1 Guiding Principles for Nationwide Interoperability A Brief Overview of Recent Efforts and Progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMO WIGOS in support of DRR 2013 Coordination Meeting of DRR FP October 2013, Geneva Dr S. Barrell, Chair, ICG-WIGOS Dr I. Zahumensky, WIGOS-PO.
Advertisements

WMO WIGOS in support of DRR 2013 Coordination Meeting of DRR FP October 2013, Geneva Dr S. Barrell, Chair, ICG-WIGOS Dr I. Zahumensky, WIGOS-PO.
United States Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration Career Pathways: Pathways to Opportunity U.S. Department of Labor Employment and.
National Incident Management System Overview. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 Directed Secretary, DHS to develop and administer: 1.National.
National Incident Management System Overview Briefing Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Implementation.
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
1 Executive Office of Public Safety. 2 National Incident Management System.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Association of University Staff (AUS) Annual Conference 2003.
Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Overview Developed by Nevada Communications Steering Committee Version 2.0 – Adopted April 6, 2006.
National Public Safety Telecommunications Council Public Safety Communications Summit John Powell, Chair National Public Safety Telecommunications Council.
IS-0700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
Understanding Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Understanding Multiagency Coordination.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
1 Collective Efficiencies Development Finance Architecture Workshop Prerna Banati - July
National Incident Management System Introduction and Overview NIMS.
Session 8 Coordination. Session Objectives Define the Principle of Coordination Define the Principle of Coordination Identify characteristics of successful.
The National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 To prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks,
Public Safety Programs Current and Future. Supporting the Mission “SEARCH is dedicated to improving the quality of justice and public safety through the.
1 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council (CSRIC) Working Group 1A - Public Safety Consolidation.
The National Incident Management System
National Incident Management System (NIMS) Jim Reardon Michigan State Police Emergency Management Division
National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive – 5 Directed the development of the National Incident Management System.
National Response Framework
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
Part of a Broader Strategy
NIMS Command and Management IS-0700.A – October 2014 Visual 6.1 NIMS Command and Management Unit 6.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Alberta-A Province Prepared Alberta Emergency Management Agency- Provincial Services.
1 Luke Klein-Berndt Command, Control and Interoperability Science and Technology Directorate November 8, 2007 Interoperability Tools & Resources 9th Annual.
AFFILIATE IN GOOD STANDING COOKBOOK Insights into what it means to be an Affiliate in Good Standing This slide deck is a subset of the obligations and.
Foundational Doctrine Guiding Fire Suppression in the Forest Service Product of the Pulaski Conference June 2005.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Overview Developed by Nevada Communications Steering Committee Version 2.0 – Adopted April 6, 2006.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Nationwide Perspective: Building a Nationwide Network for Public Safety Dusty Rhoads Office of Emergency Communications.
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
S/L/T Version 1 National Response Framework Overview for Local, Tribal and State Audiences January 22, 2008.
New River Valley Emergency Communications Regional Authority
1 SAFECOM/Interoperability Overview Dr. David Boyd, Director Public Safety Wireless Interoperability Policy Academy.
PS Version 1 National Response Framework Overview for Private Sector Audiences January 22, 2008.
Session 81 National Incident Management Systems Session 8 Slide Deck.
NIMS FOR HOSPITALS AND HEALTH CARE FACILITIES DHS and DHHS 12 Sep 06.
What does WIGOS mean at a National Level Demonstrating national leadership in observations Compliance with WMO TR (WMO-No. 49) – standard and recommended.
The National Incident Management System. National Incident Management System “…a consistent nationwide approach for federal, state, tribal, and local.
Guide to Competency Frameworks. 2 FNHM Competencies Framework Project History –Indian Health Policy (1979) and RCAP recommended to build more capacity.
Presenter’s Name June 17, eNATOA SAFECOM and Public Safety: a post 9/11 effort for local interoperability SAFECOM Overview Ken Fellman Mayor, Arvada,
Introduction to SEMS and Basic ICS. Goals of Training Basic Understanding: The California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) in place to.
National Incident Management System (NIMS)
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS)
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council VII NRIC Council Meeting Focus Group 1B Network Architectures for Emergency Communications in 2010 September.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
Healthcare Coalitions. Topics and Objectives Topics  Definition  Purpose  Preparedness  Response  Members  Oversight & Structure  Resources Objectives.
NIMS AND THE NRF – MADE SIMPLE. 2  NIMS is a comprehensive, national approach to incident management  NIMS provides the template for incident management,
NIMS Nutshell in a NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS): AN INTRODUCTION 1-hour version, October 2011.
1 Brian Carney National RECC Coordinator Regional Emergency Communications Coordination Working Groups (RECCWG) National.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
May 6, 2015 Dusty Rhoads Office of Emergency Communications Office of Emergency Communications (OEC)
Five steps to help connect North Carolina employers to the employees they need to succeed in our state and help our citizens improve their quality of life.
International Safety Rating System
Incident Management Information Sharing Capability Maturity Model
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS)
National Emergency Communications Plan Goal 2
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
An Integrated Food Safety System When Will You Know it is Here ?
Next Generation 911: Making it Happen NOW!
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Guiding Principles for Nationwide Interoperability A Brief Overview of Recent Efforts and Progress

2 Connection ≠ Interoperability  Technology doesn’t always connect people in ways that reduce confusion and misunderstanding…

3 A Nationwide Plan:  An action plan for nationwide progress on public safety communications interoperability. › 12 Guiding Principles for Interoperability › Four Major Initiatives  22 Action Steps  An action plan for nationwide progress on public safety communications interoperability. › 12 Guiding Principles for Interoperability › Four Major Initiatives  22 Action Steps

4 12 Guiding Principles: 1. Interoperability begins—and has its greatest value— with daily use by local users. › Yet it works within a unified, usable regional, tribal, state, and Federal interoperability framework. 2. Interoperability is both a technical connection and an effective shared understanding. 3. Sustaining interoperable communications requires government officials’ support at all levels, as well as stable and predictable management, funding, operations and maintenance. 1. Interoperability begins—and has its greatest value— with daily use by local users. › Yet it works within a unified, usable regional, tribal, state, and Federal interoperability framework. 2. Interoperability is both a technical connection and an effective shared understanding. 3. Sustaining interoperable communications requires government officials’ support at all levels, as well as stable and predictable management, funding, operations and maintenance.

5 12 Guiding Principles: 4. Federal interoperability with local, regional, state, and tribal agencies is the Federal Government’s responsibility. › The Federal Government must coordinate and collaborate at all levels to ensure Federal agencies can interoperate with local, regional, state, and tribal agencies. › State interoperability with local, regional, and tribal agencies is a state government’s responsibility. 4. Federal interoperability with local, regional, state, and tribal agencies is the Federal Government’s responsibility. › The Federal Government must coordinate and collaborate at all levels to ensure Federal agencies can interoperate with local, regional, state, and tribal agencies. › State interoperability with local, regional, and tribal agencies is a state government’s responsibility.

6 12 Guiding Principles: 5. Critical voice interoperability is the primary goal; data is secondary, but very important. 6. Daily use of nationally recognized names, terminology, and command structures creates trust and understanding between responders and improves joint performance. 7. Public safety professionals operate flexibly and effectively within any portion of the Interoperability Continuum. 5. Critical voice interoperability is the primary goal; data is secondary, but very important. 6. Daily use of nationally recognized names, terminology, and command structures creates trust and understanding between responders and improves joint performance. 7. Public safety professionals operate flexibly and effectively within any portion of the Interoperability Continuum.

7 12 Guiding Principles: 8. State and Federal grants support multi- agency cooperation before strengthening single systems. ›Agencies struggling with operability should consider joining regional initiatives before solo efforts. 9. Neighboring agencies should collaborate in planning and acquiring communications systems. 8. State and Federal grants support multi- agency cooperation before strengthening single systems. ›Agencies struggling with operability should consider joining regional initiatives before solo efforts. 9. Neighboring agencies should collaborate in planning and acquiring communications systems.

8 12 Guiding Principles: 10. Public safety at all levels of government will find opportunities to deploy and use shared systems and connections. 11. Users should continue to plan migration paths to shared systems, but seize unplanned opportunities as they arise. 12. Public safety agencies, policymakers, industry, and the public will be educated how interoperable communications saves lives, money, and property. 10. Public safety at all levels of government will find opportunities to deploy and use shared systems and connections. 11. Users should continue to plan migration paths to shared systems, but seize unplanned opportunities as they arise. 12. Public safety agencies, policymakers, industry, and the public will be educated how interoperable communications saves lives, money, and property.

9 Initiative Areas  Four major initiative areas: ›Leadership & Coordination ›System Design & Planning ›Standards & Certification ›Standardization and Accreditation  22 actions within those initiatives that highlight steps needed, and define the partnerships required between the public safety community and all levels of government.  Four major initiative areas: ›Leadership & Coordination ›System Design & Planning ›Standards & Certification ›Standardization and Accreditation  22 actions within those initiatives that highlight steps needed, and define the partnerships required between the public safety community and all levels of government.

10 Initiative Areas  Leadership & Coordination ›Independent communication systems are designed and managed at all levels of government. ›Within systems of systems, no single entity is completely in charge of the combined communications network. ›All levels of government must jointly develop and exercise clear interoperability leadership structures for coordination, or confusion and inefficiency will reduce public safety service effectiveness.  Leadership & Coordination ›Independent communication systems are designed and managed at all levels of government. ›Within systems of systems, no single entity is completely in charge of the combined communications network. ›All levels of government must jointly develop and exercise clear interoperability leadership structures for coordination, or confusion and inefficiency will reduce public safety service effectiveness.

11 Initiative Areas  System Design & Interconnects ›A reliable, capable public safety system of systems is difficult to achieve and never finished. We must continue to define and build them to fit our roles and communities. -All levels of government design and manage independent communication systems, yet within systems of systems no single entity is in charge of the overall network. -Each system must be designed to interoperate with others, yet retain the ability to adapt as new technologies emerge.  System Design & Interconnects ›A reliable, capable public safety system of systems is difficult to achieve and never finished. We must continue to define and build them to fit our roles and communities. -All levels of government design and manage independent communication systems, yet within systems of systems no single entity is in charge of the overall network. -Each system must be designed to interoperate with others, yet retain the ability to adapt as new technologies emerge.

12 Initiative Areas  Standards & Certification: ›Connectivity and standards should be independently certified and tested to ensure equipment works as described by manufacturers and anticipated by users.  Different types of equipment and products support various means of interoperable communications.  For systems to interoperate, technical standards or planned connections must be in place. (For people to interoperate, joint procedures are needed.)  Standards & Certification: ›Connectivity and standards should be independently certified and tested to ensure equipment works as described by manufacturers and anticipated by users.  Different types of equipment and products support various means of interoperable communications.  For systems to interoperate, technical standards or planned connections must be in place. (For people to interoperate, joint procedures are needed.)

13 Initiative Areas  Standards & Accreditation: ›Nationally standardized protocols, procedures, and accreditation must be in place to establish consistency of operations and common skill sets across the country.  Standards & Accreditation: ›Nationally standardized protocols, procedures, and accreditation must be in place to establish consistency of operations and common skill sets across the country.

14 “ This proposed Nationwide Plan for Interoperable Communications is mere words until acted upon. The principles and proposed actions represent agreements we believe must be implemented to build and strengthen interoperability across the U.S. All levels of government and emergency response can play an important role in driving this Plan forward. ” “ This proposed Nationwide Plan for Interoperable Communications is mere words until acted upon. The principles and proposed actions represent agreements we believe must be implemented to build and strengthen interoperability across the U.S. All levels of government and emergency response can play an important role in driving this Plan forward. ” Emergency Response Council SAFECOM

15 ≠ End Æ