1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Advertisements

1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
European Union Cohesion Policy
© Shutterstock - olly Joint Action Plan: Towards a management more focused on results Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the European territorial.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 July 2013.
European Territorial Co-operation Eligibility of expenditure for co-operation programmes Art. 17(1) ETC Regulation 16th meeting of the Expert Group on.
3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010 Eligibility period and reporting eligible expenditure.
Financial reporting Oskar Otsus January 2013 Moldova.
DG Research and Innovation
HORIZON 2020: FINANCIAL ISSUES
Funding Schemes. Legal and Financial Rules in the 7th Framework Programme PHOENIX Training Laulasmaa, 1 Sept 2007.
GRIP- IT Governance of Regionally Integrated Projects using Innovative Tools. (Structural Funds implementation in an integrated approach )EXPENDITURES.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Current use and perspectives June 2014.
ESIF Business Process and Simplification Nic Suggit Department of Communities and Local Government 24 April 2014.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, MA Per Dahlström, MA Lead Partner Seminar 24th- 25th March, 2015, Svolvaer, Norway.
FINANCIAL REPORTING Rules and Regulations
Financial Management and Auditing Reporting by the Lead Partner 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
30 th meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37 based on Fiche No 21 Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 18 May 2015.
1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
SOCRATES PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL HANDBOOK FOR BENEFICIARIES Selection 2005.
Financial and legal aspect in the context of proposal preparation Marija Šola, MSc. Project manager University of Belgrade School of Electrical Engineering.
Simplified Cost Options. Organizational structure National Development Agency Internal Audit Cabinet Legal Affairs Communication HR Vice-president for.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
6 September 2012 GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS CORE 2012 CALL – ELIGIBLE COSTS AND FINANCIAL ISSUES ANNA FASTYN CHIEF EXPERT SECTION FOR BILATERAL PROGRAMMES AND.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: analysis per cost category Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
Louis Vervloet, General director, ESF Agency Flanders
1 An introduction to Project Cycle Management PCM DAY 3 Gori, 31/3 – 3/4/2015.
SESSION 2: ESIF Simplification Workshop – Update on Simplified Cost Options (SCOs) Nicola Lavin, NW Growth Delivery Team Arpley House Warrington
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). …did we propose this new instrument? To focus more on outputs and results …do we believe it will work? Because focus.
REPORTING, BUDGET, ELIGIBLE COSTS. Main steps of the financial management of the project.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
32 nd meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37B Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 15 January 2016.
Eligibility of Administrative Costs in Projects of Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund 1.
NPA Eligiblity rules Per Dahlström Managing Authority 20th October 2015 – Copenhagen, Denmark.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Simplified Cost Options Impatto della semplificazione sulle attività dei controlli Francisco MERCHÁN CANTOS Direttore Audit DG EMPL Firenze, 21 novembre.
Practical work (simulation) Financial forms Peter Jany.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
Annual Interreg meeting 06 June 2016 #EUBudget4Results 1.
Interreg Atlantic Area Programme Eligibility Rules.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Experiences from programming period Simplified costs
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Tips on developing a good budget
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums Mark SCHELFHOUT& Laurent SENS DG Employment, Social.
Simplification in ESI funds for
Mid-Term Review Package on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG
Use of SCOs in the ESI funds: Survey of OPs 2017
COCOF 09/0025/00-EN The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums Laurent SENS ESF coordination.
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
ESF Committee ad’hoc group on the future of the ESF Debriefing from the focus group on proportionality (simplification) Brussels, 2 February 2010.
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Presentation transcript:

1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion Policy regulations: the programming period Laurent SENS DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Brussels, 6 October 2009

2 OBJECTIVES OF THE PRESENTATION Present the three simplified cost options and their origin Build a common understanding on these options Provide a few guidance on how to implement and audit them

3 The origin of the simplified cost options ESF Regulation : possibility to declare indirect costs on a flat rate basis Majority of errors found by ECA in structural actions expenditure due to the complexity of the rules  ECA 2007 annual report: making a greater use of ‘lump sum’ or ‘flat rate’ payments instead of ‘real costs’ Options already exist in the Financial Regulation November 2008, European Economic Recovery Plan: accelerate the implementation of structural funds. Proposal extended to ERDF => Same provisions for ERDF and ESF

4 Why the ESF initially ? Why is it a simplification? ESF supports the development of human resources immaterial expenditure mainly financed through grants Justification of expenditure based on the accounts: Many different types of costs and a large proportion of the supporting documents needed to justify a minor part of expenditure (a lot of small amount expenses) Equitable allocation of indirect costs Many small operations / small beneficiaries with limited financial management capacities Archiving supporting documents during many years Risk of financial corrections only due to mistakes

5 The amendments to the ESF/ERDF Regulations Not applicable to work or service contracts established following a public tender! With the amendment there are now 4 options to manage grants co-financed by Structural Funds –real cost, –flat rate for indirect costs (new for ERDF, but already existing for ESF). 2 new options for both funds: –standard scale of unit cost and –lump sums

6 Overview of the simplified cost options Current situation: Costs fully justified (‘real costs’) Direct costs = € 1. Personnel cost Internal personnel – remuneration Int. pers. - transport home/work Internal personnel – travel costs External personnel – remuneration External personnel - travel costs 0 2. Participants 0 3. Product develop and consumption Non depreciable consumption goods Publicity Organisation costs Other costs 0 Total costs : Indirect costs = € 3.1 Personnel costs (management) Equipment and immovable goods 54 (depreciation) 5.1 Internal administration, accountancy, management General documentation and publicity for courses and structure Office supplies Telephone, post, fax Taxes and insurance Movable material (depreciation) Immovable goods External accountancy costs Other costs 0 128,963 € Training, with a number of 21,400 hours x trainees realised (sum of hours of training undergone by every trainee) Justification: Each Euro & number of hours x trainees.

7 Overview of the simplified cost options Flat rate rule for indirect costs Indirect costs reimbursed on a flat rate basis, as percentage of paid direct costs Rate and definition of direct costs to be established ex ante, i.e. agreed before or in the grant agreement No supporting documents for indirect costs required any more  Audit: –Detailed supporting documents only for direct costs –Justification of the rate applied

8 Direct costs = € 1. Personnel cost Internal personnel – remuneration Int. pers. - transport home/work Internal personnel – travel costs External personnel – remuneration External personnel - travel costs 0 2. Participants 0 3. Product develop and consumption Non depreciable consumption goods Publicity Organisation costs Other costs 0 Indirect costs = flat rate rule Indirect costs = 13 % of direct costs = x 13% = €  Indirect costs (€) = TOTAL CERTIFIED: 128,562 € Overview of the simplified cost options Flat rate rule for indirect costs Training, with 21,400 hours x trainees realised Justification: Each Euro of direct costs & number of hours x trainees & rate

9 Overview of the simplified cost options Standard scale of unit costs Payment based on quantified activities, outputs, or outcomes multiplied by standards scale of unit costs May comprise all or part of the operation (unit cost for training, for follow up, per diem allowances for trainees,…)  Audit: not the actual costs will be audited, but: –Justify quantities –Justify the cost and the choice of the standard scale of unit

10 Overview of the simplified cost options Standard scale of unit costs Training, with 21,400 hours x trainees realised. For this type of training, the standard scale of unit defined by the national authorities is: €6 / hour x trainee => The grant paid will be: €6 x 21,400 = € 128,400 Justification: Number of hours x trainees & standard scale of unit cost.

11 Overview of the simplified cost options Lump sums Pre-established lump sum in accordance with pre-defined terms of agreement on activities and/or results For all or part of the costs of the operation For small operations or small bodies (capping), but not exclusively. Well adapted also when no quantifiable outputs exist to apply unit costs  Audit: not the actual costs, but: –Justify that the objectives were reached –Justify the ex ante calculation of the lump sum

12 An example of lump sum: new activity for a NGO managing a ‘crêche’ (childcare) 1.Draft detailed budget to calculate ex ante the amount of the lump sum 1.1 Internal personnel – remuneration Int. pers. - transport home/work Non depreciable consumption goods Equipment and immovable goods 347 (depreciation) 5.1 Administration, accountancy, management Telephone, post, fax Taxes and insurance External accountancy costs Lump sum amounting to 38,753 EUR to look after 10 additional children during one year. Before implementationClosure of operation 3.End of implementation: 11 additional children looked after during one year  Condition fulfilled  Payment of the lump sum grant of 38,753 EUR.

13 Calculation of flat rate for indirect costs, standard scales of unit costs and lump sums No method defined by the Regulation but conditions that the methods will have to fulfil. MSs will define the method. 4 conditions to be respected: key issues for sound financial management –Established in advance –Fair –Equitable –Verifiable

14 Calculation of flat rate for indirect costs, standard scales of unit costs and lump sums: a few examples By type of operations: Analysis of historical data: survey, statistical analysis, dedicated study, … Similar scales already used by national/regional authorities (daily allowances for example) Market prices, … Operation by operation: On the basis of draft budgets with real costs and + comparison to similar operations

15 Don’t forget … An important step towards simplification National authorities have 4 possible options for grants. No choice = use of ‘real cost’ principle Choice to do => fully understand the three simplified cost options and their consequences

16 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION QUESTIONS?