1 Early Intervention Graduates Go to Kindergarten: Findings from the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) Kathleen Hebbeler Donna Spiker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education as an Alternative to Academic Failure.
Advertisements

Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Transition from Early Intervention RIDE Winter Leadership Conference February 2007.
EARLY START Federal and State Requirements. What Is Early Start Frequently asked Questions Frequently asked Questions Which children are served? What.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
Promoting Quality Child Outcomes Data Donna Spiker, Lauren Barton, Cornelia Taylor, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center at SRI International Presented at: International.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: Current Status and Future Priorities Donna Spiker DaSy Center.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Resources for Special Needs Kids Kathy Bohanon, MD CASA Advocate, Pediatrician.
For Infants and Toddlers Early Intervention in Minnesota.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
EARLY ON: WHAT IT MEANS TO INFANTS AND FAMILIES Kathy Manta LMSW, ACSW.
Family Outcome Principles and Measurement Approaches Melissa Raspa Don Bailey ECO at RTI International International Society on Early Intervention (ISEI)
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 3: Parent Information Entry.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Healthy Inclusion: Caring for Children with Special Needs in Child Care © The National Training Institute for Child Care Health Consultants,
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 14: Parent Information Exit.
USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Needs Assessments to Identify and Evaluate Technical Assistance: Results of a National Survey about.
Early Intervention By: Colleen Langlands. What is Early Intervention? Early Intervention is a system that helps babies and toddlers with developmental.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
1 Preschoolers Identified as Having Autism: Characteristics, Services, and Achievement Elaine Carlson and Amy Shimshak, Westat OSEP National Early Childhood.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS) Elaine Carlson, Westat 2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference Washington, DC February 8, 2005.
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
SW 644: Issues in Developmental Disabilities Wisconsin Birth to 3 Early Intervention Program Lecture Presenter: Darsell Johns, MSW Department Of Health.
1. Today’s Purpose 1. Familiarize participants with Early ACCESS. 2. Familiarize participants with Early ACCESS process. 3. Familiarize participants with.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Outcomes Through Knowledge: The Power of Early Childhood State Databases Kathleen Hebbeler,
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
The mission of TnT is threefold: (1) to study prevalence, policy and resources, individualized decision making, training and support and other factors.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
Camille Catlett Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute GAYCFriday, October 11, 2013 High Quality Inclusion: Evidence-based.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Sharing is Good for Kids Kathy Hebbeler NERCC Part C Coordinators Meeting April 24, 2013.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Outcomes Through Knowledge: The Power of Early Childhood State Databases Kathleen Hebbeler,
Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C.
Embedding Child and Family Outcomes into Practice – Part 2 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Early Childhood Outcomes Center Webinar for the Massachusetts.
Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA): Getting It Right For All Children Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
EI/ECSE 101: Understanding the Basics of Early Intervention Under IDEA Part C Kathleen Mankinen, M. Ed. FSDB Outreach Department Parent Infant Program.
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
Documenting Family Outcomes: Decisions, Alternatives, Next Steps Don Bailey, Ph.D. Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Contact information: Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D.
Rationale for Inclusion Legal Mandates Head Start Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Americans with Disabilities Act Benefits for children with.
Infants, Toddlers, & Young Children with Disabilities ECSE 641 Spring 2015 (Lee, 2010)
Child & Family Connections #14. What is Child and Family Connections The Early Intervention Program in Illinois State funded program to assist families.
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Update from ECO: Possible Approaches to Measuring Outcomes
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014
Presentation transcript:

1 Early Intervention Graduates Go to Kindergarten: Findings from the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) Kathleen Hebbeler Donna Spiker SRI International Presented at OSEP Early Childhood Conference Washington, DC December 2005

2 Questions to be Addressed Today What are the child and family outcomes for former recipients of early intervention when the child enters kindergarten? What are the child’s experiences in kindergarten and what services are being received?

3 National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) Conducted by  SRI International  Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute  Research Triangle Institute  American Institutes for Research 10-year study funded by OSEP in 1995

4 Study Design Longitudinal. NEILS followed children and families from the time they enter early intervention through kindergarten. Families were recruited when they enrolled in early intervention for the first time. Families were recruited from September 1997 to November 1998.

5 NEILS Findings Presented Today Today’s findings based on telephone interviews with family member conducted when:  Child began early intervention (N=3200; 96%)  Child was 36 to 40 months of age (N=2584; 77%)  Child was entering kindergarten (N=2298; 69%). Asked a series of questions about child’s behavior, health, and development. Last round of family kindergarten interviews was completed in December Data are weighted to represent the nation.

6 Who are the Infants and Toddlers Entering Early Intervention?

7 Key Findings Children are more likely to begin services before 8 months and after 18 months than in the time in between. When children begin early intervention is strongly related to the reason why they are eligible for services. There is no typical child in early intervention.

8 Key Findings Children in early intervention are: In poorer health than the general population of infants and toddlers 16% fair or poor health compared to 2.3% for general population) More likely to be boys (61%) More likely have been born at low birth weight 32% vs. 8% general population 10% of children in EI are under 1000 grams

9 Percentage of Infants & Toddlers Entering Services by Age at Entry * * Age at development of the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP).

10 Eligibility for Early Intervention Services

11 Eligibility by Age at Entry

12 Child Outcomes at Kindergarten

13 Key Findings Many former EI participants are doing well at kindergarten. About half are reported to no longer have a delay or disability. A minority of children continue to have difficulties with use of arms or legs. A higher proportion of children have difficulties with communicating, relating, and behavior. Health is improving but a minority of children continue to have health problems.

14 Use of Arms and Hands

15 Use of Legs and Feet

16 Communication: How Well Child Makes Needs Known

17 Health Status

18 Health (Continued) Activities limited by health problem – 17% Currently taking medication for a condition or problem – 32%  Taking medication for behavior/mood/activity/attention – 22% Use any kind of medical device – 12%

19 At kindergarten child has a condition or delay that affects development

20 Age at IFSP by Has Delay or Disability at Kindergarten

21 Reason for Eligibility by Has Delay or Disability at Kindergarten

22 Uses Legs/Feet and Arms/Hands as Well as Other Children

23 Fine Motor Tasks Use spoon without spilling Copy a circle

24 Communication Tasks Uses 4-6 word sentence Tells about events in story in sequence

25 Knowledge and Concepts Gives first and last name Has concept of 3

26 How well does child learn, think, and solve problems

27 Exposure to Literacy: Looks at books on own

28 Social Skills and Behavior Social skills Appropriateness of behavior

29 Social Integration: Invited to another child’s house in last week

30 Kindergarten Experiences and Receipt of Special Education

31 Key Findings Transition to kindergarten has gone well for most but not all children. About half of those who participated in EI are receiving special education or therapy services at kindergarten. Some are receiving services outside of the public schools About ¾ of those in EI had IEPs developed at age 3 but only less than ½ received services continuously between EI and kindergarten. Parents are positive about their special education kindergarten experiences but not as positive as they were about EI.

32 How transition to kindergarten has gone

33 Receiving special education or therapy through the public schools at entry to kindergarten

34 Currently receiving special education or therapy through the public schools and disability status

35 Currently receiving special education or therapy through the public schools or private sources

36 (Only for children receiving public special education at K) Where child spends time at school

37 Special services received in kindergarten

38 Feelings about amount of special education or therapy through public schools

39 Feelings about quality of special education or therapy through public schools at K/EI at 36 months

40 (Only for children receiving special education at K) Feelings about time with typically developing children

41 Services Between Early Intervention and Kindergarten 77% report an IEP was developed for the child around 3 years of age  69% of them were receiving special education or therapy through the public schools at kindergarten 63% report child has received services through the public schools sometime between EI and kindergarten

42 Services Between Early Intervention and Kindergarten 45% report child has received services continuously between EI and kindergarten Among those who received preschool services through public schools, speech therapy (76%) most frequent service 21% report child received services not paid for by the public schools between EI and kindergarten

43 Family Outcomes and Perceptions at Kindergarten

44 Key Findings Family outcomes at kindergarten are positive and very similar to family outcomes at 36 months. Some families have a difficult time dealing with their child’s behavior at both time points. The only exception is that at kindergarten families feel less confident in their ability to work with professionals and advocate for their child.

45 Family Knows How to Help Child Learn and Develop

46 Difficulty Figuring Out What to Do about Behavior

47 Know How to Work with Professionals and Advocate for What Child Needs

48 Have Relatives or Friends Who Help the Family Deal with Problems

49 Family Has Little Chance to Take Part in Community Activities

50 Family’s Overall Life Situation Now

51 Child’s Overall Life Situation Now

52 Expect Family’s Life Situation Will Be…..

53 How Far in School Do You Expect Your Child Will Go…..

54 Early Intervention Retrospective

55 Key Finding At kindergarten, families still are pleased with the quality of early intervention education services and see it as having had an impact on their child’s development and on their family.

56 Quality of Help Family Received Through EI

57 Effect of EI on the Family

58 Impact of EI Services on Child Development

59 Conclusions Early intervention is serving children with a variety of different conditions and delays. In addition to having a delay or disability, EI participants differ from the general population in ways that probably have consequences for long term outcomes (e.g., poor health and poverty). By kindergarten, about half of those who received early intervention are no longer considered to have a disability.  We need to do more analyses to have a better sense of who these children are and how they differ from those who are still considered to have a delay or a disability.

60 Conclusions Many former EI participants are experiencing good outcomes at kindergarten. A small proportion of those who no longer have a delay or disability have indicators of possible future difficulties. Problem areas are communication, relating to others, and behavior. About half of the children are no longer receiving special education services. Most family outcomes are positive, especially their hope for the future and their expectations for their children. At kindergarten, most families see EI as having had a positive impact on their children and families.

61 NEILS Web Site: