Transcriptional Regulation during Gravitropism in Arabidopsis Root Tips Heike Winter Sederoff, Jeffery M. Kimbrough, Raul Salinas-Mondragon and Christopher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cancer-inducing genes - CRGs (cooperation response genes) Paper Presentation Nadine Sündermann.
Advertisements

1 MicroArray -- Data Analysis Cecilia Hansen & Dirk Repsilber Bioinformatics - 10p, October 2001.
Microarray technology and analysis of gene expression data Hillevi Lindroos.
Gene Expression Chapter 9.
Parallel human genome analysis: Microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes Mark Schena, Dari Shalon, Renu Heller, Andrew Chai, Patrick O. Brown,
Figure 1: (A) A microarray may contain thousands of ‘spots’. Each spot contains many copies of the same DNA sequence that uniquely represents a gene from.
DNA Arrays …DNA systematically arrayed at high density, –virtual genomes for expression studies, RNA hybridization to DNA for expression studies, –comparative.
Microarray Technology Types Normalization Microarray Technology Microarray: –New Technology (first paper: 1995) Allows study of thousands of genes at.
Fuzzy K means.
Genomics I: The Transcriptome RNA Expression Analysis Determining genomewide RNA expression levels.
Analysis of microarray data
Microarrays (Gene Chips) Pioneered by Pat Brown in mid 1990’s To monitor thousands of mRNAs simultaneously Comparative Northern blot on thousands of genes.
CDNA Microarrays MB206.
Amandine Bemmo 1,2, David Benovoy 2, Jacek Majewski 2 1 Universite de Montreal, 2 McGill university and Genome Quebec innovation centre Analyses of Affymetrix.
Transcriptional profiling and mRNA stability – don’t shoot the messenger David R. Sherman Seattle Biomedical Research Institute Grand Challenge of Latent.
Dr Andrew Harrison Departments of Mathematical Sciences and Biological Sciences University of Essex Looking for signals in tens of thousands.
Methodology Control (no treatment) Estrogen (5 uM) 4-nonylphenol (5 uM) Cultured Cells, Isolated RNA, RTed to cDNA Data analyzed by Spotfire software RT-PCR.
Plant Hormones.
Supplemental figure 1: Correlation coefficients between signal intensities from biological replicates of wild.
Scenario 6 Distinguishing different types of leukemia to target treatment.
Supplementary Fig. S1: Hierarchical clustering of AUX/IAA genes, showing significant differential expression under at least one abiotic stress condition.
Microarrays and Gene Expression Analysis. 2 Gene Expression Data Microarray experiments Applications Data analysis Gene Expression Databases.
MCB 317 Genetics and Genomics Topic 11 Genomics. Readings Genomics: Hartwell Chapter 10 of full textbook; chapter 6 of the abbreviated textbook.
Gene Expression Analysis. 2 DNA Microarray First introduced in 1987 A microarray is a tool for analyzing gene expression in genomic scale. The microarray.
Phytoremediation and Phytosensing of Explosives: The Target genes By: Ariel Moore.
Microarray Technology. Introduction Introduction –Microarrays are extremely powerful ways to analyze gene expression. –Using a microarray, it is possible.
A B Supporting Information Figure S1: Distribution of the density of expression intensities for the complete microarray dataset (A) and after removal of.
Gene expression (signal intensity) Control Osmotic Salt Drought Root Control Gene expression (signal intensity) Treatment.
Glutamyl-tRNA 5-Aminolevulinic acid Protoporphyrinogen IX Mg-Proto IX Heme Mg-Proto IX ME HEMA GSA PPO FC PORB CHLD, CHLH, CHLI Glutamate 1-semialdehyde.
Lecture 23 – Functional Genomics I Based on chapter 8 Functional and Comparative Genomics Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Inc.
IFAFS Meeting Gene Expression – Disease and Water Deficit John Davis.
Methodology U937 Human Immune Cells Control (No treatment) (n=4) Estrogen (5 uM) (n=4) 4-nonylphenol (5 uM) (n=4) Cultured Cells, RNA Isolation, RT (to.
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS) LECTURE 13 ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSCRIPTOME.
Transcriptome What is it - genome wide transcript abundance How do you obtain it - Arrays + MPSS What do you do with it when you have it - ?
Statistical Analysis for Expression Experiments Heather Adams BeeSpace Doctoral Forum Thursday May 21, 2009.
Lecture 26 GWAS Based on chapter 9 Functional and Comparative Genomics Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Inc.
NCode TM miRNA Analysis Platform Identifies Differentially Expressed Novel miRNAs in Adenocarcinoma Using Clinical Human Samples Provided By BioServe.
Microarray: An Introduction
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Transcriptome Characterization of Estrogen-Treated.
Figure S1 (a) (b) Fig. S1. Hydroponics culture of Arabidopsis thaliana. (a) Illustration of the hydroponics system in the growth chamber. (b) close-up.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Identification of a Novel TP53 Cancer Susceptibility.
Supplemental Figure 1. The cell death phenotype of fhy3 far1 double mutants. A. The cell death phenotype of fhy3-4 far1-2 mutant plants under LD conditions.
EQTLs.
Microarray Experiment Design and Data Interpretation
Copyright © 2015 by the American Osteopathic Association.
Suppl. Fig. S1 Fig. S1 (A, C, E, G, I, K) Double-logarithmic plot of gene expression signals of two biological replicates (B, D, F, H, J, L) Distribution.
M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Budding yeast has a small genome of approximately 6000 genes.
JAV1 Controls Jasmonate-Regulated Plant Defense
Characterization of microRNA transcriptome in tumor, adjacent, and normal tissues of lung squamous cell carcinoma  Jun Wang, MD, PhD, Zhi Li, MD, PhD,
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
by Gregory H. Underhill, David George, Eric G. Bremer, and Geoffrey S
Effects of Etanercept Are Distinct from Infliximab in Modulating Proinflammatory Genes in Activated Human Leukocytes  Asifa S. Haider, Irma R. Cardinale,
Luo Chongyuan , Durgin Brittany G. , Watanabe Naohide , Lam Eric  
Molecular Mechanisms of Root Gravitropism
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the Defects in Fragile X Syndrome Neurons Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells  Tomer Halevy, Christian Czech, Nissim.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
The BRD4 bromodomain is critical for expression of SASP genes.
RNA Sequencing of Stentor Cell Fragments Reveals Transcriptional Changes during Cellular Regeneration  Henning Onsbring, Mahwash Jamy, Thijs J.G. Ettema 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Different Plant Hormones Regulate Similar Processes through Largely Nonoverlapping Transcriptional Responses  Jennifer L. Nemhauser, Fangxin Hong, Joanne.
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
A multitiered approach to characterize transcriptome structure.
Intestinal myofibroblasts in innate immune responses of the intestine
Insights into Gene Modulation by Therapeutic TNF and IFNγ Antibodies: TNF Regulates IFNγ Production by T Cells and TNF-Regulated Genes Linked to Psoriasis.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Transcriptional Regulation during Gravitropism in Arabidopsis Root Tips Heike Winter Sederoff, Jeffery M. Kimbrough, Raul Salinas-Mondragon and Christopher Brown NSCORT-Plant Gravitational Genomics Group, Dept. Botany and Kenan Institute, NC State University NC State University Abstract Rapid, temporal changes in the abundance of specific transcripts occur in response to gravity-stimulation and these transcript level changes reveal clusters of coordinating signaling events that are required for the tissue to make a commitment to differential growth. We have carried out microarray analysis of Arabidopsis root tips after gravistimulation (reorientation) and mechanical stress and monitored transcript levels ca. 24,000 genes during the first hour after either stimuli. We identified genes responding to either stimulus specifically as well as genes shared by both signalling pathways. The temporal pattern of transcription and transcript stability of those induced genes are very distinct. We identified stress (gravity vs mechanical) specific gene expression and isoform specific expression. The earliest changes of transcript levels were seen already 2 min after the stimulus. Table I: Summary of transcript levels responding to gravity and/or mechanical stimulation by increased (up) or decreased (down) steady- state levels of transcripts.Gravity min after reorientation The Approach We are using the Arabidopsis root tip (7 day old dark-grown seedlings) to analyze the changes in transcript levels in response to gravistimulation using the Arabidopsis ATH1 GeneChip (Affymetrix), containing more than 22,500 probe sets representing approximately 24,000 genes. For our time-course experiment, approximately 150 root tips were harvested before (0 time point) and 2, 5, 15, 30, 60 min after reorientation (135◦) by pouring RNAlater (Ambion) onto the plates and cutting off the root tips (5 mm). Mechanical stress controls seedlings (0, 2, 5, 15, 30, 60 min) were moved horizontally for 5 sec without changing their orientation towards the vector of gravity. Methods: Total RNA was extracted and purified over a Qiagen RNeasy column, amplified, and labeled with biotin. 10 ug of biotin labeled aRNA (amplified RNA) was hybridized to the GeneChip® Arabidopsis ATH1 Genome Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) containing more than 22,500 probe sets. Figure 1. Scatter Plot: X-axis values (log 10 signal intensities) correspond to transcript profile before gravity stimulation. Y-axis values correspond to transcript profile of root tips harvested after a 2 minute reorientation (135◦) in the gravity vector plane. Innermost parallel green lines flanking the scatter indicate boundary for genes up or down regulated greater than 2 fold (yellow: not expressed, blue: expressed under one condition; red: expressed genes). Each dot represents a unique gene. First Results We are currently still analyzing the vast amount of data generated by this method. To get an impression of the quality of our microarrays, we carried out real-time PCR for eight genes shown to be up-regulated during gravitropism (see Fig. 3). Scatter Plots (see Fig.1) showed excellent correlation in overall gene expression between treatments. Clusters of temporal expression Preliminary results show that different clusters of genes exhibit changes in mRNA abundance with specific patterns following the time-course during the first hour after gravistimulation (Fig.2). Figure 2: Temporal changes of transcript levels of a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase XET (At4g30270), sucrose transporter SUC2, and a lipid- transfer protein-like gene (At2g18370) in Arabidopsis root tips after gravity-stimulation. Figure 3: Decrease of transcript levels of an extensinA (CAA ), RNA binding protein-like (gi: ), and pectinesterase-like (PATX:E ) in Arabidopsis root tips after gravity- stimulation. Isoform-specific and gravity-specific transcripts For some clusters of genes, we found very specific expression of individual isoforms of gene families to expressed within less than 5 min after gravistimulation. Calmodulin1 (CaM1) was upregulated within 2-5 min after gravistimulation, while none of the other calmodulin isoforms showed significant effects (Fig. 5). After mechano-stimulation, CaM1 transcript levels were down-regulated (Fig.4). Similar kinetics and specificity was found for the mu isoform of ’s. Figure 5: Specific isoforms of CaM and respond to gravistimulation. Upregulation of CaM1 and mu, occurred within less than 5 min and steady-state transcript levels were back to control levels after 30 min. Figure 4: Transcript levels of CaM1 in Arabidopsis root tips after gravistimulation compared to transient mechanical stress. Data from microarray analysis (n=2) and confirmed by real-time PCR (with Actin8 as reference). Upregulation of CaM1 occurs within 5 min of gravistimulation. Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NASA. We thank Nina Allen, Wendy Boss, Eric Davies, Steve Huber, Gloria Muday, Imara Perera, Dominique Robertson, and Ron Sederoff for stimulating discussion and support. Figure 6: Hierarchical cluster showing mechanical stress regulated transcripts For specific transcripts, changes in the rates of transcription vs transcript degradation lead to decreases of their steady- state levels (Fig. 3). Mechanical min after reorientation We found about 1,563 genes were regulated by gravity. Of those, 1,414 showed significant increases in transcript abundance during gravistimulation while 149 showed decreased levels. During mechano- stimulation, 1,350 genes showed significant regulation, 1,115 were increased, while 235 showed a decrease in transcript abundance. Gravity-specific changes were detected for 1,168 transcripts, while 956 transcript showed changes in transcript abundance only after mechano- stimulation. Especially interesting are those genes which show opposite responses in both signaling networks (see Table I). Stress:updowntotal Gravity Mechanical Gravity (specific) Mechanical (specific) Both Stresses similar response: opposite response: 25 Figure 7: Hierarchical cluster showing gravity regulated transcripts