1 CDE Licensed Employees Performance Evaluation Orientation August 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Speech-Language Pathology Assistants in Texas Schools

Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information

Performance Appraisal Systems

Unclassified Performance Management Process For Unclassified Administrative and Professional (Non-Teaching) Employees Summer 2011.

Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.

School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.

Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.

Teacher Evaluation Model

Educational Support Professional Evaluation Orientation August,

August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.

Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.

Professional Development and Appraisal System

 Performance Management, Performance Evaluation, and Correcting Problems  March 10, 2011.

ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.

Human Resources Information Reemployment Process Licensure Advancement Successes Teacher Evaluation Updates Staffing Strategies Retirement Sessions.

M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.

Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.

Educator Effectiveness: Connecting Coursework to Career Success / End of Year Self-Assessment May 15, 2014.

Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.

What does Educator Effectiveness (aka SB 191) mean for us?

Implementing post-290 EVALUATION: Remediating Inadequate Performance of Teachers 1 The Hungerford Law Firm April 13, 2015.

Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.

Oct. 17, 2011 Mark Cramer HRMS Team Lead Cheryl Brooks HRMS Business Analyst PANC Conference HRMS Update.

BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,

TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.

The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.

The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.

South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.

Evaluation: Implications for your Professional Future Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:

Creating a Climate of Professionalism Fenton Avenue Charter School Evaluation Process.

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

Chapter 8.2 Managing Human Resources. Human Resources Planning & Job Analysis  Classifying employees  Determining job requirements.

Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.

Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.

The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.

Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.

Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.

NCLB Supplemental Educational Services Meeting SEPTEMBER 17, 2010.

Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.

1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.

August Agenda  Purpose of Evaluation  Senate Bill Impact  CDE Licensure Employees  Question and Answer (Q&A) 2.

1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.

Classified Evaluations Presented to Leadership State Center Class XIV September 25, 2015 Samerah Campbell Director of Human Resources.

Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.

Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.

HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.

Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process

PGES Updates Second Read of PGES KBE meeting April 1 st. Link to materials located herehere Highlights of Changes: Section 1(Definitions):

Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.

Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process

Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements

Certified Evaluation Orientation

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation

Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.

Presentation transcript:

1 CDE Licensed Employees Performance Evaluation Orientation August 2012

2 Performance Evaluation System Agenda Purpose of Evaluation Senate Bill Impact CDE Licensure Employees Question and Answer (Q&A)

3 Purpose of Evaluation Serves as a basis for the improvement of performance Enhance the implementation of programs Serve as the measurement of satisfactory performance Evaluate the level of performance based on the effectiveness of personnel Prove a basis for making decisions in the areas of hiring, compensation, promotion, assignment, professional development, earning and retaining-non probationary status, dismissal, and non-renewal of contracts

Senate Bill Impact All teachers are on formal evaluation beginning (This means all teachers must be evaluated formally each year) 4

5 Helps improve performance practices, capabilities, and results Facilitates communication and sharing of best practices information among all employees Serves as a working tool for understanding and improving performance Evaluation Tools

Specific Measurable Attainable Research-based Timelines 6 SMART Goals

7 CDE Licensed Probationary Employees First Quarter Orientation (within first 3 weeks of beginning of school) Probationary CDE Licensed Educators * First observation by the end of first quarter (30 minutes minimum with written documentation) * Conference within 10 days of observation

8 CDE Licensed Probationary Employees Second Quarter Second observation -30 minutes minimum -Written documentation Conference within 10 days of observation

9 CDE Licensed Educators Time Lines Non-Probationary (Four plus full years) Orientation (first three weeks of school) Formal Evaluation for all teachers Transition Teachers are not evaluated One Formal Observation (30 minutes) during the School Year Conference within 10 days of observation

10 Concerns Notice of Deficiencies within ten working days of conference. Remediation Plan written within ten working days Employees have the right to request a second evaluator when placed on a Remediation Plan CSEA may attend meetings with the evaluatee Employees have the right to submit a rebuttal to the evaluation

11 Summative Report Input from evaluatee and evaluator(s) Face to Face Conference Strengths-specific Weaknesses-specific Commendations Dates-specific

12 Evaluation Support Human Resources Karey Carole

13 Questions?