Complete College Georgia Policy Working Group: RHSC Deficiency February 26, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.
Advertisements

1 C.A.F.P. HIGH-LEVEL DIALOGUE ON ANTI- CORRUPTION: Transparency and business leadership APRIL 18, 2012 Michael F. Munro Vice President, Deputy General.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Policy and Procedural Changes 6/23/2014. Context and Overview In 2012, a Policy Review Task Force was formed and tasked with reviewing system-level policies.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Evaluating School Literacy Programs October 22, 2009 Presented by Pamela Wininger, Reading Consultant Carol Franks, Writing.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Why an RE Review? Equity Quality. Focus of the RE Review –Aims –Curriculum –Exemplification of good RE practice –Assessment including qualifications.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Towards a Better Test: Communicating Assessment Results to Families and Educators Tuesday, April 14 2:00-3:00 p.m. EDT.
Work shop 2 – Identifying the solutions 20 April 2010.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2b – Evaluability Assessment.
How are we doing with assessment? Update from the Information Services Assessment Council March 8, 2006.
Submitting Projects and the Approval Process Brownbag lunch February 9, 2005 Paul Craft.
Magnet Program Audit for Baltimore County Public Schools Presentation of Key Findings and Recommendations November 19, 2013 Marilyn Zlotnik, Vice President.
Action Research In Organizational Development. Action Research Coined by Kurt Lewin (MIT) in 1944 Reflective process of progressive problem solving Also.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
1 3/22/2010 CalTPA Coordinators’ Meeting March 22, :00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m. California Baptist University.
National Summit Facilitator Orientation Circe Stumbo and Deb Hansen, SCEE Consultants April 14, 2010 CCSSO’s State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness.
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
Welcome To the Objectives Pillar Workshop Introduction Business need Target Audience - technical and professional staff who support decision maker.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
PROGRAM REVIEW ORIENTATION LAUNCH MEETING March 25, p.m. - 2 p.m. Department Orientation for Program Review Office of Academic Assessment & Program.
A.A./GEN ED PROGRAM REVIEW Karen Borglum, Ed.D. Assistant Vice President Curriculum and Articulation.
Technology Planning. Primary Elements Stakeholders Leadership team Needs assessment Technology components Work plan Budget Policies Evaluation.
Minnesota Task Force on Health Care Financing | Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP August 26, 2015 Support for this resource provided through a grant from.
Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating a New Prior Learning Assessment Program for a State University System Funding for this project provided by the U.
Legislative Policy Committee ISAC Board approved concept at their meeting in December.
Richard F. Chambers, CIA, CGAP Vice President, IIA Learning Center The Institute of Internal Auditors.
DCIPS Implementation Project Plan Update Army G2 Intelligence Personnel Management Office (IPMO) April 6, 2009.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
SD60 Social Responsibility and Positive Behaviour Support Team Leader Training.
Bishkek 3/5/2011 QA of SPs in Italy 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes National Standards for Quality Assurance.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
“Assessment Made Easy” Workshop CCSC Eastern Conference October 15, 2004 Based on a presentation by Philip K. Way, University of Cincinnati Frances K.
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
PROGRAM REVIEW ORIENTATION LAUNCH MEETING August 28, a.m. -12 p.m. Department Orientation for Program Review Office of Academic Assessment & Program.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
A practical methodology for technology needs assessment: Introduction and overview of preliminary issues Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and.
Preparing for SACS Reaffirmation The SACS Principles of Accreditation and impact on Georgia Tech.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
EHealth Initiative Business and Clinical Motivator Work Group January 21, :00 p.m. EDT.
Focused Monitoring Support and Technical Assistance Session 2 Discussion Slides for Study Districts FM
2050AP Project WP5: “Conclusions” UPM Madrid 11 de Octubre 2013.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Getting to Net Zero Taskforce March 4. Agenda Getting to Net Zero Task Force Meeting. March 4th, :00PM-9:00 PM Smith Campus Center 700 pm Welcome.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
The Commission for Blacks
ARMA PM2.5 Testing & Emissions Rate Sampling
The Council for Diversity and Interculturalism
Business System Development
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
IS4550 Security Policies and Implementation
Pierce County Performance Audit Committee
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
SVP Connecticut Values Retreat Session – November 7th
March 19, 2018 CCPTA.
Taught Degree Awarding Powers and the British School of Osteopathy
QRIS 3.0 Think Tank Wednesday, January 24, :30 pm ET.
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Fort Valley State University
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Complete College Georgia Policy Working Group: RHSC Deficiency February 26, 2014

Dr. Valerie Whittlesey Associate Vice President for Curriculum Professor of Psychology Kennesaw State University System Office Staff Welcome

Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:10 a.m.: Introduction and Welcome 10:10 a.m. – 10:15 a.m.: Scope and Context 10:15 a.m. – 10:25 a.m.: Support and Resources 10:25a.m. – 10:45 a.m.: Overview of the Suggested Policy Review Process 10:45 a.m. – 12:05 p.m.: Tasks 12:05 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.: Working Lunch 1:00 p.m. – 2:45 p.m.: Tasks 2:45 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.: Break 3:00 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.: Tasks 3:45 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.: Wrap-Up

Charge and Scope Improve completion (access and graduation) Complete College Georgia Focus on system policy and handbooks Establish issue priority Transparent process for review Recommendations for : Addressing unintentional barriers to college completion The various methods for USG students to address their RHSC deficiencies Areas of USG policy and procedure regarding RHSC that should be clarified? Recommendations need to be submitted by April 25, 2014

Support and Resources USG staff will provide research assistance as needed. Potential research services available and include: Data gathering Preliminary evaluation Policy analysis State comparisons Consultation with national partners Collecting recent academic research

Establish Review Process Develop Standard Criteria to Assess Potential Policy Changes: A.Impact on Completion A.Distribution and Equity B.Implementation Feasibility A.Implications and Risks B.Others?

Establish Review Process A SUGGESTED PROCESS FOR REVIEWING EACH SPECIFIC POLICY OR AREA: (1) Further define the underlying issue and gather research if needed (2) Determine options that address underlying issue (3) Assess options using standard review criteria (4) Decide and draft a recommendation

Establish Review Process

Discussion #1 What are the specific issues associated with this policy? Are there tangential areas of policy that also need to be explored? Is additional research needed?

Discussion #2

Discussion #3 Discussion of Working Document: What options are being considered? What are the next steps for these options?

Close Next Steps o Deliverables o Subset of working group Next Meeting Ongoing Communication

Complete College Georgia Thank you. February 26, 2014