PROGRAM EVALUATION: STAKEHOLDERS & TIMELINE Presented by: Stephanie Bailey, Arif Indiarto, Merlessa Rosacina & Natalia Samuels In partial fulfillment of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Advertisements

Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
NACEP Accreditation: Advancing Quality College Courses in High School and Improving Credit Transfer Kent Scheffel, President-Elect National Alliance of.
St. Petersburg College BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NURSING.
CREST Campus for Research, Entrepreneurship, Service, & Teaching.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
GNRS 5411 Program Evaluation: Educator
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Betsy M. McDowell, PhD, RN, CNE October 2012 SC Organization of Nurse Leaders 1.
Chamberlain College of Nursing HomeTown Health November 11, 2009.
Online Best Practices Dr. Bob Paxton, Ph.D. Campus President, NAU Online Angie Clements, MBA Director of Learner Services Online Best Practices Dr. Bob.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Jazan Community College Accreditation Experience Professor Sultan Al-Hazmi JCC Dean and Chair of the Accreditation Committee.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Program Evaluation GNRS 5311 Module 4
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Importance of Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing Education into Professional Nursing Practice American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Commission.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Nursing Curriculum Development Concept Map
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Program Evaluation & Faculty Participation By Group 4: Charlotte Featherston, Sara Martin, Christina (Gaupp) Stacy, and Elsy Thomas.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Objectives To review the key components of the Nursing Program. To understand the roles and responsibilities of the student, preceptor and faculty liaison.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
National Lutheran School Accreditation encourages, assists, and recognizes schools that provide quality Christian education and engage in continuous improvement.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Integrated Planning Initiatives Dr. Ryan Cornner Associate Vice President, Strategic Planning and Innovation November 17, 2014.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Designing a Curriculum: Finding your way through the maze.
Here Today Here to Stay August 17, TJC’s Mission.
Narrated by Mary E. Partusch, PhD, RN, CNE *Competency 8 is listed as 6c in the CNE Handbook Detailed Test Blueprint (2015)
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
WELCOME BACK!.
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Developing Objectives for a BSN Program
NURS 250 Health Promotion in Nursing Curriculum Revision
Centralization and Standardization Listening Session
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Sam Houston State University
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
Sam Houston State University
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Core Concepts of the Standards 2019
QM – Putting the Pieces Together for Strategic Visioning and Accreditation Planning QM East Regional Conference April 26, 2019.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

PROGRAM EVALUATION: STAKEHOLDERS & TIMELINE Presented by: Stephanie Bailey, Arif Indiarto, Merlessa Rosacina & Natalia Samuels In partial fulfillment of GNRS 5311: Program Evaluation Dr. Eva Stephens Date: August 4, 2015

Question 1 Identify the internal and external stakeholders in the program evaluation process for an undergraduate school of nursing.

Stakeholders  Individuals or groups who gain or lose through planning process, program, or project  Divided into external and external categories  Each holds unique influences in the institution

Internal Stakeholders  Individuals or groups within the school of nursing  Directly produce and consume education  Unique needs and expectation in the institution

Internal Stakeholders Internal StakeholderNeeds & Expectations Traditional Students Faculty relationships, campus safety, academic supports, campus activities, communication, employment, reputation Adult students Convenience of offerings, quality of education, accelerated time to program completion, transferable education, employment Online Students User friendly environment, available tech support, ease of access, employments, transferable education Trustees & Sponsors Stewardship of human, fiscal and physical resources, compliance with governing documents, timely and accurate information, effective strategic planning, resources, reputable academic program, continuance of mission Faculty & Staff Fair compensation, current technology, professional development, recognition, advancement opportunities (Students' and Stakeholders' Needs, 2015)

External Stakeholders  Parties outside of the school of nursing  Have an interest in success of the nursing program

External Stakeholders  Prospective future students  Nursing regulatory bodies  Current Practicing nurses  Clients (patients)  Employers of nursing school graduates  The community/public served by the nurses (CCNE, 2013)

Question 2 Describe the timeline for program evaluation and how is it determined.

CCNE Accreditation Process  Self Evaluation  Evaluation Team validates program claims  Program responds to evaluation report  ARC reviews all submitted documentation  CCNE approves, denies or withdraws accreditation image credit:

Timeline  Nearly continuous (Billings & Halstead, 2012)  Unwise to delay program evaluation until time for accreditation. Image credit: improvement-marketing-campaign.html

Image credit:  Start immediately following accreditation visit (Gard, Flannigan & Cluskey, 2004)  Ongoing data collection prevents rush in collecting information.  Many evaluations best done close to the “event” (Lewallen, 2015).

Accreditation at UTMB School of Nursing  UTMB School of Nursing accredited by the CCNE (UTMB School of Nursing, n.d.). Image credit: go_.jpg

Accreditation at UTMB School of Nursing  10 year cycle for existing programs such as the BSN and graduate programs at UTMB.  5 year cycle for new programs such as the DNP (UTMB School of Nursing, n.d.) Image credit: /images/Old_Red_w-plants.jpg

CIPR  CCNE support continuous improvement through CIPR (Ellis, 2012).  A mid-cycle report of the institution’s continuous improvement efforts (Ellis, 2012). Image credit: s2.jpg

Image credit:

References Billings, D.M. & Halstead, J.A. (2012). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders. Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education. (2014). Procedures for Accreditation of Baccalaureate and Graduate Nursing Programs. Retrieved from Procedures.pdf Ellis, P. (2012). Understanding the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education accreditation process and the role of the Continuous Improvement Progress Report. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28 (1), Gard, C.L., Flannigan, P.N. & Cluskey, M. (2004). Program evaluation: An ongoing systematic process. Nursing Education Perspectives, 25 (4), Lewallen, L.P. (2015). Practical strategies for nursing education program evaluation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31 (2),

References Students’ and Stakeholders’ Needs (2015). Retrieved from University of Saint Mary: Students’ and Stakeholders’ Needs. University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing (n.d.). Retrieved from: accreditations.aspx.