KCSE Annual Conference Tribal and State Jurisdiction in Enforcement and Establishment Presented by Marsha L. Harlan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEVELOPMENT OF WIND ENERGY WITHIN OKLAHOMA INDIAN COUNTRY
Advertisements

Environmental Justice in Indian Country Joseph Myers Executive Director National Indian Justice Center 5250 Aero Drive Santa Rosa, CA P: (707)
Association on American Indian Affairs The Federal Trust Relationship, Tribal Sovereignty, and Self-Determination Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Tribal Sovereign Immunity Tribal Transportation Conference September 2014 Prepared by Lisa Jaeger Tribal Government Specialist Tanana Chiefs Conference.
Grant Guidance Changes
UIFSA 2008 Intergovernmental Child Support Enforcement Speaker: John Cardoza
Session Objectives Provide a basic overview of key principles of federal Indian law (with focus on jurisdictional issues) Discuss application of legal.
Sarah Deer Associate Professor William Mitchell College of Law.
Summary of the Final Rule for Tribal Child Support Enforcement Programs.
ERICSA 51 st Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 18 – 22 ▪ Sheraton Greensboro ▪ Greensboro, North Carolina Tribal 101: Tribal Child Support.
Part 3: Selecting the Colors Historical, Legal and Political Perspectives.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE in FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS Jacqueline Jackson Senior Attorney-Advisor Office of the Solicitor Department of the Interior.
PL-280 in Alaska Tribal Management Program Kevin M Illingworth J.D. University of Alaska Fairbanks College of Rural and Community Development
ERICSA 51 st Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 18 – 22 ▪ Sheraton Greensboro ▪ Greensboro, North Carolina Lame Duck Jurisdiction Kelly Peiper.
ICWA The Tribe as the “Third Parent”. Why ICWA? Wabanaki people are indigenous to the land that is now the State of Maine. In 15 th century there were.
The National Indian Gaming Commission From Legal Bingo to Illegal Class II / III Casinos by Misusing the IGRA.
Definition of “Indian” Assuring Uniform Protection for Indians under the Affordable Care Act & the Indian Health Care Improvement Act National Indian Health.
National Tribal Child Support Association Tribal Child Support Enforcement Everything You Wanted to Know… But Were Afraid to Ask.
Tribal Transit Program August 9, 2013 State Programs Meeting Presented By Élan Flippin, FTA.
International Treaty in EU PIL
1 IRR Program Inventory and Funding Formula Update M.A.S.T. Impact Week Washington, DC March
Child Support Enforcement Review Traditional Methods 1.Criminal prosecution (Const. limits? Oakley) 2.Contempt Civil Goal – future compliance with order.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
Child Support Services Date. Purpose Child Support Services exists to establish and enforce court orders for paternity, child support and medical support.
COLORADO FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL CONFERENCE STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO June, 2015 Jeanette Savoy Chris Sorenson UIFSA 2008 AND THE HAGUE CONVENTION.
Native American Direct Loan Program The Department of Veterans Affairs.
1 Treasury Offset Program NASC PRESENTATION. 2 What is TOP? TOP = Treasury Offset Program A centralized process that intercepts federal payments of payees.
INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM. Native American/Alaskan Program Highway Safety Act of 1966, U.S.C. Title 23, Section 402, provides for U.S. DOT funding.
1. 1. Treaties 2. Executive Orders 3. Acts of Congress 4. Secretarial Orders 2.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
Customer Service Enforcement After AB 2987 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006.
Tribal 101: Empowering Tribes and States to Work Together 1.
UIFSA 101 Ins and Outs of Intergovernmental Cases Tonya Brunson & Daniel Macias.
QA/QC Team TPPCC GRIC May 6, Initial Issue: QA/QC Team Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/OC) Inventory Teams - As identified in our February.
Session Objectives Provide a basic overview of key principles of federal Indian policy and federal government relationship with tribes Provide a basic.
Developing and Implementing Solid Waste Codes ITEP - TSWEAP Wyndham San Diego Bayside, San Diego, CA September 23-25, 2014 Gussie A. Lord Jill Grant &
Title US Department of the Interior Indian Affairs 2016 Indian Affairs House/Senate Mark Presentation to Tribal/Interior Budget Council August 6, 2015.
NERC Data Collection & Coordination. Rules of Procedure: Section 1600 Overview  NERC’s authority to issue a mandatory data request in the U.S. is contained.
1 Court and Administrative Child Support Exchanges AKA: Non-Standard Exchanges Using GJXDM 2006 Global Justice XML Data Model User’s Conference September.
Native American Direct Loan Program The Department of Veterans Affairs.
Claudia Groberg Attorney-In-Charge, Civil Recovery Section Oregon Department of Justice.
Association on American Indian Affairs History and Importance of Government to Government in ICW Proceedings Jack F. Trope Executive Director.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
UIFSA: The Fundamentals and More
FEDERALISM Chapter 3. What is a federal system?  A system of government in which power is shared between the central government and state governments.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
The Evolution of US/North American Enforcement Practices 20 Years of Learning.
New Federal Intergovernmental Regulations
1 Intergovernmental Child Support: Final Rule. 2 Overview Purpose and Scope Major Areas of the Final Rule Questions and Answers.
Other amendments. Automatic stay scope 11 U.S.C. § 362(a): Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition...operates as a stay, applicable.
1 Nez Perce Reservation Presented by Mary Fauci Tribal NSR Training Temecula, CA 11/1/11.
September 19, 2007 CSDA Annual Training Conference Anaheim, CA Working With Title and Escrow Companies Real Property Liens presented by: Fesia A. Davenport.
Tribal Child Support Court Orders Stacey Bixby, Moderator, DCSS Program Policy Presenters: ■Judge Richard Blake, Chief Tribal Judge, Hoopa Valley Tribe.
1 LOCATING INDIVIDUALS THROUGH THE STATE PLS Authorized Person/ Program Authorized Purpose of the Request Persons About Whom Info May Be Asked Sources.
1 Child Support 101 Child Support Directors’ Association Annual Conference Anaheim, CA  September, 2007.
1 UNIQUE CHALLENGES TO OBTAINING AND ENFORCING INTERSTATE CASES Presented by: Victor V. Urso, Attorney, San Bernardino County Diane Brower, Attorney, Los.
OVERVIEW ■History of Interjurisdictional Law ■URESA/RURESA ■FFACCSOA ■UIFSA ✷ CEJ, DCO, ROA ■Federal Intergovernmental Regulations ■International Cases.
Human Services and Social Polilcy HN 300 Unit 5 Seminar-Helping the Needy Madelyn Harvey, PhD.
Appeal of School Concurrency Vested Rights Denial Vested Rights Denial Case: DRCA Bridgewater West Apartments a/k/a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings.
What’s Trending in Tribal Child Support Policy National Tribal Child Support Association Annual Training Conference June 26-30, 2016.
Perryville V. Tague.
IV-D Law and Regulations
Indian Law in Wisconsin: A Primer for Family Court Commissioners
Sam Cohen, Government and Legal Specialist
Indian Country Lunch and Learn
Extraordinary Intergovernmental Topics
The Lifecycle of an OAG Child Support Case
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

KCSE Annual Conference Tribal and State Jurisdiction in Enforcement and Establishment Presented by Marsha L. Harlan

Authority for Tribal IV-D Programs 45 C.F.R. Part 309 (March 30, 2004) 45 C.F.R. Part 309 (March 30, 2004) Prior to enactment of Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), authority to operate IV-D programs was vested solely with States. Prior to enactment of Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), authority to operate IV-D programs was vested solely with States.

Tribal IV-D Programs The first tribal program (Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma) was initiated in 1996 prior to the final rule. The first tribal program (Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma) was initiated in 1996 prior to the final rule. Tribal IV-D began with 9 tribes initiating programs prior to the final rule. Tribal IV-D began with 9 tribes initiating programs prior to the final rule. After the passage of PRWORA, 24 more tribes were funded. After the passage of PRWORA, 24 more tribes were funded. Currently more than 40 Tribes with Comprehensive Programs. Currently more than 40 Tribes with Comprehensive Programs. Approximately 10 tribes are in “Start Up” Phase. Approximately 10 tribes are in “Start Up” Phase.

Tribal vs State Jurisdiction (Generally) Exclusive Tribal jurisdiction Exclusive Tribal jurisdiction Tribes have exclusive jurisdiction over civil matters arising in Indian Country against tribal members. Tribes have exclusive jurisdiction over civil matters arising in Indian Country against tribal members. Concurrent jurisdiction Concurrent jurisdiction Matters involving Indians against non-Indians. Matters involving Indians against non-Indians. Public Law 280: States have concurrent jurisdiction of civil matters in Indian Country. Public Law 280: States have concurrent jurisdiction of civil matters in Indian Country.

“Indian” - Defined 45 C.F.R. § C.F.R. § Indian means a person who is a member of an Indian Tribe. Indian means a person who is a member of an Indian Tribe.

“Indian Tribe” and “Tribe” Defined 45 C.F.R. § C.F.R. § Indian Tribe means any Indian or Alaska Native Tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian Tribe and includes in the list of Federally-recognized Indian Tribal governments as published in the Federal Register pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 479a-1. Indian Tribe means any Indian or Alaska Native Tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian Tribe and includes in the list of Federally-recognized Indian Tribal governments as published in the Federal Register pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 479a-1.

“Indian Country” -Defined 18 U.S.C. § U.S.C. §1151 Indian Country is defined as (a) all land within the limits of an Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a State, and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same. Indian Country is defined as (a) all land within the limits of an Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a State, and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.

Establishment of Paternity Establishment of Tribal Paternity is governed by 45 C.F.R. § Establishment of Tribal Paternity is governed by 45 C.F.R. § Establishment requirements for states are located at 45 C.F.R. §303.5 Establishment requirements for states are located at 45 C.F.R. §303.5

Paternity (continued…) Similarities in the regulatory requirements as to Tribes and States Similarities in the regulatory requirements as to Tribes and States Distinctions between the two federal regulations Distinctions between the two federal regulations

Jurisdiction to Establish Paternity Factors to consider: Factors to consider: Tribal member status Tribal member status Residence of the parties Residence of the parties Where conception occurred Where conception occurred Whether the State is a Public Law 280 jurisdiction Whether the State is a Public Law 280 jurisdiction

Establishment of Support Orders Establishment of Tribal Support Orders is regulated by 45 C.F.R. § Establishment of Tribal Support Orders is regulated by 45 C.F.R. § Establishment of State Support Orders is regulated by 45 C.F.R. § Establishment of State Support Orders is regulated by 45 C.F.R. §302.56

Requirements of Federal Regulations Both Federal Regulations require similar provisions; however, Tribes may accept “non-cash” payments to satisfy support obligations. Both Federal Regulations require similar provisions; however, Tribes may accept “non-cash” payments to satisfy support obligations. Caveat: “Non-cash” payments shall not satisfy assigned support obligations. Caveat: “Non-cash” payments shall not satisfy assigned support obligations.

Jurisdiction to Establish Support Orders Factors to consider: Factors to consider: Tribal membership Tribal membership Residency Residency Whether public assistance is provided by the State Whether public assistance is provided by the State Public Law 280 State Public Law 280 State

Enforcement of Support Orders Tribal Enforcement Remedies Tribal Enforcement Remedies Income Withholding Income Withholding State Enforcement Remedies State Enforcement Remedies Income Withholding Income Withholding Judgments Judgments Liens and Levy Liens and Levy Federal Tax Intercept Federal Tax Intercept State Income Tax Refund Offset State Income Tax Refund Offset Financial Institution Data Match (FIDM) Financial Institution Data Match (FIDM) License Revocation License Revocation Credit Bureau Reporting Credit Bureau Reporting Posting of Bonds Posting of Bonds

Enforcement cont… Both Tribal and State IV-D programs are required by federal regulation to address modifications in order to comply with the requirements for IV-D funding. Both Tribal and State IV-D programs are required by federal regulation to address modifications in order to comply with the requirements for IV-D funding. States are specifically required to review cases for modification every three (3) years at the request of either party, in public assistance cases, or by the State’s own procedure. States are specifically required to review cases for modification every three (3) years at the request of either party, in public assistance cases, or by the State’s own procedure. Tribes are left to determine their own review/modification procedures but are required to address the process in their IV-D plan. Tribes are left to determine their own review/modification procedures but are required to address the process in their IV-D plan.

Enforcing Intergovernmental Support Orders Intergovernmental cases are those where one party who is entitled to receive support lives in one Tribe, State, or country and the obligor resides in another. Intergovernmental cases are those where one party who is entitled to receive support lives in one Tribe, State, or country and the obligor resides in another. Modification and Enforcement of intergovernmental cases. Modification and Enforcement of intergovernmental cases.

Intergovernmental Enforcement Uniform Interstate Family Support Act - 42 U.S.C.§666(f) Uniform Interstate Family Support Act - 42 U.S.C.§666(f) Required by every State BUT Tribes are not required to adopt UIFSA Required by every State BUT Tribes are not required to adopt UIFSA Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act - 28 U.S.C. 1738B(b) Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act - 28 U.S.C. 1738B(b) Applies to ALL Tribes and States Applies to ALL Tribes and States

Federal Regulations Requiring Tribal–State Cooperation States are required to cooperate with Tribal IV-D programs pursuant to 45 C.F.R. §302.36(a)(2). States are required to cooperate with Tribal IV-D programs pursuant to 45 C.F.R. §302.36(a)(2). Tribes are required to cooperate with States pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § (a). Tribes are required to cooperate with States pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § (a).