NAGPRA: THE BASICS By Lee Rains Clauss 1 st NAGPRA Community Meeting Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Willits, CA March 1, 2014. This meeting is supported.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Other Historic Preservation Statutes: Archaeology
Advertisements

NAGPRA: introductions
Grant Guidance Changes
Presentation before the Missouri Bar’s Health and Hospital Law Committee November 18, 2011 Markus P. Cicka, J.D., L.L.M. (Health Law) Director – Missouri.
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Part 3: Selecting the Colors Historical, Legal and Political Perspectives.
Archaeological Resources Protection Act Steve Perry Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement Region 7
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION The Fully Developed Claims Program Compensation Service Training Staff November 2013.
Heritage Resources Management and the Wildland Fire Suppression Undertaking.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Self-Governance Negotiations What to expect at the negotiation table 1.
Tribal Transit Program August 9, 2013 State Programs Meeting Presented By Élan Flippin, FTA.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
1 IRR Program Inventory and Funding Formula Update M.A.S.T. Impact Week Washington, DC March
Director--Northern Plains Tribal Technical Assistance Program
Teaching about contemporary indigenous people: Problematic politics of representation in museum education programming.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
NAGPRA GRANT COMMUNITY MEETING: SECTION 6 SUMMARIES UPDATE BY LEE RAINS CLAUSS SHERWOOD VALLEY BAND OF POMO FEBRUARY 7, 2015 This meeting is supported.
Local and Tribal Intergovernmental Consultation Senate Bill 18: Law, Definitions, Process Protection of Traditional Tribal Cultural Places.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Chapter 17 Caring for America’s Cultural Heritage.
Key points: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) language and intent incorporates an indigenous perspective in determining cultural.
A skeletal framework Lecture 2 The legal foundations of scientific archaeology as practiced in in the United States.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
QA/QC Team TPPCC GRIC May 6, Initial Issue: QA/QC Team Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/OC) Inventory Teams - As identified in our February.
STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE LANDS ADMINISTRATION APRIL 12 th and 13 th YELLOWKNIFE.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
IRRPCC Meeting Albuquerque, NM November 8,  Clarification needed on applicability of these roads into the IRR Inventory  Assignment given to IRRPCC.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
NATIONAL NAGPRA What is The National NAGPRA Program?
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act The Law and Ethics of the Kennewick Man Controversy Presented by: Graham Sowa.
CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Cultural Resource Management Preservation and Conservation.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Cultural Resources Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 10/27/
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Dick Wiechman, EPA region 7 Nebraska Project Officer Tribal Pesticide Program Manager.
NAGPRA GRANT COMMUNITY MEETING SHERWOOD VALLEY RANCHERIA OF POMO MARCH 1, 2014 This meeting is supported by a grant from the Department of the Interior,
By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL.
Who Owns the Dead? Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act Luis Salas.
Politics and Native American History Reconstructing the Past.
NATIONAL NAGPRA What is The National NAGPRA program?
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
FMCSA BASIC TITLE VI PROGRAM TRAINING December 2015 Lester G. Finkle FMCSA National Title VI Program Manager 11/13/20151.
Naomi Barry-Perez, Director Civil Rights Center
International Repatriation Update
Working with and benefitting from NAGPRA
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Midterm Review Public Archaeology.
Decolonizing Museums and Anthropology
Overview of 2019 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
Class I Redesignations
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Overview of 2020 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
Student Records Montana Association of School Business Officials
Presentation transcript:

NAGPRA: THE BASICS By Lee Rains Clauss 1 st NAGPRA Community Meeting Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Willits, CA March 1, This meeting is supported by a grant from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, National NAGPRA Program.

What is NAGPRA?  The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C )  Regulations—43 CFR Part 10  Passed on November 16, 1990  Two main objectives:  Resolve disposition of Native American cultural items and human remains under the control of Federal agencies and American institutions that receive Federal funding  Resolve ownership and control of cultural items and human remains discovered on Federal or Tribal lands after November 16, 1990

NAGPRA: Who is involved?  Federal agencies (excluding the Smithsonian) who have control of NAGPRA cultural items  American institutions that receive federal funds  Museum  University or college  State agency  Local agency  Lineal descendants of the deceased  Federally-recognized Indian tribes (including Alaska Native Corporations) and Native Hawaiian organizations

NAGPRA: What does it include?  Human Remains: physical remains of a Native American  These can be considered affiliated or unidentifiable  Funerary Objects: objects placed near individual human remains as part of a death rite or ceremony  These can be considered affiliated or unaffiliated  Sacred Objects: objects needed for the modern- day practice of traditional Native American religions  Objects of Cultural Patrimony: group-owned objects having ongoing importance to the group

NAGPRA: Cultural Affiliation  Native American: “of, or relating to, a tribe, people or culture that is indigenous to the United States”  Cultural affiliation: a relationship of shared group identity that may be reasonably traced historically or prehistorically between a present-day Tribe or NHO and an identifiable earlier group

NAGPRA: The Affiliation Evidence  Cultural affiliation for all NAGPRA items must be determined in consultation with lineal descendants, Indian tribes and NHOs  Lines of Evidence:  Biological  Archaeological  Anthropological  Geographical  Kinship  Linguistics  Folklore  Oral traditions  Historical data

NAGPRA: The Culturally Unidentifiable  43 CFR implemented on March 15, 2010  Applies to human remains and associated funerary objects previously determined to be Native American, but for which no lineal descendant or culturally affiliated tribe or NHO has been designated—often referred to as CUI  Institution or agency must consult about disposition of CUI with Tribes or NHOs from whose tribal lands the remains were originally interred and then, if need be, Tribes or NHOs from whose aboriginal lands the items were removed.  If institution or agency is unable to prove that it has a right of possession, it must offer to transfer control of the items to (1) Tribes or NHOs, (2) non-federally recognized tribes, or reinter the items according to State or other burial law.

NAGPRA: Provenience of CUI  Tribal land: lands within the exterior boundaries of any Indian reservation, all dependent Indian communities, or any lands administered for the benefit of Native Hawaiians  Aboriginal land: Federal land that is recognized by a final judgment of the Indian Claims Commission as the aboriginal land of a Tribe

NAGPRA: Summaries & Inventories  Federal agencies and institutions receiving Federal funds are required to compile summaries and inventories of NAGPRA cultural items  Summaries (Section 6): Lists of unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony; To be completed by 1993  Inventories (Section 5): Lists of human remains and associated funerary objects (AFO); To be completed by 1995  Museums and Federal agencies receiving a new collection, or having collections of new Indian tribes, must prepare or update inventories within 2 years and summaries within 6 months. If the museum receives Federal funds for the first time, summaries are due in 3 years and inventories in 5 years.

NAGPRA: The Summary Process  1. Institution or Federal agency produces a summary description of objects in its collection that fit, or might fit, one of the categories of cultural items and distributes it to all potential culturally affiliated Indian tribes or NHOs.  2. Institution or Federal agency consults with Indian tribes or NHOs, upon request, to identify NAGPRA cultural items.  3. Indian Tribes or NHOs submit written request, and if deemed satisfactory, the institution or Federal agency publishes a Notice of Intent to Repatriate.  4. There is a 30-day waiting period, in the case there are competing claims.  5. Transfer of control occurs within 90 days of receipt of a satisfactory, unchallenged claim and transfer of possession occurs based on mutual agreement of all parties.

NAGPRA: The Inventory Process  1. Institution or Federal agency consults with tribes or NHOs to determine if human remains and AFO in its collection are culturally affiliated or culturally unidentifiable.  2. Institution or agency creates an item-by-item inventory.  3. Within 6 months of completing inventory, institution or Federal agency sends copies to appropriate Indian tribe(s) or NHO(s) and publishes a Notice of Inventory Completion in the Federal Register.  4. Indian Tribes or NHOs submit written request, and if deemed satisfactory, the institution or Federal agency publishes a Notice of Intent to Repatriate.  5. There is a 30-day waiting period, in case of competing claims.  6. Transfer of control occurs within 90 days of receipt of a satisfactory, unchallenged claim and transfer of possession occurs based on mutual agreement of all parties.

NAGPRA: Excavation & Discovery  Section 3 of NAGPRA discusses how to resolve ownership of NAGPRA cultural items found on tribal or Federal lands, under two different scenarios, after November 16, 1990  Intentional Excavation: Prior to planned excavation, through consultation, develop a Plan of Action regarding disposition and removal. Also, publish a Notice of Intended Disposition and transfer control after 30 days.  Inadvertent Discovery: Stop work immediately, protect the site, consult with Tribes, and develop a plan. Then, publish a Notice of Intended Disposition and transfer control after 30 days.

Who owns/controls NAGPRA items discovered after 1990 ?  On Tribal land:  Human remains and AFO belong to the lineal descendant(s).  If no lineal descendant, items belong to the “tribal land” Indian tribe/NHO.  Unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony belong to the “tribal land” Indian tribe or NHO.  On Federal land:  Human remains and AFO belong to the lineal descendant(s).  If no lineal descendant, control goes to closest culturally affiliated tribe or NHO that states a claim.  Control of unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony go to closest culturally affiliated tribe or NHO that states a claim.  If cultural affiliation cannot be determined, control is with the Indian tribe that is recognized as the “aboriginal land” tribe and states a claim, unless there is a claimant whose relationship is stronger.

NAGPRA: By the Numbers  As of 2014, the numbers of CAI and CUI are:  Culturally Affiliated Individuals: 57,903  Culturally Unidentifiable Individuals: 121, 623  As of 2014, the numbers of AFO and UFO are:  Affiliated Funerary Objects: 1,256,.200  Unaffiliated Funerary Objects: 909,996  As of 2013, the following NAGPRA cultural items had been reported in Federal Register Notices of Intent to Repatriate:  Unassociated funerary objects: 212, 289  Sacred objects: 4816  Objects of cultural patrimony: 7942  Objects that are both sacred and patrimonial: 1613  Undesignated: 236

NAGPRA: By the Numbers, cont’d  Notices of Intended Disposition (Section 3 items)  143 Notices as of 2013 representing: 1047 individuals 10,964 associated funerary objects 64 unassociated funerary objects 4 objects of cultural patrimony

NAGPRA: The Results  Online databases have increased consultation, as have the new CUI regs  Published notices allow for the transfer of 47,000+ individuals  But, only about 30% (14,000 individuals) have been reported as being transferred based on year end FY 2013 report  Grant funds $90,000 per consultation grant; $15,000 per repatriation grant But, funds available for project awards remain a fraction of the total requested. Repatriation requests alone have increased 300% over the last few years.

NAGPRA: Enforcement  Civil penalties may be imposed upon repositories  There are 9 ways a repository might fail to comply:  i. Sale or transfer of NAGPRA items contrary to NAGPRA  ii. Failure to complete a summary  iii. Failure to complete an inventory  iv. Failure to notify tribes within 6 months after inventory  v. Refusal to repatriate  vi. Repatriation prior to a notice in the Federal Register  vii. Failure to consult with tribes and/or lineal descendants  viii. Failure to inform recipients of pesticide treatment  ix. Failure to offer to transfer control of CUI upon receipt of a claim by an appropriate tribal group

NAGPRA: The Resources  National NAGPRA Office  (What’s New) Guidance Reporting --FY 2013 Final Report can be found at rts/FY13FinalReport.pdf rts/FY13FinalReport.pdf Grants Online databases YouTube videos Training events Webinars On-location National meetings