Spillover Effects of State Mandated-Benefit Laws The Case of Outpatient Breast Cancer Surgery June 5, 2007 John Bian, Ph.D., Atlanta VAMC, American Cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effects of Managed Care Enrollment on Publicly Insured Children with Chronic Health Conditions Amy J. Davidoff, Ph.D. University of Maryland Baltimore.
Advertisements

Access to Care in The Medicaid Program Andrew B. Bindman, MD Professor of Medicine, Health Policy, Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California.
The Michigan Healthcare Marketplace Eileen Ellis Health Management Associates Initial Observations.
CHAPTERS 8 AND 9 UNIT V FLASHCARDS. capitation A system in which doctors are paid a set annual fee for each patient in their practice, regardless of.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2009.
1 Managed Health Care Pricing for Provider Arrangements Presented by Vanessa Olson Seminar on Health and Managed Care October 18, 1999.
Impact of Cancer Diagnosis and Chemotherapy on Mammography Use Xinhua Yu, M.B., Ph.D. A. Marshall McBean, M.D., M.Sc. Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H Division.
As noted by Gary H. Lyman (JCO, 2012) “CER is an important framework for systematically identifying and summarizing the totality of evidence on the effectiveness,
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
DOES MEDICARE SAVE LIVES?
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
The influence of Breast Cancer Pay for Performance Initiatives on breast cancer survival and performance measures: a pilot study in Taiwan Raymond NC Kuo,
1 Lecture 20: Non-experimental studies of interventions Describe the levels of evaluation (structure, process, outcome) and give examples of measures of.
Has Health Plan Quality Measurement Improved Quality of Care among Medicare Managed Care Enrollees? Presented by Kate Bundorf Coauthors: Laurence Baker.
Medicare Managed Care and Primary Care Quality: Examining Racial/Ethnic Effects across States Jayasree Basu, Ph.D. AHRQ 2009 Annual Conference.
Variation in the Delivery of Medical Care: Is More Better? Todd Gilmer, PhD Professor of Health Policy and Economics Department of Family and Preventive.
Effect of Cost-Sharing on Screening Mammography in Medicare Managed Care Plans Amal Trivedi, MD, MPH William Rakowski, PhD John Ayanian, MD, MPP 2007 AcademyHealth.
Preventive Health Care Use in Elderly Uterine Cancer Survivors Division of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health University of Minnesota.
1 Is Managed Care Superior to Traditional Fee-For-Service among HIV-Infected Beneficiaries of Medicaid? David Zingmond, MD, PhD UCLA Division of General.
Ethnic Disparities in Early Breast Cancer Management among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Rebecca P. Gelber, MD, MPH Department of Medicine, University.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
The Impact of Air Pollution on Infant Mortality: Evidence from Geographic Variation in Pollution Shocks Induced by a Recession Kenneth Y. Chay and Michael.
1 ACCESSING HPV VACCINE: Preliminary Progress Alexandra Stewart, JD Department of Health Policy Contact: June 2, 2007.
Breast Cancer Care of Mexican American Women in High Poverty California Neighborhoods: Protective Effects of Social and Financial Capital, Including Health.
1 Factors Associated with Regional Variation in Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan Participation and Beneficiary Leslie M. Greenwald, Ph.D. Principal.
The Quality of Reporting on Race & Ethnicity in US Hospital Discharge Abstract Data Roxanne Andrews, PhD June 10, 2008.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Healthcare Data and Tools … And an Overview of HCUPnet Healthcare Data and Tools … And an Overview of HCUPnet.
Unequal Utilization of New Technologies by Race The Use of New Prostate Surgeries (TUNA and TUMT) among Medicare Elderly Beneficiaries Xinhua Yu, PhD,
Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment Willard G. Manning et al. (1987) June 1, 2007 Willard G.
A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer.
Disparities Within and Between Hospitals for Inpatient Quality of Care: Targeting Resources to Close the Gap Romana Hasnain-Wynia, PhD Director, Center.
Competition, Subsidy and Requirement Regulations -Effects of State Policies and their Interactions on Hospital Uncompensated Care Provision L EI Z HANG.
1 Texas Medicaid and the Breast And Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act Texas Health Care Access Conference Texas Association of Community Health.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● February 2013 ● No. 38 Medicare Spending for Beneficiaries with Severe Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder.
Expanded Mental Health Benefits and Outpatient Depression Treatment Intensity Anthony T. Lo Sasso University of Illinois at Chicago Richard C. Lindrooth.
Evaluating the Impact of Medicaid Managed Care on Preventive Health Care Use by Children and Adolescents June 24, 2006 Todd Eberly, Ph.D. Child Health.
Impact of State Mandatory Health Insurance Coverage on the Utilization of Selected Diabetes Care Services Rui Li, Ph.D. Ping Zhang, Ph.D. Dekeely Hartsfield,
The Effects of Health Plan Performance Measurement on Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries Presented by Kate Bundorf Co-authors: Laurence Baker and.
The Future of Medicare Advantage The Heritage Foundation September 10, 2008 James C. Capretta Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center
H OLDING P LANS A CCOUNTABLE IN H EALTH R EFORM J OSHUA D. G OLDBERG National Association of Insurance Commissioners August 4, 2010 State Coverage Initiatives.
Figure 1 K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Dual Eligibles: The Basics Barbara Lyons, Ph.D. Director, Kaiser Commission on.
Demographics and Associated Costs of Dying for Enrolled Veterans Preliminary Findings James Breckenridge, PhD James Hallenbeck, MD Co-Principal Investigators.
C HAPTER 34 Code Blue Health Sciences Edition 4. Confidentiality of sensitive information is an important issue in healthcare. Breaches of confidentiality.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Healthcare Data and Tools … And an Overview of HCUPnet Healthcare Data and Tools … And an Overview of HCUPnet.
Hospital Utilization by Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage Enrollees Lauren Hersch Nicholas University of Michigan September 15, 2009.
Medicare Advantage Payment Extra Payments, Enrollment & Quality of Care Lauren Hersch Nicholas Columbia University AcademyHealth June 3, 2007 Research.
Study Design & Population A retrospective cohort design was applied to the Medicaid administrative claims data of youth continuously enrolled in a Mid-Atlantic.
Rural Health Research Center S outh C arolina Greater Rurality Increases Barriers to Primary Health Care: Evidence of a Gradient in Access or Quality Janice.
Urban/Rural Differences in Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer Melony E.S. Sorbero, Ph.D. RAND Corporation Funded by Health Resources.
Effects of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program on Children with Chronic Health Conditions Amy J. Davidoff, Ph.D. Genevieve Kenney, Ph.D. Lisa.
Do State Parity Laws Differentially Impact Low Income or High Need Groups? Colleen L. Barry, Ph.D. Susan H. Busch, Ph.D. Yale School of Medicine June 2006.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Impacts of Managed Care on SSI Medicaid Beneficiaries: Preliminary Results From A National Study Terri Coughlin Sharon K. Long The.
Kathleen Decker Alain Demers Daniel Chateau Marion Harrison Cervical Cancer in Manitoba: evaluating risk, Pap test utilization, and access CancerCare Manitoba.
The Impact of Cost Sharing on Middle-Income Children AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting June 2008 Amy M Lischko.
Using SEER-Medicare Data to Enhance Registry Data to Assess Quality of Care Joan Warren Applied Research Program National Cancer Institute NAACCR June.
Cost Drivers of Cancer Care: Medicare and Commercially Insured Populations Pamela Pelizzari April 1, 2016.
CT Screening for Lung Cancer vs. Smoking Cessation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Pamela M. McMahon, PhD; Chung Yin Kong, PhD; Bruce E. Johnson; Milton.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates by Race, Age and Indices of Access to Medical Care in the U.S., Yongping Hao, PhD 1 Ahmedin Jemal,
Hannah K Weir, PhD Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Quebec City, Quebec, Canada June 2010.
Boston University Slideshow Title Goes Here Eliminating CD4 thresholds in South Africa will not lead to large increases in persons receiving ART without.
The US is facing an unprecedented opioid epidemic, which has resulted in increases health care services utilization and a surge in overdose deaths. Medicaid.
Impact of SCHIP on Racial Disparities in Medicaid Enrollment and Prenatal Care Initiation among Pregnant Teens and Young Adults in Florida Tzy-Mey Kuo,
Impact of State Reporting Laws on Central Line– Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units Hangsheng Liu, Carolyn T. A.
Medical Care Cost of Medicare/Medicaid Beneficiaries with Vision Loss
Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect
The US is facing an unprecedented opioid epidemic, which has resulted in increases health care services utilization and a surge in overdose deaths. Medicaid.
The US is facing an unprecedented opioid epidemic, which has resulted in increases health care services utilization and a surge in overdose deaths. Medicaid.
Megan Eguchi, MPh Sana karam, md, phd
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect
Presentation transcript:

Spillover Effects of State Mandated-Benefit Laws The Case of Outpatient Breast Cancer Surgery June 5, 2007 John Bian, Ph.D., Atlanta VAMC, American Cancer Society Joseph Lipscomb, Ph.D., Emory Rollins School of Public Health Michelle M. Mello, J.D., Ph.D., Harvard School of Public Health Acknowledgement: The authors thank Jennifer Pomeranz for her assistance in a careful review of state mandated-benefit laws relating to breast cancer surgery.

State Mandated-Benefit Laws States have been particularly active in passing laws relating to breast cancer treatment. –E.g., laws protecting patients from increasing popular practice of “drive- through” mastectomy/breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with lymph node dissection (LND) ( Case et al. 2001; Warren et al. 1998; NCI 2005 ). State laws formally affect only state-regulated insurers (e.g., not self-insured employer-sponsored plans, Medicaid, or Medicare). 2 congressional bills—Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act of 1997 and 2005—in part designed to expand coverage for populations exempted from the state regulation (e.g., ERISA preempts state regulation of HMOs). However, some evidence suggests indirect effects of state laws on populations exempted from the laws ( Liu et al ).

Hypothesis: Spillover Effects of the Laws Physicians tend to treat all patients similarly regardless of insurance type. –Void costs of treatment differentiation ( Glazer and McGuire 2002; Glied and Zivin 2002 ), –Lack sufficient information about exemption details of the laws ( Liu et al ).

Data Sources Information on state breast cancer surgery laws in 12 states with SEER registries from –LexisNexis legal research database: state statutes, bills, and administrative codes. –Follow up, if needed, with key informants in state legislatures and agencies linked SEER-Medicare claims data. –SEER cancer registry data –Medicare claims and enrollment data county-level HMO enrollment file (provided by Dr. Laurence Baker, Stanford University). County-level Area Resource Files.

Patient Sample Registries from CT, NM, CA, GA, HI, IA, WA, MI, and UT* Women age 65+ years Diagnosed with early stage 0-II unilateral breast cancer from Breast cancer as the first-ever-diagnosed cancer FFS patients with both Part A and B benefits at the month of diagnosis Receiving unilateral mastectomy or BCS with LND mastectomies vs BCSs with LND. *Excluding NJ, LA, KY, and the reminder of CA because they were not in the SEER until Rural GA excluded due to unreliable linked data.

Variables Dependent variable: –Surgery delivery setting: 1 if hospital outpatient (<24 hours) or 0 inpatient, determined from claims data. Key explanatory variable: –State law in effect: 1 if a patient in CT, NM, CA, and GA (with laws) and receiving a surgery post adoption of law or 0 otherwise. Covariates: –Patient/county-level characteristics (e.g., HMO penetration).

Econometric Models Difference-in-differences (DD) analysis –Linear probability models with county & time fixed effects for estimating average effects of the laws. –Separate analyses of mastectomy and BCS with LND patients. –Huber clustered (county) standard errors correction. Sensitivity analyses –Potential sorting of outpatient mastectomy into outpatient BCS. Restrict the sample to stage 0-II patients receiving outpatient mastectomy or outpatient BCS with or without LND. Dependent variable: 1 if BCS or 0 if mastectomy. –Potential varying effects of laws over time.

Results

Estimates from DD Analyses Spillover effects of the laws Lowered likelihood of outpatient delivery of mastectomy by 5.0 percentage points (P <.001) — a reduction of over 30%. The effects on outpatient mastectomy became insignificant beyond 1st 24 months post adoption of laws. No significant impact on utilization of outpatient BCS with LND. Potential sorting of outpatient mastectomy into outpatient BCS.

Limitations Sorting mechanism may dilute effects of laws. Cross-state spillover effects may bias estimates toward nil (more than 20 states passed similar laws from ). Laws with varying mandates not modeled separately. Limited generalizability (9 states studied).

Conclusions State mandated-benefit laws studied here had a substantial spillover effect on outpatient utilization of mastectomies among Medicare FFS breast cancer patients — a large population exempted from the state laws. The effectiveness of a proposed federal law may be hampered. Our findings provide the public with timely evidence for informed debate about the Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act of 2005.