Assessment of 2014 Medicaid MCO Quality Rankings Five Slide Series, Volume 16 September 2014 www.themengesgroup.com 571-312-2360.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report and Ready Reckoner Guidance
Advertisements

Self-employed Evidence base Purpose This slide-pack aims to provide a broad evidence-base on self- employment in the UK. Drawn predominantly from.
Calculation of the ATAR and using the scaling report UAC Information Session 6, 8, 12 and 14 June 2012.
The Changing Well-being of Older Status First Nations Adults An Application of the Registered Indian Human Development Index Symposium on Aboriginal Experiences.
COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL JUNE RESEARCH REPORT - Coordinated by the Department of Planning and Community Development On.
Joining the dots Closing the Gap Getting a better understanding of the data 1 Mike Treadaway, FFT.
Database Processing for Business Intelligence Systems
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
1 Health Status and The Retirement Decision Among the Early-Retirement-Age Population Shailesh Bhandari Economist Labor Force Statistics Branch Housing.
Training on measures… We strongly recommended that you watch these on demand videos because all directions, cover sheets, etc. are housed here. OR.
Employment Projections -- Background
FFT Data Analysis Project – Supporting Self Evaluation  Fischer Family Trust / Fischer Education Project Extracts may be reproduced for non commercial.
2012 National APSE Conference Becky Hebda, Community Care of Central Wisconsin Lisa Mills, Medicaid Waiver Employment Services Consultant.
FLSA: Raising the Bar for Employee Exemptions How Will It Affect Your Organization? Presented by John S. Gannon, Esq.
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
Port Hacking High School Higher School Certificate Information Night Monday 24 February 2014.
1 School of Health in Social Science 2011 UG Entrants’ Survey Analysis.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by disability status Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National.
© 2010 THE EDUCATION TRUST Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Roles for Federal Policy.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 10/01/2012 COASTAL Google Analytics Report September 2011– December /09/2011 – 08/12/11.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
1 New Performance Tables: 2011 and Beyond… Cathy Christieson Head of School Performance Data Unit 13 th May 2011.
Business Intelligence Systems Appendix J DAVID M. KROENKE and DAVID J. AUER DATABASE CONCEPTS, 6 th Edition.
Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
Slide -1 Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage Atlanta Regional Office Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services September 12, 2005.
ADOPTION OF ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT METHODS IN MASSACHUSETTS January 2015.
Indian and Northern Affaires indiennes Affairs Canada et du Nord Canada First Nation and Inuit Community Well-Being : Describing Historical Trends ( )
Standard view – default to week tab – all ok! Please make Price with an upper case P When you click on the month tab, the average is not correct – it should.
Copyright © All rights reserved to Student Insights. 1 Student-View ™ Report Level Two July, 2007 SAMPLE REPORT.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
5 or more raise the score 4 or less let it rest
Medicaid Per Capita Costs for Persons with Disabilities Five Slide Series, Volume 5 October
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
YEAR 12 – 2016 HSC LAUNCH. SENIOR PREP. - LEARNING SUPPORT PROGRAM ALL YEAR 12 STUDENTS HAVE ACCESS TO REGULAR SUPPORT WITH:  ESSAY WRITING  EXAM TECHNIQUES.
Public Health Lessons from HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project Presentation by Loren D. Lange August 7, 2007 United States Department of Agriculture.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Assessment Information Evening 17 th September 2015.
5 Slide Series, Volume 30 November 2015
1 Status of CY 04 MCO Rates Medicaid Advisory Committee September 25, 2003.
Top to Bottom and Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Lists Federally Approved Requirements for Identifying Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools August.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES OECDOCDE 1 The OECD ITCS database in the.
Demographic Overview of Dual Eligibles Five Slide Series, Volume 4 September 2013.
Omni-channel Maturity Analysis Lester Allan Lasrado Copenhagen Business School 28 th Jan 2016.
CAPE ROAD SURGERY Patient Questionnaire 2013 / 2014.
Prescription Drug Volume by State and Major Payer Group, Slide Series, Volume 33 February 2016.
16-19 Accountability Measures. When Outcomes from summer 2016 (for students on 2 year courses). That is enrolments September First publication:
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
The Uninsured in Virginia: An Update for the Virginia Health Care Foundation May 2016 Laura Skopec, Jason Gates, Michael Karpman, and Genevieve M. Kenney.
Contact US Address 1: 2020 Charlotte Street Bozeman, MT Phone: Website:
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
Public sector pay policy: costs and consequences
4. Data Interpretation Drawing Conclusions.
Feedback/Performance Review and Compensation Process
Sheffield Performance Overview
Voter Turnout Overview 2016 Results
Policy and progress update on the reforms to A levels
Patterns and trends in adult obesity
Summary of Health System Performance Across Dimensions, Revised Baseline Ranking Note: States highlighted in green expanded their Medicaid programs under.
Semiannual Report, March 2015
How Blended is your Moodle
Summary of Health System Performance Across Dimensions, 2017 Scorecard Ranking Note: States highlighted in green expanded their Medicaid programs under.
Figure 1. Procedures for assigning confidence and likelihood qualifiers to the scientific evidence for anthropogenic ... Figure 1. Procedures for assigning.
Comparing your papers to the rest of the world
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
How to transfer information into your science fair log books.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Quality Adjustment Review of UK Consumer Price Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of 2014 Medicaid MCO Quality Rankings Five Slide Series, Volume 16 September

Summary of Tabulations NCQA Medicaid MCO Quality Scores and Ratings were published online this month; available at We assessed Medicaid MCOs’ quality scores on several dimensions. Scores were assessed on both an unadjusted and adjusted basis 15% of NCQA scores are tied to whether MCO has attained NCQA certification (rather than statistical quality performance). Our adjusted scores on the ensuing tables give 12 additional points to non-certified plans in an effort to fairly compare statistical quality performance. MCOs accredited by NCQA on an interim basis received an additional 8 points in our adjusted scores. Average Medicaid MCO quality scores by state are shown on Slides #2 and #3 Nationwide, the non-publicly traded MCO average was slightly above the publicly traded MCO average (79.6 versus 78.0 using our adjusted scores) In the 19 states where both types of MCOs compete head-to-head (with at least one MCO of each type having a 2014 quality score), average scores were higher in the non-publicly traded MCOs in 11 states, and were higher in the publicly traded MCOs in 8 states. Top-performing MCOs relative to the average of remaining MCOs in same state are shown on Slide #4. Changes in quality scores from are assessed on Slide #5. We also note that quality scores are closely clustered outside of the top-scoring MCOs and the relatively lower-scoring MCOs. The score gap from the top-ranked MCO to the #20-ranked MCO was 4.8 points. The score gap for the next 80 MCOs (MCO #21 to MCO #100) was only 5.8 points. The gap from #101 to #120 was 7.2 points. 1

Medicaid MCO Average NCQA Quality Scores by State (highest-rated states shown on this slide) 2 MCO quality scores have always been relatively high in certain states (e.g., those at top of this table). Our March 2014 report, “Analyses of NCQA Quality Rankings Among Medicaid MCOs,” assesses this dynamic in detail.

Medicaid MCO Average NCQA Quality Scores by State (lowest-rated states shown on this slide) 3

Top-Performing Medicaid MCOs Relative to The Rest of State Average During The rest of state averages were calculated using each MCO’s adjusted NCQA score to compare statistical performance only. (Our adjusted scores do not factor in NCQA certification status.)

Changes in Medicaid MCO Quality Scores from Across the 118 Medicaid MCOs with a published score in both years, the average unadjusted score increased from 78.1 in 2013 to 78.5 in This is driven by several MCOs becoming accredited thereby receiving a significant score increase. Our adjusted scores are unaffected by accreditation changes; these show that the average score across the 118 MCOs decreased from 79.9 in 2013 to 79.2 in of the 118 MCOs (64%) had a lower score in 2014 than in 2013 (looking at unadjusted scores). In 2014 the average score gap between the publicly traded and non-publicly traded MCOs narrowed. The average score for publicly traded MCOs increased from 76.8 in 2013 to 77.9 in 2014, while the average for non-publicly traded MCOs decreased slightly from 79.3 in 2013 to 79.1 in The average score was 1.2 points higher across the non publicly traded MCOs in 2014 (versus a 2.5 point gap in 2013). NCQA “raises the bar” in several ways in calculating an ensuing year’s scores, thus a lower score versus the prior year cannot automatically be presumed to reflect a poorer statistical quality performance. 5

Our Contact Information 6 Phone: Website: Address: th Street N., Suite 227 Arlington, VA 22203