WHAT IS CASA? Kevin Kloesel, College of Geosciences, OU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Course on Development and Disasters with Special Focus on Health February 10 – 21, 2003: St Anns, Jamaica CDERA Experience in Institutional.
Advertisements

WP2 : Fine-scale rainfall data acquisition and prediction : Objective: develop and implement a system for estimation and forecasting of fine-scale (100m,
Dr. Heather Lazrus Dr. Eve Gruntfest Warn on Forecast Kickoff Workshop Norman, OK February 18, 2010 Social Science Contributions to Warn-on-Forecast.
Dr. Eve Gruntfest Dr. Heather Lazrus American Meteorological Society Summer Community Meeting Norman, OK - August 11, the National Weather Center.
CASA : NSF Center for Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere Dr. José Colom-Ustáriz.
Travis Smith NSSL / OU / CIMMS The Hazardous Weather Testbed / Experimental Warning Program.
Sensors in Sustainability Jim Kurose Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts Amherst MA USA NSF WICS Workshop Salt Lake City.
Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere: End User and Social Integration 2009 American Meteorological Association Summer Community Meeting Walter.
Colorado State University
NOAA’s National Weather Service 2009 President’s Budget Rollout Jack Hayes NOAA Assistant Administrator & Director, National Weather Service National Weather.
QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS OF BROADCAST MEDIA WEATHER RADAR DATA Neil I. Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia,
Building the Georgia Mesonet Lans P. Rothfusz Meteorologist in Charge Peachtree City, Georgia A Step Toward a National Cooperative Mesonet.
Travis Smith (OU/CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center
A perspective on aircraft icing weather research Marcia K. Politovich National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO For Icing TIM Washington, DC.
CASA – Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere NWRT/PAR – National Weather Radar Testbed / Phased Array Radar Kurt D. Hondl DOC/NOAA/OAR National.
The National Severe Storms Laboratory Jeff Kimpel, Director NSSL NOAA Science Advisory Board Norman, Oklahoma November 5, 2002.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Land Protection Division, Radiation Management Section Michael Reid.
V. Chandrasekar (CSU), Mike Daniels (NCAR), Sara Graves (UAH), Branko Kerkez (Michigan), Frank Vernon (USCD) Integrating Real-time Data into the EarthCube.
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Panel Summaries Bob Dumont Senior Staff Meteorologist OFCM.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting
GIS Activities at NWS Norman with a Focus on the May 2013 Tornadoes Aaron Anderson Information Technology Officer NWS Norman Forecast Office.
Rainfall Interpolation Methods Evaluation Alejandra Rojas, Ph.D. Student Dept. of Civil Engineering, UPRM Eric Harmsen, Associate Prof. Dept. of Ag. and.
Predicting and Preparing for Natural Disasters Margaret A. Davidson Director NOAA Coastal Services Center June 7, 2005.
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Workshop Summaries Lt Col Rob Rizza Assistant Federal Coordinator for USAF/USA Affairs.
GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NWS Storm Prediction Center Dr. Russell S. Schneider Chief, Science Support Branch NWS Storm Prediction Center.
Site-Specific Scanning Strategies for WSR-88Ds: Planning for Field Tests Rodger A. Brown NOAA, National Severe Storms Laboratory Randy M. Steadham NOAA,
Presented by Sandra Cruz-Pol, Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM CASA PI Aug 9, 2006 ONR Visit to UPRM CASA an NSF ERC.
Using Ground-based Observations at NSSL Dr. David Turner (NSSL) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma non-radar ⌃ profiling ⌃
Decision Support Services Then and Now Christine Krause Forecaster, NWS Amarillo Goodwell Train Incident – June 24, 2012.
Collaborating on the Development of Warn-On-Forecast Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010 Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb.
Advanced Nowcasting Capabilities Richard L. Carpenter, Jr., Ph.D., CCM Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. MDSS Stakeholder Meeting – October 2005, Boulder,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Silver Jackets Innovative Collaboration to Maximize Solutions.
The IEM-KCCI-NWS Partnership: Working Together to Save Lives and Increase Weather Data Distribution.
Numerical Prediction of High-Impact Local Weather: How Good Can It Get? Kelvin K. Droegemeier Regents’ Professor of Meteorology Vice President for Research.
1 Clarus Clarus Nationwide Surface Transportation Weather Observing & Forecasting System Mike Campbell Program Manager NOAA Surface Weather Program U.S.
Infrastructure Planning Presentations Summary Determine climate and weather extremes that are crucial in resource management and policy making Intense.
Flash Flood Forecasting as an Element of Multi-Hazard Warning Systems Wolfgang E. Grabs Chief, Water Resources Division WMO.
National Weather Service Goes Digital With Internet Mapping Ken Waters National Weather Service, Honolulu HI Jack Settelmaier National Weather Service,
Insert Date 1 Hurricanes-Inundation Overview Objectives: Improve forecasts of tropical cyclones and related inundation hazards to enhance mitigation decisions.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation A New Approach for Using Web Services, Grids and Virtual Organizations in Mesoscale Meteorology.
1 John Ferree Severe Storms Services NOAA National Weather Service NWS Partners Meeting AMS 2009 Annual Meeting Phoenix, AZ January 15, 2009 National Weather.
CASA Update for MPAR Group David McLaughlin University of Massachusetts – Amherst V. Chandrasakar Colorado State University March 20, 2007 – OFCM/Silver.
The State Climatologist Program and a National Climate Services Initiative Mark A. Shafer Oklahoma Climatological Survey University of Oklahoma.
National Weather Service Water Science and Services John J. Kelly, Jr. Director, National Weather Service NOAA Science Advisory Board November 6, 2001.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
Severe Hazards Analysis & Verification Experiment (SHAVE) Kevin Scharfenberg OU-CIMMS & NOAA-NSSL 2 nd Workshop on NWS Severe Weather Warning Technology.
TWO-YEAR ASSESSMENT OF NOWCASTING PERFORMANCE IN THE CASA SYSTEM Evan Ruzanski 1, V. Chandrasekar 2, and Delbert Willie 2 1 Vaisala, Inc., Louisville,
1 Earth Science Technology Office The Earth Science (ES) Vision: An intelligent Web of Sensors IGARSS 2002 Paper 02_06_08:20 Eduardo Torres-Martinez –
THE BARON TORNADO INDEX (BTI)
Travis Smith Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Nowcasting Applications.
1 86 th Annual American Meteorological Society Meeting Atlanta, Georgia January 29 – February 2, 2006 The Severe Weather Data Inventory (SWDI): A Geospatial.
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
1 Symposium on the 50 th Anniversary of Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Dr. Jack Hayes Director, Office of Science and Technology NOAA National.
Potential Use of the NOAA G-IV for East Pacific Atmospheric Rivers Marty Ralph Dave Reynolds, Chris Fairall, Allen White, Mike Dettinger, Ryan Spackman.
Focus areas of the NWS Missouri/Souris River Floods of May-August 2011 Service Assessment – Per the NOAA and NWS Strategic Plans, gather stakeholder input.
Challenges in PBL and Innovative Sensing Techniques Walter Bach Army Research Office
Evaluation of CASA (and other gap-filling) Radars Severe Weather Workshop for NWS Warning Decision Making - 11 July 2007 Kurt Hondl DOC/NOAA/OAR National.
Collaboration with NCAR Aug. 15, OutlineOutline 1. SMB in brief 2. The responsibility of SMB in Expo The requirements of SMB 4. The potential.
ENVI 412 Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurement Dr. Philip B. Bedient Rice University.
The Oklahoma Climatological Survey & The Oklahoma Mesonet Mark Shafer Director of Climate Information Oklahoma Climatological Survey February 20, 2004.
Operational Use of Lightning Mapping Array Data Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Dennis Buechler, and.
Case Study: March 1, 2007 The WxIDS approach to predicting areas of high probability for severe weather incorporates various meteorological variables (e.g.
AOML Research Review Postmortem Robert Atlas Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory May 1, 2012 Welcome and introduction.
Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness Unit 7: Activity.
High Resolution Assimilation of Radar Data for Thunderstorm Forecasting on OSCER Keith A. Brewster, Kevin W. Thomas, Jerry Brotzge, Yunheng Wang, Dan Weber.
Travis Smith U. Of Oklahoma & National Severe Storms Laboratory Severe Convection and Climate Workshop 14 Mar 2013 The Multi-Year Reanalysis of Remotely.
Radar Observation of Severe Weather
Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS) Briefing by Ming Xue, Director CAPS is one of the 1st NSF Science and Technology Centers established.
Keith A. Brewster1 Jerry Brotzge1, Kevin W
Presentation transcript:

WHAT IS CASA? Kevin Kloesel, College of Geosciences, OU

Spanish for “house” Questions?

COLLABORATIVE ADAPTIVE SENSING of the ATMOSPHERE Kevin Kloesel, College of Geosciences, OU Presenting on behalf of a cast of thousands…

NSF - Engineering Research Centers... enabled by fundamental and integrated advances in Research resulting in an unprecedented ability to observe the lower portion of the earth’s atmosphere P S P/S SS P S  remote sensing  distributed networked computing  atmospheric modeling and predicting

NEXRAD System Today 3 km coverage floor Gap Earth curvature effects prevent 72% of the troposphere below 1 km from being observed

What’s needed to solve this problem? Remote sensing Microwave engineering Networking Distributed systems Numerical prediction Emergency management Radar meteorology Quantitative inversion Climate studies Social impact Antenna design core partners expertise working together

End User Participant Research Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management - Paul Spencer (State EOC) Oklahoma Emergency Managers –in-depth interviews and survey interviews NWS Forecast Office Norman – Mike Foster (MIC), Dave Andra (SOO), Rick Smith (WCM) Baron Services – Greg Wilson Vieux and Associates – Jean Vieux

Objectives 1.Identify end users’ perceptions regarding advantages and limitations of current weather observation and warning systems. 2.Identify end users’ perceptions regarding how the media and public perceive, understand, and respond to weather forecasts and warning information. 3.Examine the communication process, from weather observations to the end users. 4.Policy determinations: –Who will make the decisions regarding the allocation of weather observation resources? –In the event of simultaneous weather threats, what priority criteria, should be established to determine the allocation of resources?

Results: In-depth Interviews NWS is seen as the appropriate organization to determine the allocation of system resources. The type of weather event and the population density of a region are important considerations in allocation of system resources. Precise tracking of tornados is important for Emergency Managers who must make safe shelter decisions when a county wide tornado warning is issued by the NWS. “It would be great to be able to say that there is a large vortex up to a quarter mile wide centered at this intersection, and five minutes from now it’s going to be at this intersection, and to be very specific in that way.”

Results: In-depth Interviews More frequent updates for radar data would help Emergency Managers make decisions. Currently radar data is updated approximately every 5 minutes. Many cited one minute as an ideal update time. “Quicker updates [of radar data] would be the number one thing for me. Because it’s a long five minutes when you have a tornado coming down your throat here, and you’re hitting the reload button...” Accessing DCAS Data - Sophisticated users want access to radar before it is extensively processed for their own algorithms and visualization products. Visualization of the weather phenomena was extremely important for emergency managers. They are looking for enhanced graphics in new products.

Results: In-depth Interviews Floods historically cause more damage and deaths; however, emergency managers interviewed consider tornados the most important weather event because of their unpredictable nature. “if I don’t give the warning for a flood, I’m still going to be here tomorrow...if I don’t blow the sirens before the tornado hits the city limits, I won’t be here tomorrow.”

End User Integration Goals Incorporate end user needs into the system design from day one. Quantify the social and economic impacts to support system trade-offs and eventual technology transfer. Effective application of weather technology and information. Generating effective public response to hazards and disasters.

Key Issues Two-Way Interface : End users request and receive data from the system (fundamental shift in observing paradigm.) Resource contention: How the utility of weather information to end users and resource allocation policy determines sensing strategies and use of system resources. Technical/Training Requirements: Data formats, visualization, timing and spatial scales of forecasts for different end users. Behavior/Perceptions: Understanding end user decision making, response, communications, and perception of the strengths and limitations of current weather technology and severe warning systems. Social, economic, and behavioral impacts pre and post CASA.

Climatological focal point for –tornadoes, storm genesis, hail, dryline, microbursts, boundary-layer circulations, fronts Location of major field programs Co-located with other observing facilities, e.g., ARM/CART radiometers and profilers Serviced by 3 NEXRAD radars and 1 TDWR radar OneNet towers and partner buildings available OK-FIRST emergency managers, Earthstorm K-12 Schools, major TV markets Covers 4 US Military Bases + OKC Airport + Oklahoma Space Port Covers edge of Oklahoma winter wheat belt Oklahoma Mesonet and ARS Micronet Why Oklahoma?

Who wants it? Average Annual Rainfall 32 inches And 60 Rain Days per Year More Than 200 Hail Reports Per Year Over NETRAD Domain About 24 Tornadoes Per Year Over NETRAD Domain Average 6 inches of Snowfall Over NETRAD Domain

Test Bed Site – Sept 05-Mar 06 Emergency Management Agencies

Work in Progress: Survey Data into Policy Tables

Capability 1 – Tornado Detection. (1a) Detect low level circulation associated with a tornado within 60 s of formation. (1b) Support research related to detecting signatures confirming low level circulation is in contact with the ground and has become a tornado. Capability 2 – Tornado Pinpointing. (2a) Track centroid of low level circulation associated with a tornado with spatial errors < 300 m and temporal errors < 60 s. (2b) Support research related to tracking the point where a tornado is in contact with the ground. Capability 3 – Tornado Anticipation. (3a) Support research and provide the real-time data necessary for future demonstration of warning algorithms that detect reliable, coherent signatures that precede tornadogenesis. Capability 4 - Data Assimilation for Forecasting Models. (4a) Provide the real-time (3 sets at 1 minute intervals, every 15 minutes) data and (4b) Support research for future demonstration of model-based forecasting of severe storm threats. Capability 5 – Nowcasting. (5a) Provide the real-time (1 minute update) data necessary for future nowcasting of severe storm threats (hail, severe winds, and storm cell development). Capability 6 – End-User Integration and Optimization. (6a) Simultaneously provide severe weather and hazard data to operational end users; data for tornado anticipation, forecast models, and nowcasting to CASA researchers (6b) resolve resource contention among competing end user needs through end user policy. Oklahoma System Capabilities - Desired

Anticipating Tornadoes What signatures within storms herald the development of tornadoes, and how do these vary among storm type and tornado intensity? Can multiple features be detected and interrelated in real time in order to anticipate tornado occurrence? How can NEXRAD data be added to CASA Radars and other information to improve our ability to anticipate tornadoes?

 How to sample a tornado? How to coordinate radar scanning strategies to pinpoint a tornado?  How to modify existing detection algorithms for use in CASA radars?  How to “knit” together NEXRAD & CASA radar data for a coherent picture to improve detection performance? Localized Detection & Pinpointing

3 km 25 km NetRad Concept Goal: Map winds, rain below 3 km > 3 km covered by current technology

3 km 6 km 25 km NetRad Concept Goal: Map winds, rain below 3 km. 7 elevation beam positions scan 0 o -14 o

3 km 25 km NetRad Concept Goal: Map winds, rain below 3 km. 7 elevation beam positions scan 0 o -14 o Neighbor radars map “cone of silence” above a radar. Multiple-Doppler wind measurement throughout.

R1 R2 R1 configurations R2 configurations Sit-and- Spin Mode Targeted (limited sector) Mode NetRad Sampling Modes

Coming this fall!!! –First CASA radar will be deployed near Chickasha, OK in the fall of 2005 –Three other radars will be deployed in SW OK test bed during the next 2 years. –Data will be available for researchers, NWS, and test bed emergency managers as early as Spring ‘06

# Sensors Required for Nation-Wide Coverage NETRAD – 30 km 300 m floor 50 m floor 3 km floor Off-the-grid – 10 km