Breathing and speech planning in turn-taking Francisco Torreira Sara Bögels Stephen Levinson Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conversation Skills will be tested both as part of Formative & Summative Assessment.
Advertisements

Markpong Jongtaveesataporn † Chai Wutiwiwatchai ‡ Koji Iwano † Sadaoki Furui † † Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan ‡ NECTEC, Thailand.
Function words are often reduced or even deleted in casual conversation (Fig. 1). Pairs may neutralize: he’s/he was, we’re/we were What sources of information.
18 and 24-month-olds use syntactic knowledge of functional categories for determining meaning and reference Yarden Kedar Marianella Casasola Barbara Lust.
Analyses on IFA corpus Louis C.W. Pols Institute of Phonetic Sciences (IFA) Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC) Project meeting INTAS.
/ nailon / – software for online analysis of prosody Interspeech 2006 special session: The prosody of turn-taking and dialog acts September 20, 2006 Jens.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
Speech perception 2 Perceptual organization of speech.
Clippit Post Mortem Panel Tim Bickmore John Davis Lewis Johnson Brian Whitworth.
Adopting the Process Approach to Teaching Listening Dr. Jian Kang Loar Defense Language Institute October 15, 2011.
Automatic Prosodic Event Detection Using Acoustic, Lexical, and Syntactic Evidence Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shrikanth S. Narayanan IEEE 2007 Min-Hsuan.
Results ISI Variance in STP Corpus ISI Variance in BU Corpus * p
Niebuhr, D‘Imperio, Gili Fivela, Cangemi 1 Are there “Shapers” and “Aligners” ? Individual differences in signalling pitch accent category.
Drew H. Abney, Alexandra Paxton, Chris T. Kello, & Rick Dale Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced Complexity Matching in.
PaPI 2005 (Barcelona, June) The perception of stress patterns by Spanish and Catalan infants Ferran Pons (University of British Columbia) Laura Bosch.
The prosodic marking of the contrast between restrictive and appositive clause in Dutch Vincent J. van Heuven With the help of: Crit Cremers, Hanna Gauvin,
What is Phonetics? Short answer: The study of speech sounds in all their aspects. Phonetics is about describing speech. (Note: phonetics ¹ phonics) Phonetic.
Turn-taking in Mandarin Dialogue: Interactions of Tone and Intonation Gina-Anne Levow University of Chicago October 14, 2005.
Classification of Discourse Functions of Affirmative Words in Spoken Dialogue Julia Agustín Gravano, Stefan Benus, Julia Hirschberg Shira Mitchell, Ilia.
Breathing behavior and turn projection in conversation Francisco Torreira Sara Bögels Stephen Levinson Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen,
Interactions between Language and Stuttering NU/SFA Workshop for Fluency Specialists July, 1996 J. Scott Yaruss, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of Pittsburgh.
National Curriculum Key Stage 2
Introduction To know how perceptual and attentional processes and properties of words guide the eyes through a sentence, the following issues are particularly.
English versus French: Determinants of eye movement control in reading Sébastien Miellet, Cyril Pernet, Patrick J. O’Donnell, and Sara C. Sereno Department.
Present Experiment Introduction Coarticulatory Timing and Lexical Effects on Vowel Nasalization in English: an Aerodynamic Study Jason Bishop University.
1 7-Speech Recognition (Cont’d) HMM Calculating Approaches Neural Components Three Basic HMM Problems Viterbi Algorithm State Duration Modeling Training.
Communicative Resources. How Do We Communicate? Conversation involves more than language – Gestures, facial expressions, tone of voice, … – Face-to-face.
1 Speech Perception 3/30/00. 2 Speech Perception How do we perceive speech? –Multifaceted process –Not fully understood –Models & theories attempt to.
Copyright 2007, Toshiba Corporation. How (not) to Select Your Voice Corpus: Random Selection vs. Phonologically Balanced Tanya Lambert, Norbert Braunschweiler,
English vs. French: Determinants of Eye Movement Control in Reading Sébastien Miellet, Cyril Pernet, Patrick J. O’Donnell, and Sara C. Sereno Department.
Teaching Productive Skills Which ones are they? Writing… and… Speaking They have similarities and Differences.
Speech Perception 4/4/00.
1. Background Evidence of phonetic perception during the first year of life: from language-universal listeners to native listeners: Consonants and vowels:
Speech Science IX How is articulation organized? Version WS
Evaluating prosody prediction in synthesis with respect to Modern Greek prenuclear accents Elisabeth Chorianopoulou MSc in Speech and Language Processing.
Turn-taking Discourse and Dialogue CS 359 November 6, 2001.
Issues in Multiparty Dialogues Ronak Patel. Current Trend  Only two-party case (a person and a Dialog system  Multi party (more than two persons Ex.
HYMES (1964) He developed the concept that culture, language and social context are clearly interrelated and strongly rejected the idea of viewing language.
Background: Speakers use prosody to distinguish between the meanings of ambiguous syntactic structures (Snedeker & Trueswell, 2004). Discourse also has.
1 Natural Language Processing Lecture Notes 14 Chapter 19.
Recent Models of Stuttering Western Illinois University February 7, 1997 J. Scott Yaruss, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of Pittsburgh.
Investigating the combined effects of word frequency and contextual predictability on eye movements during reading Christopher J. Hand Glasgow Language.
© 2005, it - instituto de telecomunicações. Todos os direitos reservados. Arlindo Veiga 1,2 Sara Cadeias 1 Carla Lopes 1,2 Fernando Perdigão 1,2 1 Instituto.
Turn-taking and Backchannels Ryan Lish. Turn-taking We all learned it in preschool, right? Also an essential part of conversation Basic phenomenon of.
Gender What question would you like to ask these people? DO NOT CHOOSE THE OBVIOUS QUESTION tch?v=WDswiT87oo8.
Defining Discourse.
Natural conversation “When we investigate how dialogues actually work, as found in recordings of natural speech, we are often in for a surprise. We are.
TOPIC MANAGEMENT AND TURN-TAKING Discourse Strategies used by speakers and how cooperation is achieved.
WHAT IS DISCOURSE ANALYSIS DR. FRANCISCO PERLAS DUMANIG.
Lexical, Prosodic, and Syntactics Cues for Dialog Acts.
Phone-Level Pronunciation Scoring and Assessment for Interactive Language Learning Speech Communication, 2000 Authors: S. M. Witt, S. J. Young Presenter:
Year R Stay and Play Talk. Why?  Communication is the number one skill. Without it, children will struggle to make friends, learn and enjoy life.
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
On the role of context and prosody in the interpretation of ‘okay’ Julia Agustín Gravano, Stefan Benus, Julia Hirschberg Héctor Chávez, and Lauren Wilcox.
CLS July EYE GAZE IN TURNTAKING IN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERACTION Anne Baker & Beppie van den Bogaerde.
English vs. French: Determinants of Eye Movement Control in Reading Sébastien Miellet, Cyril Pernet, Patrick J. O’Donnell, and Sara C. Sereno Department.
London February TURNTAKING IN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERACTION Anne Baker.
PSYC 206 Lifespan Development Bilge Yagmurlu.
PRAGMATICS 3.
Turn-taking in children and adults: predictive or reactive?
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 11/8/2018.
Macrolinguistics Linguistics is not the only field concerned with language. Other disciplines such as psychology, sociology, ethnography, the science of.
Week 3: Turn-taking Practices Lecture 1
Turn-taking and Disfluencies
Learner resource 7 Features of spoken discourse
Representing Intonational Variation
Turn-taking and Disfluencies
Implications of interactive alignment
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 12/3/2018.
Communicative Resources
Presentation transcript:

Breathing and speech planning in turn-taking Francisco Torreira Sara Bögels Stephen Levinson Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands

A psycholinguistic puzzle In conversation, the most frequent transition between speakers takes only a few hundred ms (e.g. Stivers et al., 2009; Heldner & Edlund, 2010) B’s turn A’s turn ms

A psycholinguistic puzzle Planning and producing language takes time: - word-picture naming: 600 ms (Levelt et al., 1999) - simple sentence production: 1500 ms (Griffin & Bock, 2000) B’s turn A’s turn B’s production planning > 600 ms ms

A psycholinguistic puzzle Speakers often plan their turns in overlap with their interlocutors’ turns (Levinson, 2013) B’s turn A’s turn B’s production planning

Direct evidence for overlapping production and comprehension during conversation is scarce Can the breathing behavior of interlocutors provide such evidence? A psycholinguistic puzzle

Direct evidence for overlapping production and comprehension during conversation is scarce Can the breathing behavior of interlocutors provide such evidence? A psycholinguistic puzzle

Research questions In read speech, deeper and longer inbreaths before longer utterances Whalen & Kinsella-Shaw, 1997; Fuchs et al What about spontaneous conversation? What is the timing of speakers’ inbreaths relative to their interlocutors’ turns?

Conversational corpus with Respitrace inductive plethysmography

Initial observations As in controlled experiments (e.g. McFarland 2001) : – Vital cycles – Speech cycles But also (as in Bailly et al for collaborative reading) : – Speech-adapted vital cycles? – Apneas: listeners often stop breathing for several seconds!

Materials Conversational context in which a turn transition is relevant: Q & A Assistant identified Q & A sequences in 6 dyadic conversations (~ 5 h) We restricted the dataset following these criteria: – Answer is relevant to the question – Syntactically marked (wh-word, SV inversion) or intonationally marked (L* H-H%, H* H-H% or H*L-H%)

Breathing in Q&A sequences B’s answer A’s question Time

B’s inbreath Measurements B’s answer A’s question Time Asnwerers’ inbreaths that occurred after the beginning of the question

B’s inbreath Measurements B’s answer A’s question Time Acoustic signs in the speech signal attributable to either a lexical item or particle

B’s inbreath Measurements B’s answer A’s question Time First point of silence, syntactic completion, and prosodic completion Acoustic signs in the speech signal attributable to either a lexical item or particle

Breathing behavior and answer length B’s answer A’s question Time B’s inbreath Presence vs absence Depth Duration

Presence of an inbreath INBREATH NO INBREATH Not all answers are preceded by an inbreath n=145

Answer duration & inbreaths β = 949, t = 3.95, p <.0005

Inbreath depth and answer duration Answer duration (ms) Speaker-normalized Inbreath depth β = -0.03, t = -0.19, p = 0.85

Timing relative to question end B’s answer A’s question Time B’s inbreath

Inbreath timing to question end Answer Question question Inbreath

Answer Question question Inbreath Inbreath timing to question end

Answer Question question Inbreath Inbreath timing to question end

Answer Question question Inbreath answer < 2.5 s answer > 2.5 s Inbreath timing to question end

Answer Question question Inbreath answer < 2.5 s answer > 2.5 s Speech inbreaths? Partly vital? Inbreath timing to question end

Timing relative to answer start B’s answer A’s question Time B’s inbreath

Inbreath timing to answer start Answer Question question Inbreath

Inbreath timing to answer start Answer Question question Inbreath -650 ms

Is the timing of answerers’ inbreaths sensitive to where questions end?

Inbreath We examined the relationship between: -Gap duration -Inbreath timing to answer start Answer Question question Is the timing of answerers’ inbreaths sensitive to where questions end? Answer Question question Inbreath

Are answerer’s inbreaths anchored to question ends or answer starts? Distance to answer start (ms) Gap duration (ms) β = 0.48, t = 10.4, p <

Conclusions Inbreaths are more likely to occur before long answers >breathing behavior can be informative about speech planning in conversation too The timing of inbreaths before answers is sensitive to the timing of question ends, and is very often aligned with it. >evidence of interlocutors’ orientation to turn ends >speech planning often starts early during the interlocutor’s turn: B’s answer A’s question B’s inbreath Inbreath preparation Decision to take an inbreath contingent on answer length ms Draper et al., 1960

References Bailly, G., Rochet-Capellan, A., and Vilain, C. (2013). Adaptation of respiratory patterns in collaborative reading. Proceedings of Interspeech Draper, M. H., Ladefoged, P., and Whitteridge, D. (1960) Expiratory pressures and airflow during speech. British Medical Journal, 1(5189): 1837–1842. Fuchs, S., Petrone, C., Krivokapic, J., and Hoole, P. (2013). Acoustic and respiratory evidence for utterance planning in German. Journal of Phonetics, 41(1):29–47. Griffin, Z. M., and Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11:274–279 Heldner, M. and Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38:555—568. Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1):1–37. McFarland, D. H. (2001). Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44:128–143. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., and Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. PNAS, 106(26):10587– Whalen, D. H. and Kinsella-Shaw, J. M. (1997). Exploring the relationship of inspiration duration to utterance duration. Phonetica, 54:138–152.