Phase 6 Land Use Co-Chairs: Karl Berger, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Jennifer Tribo, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Coordinator:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1.2 Glossary Aesthetic Pertaining to a sense of beauty or to aesthetics. Agriculture The broad industry engaged in the production of plants and animals.

Advertisements

Introduction to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAFOs Christina Richmond West Virginia Department of Agriculture.

Unit 3: Feedstuffs Used in Livestock Diets

The Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Watershed Model Gary Shenk Presentation to COG 10/4/2012.

Presentation by Keith Rikli December 12, 2011 Suitability of Airport Placement near Monterey California.

Lancaster County GIS Projects 2012 Aerial Photos Cooperative project with NGA and USGS leveraged about $70,000 of Federal Funds Lancaster County provided.

Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.

DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.

NUTRIENT RUNOFF EFFECTS ON JORDAN LAKE Brianna Young, Jennifer Jackson and Emily Nurminen.

1 Storm Water Management: Using GIS to Direct Non-Point Source Pollution Mitigation Efforts in the Eagleville Brook Watershed Jason Parent

Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.

Land Use Loading Rates Olivia H. Devereux Forestry Workgroup October 1, 2014.

FUNDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STATEWIDE LAND COVER DATA Jennifer Tribo, Senior Water Resources Planner Hampton Roads Planning District Commission VGIN Advisory.

Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.

On-Farm Conservation and Nutrient Management in Maryland: A 2010 Snapshot Erik Lichtenberg Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University.

 The Importance of Soil Ag and Tech ! Ms. Lacross.

Working with Raster Grids and Map Algebra Katherine Paybins, USGS.

Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,

Information on Farms in Alabama (1997) Number of farms Area in farmland (acres) Average size of farm (acres) 41,384 8,704,

Nursery Production 3 Commercial Plant Production.

Cropping Practices that Influence Weed Management

Chapter One The Importance of Soil.  The history of Soil –Dates back all the way to the Egyptians civilization of 4,000 years ago –Recently in the US.

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information Reid Christianson, P.E., Ph.D. Center for Watershed Protection Ellicott City, Maryland.

Based on USDA-NASS Data Maps Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Bar Chart Bar Chart Bar Chart.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS FAO ESS Crops Statistics.

Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.

Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality Recommended by Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission and approved by the EPD.

Uses of Plants Plant Science.

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.

The Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay by the Numbers The watershed includes parts of six states and the District of Columbia, with headwaters in Cooperstown,

Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.

ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,

Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.

Karl Berger Dept. of Environmental Programs Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Developments April 28, 2015.

U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.

Models in GIS A model is a description of reality It may be: Dynamic orStatic Dynamic spatial models e.g., hydrologic flow Static spatial models (or point.

SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.

Review of Scenario Builder BMP crediting Christopher F. Brosch University of Maryland Extension Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Remote Sensing Classification Systems

Grain Oil and Specialty Field-Crop Production. Field Crops  450 million acres in the U.S. (20% of U.S. land)

Sustainable Agriculture UNIT 1 – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

The Forest Resource in Iowa. Iowa’s Forest Cover   Iowa’s forests cover 8% of our landscape   87% of our 2,97,000 acres are owned by private landowners.

Mixed Annual-Perennial Systems: Diversity on Iowa’s Land Matt Liebman Wallace Chair for Sustainable Agriculture Iowa State University.

Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.

Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed.

Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.

Using Manure as Fertilizer Saves $ On this 120 acre farm with 40 cows the manure is worth $5000 It is fertilizer already on the farm, as is the nitrogen.

1 « Agri-environmental indicators: Nitrogen balance at NUTS IV level. A case study in Greece » NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF GREECE.

University Extension/Department of Economics Crop Insurance for Organic Producers: The Latest Update 10 th Annual Iowa Organic Conference Ames, Iowa Nov.

Cover Crops - Overview Alan Sundermeier Ohio State University Extension

CENTRAL MUSCATATUCK WATERSHED. BMPs Cost-Shared by Central Muscatatuck Watershed Project.

How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?

Supervised Agricultural Experiences. What is an SAE? O A Supervised Agricultural Experience is your out-of- class activity where you apply what you have.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Finalization of Phase 6 Land Use Database, version 2 Peter Claggett, Fred Irani, Quentin Stubbs,

Agronomic Crops.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.

Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.

Human Activities in Ecosystems. Human Activities Cut down forests to make way for new houses, malls and parking lots. There is usually many of us in a.

Water Quality Protection And Improvement 30+ Years of the Clean Water Act Most industries, municipalities, and other dischargers of pollutants were not.

1 AFO or CAFO: Evaluating environmental issues on your farm Winter Dairy Management 2009 Karl Czymmek PRO-DAIRY Cornell University and Greg Albrecht NYS.

Figure 1. Rodale Farming Systems Trial with rotations. Note the presence of cover crops and amendment in organic systems. Synthetic fertilizer herbicide.

Lower Rio Grande Valley Low Impact Development (LID) Implementation and Education by Brianna Saenz,MS, EIT AUGUSTO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M.S, CFM. Institute.

Introduction to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAFOs Christina Richmond West Virginia Department of Agriculture.

Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality

Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake

WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler

Agriculture WIP Phase III Development Update

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment

Jeopardy Hosted by Mr. Manskopf.

Presentation transcript:

Phase 6 Land Use Co-Chairs: Karl Berger, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Jennifer Tribo, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Coordinator: Peter Claggett, U.S. Geological Survey

Land UseLand Cover Building a 2012 Phase 6 Land Use Raster Database:

Proposed Developed Phase 6 Land Uses Developed Impervious Roads Other (e.g. Buildings, parking lots, etc.) Pervious Tree Canopy Open Space Turf ConstructionExtractive Level I Level II Level III Developed

Proposed Developed Phase 6 Land Uses Phase 6 Roads Buildings, parking lots, etc. Turf grass Tree canopy* “Open space” Construction Extractive Phase Impervious surfaces Turf grass (pervious) Construction Extractive * provisional, pending further work on loading differences and model fitness Developed

Proposed Developed Phase 6 Land Uses Agriculture Commodity Crops Corn Soybeans Small Grains Hay and Legume forage Alfalfa and other legumes Non-legume forage Pasture and pastured Cropland Specialty and Other Crops Vines Low Cover High Cover Farmsteads Animal Non-animal Level I Level II Level III Agriculture

Proposed Agricultural Phase 6 Land Uses (from Ag Workgroup and Ag Modeling Subcommittee) Phase 6 Corn Soybeans Small grains Alfalfa Non-legume forage Pasture Vines Low cover specialty High cover specialty Impervious CAFO & AFO farmsteads Impervious non-animal farmsteads Pervious CAFO & AFO farmsteads Pervious non-animal farmsteads Phase Hightill w/ & w/o manure Lowtill with manure Nutrient management hightill w/ & w/o manure Nutrient management lowtill Alfalfa Hay w/ & w/o nutrients Nutrient management alfalfa Nutrient management hay Pasture Nutrient management pasture Nursery AFOs CAFOs Degraded riparian pasture Agriculture

Proposed Developed Phase 6 Land Uses Natural Forests Undisturbed Harvested Disturbed (e.g. insects, fire, etc.) Wetlands Tidal emergent Fresh emergent Non-tidal woody Water (non-tidal)* Level I Level II Level III Natural

Proposed Natural Phase 6 Land Uses Phase 6 Forests Harvested forest Disturbed forest Tidal emergent wetlands Fresh emergent wetlands Non-tidal woody wetlands Water* Phase Woody/open Harvested forest Water * Will expand water coverage to include 1:24K National Hydrography Dataset waterbodies and possibly Landsat derived “persistent” water features. Natural

Questions?