Bridge Safety Initiative: Slab Bridge Load Rating using AASHTO Methodology and Finite Element Analysis AASHTO RAC/TRB 2011 Summer Meeting Prepared by Dale.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simon Foo, Edward Morofsky & Brian Kyle
Advertisements

The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.
Project Scheduling for Load Testing Bridges for ENCE 667 Course Project Spring 2001 Justin Myers.
The Successful Entrepreneur
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE ACTION IN STEEL DECK PLATES AND FIBROUS CONCRETE SLABS.
Multi-Stage Bidding.
Transportation Curriculum Coordination Council (TCCC) Addressing Challenges in Construction and Maintenance Workforce and Quality.
Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department.
Ministry of Transportation RISK MANAGEMENT FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN AASHTO Sub-Committee Design July 2009 Gary Todd, P. Eng. Manager, Design & Contract Standards.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAL DESIGN SECTION REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. B-0427 ON DAIRY ROAD OVER OWL BRANCH.
TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER NDE Research Ongoing Projects and Response Based Load Rating The Office of Research, Development, and Technology.
Moisture Induced Stress Testing (MIST) to Evaluate Stripping Potential of HMA Pavements AASHTO RAC/TRB 2013 Summer Meeting Work completed by Rajib Mallick.
Element Level Inspections  AASHTO Bridge Committee wanted a more comprehensive way to look at bridges  CoRe was developed in the mid  Bridge.
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
SIMULATION. Simulation Definition of Simulation Simulation Methodology Proposing a New Experiment Considerations When Using Computer Models Types of Simulations.
Software Architecture Quality. Outline Importance of assessing software architecture Better predict the quality of the system to be built How to improve.
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Load Rating Dan Walsh.
Snapshot of Member States’ Feedback after the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse - Summary of Information Collected via Recent Surveys Malcolm Kerley, Chair –
Simple brief By: Ayat Farhat
Chapter 22 Systems Design, Implementation, and Operation Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 22-1.
Bridge Management New Bridge or Existing? New Design Conceptual Design Detailed Design Tender Preparation and Advertisement Construction Rehabilitation.
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.
Reliability Analysis Procedures for Infrastructure Facilities Andrzej S. Nowak University of Nebraska - Lincoln Outline  Causes of Uncertainty  Load.
1 Chapter 12 Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework of Benefit- Cost Analysis Evaluation of Benefits and Costs Benefit-Cost Ratios.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
LRFR vs. LFR Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 2, 2011
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David S. Rayburn.
Navigation Sequences Proper navigation Poor navigation Poor Navigation.
Operation Frequency No. of Clock cycles ALU ops % 1 Loads 25% 2
Day 1.  Decision  A choice made between available alternatives.  Decision Making  The process of developing and analyzing alternatives and choosing.
Offsite Detour analysis. Calculation of detour length Distance along SR = Distance along SR
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Testing throughout the software life cycle instructor: Tasneem.
Human Resource Information Systems: A Definition HRIS -- Systematic procedure for collecting, storing, maintaining, retrieving & validating date needed.
Computers Are Your Future Tenth Edition Chapter 13: Systems Analysis & Design Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall1.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Protecting our Bridges WSDOT Bridge Vertical Clearance Trip Planner TransComm 2015 Skills Competition Annapolis, Maryland Lars Erickson Communications.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
The USP Performance Test Dissolution Systems Suitability Studies Walter W. Hauck, Ph.D. USP Consultant Presentation to Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical.
Product Management. Facts about Product Management Many managers realized that investment in INNOVATION is critical for future growth & even in the survival.
Rapid Bridge Construction: Prefabricated Substructure Elements AASHTO RAC High Value Research Workshop July 27, 2011.
Finite Element Analysis
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Quantifying the Value of Research in Indiana Tommy Nantung INDOT Research and Development Division AASHTO RAC Annual Meeting July 29, 2015 Portland, Oregon.
Transportation infrastructure: Are bridges an area of concern? Ryan Church and Jason Mumbach September 17, 2008.
The Use of PAVEDAT for the District-wide Truck Enforcement Plan June 20, 2012 Mark Berndt Eulois Cleckley.
Kansas DOT Research Project Implementation Presented By Rick Kreider (Chief of Research) Created By Susan Barker (T 2 Engineer)
Safety-Based Deployment Assistance for Location of V2I Applications Carol Tan, FHWA and Kim Eccles, VHB Traffic Records Forum, 2015.
Overview Participants manufacture a marketable desktop organizer. The team submits a documentation portfolio of the activities and the product made during.
Optimizing the utilization of your skilled resources How to balance demand with capacity in volatile multi–project environments Barry Muir Managing Director.
Ethics & Engineering Design January 26, 2005 Dr. Nathan Ensmenger University of Pennsylvania
METHODOLOGICAL STUDIES
Design Process 1.Selection of the type of structural form to be used and the material out of which the structure is to be made. 2.Determination of the.
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Performance Reporting and Target Setting (Section 2): VDOT’s Experience Connie Sorrell Chief of System.
1 Update: July 7 th, 2016 Investing in the Rideau Canal Bobs Lake Dam Project.
IT Architecture Technical blueprint for evolving a corporate infrastructure resource that can be shared by many users and services processing systems hardware.
Load Balancing: List Scheduling
PreOpenSeesPost: a Generic Interface for OpenSees
C. Richard Donnelly and M. O’Mara, Hatch – Canada
Chapter 8 Negative Messages
Protecting our Bridges
ENTSO-E Transparency Platform Vision Project
Finding Research Collaborators
Safety Risk Management (SRM) Process Overview
Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013
Responsible decision-making
Load Balancing: List Scheduling
Double-Angle Formulas
Presentation transcript:

Bridge Safety Initiative: Slab Bridge Load Rating using AASHTO Methodology and Finite Element Analysis AASHTO RAC/TRB 2011 Summer Meeting Prepared by Dale Peabody

The Challenge  MaineDOT is responsible for 2,723 bridges and minor spans  271 are in poor condition  226 are structurally deficient  Nine percent of Maine’s bridges are over 81 years old and 37% are over 61 years old.

The Challenge  288 bridges are at risk of closure or weight restrictions in the next decade  Balance public safety and socioeconomic concerns over bridge closure and load restriction decisions  Replacement costs for a single small bridge can exceed $1 million

What We Did  Develop Finite Element Analysis program for concrete slabs - SlabRate  Conduct Finite Element Analysis on bridges with potential load restrictions  20 flat slab bridges evaluated to date  13 with unacceptable load ratings are deemed acceptable w/SlabRate

What We Did  SlabRate’s FE formulation validated using widely accepted commercial FE codes  Further validation to be done with live loading analysis

Benefits  SlabRate – models can be generated and solved in a few minutes  SlabRate – analyzes 1 to 5 span continuous slab bridges, multiple user defined rating vehicles, highly intuitive graphical user-friendly display  Thirteen of 20 bridges analyzed will not require load restrictions, repair or replacement

Benefit/Cost  SlabRate development and analysis of 20 bridges - $200k  Assume just one out of the 13 bridges will not need to be replaced - $1 million B/C = 5 B/C = 5  Assume two bridges avoid replacement B/C = 10 B/C = 10