The Kentucky Virtual High School Linda A. Pittenger, Director SEIR-TEC April 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
PORTFOLIO.
PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Administrative “Look-Fors”: Text Complexity Karen Colarossi, Kimberly Natal, Rose Sedely August 9-10, 2012.
Kauchak and Eggen, Introduction to Teaching: Becoming a Professional, 3rd Ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 7 The Organization.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
October 5, 2010 Title III Services to Private Schools.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
6/2/20151 Making the Case for Online Professional Development Linda Pittenger Kentucky Department of Education Online Learning Institute 22 March 2006.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Promoting Collaborative Work in Schools and Districts presentation for Princeton University conference on High Schools Friday, April 27, 2009 Naomi Housman.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
1 Welcome to Julius West MS Middle School Reform Phase II:
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
The Virtual Learning Magnet Education Policy Briefing United States Department of Education 23 July 2009.
NISD Summer Professional Development Update September 14, 2015.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Chapter 127 Review Process Patrick Phillips and Pam Rolfe Maine Department of Education October 27, 2005.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Los Angeles Virtual Academy A learning portal to the future.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
What is cultural competency? Cultural competency is a person’s ability to effectively understand, communicate with and interact with people of all cultures.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
LEARN NC Creating Your Own Professional Development Plan with E-Learning for Educators Ross White Associate Director LEARN NC – School.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Office of Service Quality
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Guilford Technical Community College.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
PERSONALIZED FLES. OUR VISION & MISSION The vision of FLES is to focus on personalized learning every day so all students will perform to the.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Department of Special Education
Competency Assessment
The CCPS Strategic Plan
JCPS Final Corrective Action Plan
Chapter 7 The Organization of American Schools
Presentation transcript:

The Kentucky Virtual High School Linda A. Pittenger, Director SEIR-TEC April 2001

KVHS - Quick Facts Opened Pilot 24 January 2000 Program of state department of education Not a credit-granting institution - KVHS teaches for the schools 4 Staff/ 18 Part-time teachers/ $500K/yr From 47 (Spring 2000) to 350+ students 30 courses – broad spectrum of content/ broad spectrum of learners

Kentucky – Quick Facts 3.9 million Kentuckians 600,000 K12 Students 40,000 K12 Teachers 176 School Districts 1290 schools 250 high schools

What We Believe All children can learn at higher levels The school is the best place to make decisions about what happens in the school High standards and high expectations produce high achievement We teach for results and build accountability for results Equity is crucial; inequity is unacceptable

Why a Virtual High School? More choices for students Equitable learning opportunity Address local teacher shortages Distribute and model online teaching and learning

Every School/ Every Child Commonwealth Diploma available from every school Foreign Languages Increase graduation rates – especially for alternative education Improve literacy through accelerated learning programs Recapture drop-outs and push- outs

The Ground Rules KVHS will augment local school services - not compete with local schools All courses will be taught by Kentucky teachers All courses will be aligned with state and national curriculum standards

Online Learning? Web-based Education Commission, October 2000 Shortcomings Focus on recall of facts Teacher and textbook centered instruction Limited social interaction Antiquated assessment

Online Learning More Engagement More Interaction More Content

Online Learning More Engagement in Learning  “Learner-centered” instruction  Adaptive learning/ critical thinking  No back row / No labels

Online Learning More Interaction with Learners  Creation of learning communities  Greater collaboration/ broader reach to global resources and diversities  Faculty focused on critical thinking & comprehension

Online Learning More Content  Real-world applicability  Increased access to content  More, varied opportunity to demonstrate knowledge  Inter-disciplinary is easier

Real World Issues for a Virtual School Structure and Administration Funding Curriculum and Instructional Management Faculty Student Retention, Student Retention, Student Retention

Program Administration KVHS is an educational service managed by state department:  All enrollments come through local high school  Credit is granted by the local high school  Local school retains “ownership” of student  Shared responsibility for student progress

Funding Modified cost recovery – $275/ $500 School pays fee out of ADA/FTE Fee payment governed by local policy:  Schools pay fee if course is for- credit and not available at the school Policies are not consistent across districts

Learning Environment Web Based/ 24 x 7 25 students in a class Classroom Model (v. Independent Study) Small group work Extensive use of threaded discussion, writing, and research in all content areas From “seat time” to “comprehension time”– performance based credit From traditional assessments to portfolio assessments

Student Retention Communication with teachers Course Design that engages Interaction with other students Time and opportunity to learn Preparation (content and writing) Realistic expectations Partner at the school Partner in the home

Attendance Accounting Credit earned and ADA generated for courses taken outside the normal school day and away from the school Physical presence not required

Courses Core Courses Advanced Placement Dual credit w/ Virtual University Foreign languages and electives Accelerated learning and study skills Value-added: Online Writing Center and Virtual Counseling Office

Common Platform/ Multiple Content Providers Platform eCollege Courses License from private sector License from public sector Develop Decision Points – Content and Course Design

KVHS Faculty Kentucky secondary certifications Part-time Personal Services Contract Paid at same scale – Base plus add-on per student $1K + $65$1.25K + $70 $1.5K + $95$2K + $100 Course development, mentoring, team-teaching as fee-for-service

Policy Implications for Schools Criteria for participation (who?) Scope of participation (how much?) Accommodation and monitoring (when?) Scheduling and access? Who pays? Academic calendar? Middle school access? Seniors completing early?

Critical Success Factors Teachers Small class sizes Course design – interaction, differentiated instruction Choices/ ability to accommodate learning styles Engaged partners in the school Equitable access and support Rapid cycle of innovation, reflection, change

Other Dimensions of Kentucky Virtual High School Virtual Learning for Educators  Information dissemination  Technical assistance  Professional Development Virtual Teaming  Working online across organizational/ geographic boundaries to solve problems and support schools  Efficient, effective, everywhere, every time

What’s Next Growth Identify targets Build core competencies Increase capacities Extend P16, non-public and middle school agenda

Before you make the menu for the party, take a good, long cook’s tour of the kitchen and the pantry.