A study of the Kπ system Mikhail Kozyulin, (CERN, BINP) 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 (1385) ANALYSIS STATUS Enrico Fragiacomo, Massimo Venaruzzo INFN and University Trieste Resonances meeting – CERN – 04/03/2011.
Advertisements

Fermilab, June 26 th 2001 Thoughts on the fitting procedure for the  c + lifetime with the        channel Gianluigi Boca.
S-Waves & the extraction of  s Sheldon Stone FPCP 2010, Torino, Italy, May 2010.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
CP Violation Reach at Very High Luminosity B Factories Abi Soffer Snowmass 2001 Outline: Ambiguities B  DK B  D*     etc. B  D*  a 0   etc. (“designer.
1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa March 13 th 2007  Introduction  Antineutrino selection  Feasibility.
19th July 2007CPWG1 Model independent determination of γ from B ± →D(K 0 S π + π − )K ± Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
Update on X(3872) J PC determination Soo-Kyung Choi Stephen L. Olsen Gyeongsang Univ. Univ. of Hawai’i April Fool’s day 2005 Quarkonium group meeting In.
Pinning down the J PC values of the X(3872) K. Miyabayashi for S.K. Choi & S.L. Olsen Feb, 2005 Belle Analysis & Software Meeting.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
12/14/021 Measurements of the Branching Fractions and Helicity Amplitudes in B  D*  Decays Authors: Guangpei Chen, Roy A. Briere Intended for: PRD (RC)
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
8th December 2007CLEO physics fest1 Coherence factor analyses Jim Libby, Andrew Powell and Guy Wilkinson (University of Oxford)
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
EW Corrections for CMS Z and Drell-Yan Measurements Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration Working Group on Electroweak precision.
Amplitude Analysis of the D 0        Dalitz Plot G. Mancinelli, B.T. Meadows, K. Mishra, M.D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati BaBar Coll. Meeting,
August 20, 2007 Charmless Hadronic B decays at BaBar1 Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar Woochun Park University of South Carolina Representing the BaBar.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Analysis of E852 Data at Indiana University Ryan Mitchell PWA Workshop Pittsburgh, PA February 2006.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #23.
Study of the decay   f 0 (980)    +  -  C.Bini, S.Ventura, KLOE Memo /2004 (upd. 06/2005) C.Bini, KLOE Memo /2005 (upd. 06/2005)
4/04/2001Calorimeter shaking -Andrea Venturi - April '01 ALEPH week 1 New ideas and old doubts about the calorimeter shaking procedure Andrea Venturi INFN.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
RooFit toy MC sensitivity studies for  +  s and  m s from B s →D s  /K channels at LHCb Shirit Cohen NIKHEF MSc Colloquium May 11 th 2007.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
A statistical test for point source searches - Aart Heijboer - AWG - Cern june 2002 A statistical test for point source searches Aart Heijboer contents:
Zijin Guo Univ. of Hawaii Representing BES Collaboration J/    pp and  BES Beijing, China.
H ➝ bb search and b-tagging Ricardo Gonçalo on behalf of the Higgs subgroup 5.
New Observations on Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yanping HUANG For BESIII Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) ICHEP2010, Paris,
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
Singa and kappa analyses at BESII Ning Wu Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS Beijing, China January 25-26, 2007.
Observation in BaBar of a narrow resonance in the D + s  0 system at 2317 MeV Roger Barlow Manchester University For the B A B AR Collaboration.
1 Charm Semileptonic Decay The importance of charm SL decay Pseudoscalar l decay Vector l decay –Analysis of D  K*  –The V/PS enigma :  (D+  K*  /
Report on LHT at the LHC ~ Some results from simulation study ~ Shigeki Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama) 1.What kinds of LHT signals are expected, and how accurately.
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
D s Dalitz Plot Analyses from the B Factories Mark Convery representing the BaBar Collaboration SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Charm 2010, Beijing.
P.Pakhlov ITEP, Moscow (for Belle collaboration) e+e- collision from  to  Novosibirsk, BINP, 2006.
On quasi-two-body components of (for 250fb -1 ) (for 250fb -1 ) J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Krakow DC Meeting May 16, 2005 B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D 0 D 0.
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
Resonances in decay Resonances in decay (for 400fb -1 ) (for 400fb -1 )BAM February 27th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP.
Studies of Charm Meson Decays at BaBar Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati University of Cincinnati On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration DPF 06, Honolulu,
Φ→Ψ, BINP, Novosibirsk.2011P. Pakhlov Phys. Lett. B702, 139 (2011) Charged charmonium-like states as rescattering effects in B  D sJ D (*) P. Pakhlov.
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
The dimuon physics continuum An update June 21, 2004, Sébastien Gadrat for the LPC, Clermont-Ferrand. The contributions to the dimuon spectrum above 1.5.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
LPNHE Richard Kass December Measurement of the Branching Fraction of B - → D 0 K* - J. Chauveau, M. John, R. Kass, G. Thérin Details of this.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
1 Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy at the Tevatron Ilya Kravchenko MI T.
NA60 CERN meeting - Philippe PILLOT1 Status of the J/  analysis MC simulations Event selections Results on the J/  over DY ratio Results on J/
Progress report on p0 p0 g analysis S. Giovannella, S.Miscetti
B Decays with Invisibles in the Final State
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
Martin Heck, for the CDF II collaboration
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
EMCal Recalibration Check
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Comprehensive study of S = -1 hyperon resonances via the coupled-channels analysis of K- p and K- d reactions Hiroyuki Kamano (KEK) YITP Workshop on.
Partial Wave Analysis results from JETSET the Jetset experiment
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
Presentation transcript:

A study of the Kπ system Mikhail Kozyulin, (CERN, BINP) 1

Introduction In the latest Bs  J/ψK* paper the Kpi spectum was shown, but analysed only qualitatively S-wave mass lineshape is still not well understood We would like to have better control of the waves that can enter K* region 2 Some isobar test Some K-matrix test

Introduction In addition, a higher Kpi peak is clearly visible, but neither BR(branching rations) nor polarization fractions were reported Mass fit favoured K*2(1430) rather than K*0(1430). But difficult to prove or extract exact yield without angular analysis that separates spin My summer student project: Perform an angular study of the Kpi spectrum in Bd  J/psiKpi in order to see the actual mass shape of the different waves This will allow us to: Search for an Spin-2 signal  K*2 See the mass lineshape of the S-wave …. 3

Strategy Angular analysis in bins of Kpi mass. – MC test – data 4

MC Implemented RooFit model (in helicity basis) with S and P waves and tested in generator level. Good agreement with true values for the amplitudes (including As compatible with 0). 5

Angular acceptance

7

Data 1. Fit in angular and B mass spectrum. Model=Bs+Bd+bkg, each Bs and Bd =Swave+Pwave. Acceptance with per event weights. 2. Cut in Bmass – M(Bd)+-20MeV 8 M(K*) MeV

Fit with S-,P-wave Blue: fit function Red: Bd Pink: background Black: Bs 9

Blue: fit function Red: Bd Pink: background Black: Bs 10 Fit with S-,P-wave

Construct the fit model using Urania’s tools Use Urania.Helicity to get symbolic pdf given the spin list for intermediate X  Kπ states : 0, 1, 2 Use Urania.RooInterfaces to create a RooFit C++ class out of the symbolic pdf op2 = D.RooClassGenerator(func, [x,y,z]+TransAmpModuli.values()+TransAmpPhases.values(),"RooB") op2.makePdf(integrable = kTRUE) op2.doIntegral(1,(x,-1,1)) ….. op2.doIntegral(7,(x,-1,1),(y,-1,1),(z,-Pi,Pi)) op2.overwrite()  We can use this procedure for higher and higher waves if necessary 11 Adding now the D wave …..

S - wave P - wave f L = 0 f L = 1 f L = 0.5 D - wave f L,2 = 0 f L,2 = 1 f L,2 = 0.5 Altogether 12

Fit with S-,P-,D-waves 13

P - wave f L = 0 f L = 1 f L =

15 P - wave f L = 0 f L = 1 f L = 0.5 S - wave

16 P - wave f L = 0 f L = 1 f L = 0.5 S - wave

D - wave f L,2 = 0 f L,2 = 1 f L,2 = 0.5 S - wave 17

D - wave f L,2 = 0 f L,2 = 1 f L,2 =

19

21

22

23

Conclusion We have performed an angular analysis of Bd->J/ψKπ in bins of Kπ mass. Decided to neglect background. Angular acceptance maybe not very accurate (MC10, interpolated parameters,…) but hope is good enough to identify the dominant wave in each bin. Clear evidence of spin 2, favouring K*2(1430) instead of K*0(1430). S-wave seems to be the main amplitude in ( MeV), but small variation in phases causes big changes in wave shapes, probably interferences play a dominant role in that region. 24