February 15, 2012 Clarendon Hills Home Rule Informational Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of $475 million Bond Issue and Capital Financing Options Practiced By the State System of Higher Education in Oklahoma Practiced By the State System.
Advertisements

2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
Income Tax PowerPoint HHTPP MARCH 26, 2015 Thank you !
CITY OF CHAMPAIGN TOWNSHIP Advisory Referendum February 5, 2008.
Pavement Evaluation Survey Results and Understanding Condition Values PCI February 19, 2014.
Wilton Board of Finance Information Sessions December 9 th and 16 th Wilton Library.
Getting the Community Involved in Dealing with Current Financial Realities May 17, 2012 Mohsin Dada CFP® CFO North Shore School District 112, Highland.
January 18, 2012 Clarendon Hills Home Rule Informational Session.
to 2015 Operating Budgets Governance & Priorities Committee March 7, 2013.
2011 Draft Budget February 3,  Current 2011 draft budget is $12, 088,673, an increase of $497,449 from the 2010 budget or an increase of 4.29%
2015 Municipal Budget Overview Borough of Montvale April 14, 2015.
Budget Work Session Fiscal Year July 27, 2010.
1 County Budget & Finance Issues. 2 What Counties Do.
FY12 Budget Development Alachua County Board of County Commissioners April 5, 2011.
FY12 and FY13 Budget Development Special Board Meeting Alachua County Office of Management and Budget May 17, 2011.
TOWN OF FAIRFAX Local Sales Tax : A Community Discussion TOWN OF FAIRFAX.
2013 City Budget Manhattan ~ Kansas Work Session Two.
2014 City Budget and Capital Improvement Program First City Budget Work Session.
TOWN OF HAMPDEN 2011/2012 PROPOSED BUDGET INFORMATION.
TOWN OF MONTREAT FISCAL YEAR Annual Budget Public Hearing and Presentation to the Board of Commissioners June 13, 2013.
2008 Budget Headlines Final tax increase is 9.38%, which includes 4% levy cap ($797,748), plus ($1,094,808) in State pass throughs. State Aid allocation.
2006 Budget Challenges Additional Increases in Pension Contributions = +$451,200 Additional Assessment from RVSA = +$315,000 Increases in Fuel and Utility.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
Monroe County Board Budget Issues Still No Easy Answers August 25, 2010.
2007 Budget Headlines Two Full Time positions reduced to Part Time One Part time position eliminated Effective collective bargaining negotiations – Total.
Legislative Update July 2013 Victoria Lincoln Government Relations Advocate
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago’s LIVE UNITED 2020 Income. Education. Health.
Part I - Setting the Context: A Candid View of Our City's Challenges and Opportunities March 16, 2010, 6:30p.m. HEARRR Lecture Series.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
2015 Police and Firefighter Pension Law Enrolled CS/SB 172 Bonni S. Jensen Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen & Levinson
GFOAZ Conference Public & Budget Session Prepared by: Julie A. Ghetti, MPA, CPA August 12, 2011.
2008 Total Tax Collections $125,663, Budget Headlines State Aid allocation has significantly decreased again in the amount of $315,928. Total.
Presented to the Board of Selectmen, School Committee, Finance Committee Andrew Maylor Town Administrator November 10, 2008 Town of Swampscott Fiscal 2010.
Mayor David M. Scapicchio William Sohl, Business Administrator Sherry Maniscalco, Chief Financial Officer.
November 2, 2011 Clarendon Hills Village Meeting Home Rule Discussion.
Proposed FY 2016 Budget Town of Lisbon Presentation to Board of Selectmen October 7, 2015.
CITY OF MONROE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET PRESENTATION EDWARD SELL, FINANCE DIRECTOR.
2013 City Budget August 14 – Public Hearing Budget Overview $416,171 increase for FT/PT employee salaries (1.7% COLA; 2.0% merit; plus negotiated.
BUDGET WORKSHOP FY13 April 4, City of Hendersonville Budget Workshop – April 4, 2012 GOALS and OBJECTIVES for 2013 To present a balanced budget.
CITY OF MUSCATINE BUDGET OVERVIEW PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017 GENERAL FUND BUDGET.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
FY 2011 Organizational Initiatives October 12, 2010.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
FY PROPOSED BUDGET  A "Target Level" expenditure base was established for all departments six- months’ worth of operations (July 1, 2016 – December.
Financial & Budget Outlook City Council Strategic Planning Retreat March 19, 2012 Pueblo, Colorado.
CITY OF DEKALB CITY OF DEKALB 2015 Property Tax Levy Presented to Finance Advisory Committee October 27, 2015.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Lina Williams Budget & Financial Analyst.
Village of Tarrytown Tentative Budget Fiscal Year 2012 – 2013 June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013.
FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Financial Services Department.
FY 2016 Budget Workshop June 11, 2015 Brian Maxwell, City Manager Dan Buckley, Deputy City Manager Mike Loftin, Finance Director 1.
City of La Palma The Path to Fiscal Sustainability: FY Budget Adjustments and Long-Term Response Discussion September 18, 2012.
FY 2017 BudgetHearing September 8, 2016 Mike Loftin, Assistant City Manager - Finance 1.
Williamsville Central School District Long-Range Financial Plan and Reserve Plan Report December 2016 Prepared By: Thomas Maturski - Assistant Superintendent.
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
Fund Accounting Overview
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA
Budget Overview Budget Presentation.
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
Don’t Trash it, SMASH IT! Composting Pumpkins Recovers Nutrients for Soil and Educates About Composting Kay McKeen Founder Heather Goudreau Educator.
City of Rockford Finance Task Force Home Rule
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Climate Action for MMC Municipalities
2015 Municipal Budget Overview
Joint Committee Meeting: Highway and Finance & Budget
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
Commission Workshop 3 Budget Presentation
First Public Hearing to Adopt the Tentative Budget and Millage Rate
Oak Park Elementary School District 97 Presentation of FY 2020 Final Budget September, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

February 15, 2012 Clarendon Hills Home Rule Informational Session

Home Rule Discussion in Clarendon Hills

Current Financial Condition of the Village AAA Rating given in 2011 Only 2% of municipalities in Illinois have attained a AAA rating from Moody’s, Fitch or S&P. Until now have maintained at least 40% of annual costs in reserve

General Fund Expenditure Summary

* Not Including POC Firefighters

Fire Costs Vs. Calls

Contracting and Shared Services Engineering Building/plumbing/electrical inspections Plan reviews Information technology Various Public Works services Shared dispatch Regional major crimes investigations Automatic mutual fire aid agreement (Hinsdale) Library shared services: IT, payroll, tax levy, snow removal, phone Liability and health insurance pools participation Exploring shared police service model with Hinsdale

Budget Reductions Total Budget Reductions since FY = $1.98 million; including $1.1 million in cuts, $904,000 in deferrals This year’s budget process is under way and will include additional reductions

Budget Reductions Elimination of positions in Community Development, Finance, and Police Departments Elimination of out-of-state employee training/benefits, reduction in other training Eliminated all non-emergency OT Establishment of new compensation plan eliminated cost of living increases for non-union employees Reduced infrastructure maintenance, tree trimming, sidewalk replacement and general beautification Elimination of downtown sidewalk snow removal program Reduction of downtown planting program, replacement with sponsorship program Deferral of several capital purchases Increase in employee insurance copays

Personnel vs. Non-Personnel Costs

General Fund Budgeted Revenues

History of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures

Future Concerns Reduction in revenue sharing from the State Additional unfunded mandates Aging infrastructure Costs out of Village’s control 21% of the General Fund’s expenditures go toward pension and healthcare premiums

Future Concerns Lack of sales tax base Slow down in real estate growth Dependence on property tax

General Fund Balance Projections No Additional Revenues *Assumes expenditures increase by 5 percent.

General Fund Projections Revenue Assumptions Taxes increase by 2.5%. Intergovernmental Revenues (Income Tax, Sales Tax, State Use Tax) increase by 1%. Also includes estimated revenues from Infiniti dealership. Licenses and Permits increase by 2%. Services Charges increase by 2%. Fines and Miscellaneous increase by 3%. Investment Income equals 2% of prior year fund balance.

General Fund Projections Expenditure Assumption Expenditures increase by 5% annually. Average Increase over past 5 years

General Fund Balance Projections No Additional Revenues *Assumes expenditures increase by 4 percent.

Capital Fund Balance Projections No Additional Revenues If additional revenue sources are not obtained, the Village would need to choose between funding operations or capital improvements. Based on the Village’s current ten year capital plan, the Capital Fund balance would be depleted by FY2019.

Impact of continued cuts Slower administrative response times due to reduced hours Reduction in community event support Reduced CBD beautification/maintenance Slowing down of road/capital program implementation Scaling back or elimination of new rolled concrete curb installation’s throughout town Elimination/scaling back of non-core functions such as DARE Decreased ability to review operational efficiencies

“If you want things to stay the same, then things will have to change” -Giuseppe di Lampedusa

What is Home Rule?

Constitution of the State of Illinois: Adopted at special election on December 15, 1970 Article VII, Section 6: Powers of Home Rule Units A County which has a chief executive officer elected by the electors of the county and any municipality which has a population of more than 25,000 are home rule units. Other municipalities may elect by referendum to become home rule units. Except as limited by this Section, a home rule unit may exercise any power and perform any function pertaining to its government and affairs including, but not limited to, the power to regulate for the protection of the public health, safety, morals and welfare; to license; to tax; and to incur debt. Source:

Home Rule in Illinois Addison Algonquin Alsip Alton Arlington Heights Aurora Bannockburn Barrington Hills Bartlett Batavia Bartonville Bedford Park Belleville Bellwood Benton Berkeley Berwyn Bloomingdale Bloomington Bolingbrook Bridgeview Bryant Buffalo Grove Burbank Burnham Cahokia Calumet City Calumet Park Carbon Cliff Carbondale Carlock Carol Stream Carpentersville Carterville Champaign Channahon Chicago Chicago Heights Chicago Ridge Christopher Cicero Collinsville Country Club Hills Countryside Crainville Crystal Lake Danville Darien Decatur Deerfield DeKalb DePue Des Plaines Dolton Downers Grove DuQuoin East Dundee East Hazel Crest East St. Louis Edwardsville Elgin Elk Grove Village Elmhurst Elmwood Park Elwood Evanston Evergreen Park Fairview Heights Flora Forest View Freeport Galesburg Glen Ellyn Glendale Heights Glenview Glenwood Golf Granite City Gurnee Hanover Park Harvey Harwood Heights Hazel Crest Herrin Highland Park Highwood Hillside Hodgkins Hoffman Estates Homer Glen Hopkins Park Inverness Jacksonville Johnston City Joliet Kankakee Lake Barrington Lake Bluff Lake Forest Lake in the Hills Lansing LaSalle Lincolnshire Lincolnwood Manhattan Marion Markham Mascoutah Maywood McCook McHenry Mettawa Midlothian Moline Monee Monmouth Morton Grove Mound City Mount Prospect Mount Vernon Muddy Mundelein Murphysboro Naperville Naples Nauvoo New Lenox Niles Normal Norridge North Chicago North Utica Northbrook Northfield Northlake Oak Forest Oak Lawn Oak Park Oakbrook Terrace O'Fallon Old Mill Creek Onarga Orland Park Oswego Palatine Park City Park Forest Park Ridge Pekin Peoria Peoria Heights Peru Phoenix Plainfield Posen Prairie Grove Quincy Rantoul Riverdale Riverwoods Robbins Rock Island Rockdale Rolling Meadows Romeoville Rosemont Round Lake Beach Saint Charles Sauget Schaumburg Schiller Park Sesser Sherman Skokie South Barrington South Holland Springfield Standard Stickney Stone Park Streamwood Sycamore Thornton Tilton Tinley Park Tuscola University Park Urbana Valmeyer Volo Warrenville Washington Watseka Waukegan West Chicago West City West Dundee West Frankfort Westmont* Wheaton Wheeling Williamsville Wilmette Winnetka Woodridge

Home Rule in Illinois Addison Algonquin Alsip Alton Arlington Heights Aurora Bannockburn Barrington Hills Bartlett Bartonville Bedford Park Belleville Bellwood Benton Berkeley Berwyn Bloomingdale Bloomington Bolingbrook Bridgeview Bryant Buffalo Grove Burbank Burnham Cahokia Calumet City Calumet Park Carbon Cliff Carbondale Carlock Carol Stream Carpentersville Carterville Champaign Channahon Chicago Chicago Heights Chicago Ridge Christopher Cicero Collinsville Country Club Hills Countryside Crainville Crystal Lake Danville Darien Decatur Deerfield DeKalb DePue Des Plaines Dolton Downers Grove DuQuoin East Dundee East Hazel Crest East St. Louis Edwardsville Elgin Elk Grove Village Elmhurst Elmwood Park Elwood Evanston Evergreen Park Fairview Heights Flora Forest View Freeport Galesburg Glen Ellyn Glendale Heights Glenview Glenwood Golf Granite City Gurnee Hanover Park Harvey Harwood Heights Hazel Crest Herrin Highland Park Highwood Hillside Hodgkins Hoffman Estates Homer Glen Hopkins Park Inverness Jacksonville Johnston City Joliet Kankakee Lake Barrington Lake Bluff Lake Forest Lake in the Hills Lansing LaSalle Lincolnshire Lincolnwood Manhattan Marion Markham Mascoutah Maywood McCook McHenry Mettawa Midlothian Moline Monee Monmouth Morton Grove Mound City Mount Prospect Mount Vernon Muddy Mundelein Murphysboro Naperville Naples Nauvoo New Lenox Niles Normal Norridge North Chicago North Utica Northbrook Northfield Northlake Oak Forest Oak Lawn Oak Park Oakbrook Terrace O'Fallon Old Mill Creek Onarga Orland Park Oswego Palatine Park City Park Forest Park Ridge Pekin Peoria Peoria Heights Peru Phoenix Plainfield Posen Prairie Grove Quincy Rantoul Riverdale Riverwoods Robbins Rock Island Rockdale Rolling Meadows Romeoville Rosemont Round Lake Beach Saint Charles Sauget Schaumburg Schiller Park Sesser Sherman Skokie South Barrington South Holland Springfield Standard Stickney Stone Park Streamwood Sycamore Thornton Tilton Tinley Park Tuscola University Park Urbana Valmeyer Volo Warrenville Washington Watseka Waukegan West Chicago West City West Dundee West Frankfort Westmont* Wheaton Wheeling Williamsville Wilmette Winnetka Woodridge

Are Communities like Clarendon Hills becoming Home Rule?

Suburban Towns with Average Home Sales over $600,000 Kenilworth2,494Burr Ridge6,785 Bannockburn1,429Wilmette27,651 Winnetka12,419Mettawa367 Lake Forest20,057Clarendon Hills8,427 Glencoe8,762Long Grove6,735 Hinsdale15,715Inverness6,749 Barrington Hills1,979Lake Bluff6,056 Oak Brook8,702River Forest11,635 South Barrington3,760Kildeer3,460 Northfield5,389Riverwoods3,905

Suburban Towns with Average Home Sales over $600,000 Bannockburn1,429Wilmette27,651 Winnetka12,419Mettawa367 Lake Forest20,057 Inverness6,749 Barrington Hills1,979Lake Bluff6,056 South Barrington3,760 Northfield5,389Riverwoods3,905

Suburban Towns with Average Home Sales over $600,000 Bannockburn2006 Winnetka2005Mettawa2006 Lake Forest2005 Inverness2000 Barrington Hills1990Lake Bluff2005 South Barrington1975 Northfield2005Riverwoods2006

Uses of Home Rule Fee recovery Legal and local control Stronger Business licensure to prevent fraud and abuse Intergovernmental agreement flexibility, including additional opportunities for shared services limited for non-home rule communities Elimination of State “Tax Cap” Impact fees on construction and development Property acquisition and disposal Broader powers to promote and control economic development Ability to eliminate obsolete organizational arrangements

Limits on Home Rule Article VII limits certain abilities of home rule municipalities:  Issued debt which is paid by ad valorem property tax receipts may not have a maturity period longer than 40 years  Home rule units have a constitutional debt limit  No home rule unit may define or provide for felonies, or for Class A misdemeanors without specific statutory authority  The General Assembly can also vote to impose additional limits on home rule units of government Village Board still made up of representatives of the community; still subject to local election  50% of Board up for re-election every other year Example of Self imposed limits:  Local “Tax Cap” has been proposed and will be discussed at the February 21 st Board Meeting

Home Rule in Practice Research shows that home rule municipalities do not have a higher property tax rate on average than non-home rule municipalities. (Banovetz 2002; Banovetz and Kelty 2002; Dye and McGuire 1997; Wood 2011) Historically, voters in home rule communities want to retain home rule. No community has rescinded home rule since 1983.

Home Rule Research Committee

Home Rule Committee Process Committee was formed in May, all volunteers who stepped forward were put on the committee. In June, a presentation by Village Staff on Home Rule, and the Village’s financial condition. Committee members identified information they felt they needed to make a decision on the issue. In July, the information requested by the committee was presented to them. The Committee requested that guest speakers be invited to the next meeting that had experience with and knowledge of home rule. In August, Mayor David Brummel of Warrenville, IL, and Patrick Lucansky of the law firm Klein, Thorpe, and Jenkins spoke. Village staff also presented additional financial analysis information requested by the Committee at the July 7th meeting. In September, the committee discussed five motions prepared by Village staff relating to the appropriateness and potential use of Home Rule in Clarendon Hills. The Committee approved the final report document for submittal to the Village Board.

Home Rule Committee Findings The attainment of Home Rule status is appropriate for the Village of Clarendon Hills at this time: 10 yes, 2 No Home Rule status should be utilized to affect an increase in the Village’s property tax rate beyond the authority allowed Non- Home Rule municipalities: 9 Yes, 3 No Home Rule status should be utilized to affect increases in other revenues, as determined by the current and future Village Board, to offset increases in property taxes: 11 yes, 1 no The Village Board should utilize non-financial Home Rule powers as they deem appropriate and necessary: 9 yes, 2 no, 1 abstention If a Home Rule referendum is attempted and fails, the Village should pursue an increase in property taxes by referendum: 11 yes, 1 abstention

Updated Plan including Home Rule  Maintain General Fund balance through Sales Tax, reassignment of existing revenues from Capital Fund to General Fund  Use of Home Rule for additional Cost Savings and efficiencies and expanded Economic Development  Slow down of capital expenditures, additional cost sharing with residents and borrowing for future large projects  Continued engagement with residents on budgetary priorities and revenue  Possible property tax referenda in future years

Home Rule Use Home Rule Sales Tax  Places for Eating Tax (PFE) could be repealed and an overall 1% sales tax could be put into place  This would generate $200,000 a year ($100,000 if PFE Tax were repealed)  Would eliminate local administration of the PFE Tax Sales Tax for Surrounding Communities as of July 1, 2011 Willow Springs9.50% LaGrange8.75% Western Springs8.50% Darien8.25% Downers Grove8.25% Hinsdale8.25% Willowbrook8.25% Oak Brook7.75% Westmont7.75% Burr Ridge7.50% Clarendon Hills7.25%

General Fund Balance Projections No Additional Revenues *Assumes expenditures increase by 5 percent.

Beginning in FY2013, Home Rule revenues include a 1% Sales Tax and repeal of the Places for Eating Tax. In addition, a Portion of Utility Taxes would be reassigned to the General Fund beginning in FY % annual increase in ex.p. assumed General Fund Balance Projections with Home Rule Sales Tax and Transfer of Existing Revenues

Beginning in FY2013, Home Rule revenues include a 1% Sales Tax and repeal of the Places for Eating Tax. In addition, a Portion of Utility Taxes would be reassigned to the General Fund beginning in FY % annual inc. in exp assumed

Capital Fund Balance Projections No Additional Revenues If additional revenue sources are not obtained, the Village would need to choose between funding operations or capital improvements. Based on the Village’s current ten year capital plan, the Capital Fund balance would be depleted by FY2019.

Capital Fund Balance Projections Partial Transfer of Rev/Exp Reduction Utility tax revenues are shared with the General Fund beginning in 2016, road program is significantly diminished with greater cost sharing with residents. Additional borrowing may have to be considered to maintain funding levels

Other Considerations Economic Development Advantage  Very competitive environment as communities fight to expand their tax bases Protection from Springfield  Supermajority needed to impose a mandate on a Home Rule Community Operational Flexibility = additional savings Only option that combines revenue and increased flexibility

Questions?