California’s Bioenergy Programs – Update to Options for Bioenergy Facilities Paul Clanon & Judith Iklé California Public Utilities Commission April 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procuring Our Way to Compliance IEP 27 th Annual Meeting September 23, 2008 Fong Wan, PG&E.
Advertisements

California Energy Commission Customer-side Distributed Generation Impacts CED 2013 Preliminary Demand Analysis Working Group DG PUP June.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
California Interconnection 101 An Update on Reform: What’s Happening and Why it is Important March 16, 2011 Sky C. Stanfield
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
CASA Energy Workgroup Regulatory Update SCAP Energy Management Committee May 30, 2013.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
Buying Electricity and Natural Gas for a BIG User Joan Kowal Energy Manager, UMCP March 6, 2012 Sustainable Tuesdays Speaker Series.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Net Metering and Interconnection A Policy Perspective Brad Klein Staff Attorney Envt’l Law & Policy Center March 28, 2007.
Renewable Net Short.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Containing the Cost of California’s RPS Yuliya Shmidt, Senior Analyst February 2, 2012.
Practical Ways For Towns to Save Money With Clean Energy Projects Paul Michaud Murtha Cullina LLP April 30, 2014.
1 CPUC Responsibilities for Renewable and Energy Efficiency Resource Commitments by Investor-Owned Utilities and Ratepayers Hearing on Public Goods Charge.
PG&E’s General Market Virtual Net Metering Schedule NEMV
Net Metering and Interconnection Requirements IMUA 2015 Annual Conference May 8, 2015 Delia Patterson General Counsel, APPA.
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CUSTOMER OWNED GENERATION A DISCUSSION OF INTERCONNECTION POLICIES, METERING STRATEGIES AND BILLING CONSIDERATIONS IMUA ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
California's three large IOUs collectively served 12.7% of their 2007 retail electricity sales with renewable power. – Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)
Implementing one of the most ambitious renewable energy standards in the country California’s Renewable Energy Programs Implementing one of the most ambitious.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
The Alternative Energy Policy Landscape Surrounding AR.
California Energy Action Plan Tim Tutt California Energy Commission Dan Adler California Public Utilities Commission June 24, 2004 Goal II – Accelerate.
California Energy Commission Renewable Energy in California Rasa Keanini and Heather Raitt Renewable Energy Program Efficiency, Renewables & Demand Analysis.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
Discussion of Feed-in Tariff Pilot Programs September 18, 2013 Presentation to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly 1.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Implementing one of the most ambitious renewable energy standards in the country CALIFORNIA’S Implementing one of the most ambitious renewable energy standards.
Questions? Please contact the Office of Governmental Affairs at (916) California Public Utilities Commission Legislative Briefing November 17,
PG&E’s Solar Choice Programs
California Energy Commission HEATHER RAITT Technical Director Renewable Energy Program Proposed Changes to RPS Guidelines April 17, 2006 Proposed Changes.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
Renewables Portfolio Standard: Progress and Perspectives Aaron J. Johnson Director, Renewable Energy Policy & Strategy February 1, 2011.
California’s Renewable Energy Credits (REC) Market Update
2009 Bidders Workshop Attachment D August 3, 2009.
July 9, 2010, AB 920 Workshop Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Net Metering Fall 2009 Customer Meetings. What is Net Metering?  Net metering allows the meter to “run backwards” and record generation in excess of.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
California’s Bioenergy Programs – Update to Options for Bioenergy Facilities Paul Clanon & Judith Iklé California Public Utilities Commission January 2009.
Net Metering and Embedded Generation NB Climate Action Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting – October 1, 2008 Saint John, NB Linda Berthelot.
1 Encouraging Solar Development in California Commissioner Mark Ferron California Public Utilities Commission July 13, 2011.
1 Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Settlement Overview Power Association of Northern California Luncheon, November 9, 2010 Frank Lindh General Counsel California.
Southern California Edison SM Southern California Edison Company Proposed AB920 Net Surplus Compensation Rate [NSCR] July 9, 2010.
2008 Bidders Workshop Attachment D April 11, 2008.
Renewable & Alternative Power Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Stuart R. Hemphill Director, Renewable and Alternative Power Southern.
Utah Geothermal Power Generation Workshop Regulatory Issues August 17, 2005 Presented by Becky Wilson Utility Economist Utah Public Service Commission.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
California Solar Initiative Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission March 30, 2006.
Philippine Feed-In Tariff System Implementation 1.
SELF-GENERATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM (SGIP) Website:
Renewable Energy Act of 2008
AB 920 Net Surplus Compensation: Proposal of the Solar Alliance and the Vote Solar Initiative Tom Beach Crossborder Energy July 9, 2010.
Renewables Portfolio Standard Status Report California Public Utilities Commission February 26 th, 2008.
Overview: California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program Presented by Paul Douglas RPS Program Manager California Public Utilities.
Program Overview Sachu Constantine April 23, 2008 Distributed Generation/ California Solar Initiative.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
Electricity Outlook: Summer of 2005 and Beyond." Before the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Steve Larson Executive.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Renewable Distributed Generation and Public Water Supply Utilities CWWA/CTAWWA Fall Conference Paul R. Michaud, Esq. October 20, 2015.
California Product Offerings
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Combined Heat and Power Program Settlement
Presentation transcript:

California’s Bioenergy Programs – Update to Options for Bioenergy Facilities Paul Clanon & Judith Iklé California Public Utilities Commission April 1, 2008 Conference Call Bioenergy WG

April 1, CPUC Programs Available to Bioenergy Facilities Net Energy Metering (NEM) Tariff Self Generation Incentives Program (SGIP) Feed-In Tariff (FIT) – 2 options  AB 1969 (Yee, 2006)  AB 1613 (Blakeslee, 2007) Qualifying Facilities (QF) Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program Bilateral Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)

April 1, Program Guidelines - Facility/Seller Options Net Energy Metering Tariff: Customer credited for onsite generation up to their annual onsite load Self Generation Incentive Program: Provides upfront incentive to offset the capital investment for system installation Utility Feed-In Tariff : Generator paid for output of biogas facility for 10,15, or 20 years based on CPUC adopted fixed price at start of contract Qualifying Facility Contract: Generator has access to the Grid and is paid the avoided cost of power as determined by the CPUC Renewable Portfolio Standard Contract: Generator paid negotiated price through RPS solicitation between utility and seller Bilateral Power Purchase Agreements: Price negotiated between utility and seller

April 1, Program Eligibility by Facility Capacity Facility Capacity (MW) NEM Tariff SGIPUtility Feed-In Tariff Utility Contract as a QF Utility Contract under RPS Solicitation Utility Contract under Bilateral Negotiation 0– 1.5YesYes*Yes (under AB 1969) YesYes (uncommon) 1.5–20No Yes (under AB 1613) Yes ≥ 20No Yes * Eligible technologies change on 1/1/08

April 1, Net Energy Metering for Bioenergy Net Energy Metering:  Onsite generation provides customer with credit for net monthly power production at the generation portion of their rate  Helpful to customers whose renewable generating potential is comparable to their annual consumption NEM Eligible Technologies:  Biogas-fired generators and fuel cells  Differs from other types of NEM because it does not offset the distribution or transmission rate components ¢/kWhOff-PeakMid-PeakOn-Peak PG&E N/AN/A SCE N/A SDG&E Ranges indicate Winter - Summer rates NEM credit rates effective 10/5/07

April 1, Net Energy Metering – Eligibility and Enrollment Program Guidelines  Statewide cap 50 MW  Facility capacity cap: 1 MW Statewide, 3 generating facilities may be from 1 to 10 MW in addition to the 50 MW cap PG&ESCESDG&ETotal # facilities45110 Capacity (MW) Current Enrollment* *As of October 2007

April 1, Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) for Bioenergy Incentive Program  Since 2001, SGIP has provided an incentive to offset the upfront capital costs for bioenergy facilities  Funding pays for cost of installing generation equipment Eligible Technologies  Through 12/31/2007 – biogas fueled Combined Heat and Power (CHP), internal combustion engines, small turbines, and fuel cells  After 1/1/2008 – biogas fueled fuel cells only AB 2778 (Lieber, 2006) limited the number of eligible technologies Annual Funding  $83 million/year

April 1, Pricing Characteristics of SGIP Incentive Limitations  Minimum system size 30 kW  Total system size up to 5 MW  Maximum incentive size 1 MW Only the renewable fuel cell option will remain after 1/1/08 and a 1 MW plant is eligible for funding up to $4.5 million Eligible Technologies Renewable fuel cells Renewable fuel small turbine Renewable fuel ICE and large turbine Incentive Offered ($/W) Minimum System Size (kW) 3000 # Facilities32112 Capacity (MW) Incentive Levels and Complete* Installations *as of 12/31/2007

April 1, Feed In Tariff for Bioenergy CPUC is authorized to require utilities to offer feed- in tariffs that apply to bioenergy under 2 scenarios  Scenario 1: Applies to all renewable fueled generation under 1.5 MW AB 1969 (Yee, 2006) requires utilities to purchase power from water/wastewater treatment plants CPUC Decision D expands AB 1969 FIT to include any renewable generators CPUC implementation ongoing; tariffs effective 2/14/08  Scenario 2: Applies to all CHP up to 20 MW AB 1613 (Blakeslee, 2007) requires utilities to purchase power from CHP facilities (included biogas fueled facilities) CPUC implementation just starting, tariffs likely to go into effect in 2009

April 1, Pricing Characteristics of Feed-in Tariffs (Scenario 1: AB 1969) Fixed price is determined by Market-Price Referent (MPR), as adjusted by time of delivery and season Price schedule extends years and is listed in tariff Tariffs transfer Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) from generator to utility Two options under tariff (depending on customer’s choice):  Full sale of production  Excess sales (after onsite usage) ¢/kWhSuper Off-PeakSummer Peak PG&E819 SCE631 SDG&E715 Sample Tariff Levels for AB1969 (Illustrative prices)* *These numbers are illustrative only, for a 15-year contract. There are a number of factors that will affect these the actual price such as the length of contract and year of initial commercial operation. This is an instantaneous price, not a weighted average.

April 1, Feed-in Tariffs (Scenario 2: AB 1613) Fixed or variable price to be determined by the CPUC Price schedule extends to a maximum of 10 years CHP systems must be sized to the customer’s thermal load (Sec. 2842). There is no requirement that CHP systems be sized to the customer’s electric load. Thus, oversized systems (from an electric perspective) are permitted. A 20 MW maximum size limit applies (Sec. 2840). Only new CHP systems (installed after January 1, 2008) are eligible. (Sec. 2841) A NOX standard of 0.07 pounds per MWh applies, with a credit at the rate of 1 MWh per 3.4 MMBtu of waste heat recovery.

April 1, Qualifying Facility Program for Bioenergy Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) of 1978 established QFs and outlined their payment according to the avoided cost of power QF is defined as non-utility generator with less than 80 MW capacity that utilizes cogeneration and/or renewable fuels (for bioenergy, ≥ 50% biomass) There are currently 69 bioenergy QFs  Many bioenergy facilities came online as QFs in the 1980s New standard offer contracts are currently being assembled. There has been little input from renewables PG&ESCESDG&ETotal # facilities Capacity (MW) Current Enrollment for Bioenergy Qualifying Facilities* *As of January 2008

April 1, Pricing Characteristics of Qualifying Facility Contracts Under D new contracts will be available to new and existing QFs that include new avoided and capacity costs  Contract Types: Bilateral, Firm, and As-available  For small QFs, IOUs can’t refuse a contract due to oversubscription unless 110% of current QF capacity is reached Differences between IOUs’ pricing are captured in the market heat rates and gas prices As-available:  Capacity Price: $32.53/kW-year  All-In Power Price: $73/MWh Firm:  Capacity Price: $91.97/kW-year  All-In Power Price: $80/MWh Above prices are based on a gas price of $7.50/MMBtu and heat rate of 8,887 Btu/kWh

April 1, Characteristics of RPS Contracts RPS statute mandates that IOUs, ESPs and CCAs procure an additional 1% of retail sales per year from eligible renewable sources until 20% is reached no later than 2010 (SB 1078 and 107) Contract Price  Pricing of all RPS contracts is negotiated between buyer and seller Contract Term  Contracts for 10,15, or 20 years are most common  Short term contracts are also allowed Renewable Energy Resources  CEC determines what resources are RPS-eligible  Bioenergy resources include agricultural waste, solid waste, biogas, and others Utility owns the RECs from RPS generation  Program only counts “bundled” contracts as RPS-eligible

April 1, RPS Bioenergy Contracts Since 2002, the CPUC has approved:  17 biomass projects (244 MW)  15 biogas projects (56 MW)  3 additional biogas contracts (7 MW) and 2 additional biomass contracts (90 MW) that were later canceled 50% of the biogas capacity and 40% of the biomass capacity is from new or re-started facilities 20 MW of new biogas facilities have come online 9 new biomass projects (78 MW) are delayed. Common barriers are difficulties with fuel supply and/or site control 11 MW of new biomass capacity currently pending approval at CPUC

April 1, CPUC Adopts Market Price Referent Calculated annually for RPS Solicitations Calculates levelized all-in market price deemed per se reasonable, i.e. recoverable through rates Feed-In tariff program adopts MPR values for pricing Adopted 2007 MPRs - $/kWh Online Date 10-Year15-Year20-Year

April 1, Bioenergy and Power Purchase Agreements Renewable energy purchased at a negotiated price from facilities of all sizes Opportunity for generators with excess capacity who might otherwise not participate in an RPS Solicitation Generation can fulfill a Load-Serving Entity’s RPS requirement In 2007, CPUC approved several bilateral negotiated PPAs for bioenergy projects

April 1, SCE’s Standard Offer Biomass Contracts SCE currently offers standard offer contracts for bioenergy 0 -1 MW, 1-5 MW, and 5-20 MW facilities SCE recognized that smaller biomass projects have had difficulties in participating in SCE’s annual solicitations. By eliminating the complex negotiation process that is needed for larger projects, the program gives smaller projects the opportunity to execute contracts with SCE and contribute to the State’s RPS goals.  SCE has submitted 2 of these contracts (4 MW) to the CPUC.  2 more contracts possibly within the next 2 months.  Program is planned to continue at least until the end of the year.

April 1, Biomass projects face local opposition Imperial County passed Measure X in February 2008, banning the importation of biosolids and biowastes into the area. Measure X was in response to a proposed biomass facility from Liberty Energy. Possible solution (from staff draft document): Work with land agencies to provide information that would facilitate the siting process. For instance, utilize expertise in the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group to increase community awareness and outreach as well as identify bioenergy “friendly” communities that may benefit from new economic development.

April 1, Bioenergy Interconnection Rules Biogas projects require utility interconnection Electric interconnection is by CPUC or FERC Interconnection Rules CPUC Interconnection Rule 21  Net Energy Metered biogas  Any non-exporting biogas or other onsite generation  Distribution system over which the CPUC has jurisdiction FERC Small Generator Interconnection Agreement Biogas < 20 MW exported to the grid, such as with a Power Purchase Agreement