Website (January 2, 2011)