CHAPTER 12 The Classification Problem CLASSIFICATION A. Dermanis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Advertisements

Remote sensing, promising tool of the future Mária Szomolányi Ritvayné – Gabriella Frombach VITUKI CONSULT MOKKA Conference, June
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
A Graphical Operator Framework for Signature Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery David Messinger, Ph.D. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Chester.
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
PRESENTATION ON “ Processing Of Satellite Image Using Dip ” by B a n d a s r e e n i v a s Assistant Professor Department of Electronics & Communication.
CHAPTER 13 Pattern Recognition and Classification CLASSIFICATION A. Dermanis.
Application Of Remote Sensing & GIS for Effective Agricultural Management By Dr Jibanananda Roy Consultant, SkyMap Global.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
An Overview of RS Image Clustering and Classification by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks Frank Westerlund.
Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications Murat Tunç Murat Tunç
Potential of Ant Colony Optimization to Satellite Image Classification Raj P. Divakaran.
Image Classification To automatically categorize all pixels in an image into land cover classes or themes.
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data General Classification Concepts Unsupervised Classifications.
Spectral Response Relative Reflectance Hamantaschen Spectral Response Data.
An Overview of Remote Sensing and Image Processing by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks and Frank Westerlund.
Ken Driese Dept. of Botany. 1. How could you assess the effect of drought on plant biomass in California? 2. How could you map sage grouse habitat in.
Chapter 12 Spatial Sharpening of Spectral Image Data.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed categorical information 遥感类别信息精度评估 Jingxiong ZHANG 张景雄 Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed.
Image Classification and its Applications
U N I V E R S I T À D E G L I S T U D I D I M I L A N O C17 SC for Environmental Applications and Remote Sensing I M S C I A Soft Computing for Environmental.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Classification & Vegetation Indices
Exercise #5: Supervised Classification. Step 1. Delineating Training Sites and Generating Signatures An individual training site is delineated as an “area.
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.
Resolution A sensor's various resolutions are very important characteristics. These resolution categories include: spatial spectral temporal radiometric.
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Aseri Baleilevuka OCEANS & ISLANDS PROGRAM SOPAC-SPC Benthic Habitat Mapping Lifuka Island.
Fuzzy Entropy based feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data Mahesh Pal Department of Civil Engineering National Institute of Technology.
Accomplishments Conclusions Dyctiota (macroalgae), Diploria clivosa and the gorgonians show similar reflectance curves due to the zooxanthellae (unicellular.
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP 3.2 Information support to Recovery/Reconstruction Task 7 Damage Severity Map PREFER.
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP 3.2, Task 7.
Spectral classification of WorldView-2 multi-angle sequence Atlanta city-model derived from a WorldView-2 multi-sequence acquisition N. Longbotham, C.
Digital Image Processing Definition: Computer-based manipulation and interpretation of digital images.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Digital Image Processing
CHAPTER 5 Atmospheric Influence and Radiometric Correction PRE-PROCESSING A. Dermanis.
Image Interpretation Color Composites Terra, July 6, 2002 Engel-Cox, J. et al Atmospheric Environment.
Hyperspectral remote sensing
Remote Sensing Unsupervised Image Classification.
Various Change Detection Analysis Techniques. Broadly Divided in Two Approaches ….. 1.Post Classification Approach. 2.Pre Classification Approach.
Sub pixelclassification
Housekeeping –5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 –June 1993 photography.
ADAPTIVE HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION WITH LIMITED TRAINING DATA Dissertation Defense of Joseph Troy Morgan Committee: Dr Melba Crawford Dr J. Wesley Barnes.
Christopher Steinhoff Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming Ramesh Sivanpillai Department of Botany, University of Wyoming Mapping Changes.
Remote Sensing Section Global soil monitoring and mineral mapping from emerging remote sensing technologies Sabine Chabrillat and the group “hyperspectral.
Digital Image Processing
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
The MATLAB Hyperspectral Image Analysis Toolbox
Hyperspectral Sensing – Imaging Spectroscopy
FIGURE Different sensor types
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
Class 10 Unsupervised Classification
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Hyperspectral Image preprocessing
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Supervised Classification
Unsupervised Classification
Image Information Extraction
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Satellite data Marco Puts
Supervised vs. unsupervised Learning
Mirza Muhammad Waqar PhD Scholar Website:
Class 10 Unsupervised Classification
Presentation transcript:

CHAPTER 12 The Classification Problem CLASSIFICATION A. Dermanis

Absolute Classification Prior determination of the spectral reflectance characteristics of all possible classes Creation of spectral libraries. Relative Classification Pixels are classified in the same class when their values in all bands are similar. Requires: Effective reduction of atmospheric effects (effective global monitoring of the atmosphere). Large number of well-distributed bands (hyperspectral or ultraspectral sensors) Requires: External data, collected by field work (at the same time epoch with satellite imagery). Supervised Classification: Ground data introduced before classification. Unsupervised Classification: Ground data introduced after classification. Restricting factor: Assessment of atmospheric parameters Restricting factor: Assessment of atmospheric parameters No Restriction: Atmospheric influence is the same, also for pixels with ground data information No Restriction: Atmospheric influence is the same, also for pixels with ground data information A. Dermanis

Absolute Clasification: Class centers determined from spectral library. Absolute Clasification: Class centers determined from spectral library. Relative Clasification: Unsupervised: Class centers determined from clustering algorithm. Relative Clasification: Unsupervised: Class centers determined from clustering algorithm. Relative Clasification: Supervised: Class centers determined from ground collected data (pixel samples for each class) Relative Clasification: Supervised: Class centers determined from ground collected data (pixel samples for each class) Classification by pixel position in spectral space A. Dermanis

Absolute definition of the classes not possible: Variation within each land cover type - No distinct class separation. Dependence on the particular application. Classification Problems Correction for atmospheric influence not completely possible: Global atmospheric monitoring: determines at atmospheric absorbance (T θ, T φ ) but not atmospheric diffusion due to scattering (E D, L P ) z(λ)  L S (λ) + A(λ) ρ(λ) + Β(λ) A(λ) = Τ φ (λ) [Τ φ (λ) Ε 0 (λ) cosω + Ε D (λ) 1π1π Β(λ) = L P (λ) A. Dermanis

Classification Problems Limited number of bands in multispectral sensors: Only a discrete version of spectral firm is viewed Presence of mixed pixelsVariation of the spectral signature within single class A. Dermanis