Experiences to Date Comfort levels must be checked before the procedure is started 11 adults have been fitted and did not like the initial DSL fitting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connecting with Appropriate Early Intervention Programs Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D New England Center for Hearing Rehabilitation.
Advertisements

Audiological Management: What Everyone Needs to Know Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D., CCC-A 1, 2 Kathleen Watts, M.A. 2 Karen M. Ditty, Au.D., CCC-A 2 1 New.
Introduction to Cochlear Implants for EI Service Providers Roxanne J. Aaron, MA, CCC-A, FAAA The Moog Center for Deaf Education March 2005.
The benefit of using the Microlink MLx and MLxS FM radio aid systems, over distance and in noise, with the Nucleus ESPrit 3G speech processor Sarah Flynn.
Alison King Principal Audiologist, Paediatric Services Presentation to Audiology Australia National Conference 2010 FM system usage and benefit for children.
Audiology Hayley Fiket Marketing Audiologist Dynamic Hearing Victorian Branch President of Audiological Society of Australia.
Improving audibility as a foundation for better speech understanding Pamela Souza, PhD Northwestern University Evanston, IL.
Balancing FM Systems. BATOD March 2013 Colin Peake Educational Audiologist South of England Cochlear Implant Centre Introduction Welcome to the University.
Radio Aids used in research studies Phonak Microvox Connevans 220 Connevans Genie Sennheiser Microport Phonic Ear 471R/ 475T Phonic Ear Solaris Phonak.
Figures for Chapter 9 Prescription
A quick tidbit from a 2010 publication that was “dumped” by Catherine and her esteemed selection committee...
Initial-Fit Approach Versus Verified Prescription: Comparing Self- Perceived Hearing Aid Benefit Abrams, H., Chisolm, T., McManus, M., McArdle, R. Journal.
Real-ear Measurements with the A-35
RECD Refresher Course 17th November 2004 In Situ Versus Coupler Verification Working Smarter ! Ed Brown Consultant Audiological Scientist MCHAS University.
The self-fitting hearing aid Elizabeth Convery, Harvey Dillon, Gitte Keidser, Lyndal Carter, and Dan Zhou National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia.
Freedom Processor for Nucleus CI24 The South of England Cochlear Implant Centre Experience Roberta Buhagiar, Sarie Cross and Julie Eyles 1 Aided Thresholds.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Why Should I Wear A Hearing Aid If I Already Use A Cochlear Implant? Jodi Haberstock M. Sc., CCC-Audiology.
Creating sound value TM The perceptibility, acceptability, and benefit of transitioning to new gain targets in experienced hearing aid wearers with moderately.
An Update on Hearing Aid Testing
Probe Tube Microphone Measurements (Basics and Definitions) Greg Nassar MCHAS Team University of Manchester.
Verifying Open-Ear Fittings With Speech-Mapping
MCHAS Modernising Children’s Hearing Aid Services Acoustic Feedback Reduction.
Modernising Children’s Hearing Aid Services Evaluation Questionnaires LIFE-UK IHP LSQPEACH MCHAS Modernising Children’s Hearing Aid Services Wave 4 EJB.
FP35 Hearing Aid Analyzer
Cox data: Average ratings for both sets of instruments for each category (percent preference for each condition)
User Group Meetings Child implanted at under 18 months Bilateral Cochlear Implant Research Nucleus Double Array MED-EL Compressed and Custom Teens Programme.
Vocal Emotion Recognition with Cochlear Implants Xin Luo, Qian-Jie Fu, John J. Galvin III Presentation By Archie Archibong.
Pre-operative evaluation and post-operative rehabilitation for paediatric cochlear implantation Han Demin, M.D., Ph.D. Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology.
The Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Assessment, Rehabilitation and Outcomes Jane Martin, Catherine.
Electroacoustic Testing of DSP Hearing Aids Christine Cameron & Mary Hostler MCHAS Team University of Manchester.
Fitting Formulas Estimate amplification requirements of individual patients Maximize intelligibility of speech Provide good overall sound quality Keep.
The use of FM systems with Cochlear Implants- How has research had an impact on practice? Sarah Flynn and Elizabeth Wood South of England Cochlear Implant.
Discussion and Conclusions 9 of the 10 subjects were able to discriminate speech better with the radio aid at 1m, 3m and 10m than with out the radio aid.
Modernising Children’s Hearing Aid Services RECD Measurements Wave 4 EJB 17/05/04.
Deborah Edwards, MS,CCC-A Dawn Ruley, AuD, CCC-A Advanced FM: Programming & Verification.
Introduction to the FONIX 7000 Hearing Aid Test System Software version 1.60.
R3.6.4 Improved Hearing Assessment in Noisy Environments – Parts 1 & 2 Project Leader: Michael Fisher Principal Researcher (Part 1): the late Ben Rudzyn.
National Cochlear Implant Programme Beaumont Hospital & Children’s University Hospital, Temple Street Bilateral Cochlear Implants Jennifer Robertson, Clinical.
8th and 9th June 2004 Mainz, Germany Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality in Terminals and Networks: Assessment and Prediction 1 Vincent Barriac, Jean-Yves.
A New Bone Conductor with Improved Performance Authors: Eric Burwood (NAL); George Raicevich (NAL); Harvey Dillon (NAL); Carit Laursen (Ortofon) Acknowledgement:
The effect of frequency compression and high- frequency directionality on horizontal localisation and speech in noise recognition Ingrid Yeend, Anna O’Brien,
Modernising Children’s Hearing Aid Services Sound Field Testing MCHAS TEAM Wave 4 SFR 17/05/04.
Figures for Chapter 6 Compression
SIGNAL PROCESSING IN HEARING AIDS
V Telecommunications Industry AssociationTR XXX.
Figures for Chapter 15 Special issues for children Dillon (2001) Hearing Aids.
What they asked... What are the long term effects of fitting bilateral amplification simultaneously (both aids on Day #1) versus sequentially (the second.
INTRODUCTION TO AUDIOLOGY. Audiology  What is Audiology?  It is the study of hearing and hearing disorders.
Super Power BTE A great new Trimmer Family. The new & complete, fully digital Trimmer family ReSound is proud to introduce the complete new trimmer family,
METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LITERATURE Low frequency information via a hearing aid has been shown to increase speech intelligibility in noise.
Audiology clinics in special schools – our experiences Caroline Payne Principal Audiologist Chime Social Enterprise.
Speech Based Optimization of Hearing Devices Alice E. Holmes, Rahul Shrivastav, Hannah W. Siburt & Lee Krause.
DEVELOPMENT OF NAL-NL2 Harvey Dillon, Gitte Keidser, Teresa Ching,
Need for cortical evoked potentials Assessment and determination of amplification benefit in actual hearing aid users is an issue that continues to be.
Cochlear Implantation at King Abdullaziz University Hospital, Riyadh: A Multisystem Prgram, ( )
Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for HA Users.
Functional Listening Evaluations:
FP35 Hearing Aid Analyzer
Figures for Chapter 8 Candidacy Dillon (2001) Hearing Aids.
Hz A A A A A A LDL for speech Aided Speech output Functional Gain: The way.
The Deaf/Hard of Hearing Technology RERC (DHH-RERC)
Self-Adjusted Amplification by Experienced Hearing Aid Users
Prescribing hearing aids and the new NAL-NL2 prescription rule
D I S C U S S I O N & C O N C L U S I O N
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
A proposed Proof-of-Concept experiment
Balancing FM Systems. BATOD March 2013 Colin Peake Educational Audiologist South of England Cochlear Implant Centre Introduction Welcome to the University.
Connecting with Appropriate Early Intervention Programs
Presentation transcript:

Experiences to Date Comfort levels must be checked before the procedure is started 11 adults have been fitted and did not like the initial DSL fitting targets and were then fitted using NAL. 4/11 have preferred a base cut at the first fitting already moving away form the NAL-RP targets The full balancing procedure with frequency shaping is time consuming even with adults Introduction This paper describes a multi-centre UK initiative to investigate the benefits of fitting a contra lateral hearing aid with a cochlear implant in experienced paediatric users. Current published research shows the benefits of fitting a hearing aid in the contralateral ear using a special balancing procedure. 1 However this procedure is based on the NAL-RP fitting prescription. In the UK the most commonly used fitting prescription used for children is Desired Sensation Level (DSL i/o )2. The balancing procedure outlined in the published literature has been modified to produce a generic protocol (see handout). This modified procedure has been further reduced to make it clinically practical to perform with younger children. Aims Can the the benefits of using a contralateral hearing aid be replicated using the loudness-balancing element only of the published procedure and the DSL i/o fitting prescription? Optimising the Fitting of Hearing Aids with Cochlear Implants Sarie Cross 1, Paula Greenham 2, Sarah Flynn 1, Catherine Broxholme 3, Maire Doran 4 1. ISVR, University of Southampton. 2. Cochlear Europe Ltd. 3. Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. 4. Glan Clwyd Hospital, North Wales. References 1 Should Children Who use Cochlear Implants Wear hearing Aids in the Opposite Ear? Ching T, Psarros P, Hill M, Dillon H. & Incerti P. Ear and Hearing 2001: 22, The Desired Sensation Level Method for Hearing Aid Fitting in Infants and Children Seewald, R. Phonak Focus N o 20 Modified Paediatric Procedure 1Fit the HA according to DSL targets for gain and maximum output. Do not be concerned if the gain targets above 1 kHz are not achievable. The implant system will contribute the high frequency information. Confirm fitting with real ear measurement. 2Adjust the overall gain and/or compression characteristics of the HA so that the loudness of speech in the ear with the HA is matched to that in the implanted ear at soft (55dB SPL), average (65dB SPL) and loud speech levels (80dB SPL). This is achieved with the Supero by; a) Adjusting G50 with an input level of 55dB SPL b) Adjusting G80 with an input level of 80dB SPL c) Check balance at 65dB SPL by adjusting overall gain if required 3Confirm new fitting with real ear measurement. 4Finally check that the loudness of both implant and HA together is comfortable with 80dB SPL input. Fit and Optimise Hearing Aid Administer Baseline Questionnaire Localisation Testing 11 speakers Anechoic chamber ISVR, Southampton Evaluate Speech Performance CI Alone and CI with HA Administer Follow up Questionnaire Study Protocol Subjects: 6 years of age or over Experience: Stable MAP for 6 months and have not used hearing aid for 1 year Personnel: Experienced HA Audiologist Ear Moulds: Comfortable rather than tight/deep fit Equipment:HA Programming and Real Ear Measurement Equipment Hearing Aid: Phonak Supero 412 Fitting Protocol: Desired Sensation Level Balancing: Adjust the output of the HA to match the overall loudness of the CI Listening Trial:8 weeks Speech Testing: IHR Sentences – adaptive procedure Functional Benefit: PEACH questionnaire Localisation Testing:11 speakers in anechoic chamber Parallel Study:Study with Adult subjects to validate generic balancing fitting procedure with standard prescribed fitting Further information from: Sarie Cross, SOECIC, ISVR, University of Southampton Identify Patients Obtain Consent Earmould Impressions The Authors would like to acknowledge Phonak U.K. for their support with this study. Geneva 2004