José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Status of the DHCAL Project SiD Collaboration Week January 12 – 14, 2015 SLAC

2 Outline The DHCAL project Recent Results Identified Issues R&D to be completed On a personal note

J. Repond - The DHCAL 3 The Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) I Active element Thin Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs) Glass as resistive plates Single 1.15 mm thick gas gap Readout 1 x 1 cm 2 pads 1-bit per pad/channel → digital readout 100-ns level time-stamping Calorimeter 54 active layers 1 x 1 m 2 planes with each 9,216 readout channels 3 RPCs (32 x 96 cm 2 ) per plane Absorber Either Steel or Tungsten

J. Repond - The DHCAL 4 The Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) II DHCAL = First large scale calorimeter prototype with Embedded front-end electronics Digital (= 1 – bit) readout Pad readout of RPCs (RPCs usually read out with strips) Extremely fine segmentation with 1 x 1 cm 2 pads DHCAL =World record channel count for calorimetry World record channel count for RPC-based systems 479,232 readout channels DHCAL construction Started in Fall 2008 Completed in January 2011 Test beam activities ~ 5 month in the Fermilab testbeam (Steel absorber) ~ 5 weeks in the CERN testbeams (Tungsten absorber) This is only a prototype For a colliding beam detector multiply by × 50

J. Repond - DHCAL 5 Recent Results I Response of Fe-DHCAL to Pions (Density-weighted) calibration improves linearity Close to linear up to 60 GeV Fit to power law aE m, where m is measure of saturation Hadronic Resolution Calibration improves resolution somewhat Saturation (=multiple hits/pad) degrades resolution > 30 GeV Stochastic term of 64%/ √ E (adequate for hadron calorimetry)) Burak Bilki

6 Recent Results II Fe-DHCAL: Software compensation Define hit density (= for every hit, the number of neighboring hits within 3 x 3 x 3 array) Define χ 2 to linearize positron or pion response (use only subsets of the data for this) Minimize χ 2 by adjusting weights of individual hits depending on their hit density Apply weights to pion data Linearize positron/pion response → energy reconstruction Coralie Neubüser Method still being optimized Pion response 6 – 60 GeV SC → significant improvement → 7 – 15 % No Software Compensation With Software compensation

J.Repond: Calorimetry reinvented 7 Recent Results III Configuration with minimal absorber structure Removed steel absorber plates 50 layers with each 0.4 X 0 or 0.04 λ I (detector cassette, glass, readout board) Data set Muons, positrons and pions Momentum 1 – 10, 32 GeV Response Highly saturated → as expected Resolution Spectacular! (Corrected for non-linearity) Comparison to GEANT4 simulations coming soon Benjamin Freund

J.Repond: Calorimetry reinvented 8 Recent Results IV Validation of 1-glass RPC design Design proposed and developed by Argonne group Built 2 large chambers (32 x 48 cm 2 ) Tested with Cosmic Rays and in Fermilab testbeam Conclusion → Performance as expected

9 Identified Issues I Loss of efficiency During operation of DHCAL in test beam: loss of efficiency on some chambers Problem traced back to chemical reaction at HV lead increasing resistivity Some chambers recovered by increasing the applied HV Solution → use of Kapton film as resistive layer (commercially available) Bending of boards Readout boards initially flat to within <1 mm Noticed loss of efficiency in center of chambers in CERN data (2012) Traced back to bending of boards Solution → mechanically constrain boards within cassette (SDHCAL did that)

10 Identified Issues II Muons Pions Positrons Simulation of various RPC gains Response/nominal response Loss of efficiency at borders Chambers inefficient close to the physical borders Effect larger than anticipated Traced back to increased gap size due to misshapen channels Solution → improved shape of channels Equalization of the RPC responses (In simulation) different dependence of the response to the RPC performance parameters for different particles Solution → Equalization of response for each particle type individually (unpleasant !)

11 Identified Issues III Equalization of the RPC responses Overcorrection for multiple avalanches on single pad Leads to improved linearity (contrary to MC predictions) Solution → Density-weighted calibration (work still ongoing)

12 Identified Issues IV Simulation of RPC response Standalone program (RPC_sim) Explored a number of different functional forms to spread charge on readout plane Currently best version → Sum of 2 Gaussians (still not entirely satisfactory) 10 GeV e + N hit Layer number 10 GeV e + 10 GeV π + 10 GeV μ + Not used for tuning N hit Density

13 Identified Issues V No identified issues without proposed solution!

14 R&D still to be completed I HV distribution system Every of the ~6,000 layers will need to be controlled individually University of Iowa started developing a system to distribute HV to multiple channels Turn on/off individual channels Monitor current and voltage Adjust individual channels by several hundred volt Prototype (1 channel) tested successfully Status → activity stopped due to lack of funding Gas recycling system Gas needs to be exchanged to eliminate poisons For environmental and cost reasons gas needs to be recycled University of Iowa initiated the development of a ‘Zero Pressure Containment’ system Part of a prototype system already assembled Status → activity stopped due to lack of funding

15 R&D still to be completed II Development of high-rate RPCs Typically glass RPCs lose efficiency for rates above 100 Hz/cm 2 Rate capability sufficient for most of ILC hadron calorimeter, but marginal for forward region Rate capability depends on bulk resistivity of resistive plates (~ Ω cm) Together with COE College (Iowa) developing semi-conductive glass First RPCs with new glass (~10 11 Ω cm) built and tested Conclusion → rate capability improved New glass with lower bulk resistivity in hand (not yet measured) Status → work on hold Mechanical design of hadron calorimeter Started development some time ago Status → work on hold

16 R&D still to be completed III Unless we complete this R&D, an RPC-based imaging hadron calorimeter can not seriously be proposed for an ILC detector

17 On a personal note… For FY2015 the DOE cut all funding for LC related activities → apart from a meager amount for accelerator R&D → against P5 recommendations On 10/17, Glen Crawford wrote a letter to the CALICE steering board informing them that I was ordered to step down as their spokesperson As of the start of FY2015 all DHCAL activities lost their support at Argonne → leaves our collaborators (CERN, COE, Iowa, UTA, China) hanging → in the past 10 years we were leading the development of the DHCAL technology, which will now be pursued by others (China and France with the exclusion of the U.S.) The global impact of a U.S. withdrawal from ILC/CALICE is not clear → But it will certainly not help getting the ILC approved by the Japanese Government → The U.S. will loose its leadership in the development of new calorimeter technologies → Argonne’s future participation in the construction of the calorimeter for ILC/CLIC will face significant difficulties (loss of expertise, manpower, starting all over again….)