Cell Ontology – INCF Neuron Workshop April 12-14, 2011 Loudermilk Conference Center, Atlanta Georgia Supported by NHGRI HG002273-09Z and The International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
More than one way to dissect an animal Melissa Haendel ZFIN Scientific Curator.
Advertisements

Species-Neutral vs. Multi-Species Ontologies Barry Smith.
PRIME Program for Research on Immune Modeling and Experimentation PI: Stuart Sealfon, Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
PRO-PO-GO Alexander Diehl The Gene Ontology Cellular Component – Subcellular structures, locations, and macromolecular complexes including protein.
On the Future of the NeuroBehavior Ontology and Its Relation to the Mental Functioning Ontology Barry Smith
Goal and Status of the OBO Foundry Barry Smith. 2 Semantic Web, Moby, wikis, crowd sourcing, NLP, etc.  let a million flowers (and weeds) bloom  to.
Application of OBO Foundry Principles in GO Chris Mungall Lawrence Berkeley Labs NCBO GO Consortium.
Automated tools to help construction of Trait Ontologies Chris Mungall Monarch Initiative Gene.
Revising the Cell Ontology Terrence Meehan, Christopher Mungall, Alexander Diehl The Jackson Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University.
1 Introduction to Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 The OBO Foundry Towards Gold Standard Terminology Resources in the Biomedical Domain Thomas Bittner (based on a presentation by Barry Smith)
1 Intelligence Ontology: A Strategy for the Future Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 How Ontologies Create Research Communities Barry Smith
1 Workshop 7.00 Welcoming Remarks 7.15 Barry Smith (Buffalo, NY) 7.40 Lindsay Cowell (Duke University, NC) 8.05 Nigam Shah (Stanford University, CA) 8.30.
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith with thanks to Jane Lomax, Gene Ontology Consortium 1.
Abstract The Cell Ontology (CL) is a candidate OBO Foundry 1 ontology for the representation of in vivo cell types. As part of our work in redeveloping.
1 The OBO Foundry 2 A prospective standard designed to guarantee interoperability of ontologies from the very start (contrast.
The Problem of Reusability of Biomedical Data OBO Foundry & HL7 RIM Barry Smith.
Underlying Ontologies for Biomedical work - The Relation Ontology (RO) and Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) Thomas Bittner SUNY Buffalo
Using Ontologies to Represent Immunological Networks Lindsay G. Cowell, Anne Lieberman, Anna Maria Masci Duke University Center for Computational Immunology.
1 Logical Tools and Theories in Contemporary Bioinformatics Barry Smith
Room for Lunch: Arlington Room Room for Evening Reception: Grand Prairie Room.
OBO-Foundry. OBO was conceived and announced in in october 2001 Michael Ashburner and Suzanna Lewis with acknowledgements of others in the GO.
The RNA Ontology RNAO Colin Batchelor Neocles Leontis May 2009 Eckart, Colin and Jane In Cambridge.
1 BIOLOGICAL DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES & BASIC FORMAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith.
CoE Ontology Research Group (ORG) Barry Smith Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences Ontology Research Group Department of Philosophy.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
Comprehensive Annotation System for Infectious Disease Data Alexander Diehl University at Buffalo/The Jackson Laboratory IDO Workshop /9/2010.
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences Biomedical Ontology in Buffalo Part I: The Gene Ontology Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
Limning the CTS Ontology Landscape Barry Smith 1.
The Plant Ontology: Linking Phenotypes and Genomics Across Plant Taxa Laurel D. Cooper* 1, Ramona L. Walls 2, Justin Elser 1, Justin Preece 1, Dennis W.
Ontology of Sensors: Some Examples from Biology
Ontological realism as a strategy for integrating ontologies Ontology Summit February 7, 2013 Barry Smith 1.
Intelligence Ontology A Strategy for the Future Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Terry Meehan Scientific Curator Mouse Genome Informatics The Jackson Laboratory Logical Definitions for Hematopoietic Cell Terms.
Hematopoietic Cell Types in the Cell Ontology Alexander D. Diehl 6/12/12.
Gene Expression and Cell Identity Alexander Diehl ImmPort Science Talk 3/20/14.
Cell Ontology 2.0 Elimination of multiple is_a inheritance through instantiation of relationships to terms in outside ontologies, such as the GO cellular.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Alan Ruttenberg PONS R&D Task force Alan Ruttenberg Science Commons.
Neuroscience Information Framework Ontologies: Nerve cells in Neurolex and NIFSTD Maryann Martone University of California, San Diego.
Ontologies for Neuroscience and Neurology The Neuroscience Information Framework Fahim Imam, Stephen Larson, Georgio Ascoli, Gordon Shepherd, Anita Bandrowski,
Sunday, July 22, 2012 Plan Areas of coverage: high-level neurological system process, inc. sensory perception, sensory processing, cognition transmission.
DAVID R. SMITH DR. MARY DOLAN DR. JUDITH BLAKE Integrating the Cell Cycle Ontology with the Mouse Genome Database.
Integrating the Cell Cycle Ontology with the Mouse Genome Database David R. Smith Mary Dolan Dr. Judith Blake.
Linking Animal Models and Human Diseases Supported by NIH P41 HG002659, U54 HG004028, & R01 HG Cambridge University & the University of Oregon.
DAVID R. SMITH DR. MARY DOLAN DR. JUDITH BLAKE Integrating the Cell Cycle Ontology with the Mouse Genome Database.
The Plant Ontology: Development of a Reference Ontology for all Plants Plant Ontology Consortium Members and Curators*: Laurel D.
The Cell Ontology An ontology of cell types built by biologists for the needs of data annotation and analysis. The main branch organizes and enumerates.
INCF Digital Atlasing Infrastructure: An Overview.
How to integrate data Barry Smith. The problem: many, many silos DoD spends more than $6B annually developing a portfolio of more than 2,000 business.
2 3 where in the body ? where in the cell ?
About ontologies Melissa Haendel. And who am I that I am giving you this talk? Melissa Haendel Anatomist, developmental neuroscientist, molecular biologist,
Ontology and the Semantic Web Barry Smith August 26,
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith 1.
Cell Ontology Meeting, Jackson Labs May 2010 David Osumi-Sutherland.
Cell Ontology Workshop 2010 May 18-19, 2010 Highseas Conference Center The Jackson Laboratory Supported by NHGRI HG Z “an ARRA stimulus grant at.
Need for common standard upper ontology
N IF S TD : A C OMPREHENSIVE O NTOLOGY FOR N EUROSCIENCE Fahim IMAM 1, Stephen LARSON 1, Sridevi POLAVARAM 2, Georgio ASCOLI 2, Gordon SHEPHERD 3, Jeffery.
Introduction to Biomedical Ontology for Imaging Informatics Barry Smith, PhD, FACMI University at Buffalo May 11, 2015.
Phenote Mark Gibson Berkeley Bioinformatics and Ontology Project (BBOP) National Center for Biomedical Ontologies(NCBO) Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
1 An Introduction to Ontology for Scientists Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Development of NeuronBank v2.0 Akshaye Dhawan B&B Fellow Department of Computer Science In collaboration with the Neuroscience Institute.
A Visual Web Query System for NeuronBank Ontology Weiling Li, Rajshekhar Sunderraman, and Paul Katz Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
What is an ontology and Why should you care?
University of California, San Diego
Mental Functioning and the Gene Ontology
Why do we need upper ontologies? What are their purported benefits?
OBO Foundry Update: April 2010
Presentation transcript:

Cell Ontology – INCF Neuron Workshop April 12-14, 2011 Loudermilk Conference Center, Atlanta Georgia Supported by NHGRI HG Z and The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility Co-sponsored by the Georgia State University Center for Neuromics

Thanks to Janis Breeze, INCF Jyl Boline, INCF Paul Katz, GSU Alan Ruttenburg, SUNY Buffalo Judith Blake, The Jackson Laboratory Ashley Stanton, The Jackson Laboratory Beth Partridge, Hurley Travel at Jax

Participants Giorgio Ascoli, George Mason University Judith Blake, The Jackson Laboratory Mihail Bota, University of Southern California (via teleconference) Janis Breeze, INCF Program Officer Robert Burgess, The Jackson Laboratory Jyl Boline, INCF Project Coordinator (via teleconference) Alexander Diehl, SUNY Buffalo Akshaye Dhawan, Ursinus College Chad Frederick, Georgia State University Daniel Gardner, Weil Medical College, Cornell Melissa Haendel, Oregon Health & Science University David Hamilton, George Mason University Sean Hill, INCF Excecutive Director Kei Ito, The University of Tokyo Saurav Karmakar, Georgia State University Paul Katz, Georgia State University Stephan Larson, University of California, San Diego Ed Lein, Allen Brain Institute Terrence Meehan, The Jackson Laboratory Jose Leonardo Mejino, University of Washington Chris Mungall, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Sasha Nelson, Brandeis University Sridevi Polavaram, George Mason University David Osumi-Sutherland, Cambridge University (via teleconference) Abir Ashfakur Rahman, Georgia State University Patrick Ray, SUNY Buffalo Kathleen Rockland, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alan Ruttenburg, SUNY Buffalo Deboleena Roy, Emory University Joseph Shea, SUNY Buffalo Gordon Shepherd, Yale University Raj Sunderraman, Georgia State University Menno Witter, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Workshop Goals Introduction to the Cell Ontology Review of neuron ontology efforts Discussion of the ontological representation of neurons Review of core set of high level neuron terms Set up Working Groups Working Groups develop neuron terms and report back

Satellite Meeting For in depth discussion of ontology development-related issues Discussion points to be collects during main meeting For instance, “How do we present lines of evidence for asserted neuron properties as part of the ontology?”

The Cell Ontology An ontology of cell types built by biologists for the needs of data annotation and analysis. The Cell Ontology covers in vivo cell types from all of biology. The Cell Ontology is not – A list of specific cell lines, immortal or otherwise, although the Cell Ontology may be used to describe such cells if they correspond to an in vivo cell type. – A list of in vitro methods for preparing cell cultures, although the Cell Ontology may be used to describe the resulting cells if they correspond to an in vivo cell type.

OBO Reference Ontologies RELATION TO TIME GRANULARITY CONTINUANTOCCURRENT INDEPENDENTDEPENDENT ORGAN AND ORGANISM Organism (NCBI Taxonomy?) Anatomical Entity (FMA, CARO) Organ Function (FMP, CPRO) Phenotypic Quality (PaTO) Organism-Level Process (GO) CELL AND CELLULAR COMPONENT Cell (CL) Cellular Component (FMA, GO) Cellular Function (GO) Cellular Process (GO) MOLECULE Molecule (ChEBI, SO, RnaO, PrO) Molecular Function (GO) Molecular Process (GO) Smith et al., Nature Biotechnology 25, (2007)

Overview of Cell Ontology Developed by Jonathan Bard, David States, Michael Ashburner, and Seung Rhee and first described in 2005, Genome Biology, 6:R21. The Cell Ontology is sometimes called the Cell Type Ontology, and often referred to as the “CL”, based on its identifier space. For instance the term “B cell” has the ID “CL: ” The CL currently has over 1500 cell type terms, over 500 of which have logical definitions.

Textual Definitions name: CD4-positive, CD25-positive, alpha-beta regulatory T cell def: "A CD4-positive, CD25-positive, alpha-beta T cell that regulates overall immune responses as well as the responses of other T cell subsets through direct cell-cell contact and cytokine release.” name: induced T-regulatory cell def: "CD4-positive alpha-beta T cell with the phenotype CD25-positive, CTLA-4-positive, and FoxP3-positive with regulatory function."

Logical Definitions

Pre-reasoning Post-reasoning

Logical Definitions of Neurons Retinal Ganglion Cell – def: "A neuron located in the ganglion cell layer of the eye that receives inputs via bipolar, horizontal and amacrine cells. The axons of these cells make up the optic nerve." [GOC:add, GOC:dph]

CL Neuron Improvements so far We have added textual definitions for around 120 of the existing neuron types in CL, and logical definitions for around 75 of these. With help from INCF, we have imported 130 neuron types from the BAMS (Brain Architecture Management System) and created new genus- differentia textual definitions for these. About 40 of these have been given logical definitions. These changes are still under review.

Neurons are complicated Most neurons are defined in part by their anatomical location. – Brain and nervous system anatomy varies considerably between species. – Many anatomical systems exist for brains of different species. These are often in conflict with each other. – Neurons often have their soma in one anatomical location, axon in another, and dendrites in a third. We hope upper level neuron classes that can be defined reliably across species. – Morphology – Neurotransmitter secretion – Large scale anatomical structures – Function

What does it mean to “represent” a Neuron in an Ontology? Capture basic properties of particular neurons in a textual definition based on the literature. The combination of properties should uniquely define the neuron. Translate these properties to a logical definition (cross-product), based on relations that link the neuron to terms in other ontologies. Not a mathematical model.

Neuron Ontology and Database Efforts Neurolex and NIF-cell INCF Neuron Registry Task Force Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group SenseLab NeuronBank Brain Architecture Management System (BAMS) Foundational Model of Anatomy Virtual FlyBrain