Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Evaluating programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. Research and Development The team: Porter, Murphy, Goldring, Elliott, Polikoff, May, OToole, Cravens Wallace Foundation.
Advertisements

Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Curriculum Development and Course Design
Building capacity for assessment leadership via professional development and mentoring of course coordinators Merrilyn Goos.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Getting Started on Your Teaching Portfolio 2013 Future Faculty Teaching Fellows Summer Institute Julie Saam, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education Assistant.
Using Video Segments to Enhance Early Clinical Experiences of Prospective Teachers Kristen Cuthrell, Michael Vitale, College of Education, East Carolina.
Using Accreditation to Increase the Evidence Base of Teacher Education (i.e., Using evidence to move faculty toward evidence) Sandra B. Cohen Director.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Consistency of Assessment
Volunteer Recognition Honoring and recognizing individuals for their unique contribution to educational program efforts Honoring and recognizing individuals.
Disability Access and Inclusion Planning Agents and Contractors DAIP Progress Reporting.
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Demystifying Outcomes Assessment Barbara M. Wheeling College of Business Montana State University-Billings.
- Objective of the Program Evaluation - The process of the Program Evaluation.
Course 'Evaluations': A Strategic Approach TLC Session January 26, 2006.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Rhona Sharpe, Oxford Brookes University Krista DeLeeuw, University of Aberdeen DISCIPLINE PERSPECTIVES ON GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES.
The who, what, where, why, when, and how of writing end-of-the-year reports Sarah Todd Director of Institutional Research and Assessment Presentation to.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
Goals of PTOL Workshop Provide a focus for developing an online course Develop understanding of the online course environment Identify goals for an.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
 Supporting excellence in assessment  Encouraging professional development for individuals involved in assessment  Disseminating good practice  Proving.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
REPUTATION AND EXPERIENCE The Twin Pillars of Customer Centric Organisations Presentation by Paula Giles 14th May 2015.
Outcomes Assessment 101 Assessment Showcase 2009: Best Practices in the Assessment of Learning and Teaching February 11, 2009 Gwendolyn Johnson, Ph.D.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Partnerships for student success: Integrated development of academic and information literacies across disciplines Bev Kokkinn & Cathy Mahar Learning &
Designing Survey Instrument to Evaluate Implementation of Complex Health Interventions: Lessons Learned Eunice Chong Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels Lori Webel-Edgar.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
© New Zealand Ministry of Education copying restricted to use by New Zealand education sector. Page 1 Consider the Evidence Evidence-driven.
Valuing evaluation: A Case Study of Professional Development to Support Academic Engagement in Online Evaluation Processes and Outcomes Dr. Diana Quinn.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Chapter 7 Performance Management. Measuring the performance of a helpdesk is challenging, because statistics that seem impressive at first glance are.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Marketing UpdateBoard of Directors Meeting – July 2008 Classroom Walkthrough version 3.0 An Introduction to.
Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments OECD Teaching and Learning International Study (TALIS) Teacher evaluation Evidence from TALIS OECD.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Using Data Effectively ABE Directors’ Meeting October 9th and 10th, 2002.
By Lynnece Edmond.  It is essential for researchers to collect data as a way to gather evidence to support their research question.  Collecting data.
Preparing to meet competency and accreditation standards in the US: Perspectives of a social work program administrator July, 2015 Emiko A. Tajima, PhD.
Measuring subjective well-being: the UK experience
Communities of Practice Stephen Merry & Paul Orsmond Staffordshire University Faculty of Sciences.
Cynthia Brown, DNS, RN, AHN-BC,CNE University of West Georgia Bekir Mugayitoglu, EdD(c) Duquesne University Sharon A. Cumbie, PhD, RN, CNS University of.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
Measuring Well-being October 2011 OSI Education Programme workshop Charles Seaford Head of the Centre for Well-being, new economics foundation.
‘Education has for its purpose not the imparting of particular knowledge but the strengthening of mental faculties’ (Kant c1770)
Analyse questions. What to do when you are confronted with an ANALYSE question! Analyse means to break down all the elements of the question then show.
What Do Students Know about the Ocean? Assessing Ocean Literacy at the California State University Maritime Academy Alex Parker, Colin Dewey, Steven Runyon,
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Marilee J. Bresciani, Ph.D. Professor, Postsecondary Education and Co-Director of the Center for Educational Leadership, Innovation, and Policy San Diego.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Staff Feedback Forum 3pm-5pm, 22 March 2017
Standard Four Program Impact
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
The Assessing Cycle Module 1 Assessment Assessment Accountability Data
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Accountability and Assessment in School Counseling
Presentation transcript:

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Evaluating programs

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Problem: You have been given responsibility for the quality of a three year undergraduate program involving some 30 courses. What evidence do you have about the program and its outcomes that informs decisions about quality and quality improvement?

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Feeling powerless???? GCEQ – but……………… Commission an evaluation by some-one – but what data can be collected, what standards apply, who interprets the data against the standards and how will evaluation be used in decision making?

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Answer????? Depends on what you consider to be relevant data and how it might be used either ‘by itself’ or in conjunction with other information

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA The issues for you are: Getting data that connects to academic work – eg how do students regard my course? Having tools that allow you to generate data about programs Being able to connect data and tools with professional judgments to decide about quality improvement? Getting others to understand the system and its limitations in assisting decisions about quality improvement

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Aggregated evaluation items courses Program characteristic 1 Program characteristic 2 Program characteristic n Model 1 All students in all courses in the program Exit students Program evaluation Program characteristics Model 2

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA Course evaluation aggregated to provide program and sub program data Policy framework identifies Program Directors to manage evaluation through management of course evaluation Online delivery that uses data from student information system Formal Program Evaluation Reports include benchmarking based on data

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA System Components A workable view about quality Identified standards A means of measurement Judgment against standards Linkages with quality improvement Linkages with change agents

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA A workable view about quality Resolved through policy directions Shaped by national ‘tests’ and performance tables Privileges student data within evaluation process

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA Identified standards GCEQ scales related to teaching and generic program outcomes

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA A means of measurement Course data that is aggregated rather than specific program instrument Core items make up standardised survey – items sample scales from the GCEQ and include overall satisfaction Constructed and delivered online through course home pages

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA Judgment against standards Intra program benchmarking according to other high performance courses in relation to items of the core External benchmarking – overall satisfaction and GCEQ scales

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA Linkages with quality improvement Required reportage of evaluation of program Requirements regarding identification of changes for quality enhancement

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Program Evaluation at UniSA Linkages with change agents Reward systems use evaluation data