CA-1 Preclinical Studies Philip Bentley, PhD Vice President Toxicology/Pathology Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Philip Bentley, PhD Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) Agonists Preclinical and Clinical Cardiac Safety Considerations Jeri.
Advertisements

Evaluation of a potential mutagenic MOA based on analysis of the weight of evidence and using the modified Hill criteria Martha M. Moore, Ph.D. Director,
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
rhBMP-2: origin, biology and preclinical safety
Nonclinical Pharmacology/ Toxicology Data for PROTOPIC  (Tacrolimus ointment for Atopic Dermatitis) Barbara Hill, Ph.D. Division of Dermatologic and Dental.
Response Optimization in Oncology In Vivo Studies: a Multiobjective Modeling Approach Maksim Pashkevich, PhD (Early Phase Oncology Statistics) Joint work.
Is depleted uranium a carcinogen? Keith Baverstock PhD Department of Environmental Science University of Kuopio Finland.
McKim Workshop on Strategic Approaches for Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment Jay R. Niemelä Technical University of Denmark National Food Institute.
Wet Lab Radiation Damage Measured by Micronucleus (MN) Assay Background Background Equipment Equipment Supplies Supplies Procedures Procedures Lab Demonstrations.
Principles of Occupational Toxicology 2 – Types of toxicity
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Title, in bold style Subtitle, in regular Max 3 lines of text totally NB! The graphic outside the slide will not show in “Slide Show” or on print WntResearch.
Detecting Mutagens and Carcinogens. introduction - Increased number of chemicals used and present as environmental contaminats, testes for the mutagenicity.
1 Sumol/August 21, 2002 Toxicology& Risk Analysis Sumol Pavittranon, Ph. D. Dept. Of Medical Sciences
Food and Drug Administration Preclinical safety data for “first in human” (FIH) clinical trials in healthy volunteer subjects Oncology Drug Advisory Committee.
1 11/8/00 Pharmacology of Tacrolimus Ointment William Fitzsimmons, Pharm.D. Vice President Drug Development Project Management Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc.
CANCER. THE WORD CANCER  FEAR  DEATH  PAIN  SUFFERING  LOSS  ECONOMIC LOSS  DISFIGUREMENT  WHAT’S THE FUTURE.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Subjects in Gene Transfer Clinical Protocols Vector Classes with Potential for Long-Term Risks Carolyn A. Wilson, Ph.D. Division.
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
Understanding Cancer Accelerated Biology. Faces of Cancer  You are a doctor interviewing a person (the piece of paper you got on the way in) with cancer.
Mutagenic MOA Carcinogens: How High is the Burden of Proof ?
National Committee for the Certification of Radiation Protection Officer BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
Determinants of Repeated exposure Toxicity
28/05/12 Questions (Rispondete alle domande che seguono usando il colore rosso per il testo) Tossicologia - Rubbiani Maristella.
Essential Considerations for Your IND Submission: Objectives and Pitfall Avoidance in Your Preclinical Program Darren Warren.
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
GENOTOXICITY AND INDUSTRY: UTILIZING GENETIC TOXICITY ASSAYS TO SUPPORT PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT August 24, 2015 Dan Roberts, MS Research Scientist Genetic.
Furan in Food Summary and Charge to the FAC and SCNT Terry C. Troxell, Ph.D. Director Office of Plant and Dairy Foods FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied.
Basic Aspects and Most Commonly Worldwide Employed and Validated In Vitro Assays Leon F. Stankowski, Jr., PhD Consultant, Genetic Toxicology Genotoxicity.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials in Animals: Lessons Learned William A. Craig, M.D. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
August 24-26, 2015 Philadelphia, USA
Daily used nanoparticles increases the incidence of cancer presented by Hanan Ramadan Hamad Mohamed Zoology Department Faculty of Science Cairo University.
1 The Cancer Risk Associated with Ethylene Oxide in the Processing of Cord Blood Byron Butterworth, Ph.D. Butterworth Consulting John Chapman, Ph.D. ThermoGenesis.
1.Collection of relevant data – toxicity and exposure 2.Selection of critical studies and/or HCVs 3.Health risk assessment – systemic 4.Health risk assessment.
Lecture 28 Genetics of Cancer Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Inc.
Cancer Accelerated Biology. Learning Objectives The different methods of diagnosing cancer. The difference between a malignant tumor and a benign tumor.
ASTM F748 Selecting Biological Test Methods
Russell D. Owen Wireless Phones Russell D. Owen, Ph.D. Chief, Radiation Biology Branch, Division of Life Sciences CDRH Office of Science and Technology.
Furan-Induced Cytotoxicity, Cell Proliferation, and Tumorgenicity in Mouse Liver Dr. Glenda Moser.
Pediatric Subcommittee of the AIDAC October 29-30, Topical Immunosuppressants (Calcineurin Inhibitors) - Animal Toxicology October 30, 2003 Barbara.
『창의적 예측경영』『 효율적 내실경영 』 Toxicity Lee, sang-hwi Chapter 17.
Dose-Response ENVR430 Nov 09, 2009 Casarett and Doull, Chapter 2, pp (6 th Edn) Chapter 2, pp (7 th Edn) Timbrell Chapter 2, pp (3 rd.
Toxic effects Acute / chronic Reversible / irreversible Immediate / delayed Idiosyncratic - hypersensitivity Local / systemic Target organs.
CON - 1 Conclusions C David R. Parkinson Vice President, Global Head, Clinical Research and Development Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
James G. Farrelly, Ph.D. Pharmacology Team Leader Division of Antiviral Drug Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
정책이력 일반 현황 Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) related with telomerase activity regulates tumorigenic potential of mouse embryonic stem cells Seung.
CELL DIFFERENTIATION.
第三章 Survivin siRNA nano particles are capable of inhibiting liver cancer cell growth both in vitro and in vivo Suoqin Tang,MD, Kuiyao Qu,MD, Yi Zhang,MD.
ASTM F748 Selecting Biological Test Methods
Vice President, Cancer Therapeutics, Inc.
Use of Borates in Swimming Pools: Consideration of Health Effects
…driving discovery An improved potent direct thrombin inhibitor shows efficacy with low bleeding risk Anirban Datta et al.
CELL DIFFERENTIATION.
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
Treatment with BLU9931 leads to tumor regression in the FGF19-overexpressing PDX-derived xenograft LIXC012. Treatment with BLU9931 leads to tumor regression.
Dose-Response ENVR430 Oct 13, 2008
Disruption of Iron Regulation after Radiation and Donor Cell Infusion
DNA, protein synthesis, gene expression & mutations
Health Effects of Radiation
Induction of Angiopoietin-2 gene expression by COX-2: A novel role for COX-2 inhibitors during hepatocarcinogenesis  Shinji Tanaka, Jack R. Wands, Shigeki.
1.6 U.6 Mutagens, oncogenes and metastasis are involved in the development of primary and secondary tumours. Tumours are abnormal growth of tissue that.
Developmental potential of BMSSCs clones in vivo.
Antitumor effects of celastrol in vitro and in vivo.
Note lack of cytotoxicity
Positive Genetox Findings on a Candidate Pharmaceutical…. Now What
Determination of MTD for romidepsin and pralatrexate and associated antitumor activity. Determination of MTD for romidepsin and pralatrexate and associated.
Presentation transcript:

CA-1 Preclinical Studies Philip Bentley, PhD Vice President Toxicology/Pathology Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Philip Bentley, PhD Vice President Toxicology/Pathology Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

CA-2 Tegaserod Carcinogenicity Studies Rat study: No tumor increase Mouse study: One tumor type increased Rat study: No tumor increase Mouse study: One tumor type increased

CA-3 Increased Incidence of Intestinal Tumors in Tegaserod Mouse Carcinogenicity Study Dose, mg/kg SexMFMFMFMF No. of intestines examined AdenocarcinomaSmall intestine Mucosal hyperplasiaSmall intestine Dose, mg/kg SexMFMFMFMF No. of intestines examined AdenocarcinomaSmall intestine Mucosal hyperplasiaSmall intestine mg/kg = 34 times human exposure (AUC); 80 fold human dose (BSA) 600 mg/kg = 70 times human exposure (AUC); 240 fold human dose (BSA)

CA-4 Mouse Small Intestinal Tumors  Increased incidence at high dose only, which caused severe inhibition of body weight gain and exceeded the Maximal Tolerated Dose (MTD)  Associated with sustained hyperplasia of small intestinal mucosa  Increased incidence at high dose only, which caused severe inhibition of body weight gain and exceeded the Maximal Tolerated Dose (MTD)  Associated with sustained hyperplasia of small intestinal mucosa

CA-5 Body Weight Curves in the Tegaserod Mouse Carcinogenicity Study

CA-6 Tegaserod Has No Mutagenic Potential  In vitro assays –Ames test, Salmonella typhimurium –Chromosomal aberration, V-79 cells –HGPRT gene mutation, V-79 cells –DNA repair (UDS), rat hepatocytes  In vivo assay –Bone marrow micronucleus, CD-1 mouse  In vitro assays –Ames test, Salmonella typhimurium –Chromosomal aberration, V-79 cells –HGPRT gene mutation, V-79 cells –DNA repair (UDS), rat hepatocytes  In vivo assay –Bone marrow micronucleus, CD-1 mouse

CA-7 Tegaserod Induces Reversible Hyperplasia in Mouse Intestinal Mucosa Incidence of Study week Dose, mg/kgBrdU LIhyperplasia After 13-week /10 treatment *2/ *6/10 After 4-week026.90/10 recovery / /10 Incidence of Study week Dose, mg/kgBrdU LIhyperplasia After 13-week /10 treatment *2/ *6/10 After 4-week026.90/10 recovery / /10

CA-8 Tumors Result From Epigenetic Effects  Short-term treatment of mice resulted in reversible hyperplasia of small intestinal mucosa  Long-term treatment at very high doses resulted in sustained mucosal hyperplasia as observed in the mouse carcinogenicity study  Short-term treatment of mice resulted in reversible hyperplasia of small intestinal mucosa  Long-term treatment at very high doses resulted in sustained mucosal hyperplasia as observed in the mouse carcinogenicity study

CA-9 Threshold Sustained Hyperplasia Is Required for Tumor Formation Hyperplasia Tumor 200 mg/kg 600 mg/kg

CA-10 The Tumor Incidence Was Only Increased at a Very High Tegaserod Dose  The dose of 600 mg/kg was above the MTD: –1,800-fold human dose (240 fold BSA) –70-fold expected human exposure (AUC) –570-fold estimated local intestinal concentration  The no-effect level of 200 mg/kg was at the MTD: –600-fold human dose (80 fold BSA) –34-fold expected human exposure (AUC) –190-fold estimated local intestinal concentration  The dose of 600 mg/kg was above the MTD: –1,800-fold human dose (240 fold BSA) –70-fold expected human exposure (AUC) –570-fold estimated local intestinal concentration  The no-effect level of 200 mg/kg was at the MTD: –600-fold human dose (80 fold BSA) –34-fold expected human exposure (AUC) –190-fold estimated local intestinal concentration BSA = Body surface area

CA-11 Tegaserod Therapy Poses No Carcinogenic Risk  Tegaserod is not mutagenic  Tumor incidences only increased at single site  No intestinal mucosal hyperplasia in dogs or rats  Initial hyperplasia in mice reversible  No carcinogenic effects in rats  Tumors only at the high dose in the mouse –Very high safety margin  Tegaserod is not mutagenic  Tumor incidences only increased at single site  No intestinal mucosal hyperplasia in dogs or rats  Initial hyperplasia in mice reversible  No carcinogenic effects in rats  Tumors only at the high dose in the mouse –Very high safety margin