Recognizing Fallacies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Copyright © 1995–2007 by Pearson Education, publishing as Longman Publishers Fowler/Aaron, The Little, Brown Handbook, Tenth Edition ARGUMENT.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
 Logical fallacies are errors in the structure of an argument.  “Fallacy” means falsehood.  These arguments can be used to distract people from the.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/
Logical Fallacies.
Argumentation/Persuasion
Bias, Persuasion, and Propaganda From:
Fallacies Information taken from Purdue OWL, Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument and Annette Rottenberg’s Elements of Argument.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Argument Unit AP Language and Composition. Deductive Reasoning General Particular.
1 Argument & Rhetoric Raymond M. Vince Composition II February 2006.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Errors in Reasoning.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
© 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman Publishers Efficient and Flexible Reading, 8/e Kathleen T. McWhorter Chapter 11: Evaluating Arguments.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Recognizing Fallacies From Various Sources. Fallacy Illogical statements that may sound reasonable or true but are actually deceptive and dishonest.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies: Or, How to Really Fail at Argumentation “Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end.” – Dr. Spock, Star Trek.
Write whether the following are good or bad. List three reasons why.  Premarital sex  Drugs  Hitting someone who hit you first  Death penalty  Abortion.
Argumentation.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES FLAWED ARGUMENTS. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: –Strengthen your own.
Academic Vocabulary Unit 7 Cite: To give evidence for or justification of an argument or statement.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
 Writers DO certain things to convince us.  What convinces you to do something or changes your mind?
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Logical Fallacies. Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Copy the following information on fallacies. Fallacies are: Flaws in an argument Often subtle.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS AND BUILDING ARGUMENTS ENGL 121 Howard Community College.
Fallacies are errors in argument and they fall into two groups: 1.Evasions 2.Oversimplifications Source: The Little Brown Handbook, 11th ed.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
Persuasive Speech Unit Logical Fallacies Fallacy: A mistake in an argument that automatically invalidates it.
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
Common Logical Fallacies
Argumentation/ Persuasion
Bias, Persuasion, and Propaganda
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Fallacies Flaws in Reasoning.
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter 14: Argumentation
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
UNDERSTANDING THE ELEMENTS OF PERSUASION
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Presentation transcript:

Recognizing Fallacies English 28 Ms. Grooms

Fallacies Errors in argument Evade issue of argument Treat argument as if it were much simpler than it is

An ineffective argument dodges the issue. Recognizing Evasions An ineffective argument dodges the issue.

FALLACIES Begging the Question Treating an opinion that is open to question as if it were already proved/ disproved Ex: Political campaign financing is too corrupt to be reformed.

Evasions… Non sequitur: (“it does not follow”) the second idea does not follow from the first Ex: She uses a wheelchair, so she must be unhappy. Red Herring: an irrelevant issue intended to distract readers from relevant issues Ex: A campus speech code is essential to protect students, who already have enough problems with rising tuition.

Inappropriate Appeals: Appeals to readers’ fear or pity False authority: cite as an expert someone whose expertise is doubtful or nonexistent Ex: Jason Bing, a recognized expert in corporate finance, maintains that pharmaceutical companies do not test their products thoroughly enough. Inappropriate Appeals: Appeals to readers’ fear or pity Ex: Vote for our candidate so that your city can be safe again.

Evasions… Bandwagon approach: accepts an assertion because everyone does Ex: Blake Lively has an account at Big City Bank, and so should you. Argument Ad Populum: (“argument to the people”) asks readers to accept a conclusion based on shared values or even prejudices and nothing else Ex: Any truly patriotic American will support the President’s action.

Recognizing Oversimplifications Oversimplify: to conceal or ignore complexities in a vain attempt to create a neater more convincing argument than reality allows

Oversimplifications… Hasty Generalization (jumping to a conclusion) a claim based on too little evidence or on evidence that is unrepresentative Ex: It is disturbing that several of the youths who shot up schools were users of violent video games. Obviously, these games can breed violence, and they should be banned.

Sweeping Generalization Probably not supportable at all. Includes Absolute Statements- all, always, never, none Allows for no exceptions

Sweeping Generalizations People who live in cities are unfriendly. Californians are fad-crazy. Women are emotional. Men can’t express their feelings.

Reductive Fallacy Oversimplifies (or reduces) the relation between causes and their effects Ex: Poverty causes crime.

Oversimplifications… Post Hoc: the assumption that A preceded B , then A must have caused B Ex: The town council erred in permitting the adult bookstore to open, for shortly afterward, two women were assaulted. Ex: In the two months since he took office, Mayor Holcomb has allowed crime in the city to increase by 12%.

Oversimplifications… Either / Or : (false dilemma) assumes that a complicated question has only 2 answers: one good & one bad, both bad, or both good. Ex: City police officers are either brutal or corrupt. Ex: Either we permit mandatory drug testing in the workplace or productivity will continue to decline.

False Analogy assumes a complete likeness Analogy: a comparison between 2 essentially unlike things for the purpose of definition or illustration

False Analogy… To win the war on drugs, we must wage more of a military-style operation. Prisoners of war are locked up without the benefit of a trial by jury, and drug dealers should be, too. Soldiers shoot their enemy on sight, and officials who encounter big drug operators should be allowed to shoot them, too. Military traitors may be executed, and corrupt law enforcers could be, too.

Identifying & Revising Fallacies 1) The American government can sell nuclear technology to nonnuclear nations, so why can’t individuals, who after all have a God-given right to earn a living as they see fit?

What is the fallacy? 2) A successful marriage demands a maturity that no one under twenty-five possesses.

Name the fallacy. 3) Students’ persistent complaints about the grading system prove that it is unfair.

Is it a fallacy? 4) People watch television because they are too lazy to talk or read or because they want mindless escape from their lives.

Anything wrong with this logic? 5) Racial tension is bound to occur when people with different backgrounds are forced to live side by side.