1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Earth Sciences Division 2 University of Oslo, Department of Geophysics,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Water Budget IV: Soil Water Processes P = Q + ET + G + ΔS.

Advertisements

Kyle Withers University of Arizona Acknowledgements: James Callegary USGS Space Grant Symposium April 18, 2009 Using Geophysical and GIS Methods to Develop.

Infiltration and unsaturated flow Learning objective Be able to calculate infiltration, infiltration capacity and runoff rates using the methods described.

STABILITY ANALYSIS IN PRESENCE OF WATER Pore pressures Rainfall Steady state flow and transient flow.

報告者：蕭鈺指導老師：倪春發老師 2010/12/ Introduction 2. Rocca Pitigliana Test Site 3. Monitoring System 4. Hydrologic Modeling 5. Results and Discussion 6.

z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.

The Boulou Fault Zone Its Geology and its Impacts on the Perthus Tunnel project The Boulou Fault Zone Eastern Pyrenees, France Its Geology and its Impacts.

Near Surface Soil Moisture Estimating using Satellite Data Researcher: Dleen Al- Shrafany Supervisors : Dr.Dawei Han Dr.Miguel Rico-Ramirez.

SMOS – The Science Perspective Matthias Drusch Hamburg, Germany 30/10/2009.

A Channel Selection Method for CO 2 Retrieval Using Information Content Analysis Le Kuai 1, Vijay Natraj 1, Run-Lie Shia 1, Charles Miller 2, Yuk Yung.

HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.

Reed Maxwell 1,2,3 Ian Ferguson 1,3 Shadi Moqbel 1,3 John Williams 1,2,3 Steven Meyerhoff 1,2,3 Erica Siirila 1,2,3 1 Department of Geology and Geologic.

Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney

Evaluation of Ground-Penetrating Radar-Derived Soil Moisture Contents for Use with Unsaturated Numerical Flow Models Eric Harmsen Hamed Parsiani.

Vadose-zone Monitoring System

Kristie J. Franz Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University

Operational Radar and Optical MApping Partners The OROMA team consists of 7 developers and 4 end users from coastal management: Overview Beach nourishment.

The University of MississippiNational Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering Rainfall runoff modeling in agricultural watershed using 2D.

Soil Water Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.1 and 4.2 Topics

Experiments and Modeling of Water and Energy Transfer in Agro-ecosystem Yi LUO Zhu OUYANG Yucheng Comprehensive Experiment Station, CAS Sept, 2002.

Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.

The Hydrometeorology Testbed Network. 2 An AR-focused long-term observing network is being installed in CA as part of a MOA between CA-DWR, NOAA and Scripps.

Water underground MS. COULTER. How water moves underground  Water underground trickles down between particles of soil and through cracks and spaces in.

Lecture Notes Applied Hydrogeology

Scenarios 1.Tidal influence 2.Extreme storm surge (wave overtopping, max. limit 200 l/s/m, period 2 h) Outlook calibration and validation of 3D model transfer.

Data assimilation, model parameterization and application Cathy and Michael.

Water Movement Below Surface

Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method

Variation of Surface Soil Moisture and its Implications Under Changing Climate Conditions 1.

An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.

Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.

Oslo Gardermoen Oslo N12 N10 N18 N20 N34 N32 N30 N40 N38 N36 N46 N44 N42 N12 N10 N18 N20 N34 N32 N30 N40 N38 N36 N46 N44 N42 GPR(44)GPR(46) GPR(47) GPR(45)

Groundwater 6 th. Ground Water What if you dump a bucket of water on the ground what will happen? Depends on the Ground!!!

Retrieval of Moisture from GPS Slant-path Water Vapor Observations using 3DVAR and its Impact on the Prediction of Convective Initiation and Precipitation.

How does water underground reach the surface? Freshwater flows underground.

Final Project I. Calibration Drawdown Prediction Particle Tracking

Cheng Zeng EECS 725 May 4, 2015 History and Applications Ground Penetrating Radar.

Transient Two-dimensional Modeling in a Porous Environment Unsaturated- saturated Flows H. LEMACHA 1, A. MASLOUHI 1, Z. MGHAZLI 2, M. RAZACK 3 1 Laboratory.

Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.

Get the Ground Water Picture. Individual Questions The horizontal scale of the cross section is 1 inch = 1 mile. The vertical scale is 1 inch = 50 ft.

1 Effects of Seasonality upon Water and Solute Movement in The Unsaturated Zone Sleem Kreba and Charles Maule Department of Agricultural and Bioresource.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.

National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI), a constituent Laboratory of CSIR, was established in 1961 with the mission to carry out research in multidisciplinary.

Water Underground Chapter 11 section 3. How does water move underground? Like surface water, underground water generally comes from precipitation. Water.

Spatial and temporal variability of the unsaturated zone characterised by geophysical and conventional methods H.K. French, Centre for Soil and Environmental.

The Use of Ground Penetrating Radar Data in the Development of Facies-Based Hydrogeologic Models Rosemary Knight, Elliot Grunewald, Richelle Allen-King,

Soil Water Balance Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.3 and 4.4

Movement & Storage of Groundwater

Soil wetting patterns under porous clay pipe subsurface irrigation A. A. Siyal 1 and T. H. Skaggs 2 1 Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan.

GPR Simulations for pipeline oil drainage

The Institute of Hydrology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences,

Coulter Water underground.

Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )

Infiltration and unsaturated flow

معرفي دستگاه GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar)

Groundwater is the water found in cracks and pores in sand, gravel, and rocks below the earth’s surface. Aquifer is the porous rock layer underground.

Infiltration and unsaturated flow

Applied Hydrology Infiltration

Hydrologic Cycle Terms and Vocabulary.

Aquifer Anisotropy and general flow equations

Relative volume of the ocean and Earth.

Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.

The Crossley Heath School, Halifax

RegCM3 Lisa C. Sloan, Mark A. Snyder, Travis O’Brien, and Kathleen Hutchison Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences.

Unit: Water and the Atmosphere

Water Cycle Model Sign with group members

Groundwater Vocabulary

Presentation transcript:

1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Earth Sciences Division 2 University of Oslo, Department of Geophysics, Simulating Unsaturated Flow Fields Based on Ground Penetrating Radar and Saturation Measurements Stefan Finsterle 1 andNils-Otto Kitterød 2

Purpose: Estimate unsaturated flow velocities by inverse modelling of flow parameters conditioned on soil moisture content and Ground Penetrating Radar Why soil moisture? Why unsaturated flow? Why inverse modelling? Why Ground Penetrating Radar? Why do a tracer test?

Why unsaturated flow? Protection of groundwater resources The Gardermoen airport

The Moreppen research station Oslo Airport Gardermoen 4 km 2 km

Residence time? On the runways (acetate, formeate) On the airplanes (glycol) Consumption of ~ 400 mill. liter/year Deicing chemical Jet fuel Main problem: Good remediation potential in the unsaturated zone (oxygen is the best electron acceptor) However:

Why Ground Penetrating Radar? Electromagnetic Wave Propagation  2 = j  (  + j  )  Soil moisture content,  :  = f(  ) Sedimentological heterogeneities Most important in unsaturated zone

Oslo Airport Gardermoen railway runways utm-E utm-N Moreppen research site 10m N Moreppen research site 615,750615,800 6,677,740 6,677,760 6,677,780 6,677,800 6,677,820 6,677,840 p42 p44 p46 p48 p33 p41 p43 p45 p47 p35

p47 Delta topset Delta foreset What did we see?Cross section of a delta Delta bottomset Iso-crones Delta foreset Delta topset Sea level (~ BP)

p47 p45 p43 p41 GPR profiles p41 p43 p45 p47 Moreppen N 10 m

Why GPR? geological architecture  depth [m] West- East position [m] Significance of heterogeneities to flow? soil moisture content, because  = f(  )   inverse modeling

Why soil moisture? easy  high resolution in space  continuous in time  (compared to other variables) satellite radar  GPR profiles p41 p43 p45 p47 Moreppen N 10 m N12 N10 N18 N20 N34 N32 N30 N40 N38 N36 N46 N44 N42 N12 N10 N18 N20 N34 N32 N30 N40 N38 N36 N46 N44 N42 GPR(44)GPR(46) GPR(47) GPR(45) 5 m

soil moisture content 0.2 m below the surface Moreppen, delta topset May vol% H 2 O interpolation in 3D

soil moisture content 0.3 m below the surface Moreppen, delta topset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 0.5 m below the surface Moreppen, delta topset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 1.0 m below the surface Moreppen, delta topset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 1.5 m below the surface Moreppen, delta topset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 2.0 m below the surface Moreppen, delta topset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 2.5 m below the surface Moreppen, delta foreset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 3.0 m below the surface Moreppen, delta foreset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 3.5 m below the surface Moreppen, delta foreset May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content 3.7 m below the surface Moreppen, below groundwater table May vol% H 2 O

soil moisture content Moreppen, fence diagram May vol% H 2 O

Why inverse modeling? honor observations  include a priori information  consistent homogenization  question of scale!!

find model parameters that minimize | cal. – obs. | Inverse modeling: k abs,S r, 1/ , n |  calc –  obs |

depth (m) depth (m) top1 top2 dip1 dip2 dry saturated ~ 0.5 sat. depth (m) c11c16

top1 top2 dip1 dip2 observed most likely with uncertanty c11 and c16 are the conditioning wells

 obs –  calc for the whole flow domain

Why do a tracer test? validate model parameters by independent observations  Primary observations is reproduced are we able to reproduce (or make forecasts) of non-observed variables?, but

GPR profiles p41 p43 p45 p47 Moreppen N 10 m GPR profiles p41 p43 p45 p47 Moreppen N 10 m

Lysimeter trench GPR profiles p41 p43 p45 p47 Moreppen N 10 m Prenart probe

3.5 m 6 m 2.3 m Background, 48 mm/day, through the dripper lines Bromide (Br) Tritiated water (HTO)

depth (m) day 1 day 2 day 3

F(x) for [Br] and [HTO] time Søvik and Alfnes et al. (2001) Moreppen tracer test m (Br) m (Br) m (Br) m (Br) m (Br) m (HTO) m (HTO) m (HTO) m (HTO) m (HTO) 1.8 m iso 2.8 m iso 3.3 m iso 1.8 m ani 2.8 m ani 3.3 m ani

Future work 1) Preferential flow How much ? How fast? F(x) for [Br] and [HTO] time m (Br) m (Br) 2)Effective parameters

homogeneous anisotropic heterogeneous isotropic

c a b

breakthrough curves (42 mm/d infiltration) time (days) number of particles heterogeneous isotropic (case a) pressure (all) pressure and saturation saturation (no dip2) pressure (no dip2) homogeneous anisotropic saturation (all)