STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
STAR 3 : An Overview Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Grant Project for the WS/FCS.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Differentiated Accountability Strategies and Support Dr. Maria P. de Armas Assistant Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction (K-12 Core) Curriculum.
Foundations for Success Initial Findings and New Directions Jason Snipes Director of Research Council of the Great City Schools Defining the Achievement.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
C Charting our Course Into Learning Through the Arts.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Minneapolis Public Schools QComp An Overview of Quality Compensation In Minneapolis Bill Gibbs Site administrator Kenny School Former district QComp Coordinator.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
School Based Inquiry Teams Getting Started. Introductions Overview Purpose.
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Developing Talent Enhancing Careers Improving Student Learning REIL “Update” Rewarding Excellence in Instruction and Leadership Education Service Agency.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
By: Nickie, Heather, and Melody. It is the vision of our district to infuse technology into our curriculum in such a way that will maximize the student’s.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
CLASS Project Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best. CLASS Project.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Merit & Incentive Pay Based on High Stakes Testing
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Presentation transcript:

STAR3 Project for WS/FCS

STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide that teacher.

STAR3 Project Director: Dr. Wayne Foster Purpose: To Recruit, retain and reward effective administrators and teachers Year 1: Planning Year (Core Elements)

STAR3 Progress Core Elements Progress of the Project

Core Elements

Core Element A and B Communication Plan –Effectively Communicate with stakeholders about PBCS –Involve teachers, principals, personnel, and unions

Core Element C Rigorous, transparent, and fair evaluation systems for teachers and principals that differentiate effectiveness using growth and classroom observations EVAAS and Two Observations

Core Element D A data-management system that can link student achievement data to teacher and principal payroll and human resources systems Dr. Judy Penny, Jon Brasfield

Core Element E A plan for ensuring that teachers and principals understand the specific measures of teacher and principal effectiveness EVAAS and Principal/Teacher Evaluation Process

K-2 Assessment K-2 assessment must be in place to provide growth indicators for K-2 personnel ITBS for K-2

STAR3 Purpose 1 –Provide differentiated Levels of Compensation for Effective Teachers and Principals

Elementary Pay Plan

Middle School Pay Plan

Purpose 2 Fiscal Sustainability of the Performance-Based Compensation System (PBCS) –The district will provide such PBCS to teachers, principals, and other personnel who earn it. –The district will provide from non-TIF funds over the course of the five year project.

Purpose 3 Comprehensive Approaches to the Performance-based Compensation System –The Program must be aligned with a coherent and integrated strategy for strengthening the educator workforce.

Purpose 3 Single School Culture Learning Teams Learning Focused Lesson Planning and Delivery Response to Instruction Differentiated Professional Development

Purpose 3

School Improvement Plans must reflect the pillars of STAR3 The pillars must be implemented school-wide by the end of the project Additional professional development will be provided as needed (PD on Demand)

Purpose 3 Single School Culture

Purpose 3 Single School Culture will be monitored through attendance sheets at learning team meetings and action plans that use either unpacking standards, creating common formative assessments, or utilizing standards in practice protocols

Purpose 3 Learning Focused

Purpose 3 Learning Focused will be monitored through high-quality peer-reviewed unit plans twice a year. This year those will be collected in the spring using existing lesson plans Next Fall (2012) those will be scored on a Learning Focused rubric using their lesson plan format.

Purpose 3 Response to Instruction

Purpose 3 Response to Instruction will be monitored through how it is included in the School Improvement Plan.

Purpose 3 Individualized professional development for principals and teachers

Purpose 3 Professional development will be monitored through school-wide professional development based on School Improvement Plans. Teachers must participate in differentiated professional development trainings outlined on a menu available by the new teaching standards.

Purpose 3 Menu of choices under each standard in the NC Teacher Evaluation Tool will be provided Professional Development offered in three formats- workshop, online, and one on one.

Purpose 3 Principals and teachers will understand and use the measures of effectiveness to improve practice and student achievement. EVAAS and Observation Tool

Purpose 4 The program will use a value- added measure of the impact on student growth as a significant factor in calculating the PBCS. Use of EVAAS-value add data

EVAAS Trainings December 2011 Value Added and EVAAS basics Primary EVAAS Reports April 2012 Defining growth in the EVAAS value added System Using EVAAS for instructional planning

EVAAS Training June 2012 Using EVAAS for Scheduling and Planning

Purpose 5 This program will retain effective teachers in teaching positions in hard-to-staff subjects such as mathematics, science, special education and English language acquisition.

Purpose 5 Schools will use sign-on bonus and support mechanisms to retain and recruit teachers in hard to fill positions.

STAR3

Fiscal Progress Budget Expenditures- $384,000 Personnel/Technology $271,340 Staff Development $91,000 Supplies $6,700Other Total Spent: $ 753,040 Project Budget Total: $19.6 Million

STAR3 Let’s recruit, retain, and reward the best teachers so that we have strong, innovative teachers in every classroom.