Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Advertisements

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
1 Shelton School District Title Programs Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services.
Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:
North Mason School District September 2, ◦ District 4 th and 5 th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. ◦ District 4 th grade Writing.
By Bobby Schueller, Brianna Trower ED 446, 11/11/2011.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.
Tacoma School District - 1 Student Achievement Board Study December 6, 2007 Michael Power Assist. Superintendent Program and Learning Support Tel
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS MCA RESULTS. Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students Ethnicity25.6%20.4% LEP7.7%11.1% Special Education14.8%16.8%
Tacoma School District - 1 updated:12/4/2007 Student Achievement Board Study Session December 6, 2007 (Supplement) Dr. Michael Power Assist. Superintendent.
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY Pam Farr, Director of Teaching & Learning Gail Straus, Director of ECE & Federal Programs.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Presented January 14, Focus Strategic Plan – Goal Three Recruit, retain and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff,
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program Presentation to Board of Directors Shelton School District September 8, 2009 Gail Straus, Assistant.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2012 AYP Presentation.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Student Performance Board of Directors Meeting Everett Public Schools September 6, 2005, Rev. September 7, 2005.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA OLD TITLE: Do Grades Prove Proficiency? Comparing Students’ Math GPA and WASL Scores THIS PRESENTATION HAS.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Spring ABOUT THE CHKS  SPONSOR California Department of Education  Anonymous, voluntary, confidential student self- report, comprehensive health.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.
Test Scores Comparison completed using Spring CRCT reports Natalie Hayes.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Manson Schools Preliminary Data
Millbrae Elementary School District
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Shelton School District
Buckeye Central Local Schools
Rufus Cage Elementary Houston Independent School District
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Preliminary PARCC & NJ ask DATA
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA Results
Results of the Civil Rights Movement Data & Trends
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Evergreen Elementary School
Texas State Accountability
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11
Central City Elementary School
Data Overview Shiver Elementary School Faculty and Staff July 21, 2013
MEAP Results.
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA II Results
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11
School Profile Andy Dekaney High School
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Shelton School District SY 11-12
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Presentation transcript:

Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found at Administrator’s Retreat August 2009 AYP and WASL Results 2009

District Areas Not Making AYP Spring WASL 2009 GradeReadingMathOther Elementary (grades 3, 4, 5)  All  White  Special Ed  Low Income  All  American Indian  Hispanic  Special Ed & Low Income Met all participation rates and unexcused absence rate. Middle (grades 6, 7, 8)  Hispanic  Special Ed  Low Income  All  Hispanic  White  Special Ed & Low Income Met all participation rates and unexcused absence rate. High School (grade 10) N.A. – All measured reading cells were met! No math cells were met. Cells measured (having “N” requirement)  All  White  Low Income Did not meet Reading participation rate:  All  Special Ed  Low Income Did not meet Math participation rate:  Hispanic  Special Ed  Low Income Did not meet on time graduation rate.

District Areas Not Making AYP Comparison WASL 2008 & 2009 Newly identified 2009; Identified for both 2008 and 2009 GradeReadingMathOther Elementary (grades 3, 4, 5)  White  Special Ed  All  Low Income  American Indian  Special Ed  All  Hispanic  Low Income N.A. Middle (grades 6, 7, 8)  Hispanic  Low Income  Special Ed  Hispanic  Special Ed  Low Income  All and White N.A. High School (grade 10) All measured cells with qualifying “N” made AYP for 2009 (All; White; Low Income) Low Income was identified for  All  White  Low Income “N” does not apply to participation rate Reading Participation rate:  All  Special Ed  Low Income Math Participation rate:  Hispanic  Special Ed  Low Income Not meeting graduation rate standard

WASL Trend – Grade 3 Reading 3 rd Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar % 64.2% %70.9%64.2% %70.7%76.1% %71.3%76.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 3 Math 3 rd Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %64.2%47.3% %69.6%47.3% %68.6%64.9% %66.3%64.9%

WASL Trend – Grade 4 Reading 4 th Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar %65.6%52.2% %66.7%52.2% %74.4%52.2% %79.5%64.2% %81.2%64.2% %76.6%64.2% %72.6%76.1% %73.5%76.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 4 Math 4 th Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %51.8%29.7% %55.2%29.7% %59.9%29.7% %60.8%47.3% %58.9%47.3% %58.1%47.3% %53.6%64.9% %52.3%64.9%

WASL Trend – Grade 4 Writing 4 th Grade Writing YearDistrictState %49.5% %53.6% %55.8% %57.7% %60.4% %60.2% %62.3% %60.3%

WASL Trend – Grade 5 Reading 5 th Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar %76.3%64.2% %71.9%64.2% %75.6%76.1% %73.9%76.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 5 Math 5 th Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %55.8%47.3% %59.5%47.3% %61.2%64.9% %61.9%64.9%

WASL Trend – Grade 5 Science 5th Grade Science YearDistrictState %28.2% %35.6% %35.7% %36.5% %43.0% %44.9%

WASL Trend – Grade 6 Reading 6 th Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar %66.7%47.6% %68.0%47.6% %68.9%65.1% %72.0%65.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 6 Math 6 th Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %49.5%38.0% %49.6%38.0% %49.1%58.7% %50.9%58.7%

WASL Trend – Grade 7 Reading 7 th Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar %44.5%30.1% %47.9%30.1% %60.4%30.1% %69.0%47.6% %61.5%47.6% %68.7%47.6% %63.1%65.1% %59.3%65.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 7 Math 7 th Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %30.4%17.3% %36.8%17.3% %46.3%17.3% %50.8%38.0% %48.5%38.0% %54.6%38.0% %50.5%58.7% %51.8%58.7%

WASL Trend – Grade 7 Writing 7 th Grade Writing YearDistrictState %53.0% %54.7% %57.9% %61.2% %64.6% %68.4% %70.0% %69.7%

WASL Trend – Grade 8 Reading 8 th Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar %70.1%47.6% %65.0%47.6% %66.3%65.1% %67.5%65.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 8 Math 8 th Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %48.9%38.0% %49.8%38.0% %51.8%58.7% %50.8%58.7%

WASL Trend – Grade 8 Science 8 th Grade Science YearDistrictState %35.8% %39.4% %36.4% %42.9% %44.6% %48.2% %51.1%

WASL Trend – Grade 10 Reading 10 th Grade Reading YearDistrictStateBar %59.2%48.6% %60.0%48.6% %64.5%48.6% %72.9%61.5% %82.0%61.5 % %80.8%61.5 % %81.8%74.3% %80.9%74.3%

WASL Trend – Grade 10 Math 10 th Grade Math YearDistrictStateBar %37.3%24.8% %39.4%24.8% %43.9%24.8% %47.5%43.6% %51.0%43.6 % %50.4%43.6 % %49.6%62.4% %45.2%62.4%

WASL Trend – Grade 10 Writing 10 th Grade Writing YearDistrictState %54.3% %60.5% %65.2% %65.2% %79.8% %83.9% %86.8% %86.3%

WASL Trend – Grade 10 Science 10 th Grade Science YearDistrictState %31.8% %32.2% %35.8% %35.0% %36.4% %40.0% %38.6%

Gold Nugget BDX Gr. 4 Reading: Native American 4 th Grade Reading YearSchoolDistrictState %50.0%48.7% %50.9% %51.7% %80.8%59.4% % 63.8% %69.1% % 62.7% %56.7% %73.7%60.6%

Gold Nugget BDX Gr. 4 Math: Male 4 th Grade Math YearSchoolDistrictState %39.7%56.7% %44.9%52.5% %38.0%51.8%

Gold Nugget EVG Gr. 3 Reading: LEP 3 rd Grade Reading YearSchoolDistrictState %8.7%30.8% %33.3%27.1% %34.6%30.8% % 33.6%

Gold Nugget EVG Gr. 5 Science: All 5 th Grade Science YearSchoolDistrictState %22.3%28.2% %19.1%35.6% %25.4%35.7% %27.0%36.5% %30.8%43.0% %40.8%44.9%

Gold Nugget MTV Gr. 4 Writing: Low Income 4 th Grade Writing YearSchoolDistrictState %31.6%46.0% %55.7%48.9% %53.4%47.4%

Gold Nugget MTV Gr. 5 Math: Male 5 th Grade Math YearSchoolDistrictState %46.1%55.6% %44.9%58.7% %45.5%59.0% %55.7%61.3%

Gold Nugget Grade 6 Reading: Native American 6 th Grade Reading YearDistrictState %50.8% %51.7% %52.6% %55.2%

Gold Nugget Grade 7 Math: Female 7 th Grade Math YearDistrictState %50.2% %55.6% %52.2% %52.5%

Gold Nugget Grade 8 Science: All 8 th Grade Science YearDistrictState %35.8% %39.4% %36.4% %42.9% %44.6% %48.2% %51.1%

Gold Nugget Grade 10 Reading: Male 10 th Grade Reading YearSchoolDistrictState %47.3%59.6% %55.0%68.2% %63.9%79.0% %66.4%77.3% %67.9%78.9% %78.2%77.7%