The X-ray source population of M 31 and M 33 Wolfgang Pietsch Max Planck Institut für extraterrestrische Physik.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low Mass X-Ray Binaries and X-Ray Bursters NTHU Yi-Kuan Chiang 2007/12/13.
Advertisements

P.Tisserand Rencontres du Vietnam Final results on galactic dark matter from the EROS-2 microlensing survey ~ images processed - 55 million.
Deriving direct mass measurements of black holes in ULXs Jeanette Gladstone, T. Roberts, C. Copperwheat, A. Goulding, C. Heinke, A Swinbank, T. Cartwright,
Chapter 15 The Milky Way Galaxy.
SUPERNOVA REMNANTS IN THE MAGELLANIC CLOUDS JOHN R. DICKEL UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO AND ROSA MURPHY WILLIAMS COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY Preliminary SNR.
Supernova Remnants in the ChASeM33 X-ray Survey of M33 Knox S. Long, William P. Blair, P. Frank Winkler, and the ChASeM33 team.
Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2.
Chandra Observations of the Norma Region Bodaghee et al Search for new HMXBs and study hard X-ray populations Twenty-seven 20 ks pointings Red:
Sean Farrell XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre University of Leicester, UK In collaboration with… N. Webb, D. Barret, O. Godet & B. Plazolles – CESR, France.
Tidal Disruptions of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes Suvi Gezari (Caltech) Chris Martin & GALEX Team Bruno Milliard (GALEX) Stephane Basa (SNLS)
Supernova Remnants in the ChASeM33 X-ray Observations of M33 Knox Long, Bill Blair, Frank Winkler, Terry Gaetz, David Helfand, Jack Hughes, Kip Kuntz,
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
Vadim Burwitz X-ray Grating Spectroscopy, Cambridge, MA, July 12, 2007 The complex and variable X-ray spectra of the super-soft source RXJ Vadim.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: High Energy II: X-ray Binaries Geoff Bower.
Q. Daniel Wang and Cornelia Lang (U. of Massachusetts) Eric Gotthelf (Columbia U.) Chandra X-ray Survey of the Galactic Center: On the Nature of the X-ray.
The Ultra-luminous X-Ray Sources Near the Center of M82 NTHU 10/18/2007 Yi-Jung Yang.
Gemma Anderson ChIcAGO Chasing the Identification of ASCA Galactic Objects.
Summary Candidate supernova remnants G and G23.5–0.0 were observed by XMM-Newton in the course of a snap-shot survey of plerionic and composite.
Supersoft and quasi-soft X-ray sources in the core of M31 Marina Orio, INAF-Torino and University of Wisconsin (2005 preprint on supersoft X-ray sources.
An X-ray Study of the Bright Supernova Remnant G with XMM-Newton SNRs and PWNe in the Chandra Era Boston, MA – July 8 th, 2009 Daniel Castro,
Our Galaxy The Milky Way. The Milky Way Almost everything we see in the night sky belongs to the Milky Way We see most of the Milky Way as a faint band.
FMOS and UKIDSS Galactic Astronomy Phil Lucas UHerts.
Black holes: do they exist?
A. Zezas (PI; UoC/SAO) SMC XVP Collaboration: P. Plucinsky; SMC XVP Collaboration: C. Badenes; B. Blair; R. Di Stefano; J. Drake; A. Foster; T. Gaetz;
M101 Group Dave Riebel & Justice Bruursema 12 Februrary 2007.
RXJ a soft X-ray excess in a low luminosity accreting pulsar La Palombara & Mereghetti astro-ph/
SSS in young stellar populations: progenitors of the “prompt” Sne Ia? Thomas Nelson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center University of Maryland – Baltimore.
Galaxies Chapter 16. Topics Types of galaxies Dark Matter Distances to galaxies Speed of galaxies Expansion of the universe and Hubble’s law.
Constraints on progenitors of Classical Novae in M31 Ákos Bogdán & Marat Gilfanov MPA, Garching 17 th European White Dwarf Workshop 18/08/2010.
A multi-colour survey of NGC253 with XMM-Newton Robin Barnard, Lindsey Shaw Greening & Ulrich Kolb The Open University.
Supersoft sources in M 31: Comparing the XMM-Newton Deep Survey, ROSAT and Chandra catalogues Holger Stiele SuperSoft X-ray Sources – New Developments.
Young X-ray source populations in M81 and other galaxies Andreas Zezas Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In collaboration with: K. Gazeas, J.
Introduction - Aims 1948 X-ray sources XMM-Newton EPIC observations of the largest Local Group spiral galaxy M 31, taken between June 2006 and February.
Binary millisecond X-ray pulsars Department of Physics University College Cork Paul Callanan and Mark Reynolds Alexei Filippenko, Department of Astronomy,
A New Magnetar Candidate Located Outside the Galactic Plane? Joe Callingham | Sean Farrell | Bryan Gaensler | Geraint Lewis Sydney Institute for Astronomy.
Populations of accreting X-ray sources in galaxies
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves, Darach.
Nature of X-ray binaries in the Magellanic Clouds Andry RAJOELIMANANA 1, 2 (MSc) Supervisor : Prof Phil CHARLES 1, 2 1 University of Cape Town, Private.
Chandra Observation of the Failed Cluster Candidate K. Hayashida, H. Katayama (Osaka University), K. Mori (Penn State University), T.T. Takeuchi.
Lecture Outlines Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 23.
Nature of X-ray transients in the Magellanic Clouds : (Be/X-ray pulsars, and Supersoft sources) Andry RAJOELIMANANA 1, 2 ‏ Supervisor : Prof Phil CHARLES.
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
X-ray study of a nearby nuclear X-ray study of a nearby nuclear starburst and a nearby AGN starburst and a nearby AGN Roberto Soria (UCL) Mat Page, Kinwah.
An XMM-Newton View of the Luminous X-ray Source Population of M101 Leigh Jenkins Tim Roberts, Robert Warwick, Roy Kilgard*, Martin Ward University of Leicester,
Observational Evidence for Quasi-soft X-Ray Sources in Nearby Galaxies and the link to Intermediate-mass Black Holes Albert Kong and Rosanne Di Stefano.
XMM slew survey Richard Saxton 1, Andy Read 2, Pili Esquej 3, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1 1. ESAC 2. University of Leicester 3. MPE XMM slew survey.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Clicker Questions Chapter 14 The Milky Way Galaxy.
Diffuse Emission and Unidentified Sources
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker X-Ray Studies of the Central Compact Objects in Puppis-A & RX J Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
VALLIA ANTONIOU IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY High Energy View of Accreting Objects: AGN and X-ray Binaries Agios Nikolaos, Crete, Greece October 2010.
Galaxies and X-ray Populations G. Fabbiano Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
2XMMp and Galactic neutron stars Natalie Webb Stéphanie Dupuy.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
Finding Black Hole Systems in Nearby Galaxies With Simbol-X Paul Gorenstein Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The X-ray source population studies in nearby galaxies Wolfgang Pietsch Max Planck Institut für extraterrestrische Physik.
Jérôme Chenevez INTEGRAL monitoring of unusually Long X-ray bursts Maurizio Falanga Erik Kuulkers Søren Brandt Niels Lund Andrew Cumming Duncan Galloway.
The 7-year view of the accreting X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL R.Krivonos, M.Revnivtsev, S.Tsygankov, E.Churazov, R.Sunyaev MPA Garching, Germany; IKI,
Exploring an evidence of supermassive black hole binaries in AGN with MAXI Naoki Isobe (RIKEN, ) and the MAXI
Identification of X-ray Point Sources and Study on the Nature of 62 X-ray Globular Cluster Candidates in M31 Zhou Fan, Jun Ma, Xu Zhou, Jiansheng Chen,
Towards a new synergy between X and  -ray astronomies Patrizia Caraveo In collab. with A. DeLuca, M.Marelli, G.Bignami.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
XMM-NEWTON reveals a dipping black-hole X-ray binary in NGC 55
Stars.
Analysis of Off-Nuclear X-Ray Sources in Galaxy NGC 4945
Supersoft X-ray sources in M31
Supernova Remnants in the ChASeM33 X-ray Observations of M33
Galaxies Chapter 16.
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
Presentation transcript:

The X-ray source population of M 31 and M 33 Wolfgang Pietsch Max Planck Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

Outline Introduction to X-ray source population in galaxy fields X-ray source population of M 33 field X-ray source population of the Andromeda galaxy M 31 field Outlook Talk restricted mainly to XMM-Newton results Chandra results presented by B. Williams Luminosity functions M. Gilfanov and others

Why observe Nearby Galaxies Nearby examples of early and late types of galaxies “Same” distance to all sources in a galaxy Different source classes resolved Better understanding of population of the Milky Way Understanding of unresolved emission from distant galaxies

Introduction: X-ray sources in nearby galaxy fields –Sources within galaxy (all approximately at same distance) X-ray binaries (XRBs) –Low mass XRBs (?dips with orbital period, bursts,...) –High mass XRBs (?eclipses with orb. period, pulsations, optical id,...) –Bright transients Supersoft X-ray sources –Classical SSS as known from Magellanic Clouds –Optical novae (dominant class of SSS in M 31) Supernova remnants –Thermal remnants –Plerions (PWN) Nuclear source Ultraluminous X-ray sources Diffuse emission in disk and halo –Foreground stars –Galaxies, galaxy clusters and AGN in background

408 X–ray sources X-ray properties Correlation with catalogues from other wavelength Optical identification Identify foreground and background sources Characterization of X-ray source population of M 33 XMM-Newton survey of the Local Group galaxy M 33 XMM-Newton survey of the Local Group galaxy M 33 W. Pietsch, Z. Misanovic, F. Haberl, D. Hatzidimitriou, M. Ehle, G. Trinchieri 2004, A&A 426, 11

Hardness ratio plots of M 33 sources HR i = (B i+1 – B i )/ (B i+1 + B i )B 1 : keV B 2 : keV B 3 : keV B 4 : keV B 5 : keV fg-star AGN SSS SNR XRB

Hardness ratio plots of M 33 sources HR i = (B i+1 – B i )/ (B i+1 + B i )B 1 : keV B 2 : keV B 3 : keV B 4 : keV B 5 : keV fg-star AGN SSS SNR XRB

Hardness ratio plots of M 33 sources HR i = (B i+1 – B i )/ (B i+1 + B i )B 1 : keV B 2 : keV B 3 : keV B 4 : keV B 5 : keV fg-star AGN SSS SNR XRB

X-ray sources in M 33 field: identification and classification identifiedclassified foreground stars530 AGN12 Galaxies1 1 SSS 5 SNR 21 (+2)23 (-2) (Ghavamian et al. 2005, AJ 130, 539) XRB2 Hard 267 Using X-ray hardness ratio criteria, optical correlation with USNO-B1, catalogues at different wavelengths, SIMBAD, NED

Variability of M 33 sources between XMM-Newton pointings Misanovic, Pietsch, Haberl, Ehle, Hatzidimitriou, Trinchieri 2006, A&A 448, 1247 Analysis of individual observations 39 new sources improved positions and time variability 8 new XRB candidates SNR luminosity function

M 33 zoom in M33 X-7 [PMH2004] 47

Einstein + ROSAT observations: 3.45 d period 0.31 s pulsation? Peres et al. 1989, ApJ 336, 140; Dubus et al. 1999, MNRAS 302, 731 Eclipsing X-ray binary M33 X-7

On stateEclipse On state XMM-Newton EPIC Chandra ACIS I keV images Eclipsing X-ray binary M33 X-7 Pietsch et al. 2004, A&A 413, 879

Optical identification Star with V 18.9 mag with 3.45 d variability DIRECT image by B. Mochejska Green circle: ROSAT error box Haberl & Pietsch 2001 Yellow circle: Chandra error box Insert HST image 10“ x 10“ Pietsch et al. 2006, ApJ 646, 420 Eclipsing X-ray binary M33 X-7 Pietsch et al. 2004

XMM-Newton EPIC + Chandra ACIS-I Optical V and B-V light curve re-analysis of DIRECT data by B. Mochejska folded modulo 3.45d period Dubus et al Improved binary ephemeris Eclipsing X-ray binary M33 X-7 Pietsch et al. 2004, A&A 413, 879

Best fitting spectral models: Absorbed bremsstrahlung or disk blackbody Eclipsing X-ray binary M33 X-7 First eclipsing black hole (high mass) X-ray binary ?

ChASeM33 light curve of X-7 Pietsch et al. 2006, ApJ 646, 420 Gemini North radial velocity curve: M sun black hole with 70 M sun companion Orosz et al. 2007, ATel 977, Nature 2007, accepted

ChASeM33 light curve of [PMH2004] 47 Pietsch et al. 2006, ATel nd eclipsing HMXB in M33 Orbital period d Similar to LMC X-4 or Her X-1

The Andromeda Galaxy M 31 W. Pietsch, M. Freyberg, F. Haberl et.al. 2004, A&A 434, 483 Similar analysis to M 33 based on archival data 856 sources in fields Hardness ratio and time variability classification and identification

M 31 centre All EPIC mosaic (~100 ks) SNRs, SSSs foreground stars diffuse emission Many LMXBs Galaxtic center sources not fully resolved Movie of centre area by blinking four observations with separation of half a year plus one 2.5 year later

X-ray sources in M 31 field: identification and classification identifiedclassified foreground stars690 AGN136 Galaxies1 Galaxy clusters 1 1 SSS18 SNR 2123 Globular clusters 2710 XRB7 9 Hard 567

Summary catalogue HR2-HR1 diagram important to select SSS, thermal SNRs and foreground stars f x /f opt separate SNRs and foreground stars Hard X-ray spectra very important for classification: should separate –XRBs –Active nuclei –Plerions Individual papers on bright sources (Osborne et al, Barnard et al., Trudolyubov et al., Mangano et al., …) Time variability studies to identify XRBs

W. Pietsch & F. Haberl 2005, A&A 430, L45 search for X-ray bursts in GC candidates from catalogue paper 37 sources in fields most GC sources in center field that got longest exposure two burst sources detected in X-ray faint GCs, neutron star LMXBs XMM-Newton detection of type I X-ray bursts in M 31

X-ray burster [PFH2005] 253 in the GC [WSB85] S5 15 Observation c4 Jan 7, 2002

X-ray burster [PFH2005] 253 in the GC [WSB85] S5 15 Rise time < 10 s Total 50 cts Maximum duration < 20 s Max. rate1.4±0.4ct/s Decay to backgr. ~150 s corresponds to erg/s Quiescent luminosity ~ erg/s (Eddington limit for H-poor matter)

Pietsch, Fliri, Freyberg, Greiner, Haberl, Riffeser, Sala 2005, A&A 442, 879 search for optical nova correlations in XMM- Newton, Chandra and ROSAT catalogs and archival observations 21 X-ray counterparts in M 31 and 2 in M 33 novae dominant class of supersoft X-ray sources in M 31 center determine masses of ejecta and burned mass from lightcurve Optical novae: the major class of supersoft X-ray sources in M arcmin

Chandra HRC nova detections 2004/5 Pietsch et al. 2007, A&A 465, 375 Nova SSS light curves (<250 d) More than 30% of optical novae show SSS state

Summary optical novae 30 to 50 optical novae per year in M 31 (~half in bulge area) Novae established as major class of SSS in M 31 center Monitoring of bulge area gives light curves of many novae simultaneously inone XMM-Newton/Chandra field (Galactic novae can only be monitored one by one, i.e. is much less efficient) Spectra can be modeled by BB spectra (T <70 eV) Novae as SSS best detectable with XMM-Newton EPIC pn, Chandra HRC I and ACIS S SSS state of novae may start within 50 days after optical outburst X-ray outburst may last only 2-3 months, but three of the novae still bright nine years after optical outburst (similar to GQ Mus and Nova LMC 1995) several novae missed in optical and X-ray searches Number of X-ray detected optical novae much higher than previously estimated (>30%) X-ray light curves give estimates for ejected hydrogen mass for optical novae as well as burned mass and mass of White Dwarf by comparing with models, that include chemical composition ??? Recurrent novae precursor of type Ia supernovae ???

SNR identifications by comparison with Local Group survey images by Massey et al. (I) M 31 examples Halpha and [SII] images of SNRs and candidates

SNR identifications by comparison with Local Group survey images by Massey et al. (II) M 31 examples Halpha and [SII] images of SNRs and candidates

Stiele, Pietsch, Haberl, Freyberg 2007, A&A, in preparation 39 new sources in individual pointings Determine time variability between M 31 center pointings half a year apart Check classification of SNRs Classify new XRB candidate by time variability Time variability of X-ray sources in the M 31 centre field (2000 – 2004) erg/s

Time variability versus hardness ratios

keV keV keV

Variable X-ray sources in the M 31 centre

On-going M 31 programs involving XMM-Newton - M 31 raster survey AO5 and AO6 see talk by H. Stiele - first colour image - about 2000 sources - identification - population study - Monitoring of M 31 centre XMM-Newton/Chandra - AO5 and AO6 - monitoring optical novae as SSS sources

Summary XMM-Newton observations of M 31 and M 33 revealed many exciting results Demonstrated that X-ray sources in Local Group galaxies can be well classified Important: long (>50 ks) uninterrupted observations per field Separation of different source populations by hardness ratios and time variability very efficient SSS observations of optical novae demonstrate that specific source classes can be more homogeneously investigated in galaxies outside Milky Way Wealth of sources with good positions (including Chandra source catalogues) for follow-up in other wavelength regimes (HMXBs, SNRs, SSS, transients versus foreground stars and sources in background)

What XMM-Newton should do next in Nearby Galaxy field Survey full area of SMC (see Frank Haberl’s talk) Survey systematically large part of LMC Deeper observations of M 33 (>100 ks exposures) Chandra VLP results show potential for finding XRB periods Continue monitoring of M 31 centre for optical novae and other transients 2.6x2.6 dgr daily optical survey of M 31 in 2008 with PANSTARRS Comparison X-ray source populations to the Milky Way and other nearby galaxies